EN FR
EN FR
AUCTUS - 2025

2025​​Activity reportProject-TeamAUCTUS​​​‌

RNSR: 201722256X

Creation​‌ of the Project-Team: 2020​​ April 01

Each year,​​​‌ Inria research teams publish​ an Activity Report presenting​‌ their work and results​​ over the reporting period.​​​‌ These reports follow a​ common structure, with some​‌ optional sections depending on​​ the specific team. They​​​‌ typically begin by outlining​ the overall objectives and​‌ research programme, including the​​ main research themes, goals,​​​‌ and methodological approaches. They​ also describe the application​‌ domains targeted by the​​ team, highlighting the scientific​​​‌ or societal contexts in​ which their work is​‌ situated.

The reports then​​ present the highlights of​​​‌ the year, covering major​ scientific achievements, software developments,​‌ or teaching contributions. When​​ relevant, they include sections​​​‌ on software, platforms, and​ open data, detailing the​‌ tools developed and how​​ they are shared. A​​​‌ substantial part is dedicated​ to new results, where​‌ scientific contributions are described​​ in detail, often with​​​‌ subsections specifying participants and​ associated keywords.

Finally, the​‌ Activity Report addresses funding,​​ contracts, partnerships, and collaborations​​​‌ at various levels, from​ industrial agreements to international​‌ cooperations. It also covers​​ dissemination and teaching activities,​​​‌ such as participation in​ scientific events, outreach, and​‌ supervision. The document concludes​​ with a presentation of​​​‌ scientific production, including major​ publications and those produced​‌ during the year.

Keywords​​

Computer Science and Digital​​​‌ Science

  • A5.1.1. Engineering of​ interactive systems
  • A5.1.2. Evaluation​‌ of interactive systems
  • A5.1.3.​​ Haptic interfaces
  • A5.1.5. Body-based​​​‌ interfaces
  • A5.1.7. Multimodal interfaces​
  • A5.1.9. User and perceptual​‌ studies
  • A5.5.1. Geometrical modeling​​
  • A5.6.2. Augmented reality
  • A5.10.1.​​​‌ Design
  • A5.10.2. Perception
  • A5.10.3.​ Planning
  • A5.10.4. Robot control​‌
  • A5.10.5. Robot interaction (with​​ the environment, humans, other​​​‌ robots)
  • A5.10.8. Cognitive robotics​ and systems
  • A6.2.5. Numerical​‌ Linear Algebra
  • A6.2.6. Optimization​​
  • A6.4.6. Optimal control
  • A6.5.1.​​​‌ Solid mechanics
  • A8.2.6. Numerical​ methods for optimization
  • A9.5.​‌ Robotics and AI
  • A9.8.​​ Reasoning
  • A9.12.2. Activity recognition​​
  • A9.12.4. 3D and spatio-temporal​​​‌ reconstruction
  • A9.12.5. Object tracking‌ and motion analysis
  • A9.12.6.‌​‌ Object localization
  • A9.12.8. Motion​​ capture

Other Research Topics​​​‌ and Application Domains

  • B1.2.2.‌ Cognitive science
  • B1.2.3. Computational‌​‌ neurosciences
  • B2.8. Sports, performance,​​ motor skills
  • B5.1. Factory​​​‌ of the future
  • B5.2.‌ Design and manufacturing
  • B5.6.‌​‌ Robotic systems
  • B9.5.5. Mechanics​​
  • B9.6. Humanities
  • B9.9. Ethics​​​‌

1 Team members, visitors,‌ external collaborators

Research Scientists‌​‌

  • David Daney [Team​​ leader, INRIA,​​​‌ Senior Researcher, HDR‌]
  • Sebastien Kleff [‌​‌INRIA, Starting Research​​ Position]
  • Vincent Padois​​​‌ [INRIA, Senior‌ Researcher, HDR]‌​‌
  • Pierre Puchaud [INRIA​​, Researcher, from​​​‌ Jun 2025]
  • Margot‌ Vulliez [INRIA,‌​‌ Researcher]

Faculty Members​​

  • Sylvie Michel [UNIV​​​‌ BORDEAUX, Associate Professor‌ Delegation, from Sep‌​‌ 2025, HDR]​​
  • Jean-Marc Salotti [BORDEAUX​​​‌ INP, Professor,‌ HDR]

Post-Doctoral Fellows‌​‌

  • Benjamin Camblor [INRIA​​, Post-Doctoral Fellow,​​​‌ until Aug 2025]‌
  • Remi Lafitte [INRIA‌​‌, Post-Doctoral Fellow,​​ until Sep 2025]​​​‌
  • Jacques Zhong [INRIA‌, Post-Doctoral Fellow,‌​‌ until Oct 2025]​​

PhD Students

  • Alicia Barsacq​​​‌ [INRIA]
  • Virgile‌ Batto [CNRS,‌​‌ until Sep 2025]​​
  • Alexis Boulay [FARM3​​​‌, CIFRE, from‌ Jun 2025 until Jun‌​‌ 2025]
  • Alexis Boulay​​ [FARM3 , CIFRE​​​‌, until May 2025‌]
  • Ahmed-Manaf Dahmani [‌​‌INRIA]
  • Elio Jabbour​​ [INRIA, until​​​‌ Oct 2025]
  • Tianyi‌ Jin [INRIA,‌​‌ from Oct 2025]​​

Technical Staff

  • Alexis Boulay​​​‌ [INRIA, Engineer‌, from Sep 2025‌​‌]
  • Esteban Cosserat [​​INRIA, Engineer,​​​‌ from May 2025]‌
  • Raphael Gerin [INRIA‌​‌, Engineer, from​​ May 2025]
  • Lucas​​​‌ Joseph [INRIA,‌ Engineer]
  • Erwann Landais‌​‌ [INRIA, Engineer​​, from Apr 2025​​​‌]
  • Loic Mazou [‌INRIA, Engineer,‌​‌ from Apr 2025]​​

Interns and Apprentices

  • Kloe​​​‌ Bonnet [INRIA,‌ Intern, from Feb‌​‌ 2025 until Aug 2025​​]
  • Quentin Gressent [​​​‌UNIV BORDEAUX MONTAIGNE,‌ Intern, from Feb‌​‌ 2025 until May 2025​​]
  • Khouloud Hamrouni [​​​‌INRIA, Intern,‌ from Mar 2025 until‌​‌ Aug 2025]
  • Hoang-Vy​​ Nguyen [UNIV BORDEAUX​​​‌, Intern, from‌ Apr 2025 until Jun‌​‌ 2025]

Administrative Assistant​​

  • Nathalie Robin [INRIA​​​‌]

External Collaborators

  • Nasser‌ Rezzoug [UNIV POITIERS‌​‌, from Sep 2025​​, HDR]
  • Jean-Christophe​​​‌ Sarrazin [ONERA]‌

2 Overall objectives

The‌​‌ project of the Auctus​​ team is to design​​​‌ the collaborative robotics cells‌ of the future.

The‌​‌ robotics community still tends​​ to separate Human-Robot interaction's​​​‌ cognitive (HRI) and physical‌ (pHRI). One of the‌​‌ main challenges is to​​ characterize the task and​​​‌ biomechanical, physiological and cognitive‌ capabilities of humans in‌​‌ the form of physical​​ constraints or objectives for​​​‌ the design of cobotized‌ workstations. This design must‌​‌ be understood in a​​ large sense: the choice​​​‌ of the robots' architecture‌ (cobot, exoskeleton, human-robot interface,‌​‌ etc.), the dimensional design​​​‌ (human/robot workspace, trajectory calculation,​ etc.), the coupling mode​‌ (comanipulation, teleoperation, etc.) and​​ the control strategy. The​​​‌ approach then requires the​ contributions of the human​‌ and social sciences to​​ be considered in the​​​‌ same way as those​ of exact sciences. The​‌ topics considered are broad,​​ ranging from cognitive sciences,​​​‌ ergonomics, human factors, biomechanics​ and robotics.

The first​‌ challenge is to evaluate​​ the hardship at work,​​​‌ the well-being of the​ operators and, further upstream,​‌ their cognitive state which​​ impacts their sensorimotor strategy​​​‌ while performing a task.​ In the industry, the​‌ ergonomic analysis of the​​ task is carried out​​​‌ by an ergonomist based​ on direct but often​‌ ad hoc observations. However,​​ the context is changing:​​​‌ the digitization of factories,​ through the installation of​‌ on-site sensors, allows longitudinal​​ observation of machines and​​​‌ humans. The available information​ can thus allow us​‌ to rethink how the​​ evaluation of activities is​​​‌ carried out. Currently, an​ emerging subdomain, named ergonomic​‌ robotics, adapts available​​ ergonomic criteria (RULA, REBA,​​​‌ etc.) to the evaluation​ of robotic cells. However,​‌ such criteria are related​​ to the (quasi-static) posture​​​‌ of the operator, which​ limits the understanding of​‌ human motor strategies over​​ a long period. Similarly,​​​‌ muskuloskeletal analyses may tend​ to see humans as​‌ high-performance machines to be​​ optimized. This can make​​​‌ sense for a top-level​ athlete, but repeating actions​‌ in the industry over​​ a day, months or​​​‌ years of work means​ that a temporary change​‌ of posture, possibly poorly​​ rated according to usual​​​‌ ergonomic criteria, could be​ a good long-term strategy.​‌ These questions directly link​​ motor and cognitive aspects​​​‌ that can be reflected​ in particular strategies such​‌ as fatigue or expertise​​ (manual and cognitive). We​​​‌ aim to creat musculoskeletal​ metrics through extensive modeling​‌ of the human at​​ work. This approach has​​​‌ not been widely explored​ in robotics but it​‌ could determine the right​​ criteria to adapt to​​​‌ the behavior of a​ cobot.

The second challenge​‌ is to define a​​ methodology to link the​​​‌ analysis of the task​ and the induced human​‌ movements to the robot​​ design. Several of our​​​‌ industrial projects have shown​ that there is a​‌ significant conceptual distance between​​ the ergonomist, an expert​​​‌ in task analysis and​ psychology, and the roboticist,​‌ an expert in mechanics,​​ control and computer science,​​​‌ which makes it very​ difficult to analyze the​‌ needs and define the​​ specifications of the technical​​​‌ solution. To fill these​ methodological gaps, it is​‌ necessary to better define​​ the notion of tasks​​​‌ in the context of​ a human/robot coupling, based​‌ on case studies. We​​ also have to establish​​​‌ a typology of human/robot​ interaction by taking into​‌ account the different physical​​ and cognitive constraints, in​​​‌ a very detailed fashion,​ and their potential psychological,​‌ organizational or ethical impacts.​​

The third challenge addresses​​​‌ the need to think​ about the control laws​‌ of collaborative robots in​​ terms of human/robot coupling.​​​‌ The effectiveness of this​ coupling requires an ability​‌ to predict future human​​ actions. This prediction should​​ make the interaction more​​​‌ intuitive, but also aims‌ at optimizing the robot‌​‌ assistive behavior from the​​ point of view of​​​‌ "slow" phenomena, such as‌ fatigue. The major challenge‌​‌ is, therefore, to move​​ from reactive to anticipatory​​​‌ control laws, by integrating‌ a human prediction model,‌​‌ both in terms of​​ movement strategies and decision​​​‌ strategies. Beyond the great‌ computational complexity of predictive‌​‌ approaches, obtaining prediction models​​ is an ambitious challenge.​​​‌ It is indeed necessary‌ to learn models that‌​‌ are quite complex, due​​ to the physical realities​​​‌ they can account for,‌ and quite simple from‌​‌ a computational point of​​ view.

3 Research program​​​‌

3.1 Analysis and modeling‌ of human behavior

3.1.1‌​‌ Scientific Context

The purpose​​ of this axis is​​​‌ to provide metrics to‌ assess human behavior. Our‌​‌ human study specifically focuses​​ on industrial operators. We​​​‌ assume the following working‌ hypotheses: the operator's task‌​‌ and environmental conditions are​​ known and circumscribed; the​​​‌ operator is trained in‌ the task, production tools‌​‌ and safety instructions; the​​ task is repeated with​​​‌ more or less frequent‌ intervals. We aim to‌​‌ analyze the following:

  • the​​ physical and cognitive fragility​​​‌ of operators to meet‌ assistance needs;
  • cognitive biases‌​‌ and physical constraints leading​​ to a loss of​​​‌ the operator safety;
  • ergonomics,‌ performance and acceptance of‌​‌ the production tool.

In​​ the industrial context, these​​​‌ questions are tackled through‌ the fields of work‌​‌ ergonomics and cognitive sciences.​​ Four main axes are​​​‌ typically addressed: physiological/biomechanical, cognitive,‌ psychological and sociological studies.‌​‌ We particularly focus on​​ the biomechanical, cognitive and​​​‌ psychological aspects, as described‌ by the ANACT 23‌​‌, 24. The​​ aim is to translate​​​‌ these factors into metrics,‌ optimality criteria or constraints‌​‌ to better analyze, design​​ and control the collaborative​​​‌ robots.

A review of‌ ergonomic workstation evaluation helps‌​‌ in positioning our desired​​ contributions in robotics. Ergonomists​​​‌ evaluate the gesture through‌ the observation of the‌​‌ workstations and, generally, through​​ questionnaires. This requires long​​​‌ periods of field observation,‌ followed by analyses based‌​‌ on ergonomic grids (e.g.​​ RULA 40, REBA​​​‌ 31, LUBA 35‌, OWAS 34,‌​‌ ROSA 54,...). Until​​ then, the use of​​​‌ more complex measurement systems‌ was reserved for laboratories,‌​‌ particularly in biomechanical studies.​​ The advent of cost-effective​​​‌ and minimally intrusive motion‌ capture sensors (Inertial Measurement‌​‌ Units, RGB-D cameras), coupled​​ with advancements in computer​​​‌ vision algorithms, now enables‌ on-site data collection to‌​‌ assess workers' gestures, postures,​​ movements, and physiological states.​​​‌ Some of these systems‌ can be permanently integrated‌​‌ into production lines without​​ disrupting workflow, while simultaneously​​​‌ evaluating worker well-being through‌ biomechanical and physiological metrics.‌​‌ This facilitates longitudinal motion​​ capture studies, similar to​​​‌ the evolution of maintenance‌ practices from reactive to‌​‌ predictive.

Ergonomic robotics has​​ recently taken an interest​​​‌ in this new evaluation‌ paradigm to adapt the‌​‌ robot behavior to reduce​​ ergonomic risks. This ergonomic​​​‌ adaptation complements the conventional‌ approaches that only consider‌​‌ the performance of the​​ action produced by the​​​‌ human in interaction with‌ the robot. However, ergonomic‌​‌ criteria are usually based​​​‌ on the principle that​ the comfort positions are​‌ distant from the human​​ joint limits. These notations​​​‌ are compatible with an​ observation of the human​‌ operator through the eye​​ of the ergonomist. In​​​‌ practice, such evaluations are​ inaccurate and subjective 57​‌. Moreover, they only​​ consider quasi-static human positions,​​​‌ without taking into account​ the evolution of the​‌ person's physical, physiological and​​ psychological state. We aim​​​‌ to extend this approach​ to more reliable and​‌ comprehensive ergonomic metrics with​​ musculoskeletal, fatigue, metabolic consumption​​​‌ modelling. The repetition of​ gestures, and the solicitation​‌ of muscles and joints,​​ are questions that must​​​‌ complete these analyses. A​ method used by ergonomists​‌ to limit biomechanical exposures​​ is to increase variations​​​‌ in motor stress by​ rotating tasks 55.​‌ However, this type of​​ extrinsic method is not​​​‌ always suitable in the​ industrial context 39 where​‌ we place our research​​ efforts.

Through these human​​​‌ analyses, the Auctus team​ aims to revise the​‌ use of collaborative robots​​ in the workplace to​​​‌ vary the operator's environment​ and encourage more appropriate​‌ motor strategies. Biomechanical studies​​ of the intrinsic variability​​​‌ of the motor system​ allowed by the joint​‌ redundancy of the human​​ body should result in​​​‌ the alternation of postures,​ movements and muscle activity​‌ observed in the individual​​ to perform a requested​​​‌ task 55. This​ variation leads to differences​‌ between the motor coordination​​ used by each operator,​​​‌ and conveys the notion​ of motor strategy 32​‌. We aim to​​ provide exhaustive studies of​​​‌ motor strategies in industrial​ setups.

The cognitive dimension​‌ of ergonomics must also​​ be addressed in our​​​‌ approach to reduce the​ mental workload and foster​‌ the wellness of the​​ worker. We believe that​​​‌ known sensorimotor strategies can​ be a physically quantifiable​‌ reflection of the operator's​​ cognitive state. For example,​​​‌ human motion measurements can​ be used to predict​‌ fatigue 52 and, therefore,​​ adjust the robot's assistance.​​​‌ A key challenge here​ is to better analyze​‌ human manual expertise (dexterous​​ and cognitive) to adapt​​​‌ the human-robot interaction. The​ expertise embodies the operators'​‌ decision-making process while perceiving,​​ understanding, and anticipating their​​​‌ gestures to preserve their​ safety, comfort, and performance​‌ in the task. We​​ aim to adapt and​​​‌ refine known human cognitive​ models (multisensory perception 29​‌, situation awareness 28​​) to infer the​​​‌ influence of the task​ context and environment on​‌ operator behavior.

3.1.2 Methodology​​

How can we observe,​​​‌ understand and quantify human​ sensorimotor and cognitive strategies​‌ to better design and​​ control the behavior of​​​‌ the cobotic assistant?

When​ we study systems of​‌ equations (kinematic, static, dynamic,​​ musculoskeletal, etc.) to model​​​‌ human behavior, several problems​ appear and explain our​‌ methodological choices:

  • the large​​ dimension of the problems​​​‌ to be considered, due​ to the human body​‌ complexity (eg. joint, muscle​​ redundancy);
  • the distribution of​​​‌ anthropometries, force capacities, and​ fatigue resistance among workers,​‌ for example, size, the​​ muscle mass, the possible​​​‌ geometric configurations on a​ workstation (set of possible​‌ trajectories, postures, and placements​​ of the operator), and​​ the forces needed to​​​‌ be produce to execute‌ a task;
  • the uncertainties‌​‌ in the measurement and​​ the model approximations.

The​​​‌ idea is to start‌ with a description of‌​‌ redundant workspaces (geometric, static,​​ dynamic...). We use set-theory​​​‌ approaches, based on interval‌ analysis 56, 45‌​‌, which meet the​​ variability requirement and cope​​​‌ with model and measurement‌ uncertainties. Another advantage of‌​‌ such techniques is that​​ they allow the results​​​‌ to be certified, which‌ is essential to address‌​‌ safety issues. Some members​​ of the team have​​​‌ already achieved success in‌ mechanical design for performance‌​‌ certification and robot design​​ 42. By extending​​​‌ these set-theory approaches to‌ our problem, a mapping‌​‌ of ergonomic, efficient, and​​ safe movements can be​​​‌ obtained, in which we‌ project the operators' motor‌​‌ strategies. Biomechanical, ergonomic, and​​ cognitive metrics can, then,​​​‌ be defined and evaluated‌ to quantify the human‌​‌ behavior in specific work​​ situations.

It is therefore​​​‌ necessary to:

  • model human‌ capabilities, both at the‌​‌ musculoskeletal and the perceptive/cognitive​​ levels, to allow for​​​‌ global, yet detailed, analyses‌ as well as efficient‌​‌ integration of such knowledge​​ in the control of​​​‌ the collaborative robots.
  • contribute‌ to accurate representations of‌​‌ the shoulder joint involved​​ in most cobotic interactions​​​‌ and worker efforts. Its‌ complex range of motion‌​‌ and the numerous muscles​​ involved make proper shoulder​​​‌ modeling a significant challenge‌ for musculoskeletal (MSK) models‌​‌ 8.
  • propose new​​ ergonomic, biomechanical, robotic, and​​​‌ cognitive indices that will‌ link different types of‌​‌ performances while taking into​​ account the influence of​​​‌ fatigue, stress, level of‌ expertise, etc.;
  • divide the‌​‌ task and the gesture​​ into homogeneous phases: this​​​‌ process is complex and‌ depends on the type‌​‌ of studied index and​​ the techniques being used.​​​‌ We are exploring several‌ methods: inverse optimal control,‌​‌ learning methods, techniques from​​ signal processing;
  • develop interval​​​‌ extensions of the proposed‌ indices. The indices are‌​‌ not necessarily the result​​ of a direct model,​​​‌ and algorithms must be‌ developed or adapted to‌​‌ compute them (calculation of​​ manipulability, Uncontrolled Manifold, etc.);​​​‌
  • Aggregate proposals into a‌ dedicated interval-analysis library for‌​‌ human behavior studies (use​​ of and contribution to​​​‌ the existing ALIAS-Inria and‌ the open-source IBEX library).‌​‌

The major contribution of​​ the methodology is to​​​‌ embrace in the same‌ model the measurement uncertainties‌​‌ (important for on-site use​​ of measurement equipment), the​​​‌ variability of tasks and‌ trajectories (proper to dexterous‌​‌ industrial operations), and the​​ physiological characteristics of the​​​‌ operators (critical adaptability to‌ every individual). The originality‌​‌ of the approach is​​ to combine biomechanical, ergonomic​​​‌ and cognitive metrics with‌ the usual performance indices‌​‌ to build a comprehensive​​ and objective analysis of​​​‌ human behavior.

Other avenues‌ of research are being‌​‌ explored, particularly around the​​ inverse optimal control 46​​​‌, to project human‌ movements based on the‌​‌ performance or ergonomic indices.​​ Such a projection would​​​‌ offer new interpretations and‌ enhance the analysis of‌​‌ human behaviors.

Finally, the​​ development of a population-scale​​​‌ musculoskeletal model database and‌ the application of anthropometry-robust‌​‌ optimal control represents a​​​‌ new aera of research​ that the team will​‌ explore by 2025. This​​ approach would further explore​​​‌ the inherent variability within​ human workforces. By constructing​‌ a diverse virtual population​​ through statistical and biomechanical​​​‌ principles, we will be​ able to leverage predictive​‌ simulation to identify broadly​​ applicable movement strategies and​​​‌ minimize potential strain across​ a spectrum of worker​‌ morphologies and capabilities. This​​ dual approach moves beyond​​​‌ traditional, one-size-fits-all ergonomic assessments,​ enabling the development of​‌ personalized or, at minimum,​​ broadly robust recommendations for​​​‌ safer and more efficient​ work practices.

3.2 Operator/robot​‌ coupling

This research axis​​ is at the frontier​​​‌ between humans and robots​ and focuses on optimal​‌ methods to couple these​​ two entities to perform​​​‌ joint activities. This raises​ questions that are directly​‌ related to human models​​ and abilities (axis 1)​​​‌ and robot control (axis​ 3). Two main concerns​‌ must be addressed to​​ form an effective human-robot​​​‌ dyad.

3.2.1 Human-Robot interaction​

The first step to​‌ couple the operator and​​ cobot together at work​​​‌ is to provide interaction​ modalities through which the​‌ agents can communicate and​​ coordinate. The interaction can​​​‌ be direct, where the​ robot and operator act​‌ together in the same​​ shared environment, or the​​​‌ operator can remotely perform​ the task with the​‌ robot through a teleoperation​​ system (which reflects the​​​‌ remote interaction and potentially​ corrects for punctual weaknesses).​‌ The level and type​​ of human-robot interactions are​​​‌ chosen with respect to​ the task, the context,​‌ or other human factors.​​ The challenge is, then,​​​‌ to predict the joint​ human-robot behavior and capabilities​‌ for each interaction situation​​ and collaborative context.

The​​​‌ formal computation of joint​ human-robot capabilities can be​‌ given thanks to the​​ models and evaluation indices​​​‌ presented in Axis 1.​ We can focus on​‌ quantifying how the interaction​​ with the robot will​​​‌ impact the human sensorimotor​ strategy (changes in the​‌ posture, positions, forces, etc.,​​ induced by the robot)​​​‌ and recomputing metrics such​ as human fatigue and​‌ motor variability51 and​​ the Mover project. We​​​‌ can further use the​ biomechanical and robotic models​‌ to consider a unified​​ operator-robot entity and to​​​‌ compute their joint abilities​ (e.g. common human-robot force​‌ capabilities 53).

Developing​​ human cognitive and sensorimotor​​​‌ models to account for​ the effect of the​‌ human-robot interaction could provide​​ a valuable tool to​​​‌ evaluate cobotic systems and​ collaborative works. However, the​‌ accuracy of these models​​ must be addressed. We​​​‌ wish to understand how​ the robot influences the​‌ operator's work, and thus​​ how his mental model​​​‌ of the task evolves​ according to the interactions​‌ with the robot. The​​ challenge is, then, to​​​‌ predict the behavior of​ the operator that takes​‌ into account his cognition​​ in the interaction situations.​​​‌ Preliminary literature results have​ shown that key cognitive​‌ mechanisms in human teaming​​ may transfer to human-robot​​​‌ collaboration, such as joint​ human-robot action representation 26​‌ or coordination mechanisms 44​​. However, the situation​​​‌ awareness of the operator​ is modified by the​‌ interaction with the robot​​ 49. Developing a​​ joint mental model that​​​‌ accurately captures the human-robot‌ interaction can later guide‌​‌ the design of relevant​​ interaction modalities to improve​​​‌ the team's understanding 27‌.

3.2.2 Cobot adaptive‌​‌ assistance

Taking into account​​ the coupling between the​​​‌ operator and the robot‌ at the control level‌​‌ is also central to​​ the team's objectives. We​​​‌ wish to demonstrate how‌ a collaborative robot can‌​‌ be used to mediate​​ between a control objective​​​‌ that optimizes task performances,‌ safety and comfort (what‌​‌ we consider as the​​ expertise trinity), on​​​‌ one hand, and the‌ action model of the‌​‌ human interacting with the​​ robot (the inferred human​​​‌ intent), on the other‌ hand. Such an arbitration‌​‌ in the control law​​ adapts the robot's assistive​​​‌ behavior to better collaborate‌ with the operator. This‌​‌ shared-autonomy concept is the​​ focus of part of​​​‌ our research. It can‌ range from a discrete‌​‌ task allocation between the​​ agents to an effectively​​​‌ shared task 43.‌

We are strongly confident‌​‌ that the notion of​​ expertise is central to​​​‌ adjusting the cobot behavior.‌ The robot controller is‌​‌ designed to increase the​​ level of expertise in​​​‌ the operator/robot team: it‌ optimizes the human-centered metrics‌​‌ (safety criteria, biomechanical and​​ cognitive comfort, etc.) and​​​‌ provides a gain in‌ performances (joint human-robot capabilities).‌​‌ But it also aims​​ at preserving the operator's​​​‌ particular expertise and know-how‌ at the center of‌​‌ the activity. Manual expertise​​ of highly skilled operators​​​‌ needs to be analyzed‌ respectively on its dynamic‌​‌ aspects and on the​​ ability to synchronize with​​​‌ other operators in the‌ environment. Understanding better the‌​‌ expertise is envisioned as​​ a way to alleviate​​​‌ the operators of repetitive‌ and easy operations while‌​‌ maintaining their ability to​​ perform expert gestures based​​​‌ on the complexity of‌ the task.

Furthermore, this‌​‌ research axis raises the​​ question of the modification​​​‌ of the work induced‌ by collaborative robots for‌​‌ expert operators. While the​​ overall goal is to​​​‌ make use of robots‌ to punctually or continuously‌​‌ improve the work conditions​​ of these operators (and​​​‌ not to replace them),‌ the presence of these‌​‌ robots necessarily impacts the​​ work referential and thus​​​‌ the expertise itself. One‌ of the central questions,‌​‌ yet to be tackled,​​ relates to the original​​​‌ and core part of‌ the expertise that should‌​‌ remain unchanged. The proposed​​ modeling of the operator/robot​​​‌ coupling and interaction is‌ the first avenue to‌​‌ predict possible changes in​​ the expertise. It can​​​‌ be input to the‌ controller to constraint the‌​‌ robot to let the​​ operator make the expert​​​‌ decisions naturally.

3.3 Design‌ of cobotic systems

3.3.1‌​‌ Architectural design

Is it​​ necessary to cobotize, robotize​​​‌ or assist the human‌ being? Which mechanical architecture‌​‌ meets the task challenges​​ (a serial cobot, a​​​‌ specific mechanism, an exoskeleton)?‌ What type of interaction‌​‌ (H/R cohabitation, comanipulation, teleoperation)?​​ These questions are the​​​‌ first requests from our‌ industrial partners. For the‌​‌ moment, we have few​​ comprehensive methodological answers to​​​‌ these requests. Choosing a‌ collaborative robot architecture is‌​‌ a difficult problem 36​​​‌. It becomes even​ more complex when the​‌ architectural design is approached​​ from concurrent cognitive ergonomic,​​​‌ biomechanical and robotic perspectives.​ There are major methodological​‌ and conceptual differences in​​ these areas. It is,​​​‌ therefore, necessary to bridge​ these representational gaps and​‌ to propose a global​​ and generic approach that​​​‌ takes into consideration the​ expectations of the robotician​‌ to model and formalize​​ the general properties of​​​‌ a cobotic system as​ well as those of​‌ the ergonomist to define​​ the expectations in terms​​​‌ of an assistance tool.​

To do this, we​‌ propose a user-centered design​​ approach, with a particular​​​‌ focus on human-system interactions.​ From a methodological point​‌ of view, this requires​​ to develop a structured​​​‌ experimental approach. It aims​ at characterizing the task​‌ to be carried out​​ ("system" analysis) but also​​​‌ at capturing the physical​ markers of its realization​‌ (required movements and efforts,​​ ergonomic stress, etc.). This​​​‌ specification must be done​ through the prism of​‌ a systematic study of​​ the exchanged information (type​​​‌ and modality) needed by​ humans to perform the​‌ considered task. Based on​​ these analyses, the main​​​‌ challenge is to define​ a decision support tool​‌ for the choice of​​ the robotic architecture and​​​‌ the specifications of the​ role assigned to the​‌ robot and the operator​​ as well as their​​​‌ interactions.

The evolution of​ the chosen methodology is​‌ for the moment empirical,​​ based on the user​​​‌ cases regularly treated in​ the team (see sections​‌ on contracts and partnerships).​​

The process can be​​​‌ summarized through the following​ steps:

  • identify expert or​‌ difficult jobs on industrial​​ sites. This is done​​​‌ through visits and exchanges​ with our partners (manager,​‌ production manager, ergonomist...);
  • select​​ some challenging use cases​​​‌ to be studied and,​ then, observe the operator​‌ in its ecological environment.​​ Our motion capture tools​​​‌ allow us to produce​ a force-motion analysis, based​‌ on previously defined ergonomic​​ criteria, and a physical​​​‌ evaluation of the task​ in terms of expected​‌ performances, from both experiments​​ and simulations. In parallel,​​​‌ an evaluation of the​ operator's expertise and cognitive​‌ strategy is throught questionnaires;​​
  • synthesize these observatory results​​​‌ into design requirements to​ deduce: the robotic architectures​‌ to be initiated, the​​ key points of human-robot​​​‌ interaction to be developed,​ and the difficulties in​‌ terms of human factors​​ to be taken into​​​‌ account.

The different human​ and task analyses take​‌ advantage of the expertise​​ available within the AUCTUS​​​‌ team. The team has​ already worked on the​‌ currently dominant approach: the​​ use of human models​​​‌ to design the cobotic​ cell through virtual tools.​‌ We would like to​​ gradually introduce the additional​​​‌ evaluation criteria presented above.​ However, the very large​‌ dimensions of the treated​​ problems (modeling of the​​​‌ body's degrees of freedom​ and the constraints applied​‌ to it) makes it​​ difficult to carry out​​​‌ a certified analysis. We​ choose to go through​‌ the calculation of the​​ human workspace and performances,​​​‌ which is not yet​ done in this field.​‌ The idea here is​​ to apply set theory​​ approaches, using interval analysis​​​‌ as already discussed in‌ section 3.1.2. The‌​‌ goal is, then, to​​ extend the human constraints​​​‌ to intervals, which integrate‌ the model variability, and‌​‌ to play them in​​ virtual reality during simulations​​​‌ of the tasks. This‌ would allow the operator‌​‌ to check his trajectories​​ and scenarios not only​​​‌ for a single case‌ study but also for‌​‌ sets of cases. For​​ example, it can be​​​‌ verified that, regardless of‌ the bounded sets of‌​‌ simulated operator physiological capabilities,​​ the physical constraints of​​​‌ a simulated trajectory are‌ not violated. Therefore, the‌​‌ assisted design tools certify​​ cases of use as​​​‌ a whole. Moreover, the‌ intersection between the human‌​‌ and robot workspaces/capabilities provides​​ the necessary constraints to​​​‌ certify the feasibility of‌ a task in the‌​‌ interaction situation. Overall, integrating​​ human and task-related physical​​​‌ constraints in the design‌ process brings to better‌​‌ cobotic systems. In the​​ future, we will similarly​​​‌ develop tools to include‌ human cognitive markers in‌​‌ the design approach.

This​​ research line merges the​​​‌ contributions of the other‌ axes, from the analysis‌​‌ of the human behavior​​ and capabilities in its​​​‌ environment for an identified‌ task, the prediction of‌​‌ the effects of the​​ interaction/coupling strategy with the​​​‌ robot, to the choice‌ of a mechanical architecture‌​‌ from the resulting design​​ constraints. The proposed task-oriented​​​‌ and human-centered methodology is‌ perfectly integrated into an‌​‌ Appropriate Design approach. It​​ can be used for​​​‌ the dimensional design and‌ optimization of robots, again‌​‌ based on interval analysis.​​ The challenges are the​​​‌ change of scale in‌ models that symbiotically consider‌​‌ the human-robot pair, the​​ uncertain, flexible and uncontrollable​​​‌ nature of human behavior,‌ and the many evaluation‌​‌ indices needed to describe​​ them.

It is worth​​​‌ noting that we aim‌ to develop a global‌​‌ mechatronic design approach, which​​ would build upon the​​​‌ design constraints to specify‌ the robot hardware and‌​‌ controller at once. The​​ chosen set-theory computational methodology​​​‌ is particularly appropriate to‌ meet this objective since‌​‌ the interval-based representation of​​ the design constraints can​​​‌ be directly and equally‌ used to set the‌​‌ control constraints.

3.3.2 Control​​ design

The control laws​​​‌ of collaborative robots from‌ the major robot manufacturers‌​‌ differ little or not​​ at all from the​​​‌ existing control laws in‌ the field of conventional‌​‌ industrial robotics. Security is​​ managed a posteriori, as​​​‌ an exception, by a‌ security PLC / PC.‌​‌ It is therefore not​​ an intrinsic property of​​​‌ the controller. This strongly‌ restricts possible physical interactions‌​‌ 1 and leads to​​ suboptimal operation of the​​​‌ robotic system. It is‌ difficult in this context‌​‌ to envision tangible human-robot​​ collaboration. Collaborative operation requires,​​​‌ in this case, a‌ control calculation that integrates‌​‌ safety and ergonomics as​​ a priori constraints.

The​​​‌ control of truly collaborative‌ robots in an industrial‌​‌ context is, from our​​ point of view, underpinned​​​‌ by two main issues.‌ The first one is‌​‌ related to the macroscopic​​ adaptation of the robot's​​​‌ behavior according to the‌ phases of the production‌​‌ process. The second one​​​‌ is related to the​ fine adaptation of the​‌ degree and/or nature of​​ the robot's assistance according​​​‌ to the ergonomic state​ of the operator. If​‌ this second problem is​​ part of a historical​​​‌ dynamics in robotics that​ consists in placing safety​‌ constraints, particularly those related​​ to the presence of​​​‌ a human being, at​ the heart of the​‌ control problem 3041​​, 33, it​​​‌ is not approached from​ the more subtle point​‌ of view of ergonomics​​ where the objective cannot​​​‌ be translated only in​ terms of human life​‌ or death, but rather​​ in terms of long-term​​​‌ respect for their physical​ and mental integrity. Thus,​‌ the simple and progressive​​ adoption by a human​​​‌ operator of the collaborative​ robot intended to assist​‌ him in his gesture​​ requires a self-adaptation in​​​‌ the time of the​ command. This self-adaptation is​‌ a fairly new subject​​ in the literature 47​​​‌, 48.

At​ the macroscopic level, the​‌ task plan to be​​ performed for a given​​​‌ industrial operation can be​ represented by a finite-state​‌ machine. To avoid increasing​​ the human's cognitive load​​​‌ by explicitly asking him​ to manage transitions for​‌ the robot, we propose​​ to develop a decision​​​‌ algorithm that would ensure​ discrete transitions from one​‌ task (and the associated​​ assistance mode) to another​​​‌ based on an online​ estimate of the current​‌ state of the human-robot​​ couple. The associated scientific​​​‌ challenge is to establish​ a link between the​‌ robot's involvement and a​​ given working situation. We​​​‌ propose an incremental approach​ to learn this complex​‌ relationship. Its first stage​​ will consist of identifying​​​‌ the general and relevant​ control variables to conduct​‌ this learning in an​​ efficient and reusable way,​​​‌ regardless of the particular​ calculation method of the​‌ control action. Then, physically​​ realistic simulations and real-world​​​‌ experiments will be used​ to feed this learning​‌ process.

To handle mode​​ transitions, we propose to​​​‌ explore the richness of​ the multi-tasking control formalism​‌ under constraints 38.​​ It would ensure a​​​‌ continuous transition from one​ control mode to another​‌ while guaranteeing compliance with​​ a certain number of​​​‌ robot control constraints. Some​ of these constraints convey​‌ the ergonomic specifications and​​ are dependent on the​​​‌ state of the robot​ and of the human​‌ operator, which, by nature,​​ is difficult to predict​​​‌ accurately. We propose, again,​ to exploit the interval-analysis​‌ paradigm to efficiently formulate​​ ergonomic constraints robust to​​​‌ the various existing uncertainties.​

Purely discrete or reactive​‌ adaptation of the control​​ law would make no​​​‌ sense given the slow​ dynamics of certain physiological​‌ phenomena such as fatigue.​​ Thus, we propose to​​​‌ formulate the control problem​ as a predictive problem​‌ where the impact of​​ the control decision at​​​‌ a time t is​ anticipated at different time​‌ horizons. This requires a​​ prediction of human movement​​​‌ and knowledge of the​ motor variability strategies it​‌ employs. This prediction is​​ possible based on the​​​‌ supervision at all times​ of the operational objectives​‌ (task in progress) in​​ the short term. However,​​ it requires the use​​​‌ of a virtual human‌ model and possibly a‌​‌ dynamic simulation to quantify​​ the impact of these​​​‌ potential movements in terms‌ of performances, including ergonomics.‌​‌ It is impractical to​​ use a predictive command​​​‌ with simulation in the‌ loop with an advanced‌​‌ virtual manikin model. We,​​ therefore, suggest adapting the​​​‌ prediction horizon and the‌ complexity of the corresponding‌​‌ model to guarantee a​​ reasonable computational complexity.

4​​​‌ Application domains

4.1 Factory‌ 4.0

The 4th industrial‌​‌ revolution (factory 4.0) is​​ characterized by the integration​​​‌ of digital technologies into‌ the production process, to‌​‌ meet the challenge of​​ customizing services and products.​​​‌ This agility requires making‌ manufacturing and maintenance lines‌​‌ flexible and versatile. This​​ adaptation capacity is a​​​‌ characteristic of the human‌ being, which puts him‌​‌ at the center of​​ the production apparatus. However,​​​‌ this can no longer‌ be done at the‌​‌ expense of the human​​ operators' health and well-being.​​​‌ How can we reconcile‌ the enhancement of our‌​‌ manual and analytical expertise,​​ the ever-desired increase in​​​‌ productivity and manufacturing quality,‌ while reducing the hardship‌​‌ at work? Collaborative robotics,​​ which we are seeking​​​‌ to build, is one‌ of the key solutions‌​‌ to meet these societal​​ challenges. By assisting humans​​​‌ while performing dangerous and‌ painful tasks, the collaborative‌​‌ robot complements and helps​​ them in their phases​​​‌ of physical and cognitive‌ fragility.

More generally, we‌​‌ are interested in workstation​​ cobotization, in the manufacturing​​​‌ and assembly industries but‌ also the construction and‌​‌ craft industries. The application​​ areas are related to​​​‌ regional needs in aeronautics,‌ maintenance, water and waste‌​‌ treatment. In most of​​ these cases, it is​​​‌ possible to define the‌ tasks and to evaluate‌​‌ the stakes and added​​ value of our work.​​​‌

5 Social and environmental‌ responsibility

The scientific positioning‌​‌ of Auctus has an​​ explicit social objective: assisting​​​‌ industrial workers to improve‌ their working conditions through‌​‌ the appropriate limitations of​​ physical solicitations and the​​​‌ improvement of their cognitive‌ comfort. This has a‌​‌ direct societal impact on​​ the health of the​​​‌ population and regarding the‌ preservation of industrial skills‌​‌ and expertise in the​​ local and national industrial​​​‌ ecosystem. For this research‌ to be effective, we‌​‌ need to bridge academic​​ research with industrial practice.​​​‌ To do so, we‌ have developed a multilevel‌​‌ ecosystem that brings together​​ research and innovation and​​​‌ fosters the transfer of‌ our activities and developed‌​‌ knowledge toward industry. Beyond​​ the numerous conventional research​​​‌ partnerships with companies we‌ are involved in (see‌​‌ section 7.5), two transfer​​ actions particularly support knowledge​​​‌ dissemination. First, we participated‌ in the France Relance‌​‌ program and its Inria​​ instantiation through two "Plan​​​‌ de relance" projects: with‌ the Gironde SME Aerospline,‌​‌ by focusing on industrial​​ robot control methodologies; and​​​‌ with the startup FuzzyLogicRobotics,‌ by exploring the possibilities‌​‌ offered by quadratic programming​​ under constraints for rapid​​​‌ generation of robot trajectories.‌ Second, we are involved‌​‌ in two ANR Défi​​ Transfert France 2030 projects:​​​‌ Grip4All (PI David Daney),‌ in collaboration with Fives‌​‌ Syleps, aims to demonstrate​​​‌ the feasibility of dynamic​ robotic palletization of heterogeneous​‌ products in hard working​​ conditions; Extender (PI Vincent​​​‌ Padois), in collaboration with​ Orthopus, seeks to demonstrate​‌ the benefits of advanced​​ control methods in robotics​​​‌ for an assistive arm​ mounted on a wheelchair.​‌ All these knowledge-transfer projects​​ provide proof-of-concepts of the​​​‌ applicability of our research​ developments, notably in advanced​‌ robotic system control, into​​ concrete industrial applications with​​​‌ human assistance in mind.​

Collaborations for social and​‌ cultural impact. Team members​​ participate in a few​​​‌ projects and events with​ socio-cultural impact: Sylvie Michel,​‌ Vincent Padois, Pierre Puchaud,​​ and Margot Vulliez recently​​​‌ joined the Inria HanditechLab,​ a network led by​‌ the CAMIN team (Inria​​ Sophia Antipolis) and the​​​‌ SED of Inria Grenoble,​ to develop ad hoc​‌ assistance solutions on demand,​​ based on simple and​​​‌ easily reproducible technologies, for​ people with disabilities. Lucas​‌ Joseph and David Daney​​ are involved in the​​​‌ collaborative project ARTES, between​ the University Bordeaux Montaigne,​‌ the SCRIME and the​​ University of Bordeaux, to​​​‌ perform motion capture analysis​ of expert dancer gestures.​‌ The Auctus team was​​ involved in 2024 in​​​‌ the organization of the​ two-day conference RobNA on​‌ ethics and robotics in​​ Bordeaux, and of the​​​‌ multidisciplinary school xiho to​ explore methodologies to combine​‌ Social Sciences and Humanities,​​ Human-Robot-Interaction, and user experiments.​​​‌

Ethics. The work on​ the emergence of ethical​‌ questions in the robotics​​ research process, led​​​‌ by Sylvie Michel, Associate​ Professor at IRGO of​‌ the University of Bordeaux​​ in delegation within the​​​‌ Auctus team, is central​ to supporting the consideration​‌ of ethical issues within​​ our community and to​​​‌ providing organizational tools that​ aid in integrating this​‌ societal dimension within our​​ research. Besides this specific​​​‌ research focus, the Auctus​ team validates all its​‌ developments through rigorous user​​ studies, validated by the​​​‌ Coerle local ethical committee,​ and before which all​‌ involved students are made​​ aware of scientific research​​​‌ ethics and good practices​ regarding data (GDPR).

Environmental​‌ impact. When climate change​​ makes environmental resources scarcer,​​​‌ sustainability of robotic solutions​ can no longer be​‌ ignored and forces us​​ to reconsider our developments​​​‌ in terms of environmental​ impacts. We recently started​‌ to question this challenge​​ of frugality in robotics​​​‌. Vincent Padois is​ a member of the​‌ steering committee, and Margot​​ Vulliez participates in the​​​‌ discussions of the Priority​ Action AP1 "Robotique et​‌ Sobriété" of the GDR​​ Robotique. Vincent Padois and​​​‌ Margot Vulliez have co-supervised​ Master internships about sustainable​‌ co-design of a robotic​​ manipulator. Vincent Padois participated​​​‌ in ANF EcoInfo 2025​ on "Digital Sustainability" and​‌ has a membership in​​ the GDRS EcoInfo network.​​​‌ He will soon organize​ local and national trainings​‌ on "Robotic Sustainability" through​​ this network and the​​​‌ URFIST Bordeaux. Antun Skuric​ and Vincent Padois received​‌ the IEEE/RAS Sustainability Award​​ in 2025 for developing​​​‌ an open-source platform (pycapacity)​ to quantify robotic capabilities​‌ for measured and appropriate​​ use.

5.1 Involvement in​​​‌ working groups

  • Margot Vulliez​ is member of the​‌ Committee on Gender Equality​​ and Equal Opportunities (GT​​ Parité-Egalité) and of the​​​‌ local Committee for Mentoring‌ at the Inria Bordeaux‌​‌ research center, since January​​ 2024.
  • Margot Vulliez participate​​​‌ in the activities of‌ the working group on‌​‌ Gender Equality of the​​ priority action AP3 of​​​‌ the GDR Robotique, since‌ December 2025.
  • Vincent Padois‌​‌ and Margot Vulliez respectively​​ steer and participate in​​​‌ the activities of the‌ priority action AP1 on‌​‌ Robotics and Sobriety of​​ the GDR Robotique.
  • Vincent​​​‌ Padois is a member‌ of the GDRS EcoInfo.‌​‌
  • Sylvie Michel , Vincent​​ Padois , Pierre Puchaud​​​‌ , and Margot Vulliez‌ are members of the‌​‌ Inria HanditechLab.

6 Highlights​​ of the year

6.1​​​‌ Remarkable events

  • The work‌ of Antun Skuric, Nicolas‌​‌ Torres, Lucas Joseph ,​​ Vincent Padois and David​​​‌ Daney on the optimal‌ use of robot motion‌​‌ capabilities for the online​​ replanning of robot trajectories​​​‌ has been published in‌ the prestigious IEEE Transactions‌​‌ on Robotics journal 10​​. It provides a​​​‌ control methodology that better‌ exploits the true robot‌​‌ capabilities while allowing for​​ online trajectory adaptations. We​​​‌ consider it as a‌ stepping stone towards a‌​‌ general reduction of the​​ use of resources in​​​‌ Robotics.
  • Sylvie Michel ,‌ Associate Professor at IRGO‌​‌ of the University of​​ Bordeaux, has obtained a​​​‌ one year partial delegation‌ within the Auctus team.‌​‌ Her role is central​​ to supporting the consideration​​​‌ of ethical issues within‌ our community and to‌​‌ providing organizational tools that​​ aid in integrating this​​​‌ societal dimension within our‌ research. This is a‌​‌ pioneering cross-disciplinary approach to​​ research in robotics which​​​‌ is essential to a‌ proper consideration of the‌​‌ societal and environmental challenges​​ we are facing and​​​‌ we are proud to‌ promote it.
  • Five members‌​‌ of the Auctus team​​ participated in May to​​​‌ the Festival Sciences Tout‌ Court through 26 interventions‌​‌ in primary school classes​​ all over Gironde, in​​​‌ preparation of the main‌ projection day of the‌​‌ Festival. These interventions were​​ initiated by Vincent Padois​​​‌ in collaboration with Caroline‌ Baronnet from Academie de‌​‌ Bordeaux.

6.2 Working conditions​​

The Auctus team is​​​‌ currently hosted at the‌ École Nationale Supérieure de‌​‌ Cognitique (ENSC) of Bordeaux​​ INP, under conditions that​​​‌ have been inadequate for‌ several years due to‌​‌ a severe lack of​​ space. Permanent researchers share​​​‌ open-plan offices with students,‌ which significantly impacts working‌​‌ conditions. The launch of​​ two “ANR Défi Transfert”​​​‌ projects (Grip4All and Extender)‌ required additional experimental space,‌​‌ leading the team to​​ finance an agreement with​​​‌ Arts et Métiers to‌ host part of its‌​‌ activities on their Bordeaux​​ site. This transitional and​​​‌ fragmented setup has proven‌ both organizationally costly and‌​‌ inefficient. Moreover, the hosting​​ conditions at Arts et​​​‌ Métiers are unsatisfactory, and‌ the division of the‌​‌ team across two sites​​ is not viable in​​​‌ the long term.

7‌ Latest software developments, platforms,‌​‌ open data

During the​​ year, the Auctus team​​​‌ focused on migrating its‌ codebase from ROS1 to‌​‌ ROS2. All robots and​​ haptic devices now operate​​​‌ under this middleware. This‌ migration required a significant‌​‌ investment of time and​​​‌ effort. In parallel, several​ experimental platforms were developed,​‌ either for research purposes​​ or within the framework​​​‌ of the various engineering​ contracts that started this​‌ year.

7.1 Latest software​​ developments

7.1.1 Qontrol

  • Name:​​​‌
    Quadratic Optimization coNTROL
  • Keywords:​
    Robotics, Control, Optimisation
  • Scientific​‌ Description:
    Generic expression of​​ a robot control problem​​​‌ using constrained optimization in​ a dynamic environment, applicable​‌ to robots that can​​ be controlled in terms​​​‌ of torque, speed or​ position.
  • Functional Description:
    Qontrol​‌ is a tool for​​ the generic formulation of​​​‌ robotic control problems in​ the form of constrained​‌ optimization problems. It is​​ initially intended for fixed-base​​​‌ polyarticulated robots. It allows​ to easily create tasks​‌ and constraints in the​​ control law.
  • News of​​​‌ the Year:
    Declaration to​ the Program protection office.​‌ Appears in "transfert challenge"​​ kind of project (awaiting​​​‌ for finding) Appears in​ a european project (awaiting​‌ for finding)
  • URL:
  • Contact:
    Lucas Joseph
  • Participants:​​​‌
    Lucas Joseph, Vincent Padois​

7.1.2 pin-actuation

  • Keywords:
    Biomechanics,​‌ Robotics, Python
  • Functional Description:​​
    Pin-actuation is a Python​​​‌ library for adding actuation​ models to Pinocchio multibody​‌ dynamics models. It extends​​ Pinocchio's core capabilities by​​​‌ enabling the simulation of​ different types of actuators,​‌ including motors and muscles.​​ It also provides tools​​​‌ for parsing OpenSim models​ (version 4) to integrate​‌ their actuation specifications into​​ Pinocchio. This allows for​​​‌ the analysis and control​ of complex biomechanical and​‌ robotic systems with realistic​​ actuation dynamics.
  • Release Contributions:​​​‌

    Features Added Freeflyer joint​ option Added Universal Joint​‌ option Added passive actuators​​ Added visual model creation​​​‌ Added model sub-module and​ vtp2stl support Added joint​‌ coordinate_names list Added joint​​ position limits to parsed​​​‌ models

    Improvements & Refactors​ Refactored custom_joint parsing Refactored​‌ cable wire handling General​​ refactors and test maintenance​​​‌ Cleaned OpenSim scouting parser​ Improved child orientation handling​‌ for joint addition Multiple​​ internal refactors (topic/refactor)

    Fixes​​​‌ Fixed child orientation during​ joint addition

    Chore /​‌ Maintenance Added Ruff line-length​​ check to CI Updated​​​‌ README Improved .gitignore (PyCharm​ & cache files) Fancy​‌ .gitignore cleanup

    Contributors Thanks​​ to:

    Pierre PUCHAUD Mégane​​​‌ MILLAN Alexandre SCHORTGEN Maël​ GALLOIS

  • URL:
  • Contact:​‌
    Pierre Puchaud

7.1.3 moveit2_trajectory​​

  • Keyword:
    Robotics
  • Functional Description:​​​‌
    This package provides trajectory​ processing and execution capabilities​‌ for robotic systems. It​​ serves as a bridge​​​‌ between MoveIt2 motion planning​ and robot controllers, offering​‌ trajectory interpolation, Cartesian pose​​ computation, and a ROS​​​‌ 2 action server interface.​
  • URL:
  • Contact:
    Lucas​‌ Joseph

7.1.4 ik_qontrol

7.1.5 Active Constraint

  • Keywords:​
    Haptic guidance, Haptic, Telerobotics​‌
  • Scientific Description:
    The implementation​​ of haptic guidance in​​​‌ a teleoperation context with​ a haptic interface aims​‌ to encourage operators to​​ follow a desired behaviour​​​‌ while allowing a certain​ freedom of action. This​‌ package includes the integration​​ of a generic formula​​​‌ allowing continuous transition between​ different types of generic​‌ guidance model (potential fields,​​ spring-damper and guide tube)​​ as well as adaptable​​​‌ guidance models (ruling guidance,‌ marble cart).
  • Functional Description:‌​‌
    active_constraint defines the following​​ parameters: stiffness and damping​​​‌ factors for five different‌ types of guidance (potential‌​‌ fields, spring-damper, guide tube,​​ ruling guidance, and marble​​​‌ cart), as well as‌ threshold distances, parameters for‌​‌ changing models on the​​ fly, and parameters specific​​​‌ to each guidance model.‌ The integration of an‌​‌ RVIZ plugin allows you​​ to switch between each​​​‌ guidance type on the‌ fly and modify the‌​‌ above parameters. The package​​ subscribes to the position​​​‌ and velocity topics of‌ the robot and the‌​‌ haptic interface scaled in​​ the robot's workspace. It​​​‌ also subscribes to a‌ topic to retrieve the‌​‌ target position(s) of the​​ guidance. These positions and​​​‌ velocities are used to‌ generate a guidance force‌​‌ that is sent to​​ the communication hub linked​​​‌ to the haptic interface.‌
  • Publications:
  • Contact:
    Alexis Boulay
  • Participants:​​
    Alexis Boulay, Margot Vulliez,​​​‌ David Daney

7.2 New‌ platforms

7.2.1 Grip4All

Participants:‌​‌ Erwann Landais, Loic​​ Mazou, Alexis Boulay​​​‌, Lucas Joseph,‌ David Daney.

This‌​‌ platform consists of two​​ KUKA LBR iiwa 14​​​‌ robotic arms, a conveyor,‌ and a monocular camera.‌​‌ It demonstrates an automated​​ palletizing solution for fresh​​​‌ produce. Product spatial positions‌ are estimated using monocular‌​‌ vision. Depending on the​​ product characteristics, grasping is​​​‌ performed either by a‌ single arm (asynchronous operation)‌​‌ or collaboratively by both​​ arms (synchronous operation).

Advanced​​​‌ control techniques are employed‌ to dynamically manage accessibility‌​‌ constraints, grasping and placement​​ feasibility, grasp stability during​​​‌ transfer, and the overall‌ manipulation capabilities of the‌​‌ robotic system. In particular:​​

  • Qontrol: online generation​​​‌ of optimal motions in‌ dynamic contexts using model‌​‌ predictive control and advanced​​ performance optimization tools for​​​‌ robotic systems.
  • MegaPose:‌ object recognition and 6D‌​‌ pose estimation (position and​​ orientation in space).

These​​​‌ tools are developed at‌ Inria or within the‌​‌ Auctus team and contribute​​ to showcasing and advancing​​​‌ Inria's expertise in robotics.‌

7.2.2 Explorer

Participants: Esteban‌​‌ Cosserat, Margot Vulliez​​, Vincent Padois,​​​‌ Lucas Joseph.

The‌ Orthopus Explorer is a‌​‌ 6-DOF robotic arm used​​ within the EXTENDER project.​​​‌ The goal of the‌ EXTENDER project is to‌​‌ improve the daily lives​​ of people with disabilities​​​‌ by developing new, adaptable‌ control modes for robotic‌​‌ arms. The objective is​​ to use the Qontrol​​​‌ control software to command‌ the robotic arm developed‌​‌ by Orthopus and to​​ evaluate different control modalities,​​​‌ which will subsequently be‌ tested by users with‌​‌ disabilities.

7.2.3 Courrier

Participants:​​ Raphael Gerin, Margot​​​‌ Vulliez, Vincent Padois‌, Lucas Joseph.‌​‌

The objective of the​​ Courrier project is to​​​‌ evaluate the relevance of‌ communicating a robot's intention‌​‌ to a human operator​​ working in the same​​​‌ workspace. In this context,‌ an experimental platform has‌​‌ been developed involving a​​ robot tasked with sorting​​​‌ colored objects. The operator‌ and the robot share‌​‌ a common goal. The​​ software component allows the​​​‌ selection of different communication‌ modalities used by the‌​‌ robot in order to​​​‌ assess their impact on​ task efficiency and safety.​‌

7.2.4 DMC (Dual Marble​​ Cart)

Participants: Alexis Boulay​​​‌, Margot Vulliez,​ David Daney.

Experimental​‌ simulation platform dedicated to​​ the evaluation of a​​​‌ novel adaptive guidance model​ (dual adaptable) and its​‌ comparison with traditional guidance​​ models through reaching scenarios​​​‌ in dynamic and changing​ environments. This platform combines​‌ a physical haptic device​​ with a simulated robotic​​​‌ system and has already​ been used to conduct​‌ an experimental campaign, which​​ is expected to lead​​​‌ to scientific publications.

7.2.5​ DRPG (Deformable Robot Path​‌ Guidance)

Participants: Alexis Boulay​​, Margot Vulliez,​​​‌ David Daney.

Experimental​ simulation platform for assessing​‌ new adaptable virtual objects​​ (elastic band and predictive​​​‌ guide) and comparing them​ with a fixed virtual​‌ object through reaching scenarios​​ in changing environments. This​​​‌ platform relies on a​ physical haptic device coupled​‌ with a simulated robot​​ and has been used​​​‌ to conduct an experimental​ campaign that is expected​‌ to lead to scientific​​ publications.

7.2.6 OuiJa

Participants:​​​‌ Alicia Barsacq, Lucas​ Joseph, David Daney​‌.

Development of an​​ experimental platform for planar​​​‌ haptic communication between a​ human dyad, aimed at​‌ assessing the sense of​​ agency and understanding force​​​‌ exchange mechanisms. This platform​ makes use of force/torque​‌ sensors available at Inria,​​ as well as a​​​‌ motion capture system, to​ analyze participant behavior and​‌ identify key interaction features.​​

7.2.7 LePre Haptic

Participants:​​​‌ Benjamin Camblor, Hoang-Vy​ Nguyen, Alicia Barsacq​‌, Lucas Joseph,​​ Margot Vulliez.

Experimental​​​‌ platform designed to evaluate​ the impact of legibility​‌ and predictability of haptic​​ guides on performance, sense​​​‌ of agency, and subjective​ measures during an assisted​‌ teleoperation grasping task.

7.2.8​​ Beta

Participants: Jacques Zhong​​​‌, Lucas Joseph,​ Margot Vulliez.

Experimental​‌ simulation platform dedicated to​​ the evaluation and comparison​​​‌ of different dynamic arbitration​ methods. The experimental setup​‌ consists in a simulated​​ 7 DoF robot arm​​​‌ (Panda Franka) implemented in​ Gazebo with communication between​‌ the devices handled in​​ ROS. The robot is​​​‌ teleoperated with a haptic​ interface (omega.7, Force Dimension)​‌ in rate control. The​​ task is a shared-control​​​‌ pick-and-place, where the assistance​ estimate can be non-conflictual​‌ or conflictual with the​​ human targets at each​​​‌ scenario.

7.2.9 VisuoHaptic

Participants:​ Remi Lafitte, Lucas​‌ Joseph, Margot Vulliez​​.

Experimental teleoperation platform​​​‌ to study how Human​ agents perceive visual and​‌ haptic information and to​​ further characterize the rules​​​‌ of multisensory integration. Users​ are asked to perform​‌ a psychometric size-discrimination task.​​ Visual, haptic, and visuo-haptic​​​‌ objects (rectangular 3D shapes)​ are presented by means​‌ of a simulated visual​​ environment (computer screen, Chai3D​​​‌ simulation environment) and a​ haptic interface (Omega 7.0).​‌ Object width, cues reliabilities,​​ and visuo-haptic conflicts can​​​‌ be manipulated.

7.2.10 Bipetto​

Participants: Virgile Batto,​‌ Margot Vulliez.

Prototype​​ of a kid-size humanoid​​​‌ robot, built as an​ open-source, parallel-actuated biped experimental​‌ platform to evaluate proposed​​ co-design and multi-objective optimization​​​‌ methodologies.

7.3 Open data​

All the project-team's publications​‌ are openly accessible and​​ referenced through HAL. The​​ software associated with our​​​‌ publications is hosted on‌ public repositories on the‌​‌ Auctus GitLab server, ensuring​​ transparency and reproducibility of​​​‌ our results.

Pierre Puchaud‌ is involved in maintaining‌​‌ a biomechanics suite of​​ software in the Pyomeca​​​‌ organization within the ACER‌ associate team, notably the‌​‌ software Bioptim dedicated to​​ human motion simulation. He​​​‌ is also contributing to‌ the Pinocchio software, with‌​‌ Mégane Millan (Engineer in​​ the Inria Willow team)​​​‌ and Lucas Joseph .‌

Regarding research data, the‌​‌ datasets generated by the​​ team are not publicly​​​‌ released, as they often‌ involve industrial collaborations or‌​‌ sensitive information. Nevertheless, all​​ data are stored and​​​‌ managed according to the‌ FAIR principles: they are‌​‌ Findable within our internal​​ storage infrastructure, Accessible to​​​‌ authorized members, Interoperable through‌ standardized formats (CSV, HDF5,‌​‌ ROS bags, etc.), and​​ Reusable thanks to comprehensive​​​‌ metadata, versioning practices, and‌ documentation. Access rights and‌​‌ protection measures are defined​​ jointly with our partners​​​‌ to ensure compliance with‌ confidentiality requirements while preserving‌​‌ long-term data integrity and​​ traceability.

All practices related​​​‌ to open science, data‌ handling, and ethical considerations‌​‌ follow the guidelines established​​ by Inria's Coerle,​​​‌ ensuring that our research‌ activities respect the institute's‌​‌ standards for scientific integrity,​​ responsibility, and transparency.

8​​​‌ New results

8.1 Human‌ Factors and cognitive approaches‌​‌ in human/system interactions

8.1.1​​ Personalized Binary Emotion Classification​​​‌ Using Multimodal Smartphone and‌ Wearable Sensor Data

Participants:‌​‌ Jean-Marc Salotti.

The​​ results of Nicolas Simonazzi’s​​​‌ PhD thesis, defended three‌ years ago, were revisited,‌​‌ valorized and published in​​ 2025. This study investigated​​​‌ the binary classification of‌ emotional valence using data‌​‌ collected from motion sensors​​ and keystroke dynamics on​​​‌ a smartphone, as well‌ as from a connected‌​‌ wristband. To this end,​​ we developed a mobile​​​‌ application designed to induce‌ emotions through video stimuli‌​‌ while recording user interactions.​​ A dedicated digital self-assessment​​​‌ tool, adapted from the‌ Geneva Emotion Wheel, was‌​‌ created to help participants​​ report their emotional states.​​​‌ Sensor recordings were labeled‌ according to participants’ self-reports‌​‌ and the experimental video​​ conditions. We propose a​​​‌ method to process the‌ resulting temporal data and‌​‌ to automatically classify the​​ valence of reported emotions​​​‌ using machine learning techniques.‌ Both a general valence‌​‌ classifier trained on all​​ emotions from all participants​​​‌ and a personalized classifier‌ trained on a subset‌​‌ of emotions from a​​ single individual were evaluated.​​​‌ The most promising results‌ were obtained with the‌​‌ personalized model, which achieved,​​ on average across participants,​​​‌ approximately two-thirds accuracy in‌ valence classification using multimodal‌​‌ data fusion. 9.​​

8.1.2 Modeling Human visuo-haptic​​​‌ perception in teleoperation

Participants:‌ Rémi Lafitte, Margot‌​‌ Vulliez, Cécile Scotto​​.

Reliable visual and​​​‌ haptic feedback are known‌ to improve teleoperation tasks.‌​‌ Better understanding human visuo-haptic​​ perception could help to​​​‌ develop feedback strategies that‌ better inform the human‌​‌ operator during human-robot interaction.​​ The project is conducted​​​‌ in collaboration with the‌ CeRCA-CNRS at the University‌​‌ of Poitiers.

Psychophysic experiments​​ have suggested that the​​​‌ brain combines visual and‌ haptic estimates of environmental‌​‌ properties (e.g., object size)​​​‌ in a statistically optimal​ fashion. Whether this sensory​‌ integration still holds in​​ a more challenging environment,​​​‌ such as for teleoperation,​ remains unknown. We developed​‌ a psychophysic experiment, involving​​ 10 young healthy adults​​​‌ (median age = 27​ years old, 5 males)​‌ performing teleoperation size-estimation tasks,​​ to assess the validity​​​‌ of established integration models​ in teleoperation conditions. We​‌ compared the experimental results​​ to the predictions of​​​‌ the optimal integration (Maximum-Likelihood​ Estimate) and of best-cue​‌ switching models. The experimental​​ findings indicate that the​​​‌ observed visuo-haptic judgments could​ not be fully accounted​‌ by the sensory integration​​ or sensory segregation models.​​​‌ In this sense, sensory​ integration in this experiment​‌ could be said “ambiguous”​​ 22.

We further​​​‌ extended the experimental protocol​ to test if integrating​‌ the perceptual estimates of​​ an individual operator in​​​‌ the feedback process, specifically​ by modulating the haptic​‌ feedback, can help the​​ latter to better perform​​​‌ discriminate objects in teleoperation.​

8.1.3 Legibility and predictability​‌ of haptic guidance in​​ teleoperation

Participants: Benjamin Camblor​​​‌, Hoang-Vy Nguyen,​ Alicia Barsacq, Margot​‌ Vulliez.

Haptic guidance​​ is a method to​​​‌ assist a human operator​ performing tasks in teleoperation​‌ through force feedback. Taking​​ into account human factors​​​‌ and individual preferences is​ crucial when designing such​‌ haptic assistance. It can​​ modify the perception and​​​‌ understanding that humans have​ of the robot's assistance​‌ behavior, i.e. the cognitive​​ transparency of the robot.​​​‌ Specifically, making the robot​ actions more predictable and/or​‌ more legible can highly​​ impact the understanding of​​​‌ the robot's behavior during​ human-robot interaction. The predictability​‌ of an action is​​ linked to its similarity​​​‌ to the action that​ the human agent would​‌ expect for a given​​ objective (action deduced from​​​‌ its goal). Conversely, an​ action is legible when​‌ it enables the human​​ to predict the objective​​​‌ or intention it expresses​ (goal deduced from the​‌ action).

The project aims​​ at evaluating the impact​​​‌ of different haptic guidance​ on the legibility and​‌ predictability of the robot's​​ assistance in teleoperation. We​​​‌ designed an experimental protocol​ and platform to study​‌ how different haptic guidance,​​ where we vary the​​​‌ guidance-path curvature, can be​ more or less legible​‌ and predictable during assisted​​ reaching scenarios. We further​​​‌ investigate the effect of​ haptic guidance legibility/predictability on​‌ performance, user comfort, and​​ agency.

8.1.4 Proximal Human-Robot​​​‌ Collaboration: Toward Human-Like Joint​ Agency

Participants: Alicia Barsacq​‌, David Daney,​​ Jean-Christophe Sarrazin.

When​​​‌ interacting with artificial agents​ in a joint task,​‌ human can experience a​​ loss of feeling of​​​‌ control, or a loss​ of agency. The origin​‌ of this phenomenon is​​ not well understood, but​​​‌ have a negative impact​ on the subjective and​‌ objective performance, awareness during​​ the task and involvment.​​​‌ However, interacting with a​ human partner can prevent​‌ this loss of agency​​ in collaborativ joint action.​​​‌

Through a literature review​ of current evaluations of​‌ agency in collaborative human-robot​​ interaction, we show that​​​‌ the embodiement of robots​ can prevent agency loss​‌ in joint tasks in​​ the same way two​​ humans interacting together do.​​​‌ Several barriers preventing the‌ understanding of joint agency‌​‌ in human-robot collaboration were​​ identified, and guidelines for​​​‌ roboticists were provided to‌ overcome them.

This thesis‌​‌ is co-supervised with ONERA​​ as part of the​​​‌ PEPR O2R program.

8.2‌ Human Behavior Analysis

8.2.1‌​‌ Study of Motor Variability​​

Participants: David Daney,​​​‌ Vincent Padois, Pauline‌ Maurice, Jonathan Savin‌​‌.

This long term​​ research project led to​​​‌ a main action in‌ 2024: the analysis of‌​‌ the experimental results obtained​​ during the experimental campaign​​​‌ of 2023 (MOVER). These‌ results are encouraging as‌​‌ they demonstrate that motor​​ variability depends on some​​​‌ features of the task,‌ especially pace and direction‌​‌ of the movement. Moreover,​​ the observed motor variability​​​‌ is high enough to‌ induce changes in biomechanical‌​‌ risk factors as estimated​​ through standard ergonomic scores​​​‌ 50. The analysis‌ of the results will‌​‌ be pursued in 2025,​​ potentially within the framework​​​‌ of the INTRO project‌ submitted to the ANR‌​‌ yearly call in collaboration​​ with INRS and the​​​‌ LARSEN team in Nancy.‌

8.2.2 Searching for best-fitting‌​‌ musculoskeletal models approximating an​​ individual's upper limb force​​​‌ capacities

Participants: Gautier Laisné‌, Jean-Marc Salotti,‌​‌ Nasser Rezzoug.

Upper-limb​​ force feasible set: theoretical​​​‌ foundations and musculoskeletal model‌ reconstruction.

In biomechanics, human‌​‌ hand force capacities refer​​ to the set of​​​‌ feasible forces exertable at‌ the hand considering arm‌​‌ posture and muscle tensions.​​ In physical Human-Robot Interaction​​​‌ (pHRI), knowing the operator's‌ force capacities allows the‌​‌ robot to adjust its​​ assistance to avoid exceeding​​​‌ force limits. Using a‌ musculoskeletal model representing a‌​‌ human upper-limb, force capacities​​ can be described as​​​‌ a 3D polytope called‌ the force polytope. Following‌​‌ Gautier Laisné's PhD defense​​ in December 2024, we​​​‌ further investigated the relationship‌ between a wrench generated‌​‌ at the end-effector of​​ a serial kinematic chain​​​‌ with n degrees of‌ freedom and the set‌​‌ of cable tensions capable​​ of producing it in​​​‌ cable-actuated systems. A set-theoretic‌ framework is used to‌​‌ characterize feasible force and​​ moment sets, showing that​​​‌ their shape and size‌ depend on the modeling‌​‌ of cable activations and​​ tend toward an ellipsoidal​​​‌ geometry when a sufficient‌ number of cables is‌​‌ available. A computationally efficient​​ method based on the​​​‌ projection constant is introduced‌ to construct ellipsoidal approximations‌​‌ of force and moment​​ polytopes. The framework is​​​‌ extended to describe the‌ full set of cable‌​‌ activations generating a given​​ feasible wrench, and it​​​‌ is shown that maximal‌ wrenches correspond to unique‌​‌ activations under spherical activation​​ constraints. The approach is​​​‌ applied to inverse dynamics‌ in a musculoskeletal model‌​‌ of the human upper​​ limb with seven degrees​​​‌ of freedom and fifty‌ muscles, enabling solutions to‌​‌ be computed in milliseconds​​ without optimization. A Python​​​‌ library supporting high-dimensional convex‌ set operations is provided‌​‌ to facilitate practical applications​​ in robotics and biomechanics.​​​‌ A paper on this‌ topic has been submitted‌​‌ to a journal.

8.2.3​​ Parametric Identification of Metabolic​​​‌ Models of Fatigue

Participants:‌ Pierre Puchaud, Simon‌​‌ Bernier, Jérémy Briand​​​‌.

In the context​ of analyzing human physical​‌ capacity and fatigue. We​​ developed a computational pipeline​​​‌ using Bioptim to identify​ individualized physiological parameters from​‌ mechanical power and oxygen​​ consumption. This framework provides​​​‌ a robust method for​ extracting internal physiological characteristics​‌ and fatigue metrics, expanding​​ the team's capabilities in​​​‌ human monitoring beyond pure​ kinematics and dynamics. The​‌ problem aims to identify​​ time-independent parameters, specifically maximal​​​‌ oxygen uptake, maximal lactate​ production rate, and active​‌ muscle mass percentage, while​​ simultaneously reconstructing hidden metabolic​​​‌ states such as glycogen​ depletion and muscle lactate​‌ accumulation. The formulation satisfy​​ non-linear biochemical dynamics derived​​​‌ from equilibrium equations (e.g.,​ creatine-phosphate reaction, Hill equations​‌ for oxidative phosphorylation). This​​ work is a collaboration​​​‌ with Université de Montréal.​

8.2.4 Modeling of human-human​‌ physical interaction

Participants: Alicia​​ Barsacq, David Daney​​​‌, Jean-Christophe Sarrazin.​

Using control theory tools​‌ such as feeback control​​ and MPC, a physical​​​‌ model of the OuiJa​ platform was developped. This​‌ model allow for a​​ simulation of the behaviour​​​‌ of one or two​ humans collaborating via haptic​‌ information exchange. The model​​ relies on traditionnal implementation​​​‌ of computationnal neuroscience, taking​ into account muscle dynamics,​‌ sensory delays and noise.​​ It produces simulated data​​​‌ such as force, movement​ of the OuiJa platform​‌ (position, velocity). Those simulated​​ data can be compared​​​‌ to the experimental one​ in different conditions. Finally,​‌ this model allow for​​ a computationnal model of​​​‌ agency to be tested​ via simulated prediction error​‌ in different conditions.

This​​ thesis is co-supervised with​​​‌ ONERA as part of​ the PEPR O2R program.​‌

8.3 Human Robot Interaction​​

8.3.1 Re-expression of manual​​​‌ expertise through manual control​ of a teleoperated system​‌

Participants: Erwann Landais,​​ Vincent Padois, Nasser​​​‌ Rezzoug.

In the​ thesis of Erwann Landais​‌ which was defended in​​ December 37, we​​​‌ studied how teleoperation can​ allow for the remote​‌ expression of technical gestures,​​ with chemistry as a​​​‌ potential applicative domain. Indeed,​ teleoperation enables a task​‌ to be carried out​​ remotely by a human​​​‌ expert. This remote control​ is often a guarantee​‌ of greater safety and​​ comfort, or simply of​​​‌ feasibility in hazardous environments.​ However, it can also​‌ mean a loss of​​ efficiency, or added complexity.​​​‌ To avoid these pitfalls,​ it is necessary to​‌ consider 1) what constitutes​​ an operator's expertise for​​​‌ a given task, 2)​ the constraints encountered in​‌ carrying it out, and​​ 3) the form of​​​‌ a teleoperation system adapted​ to it. An example​‌ of a task that​​ could benefit from teleoperation​​​‌ is the task of​ finding solvents for chemical​‌ compounds, which is one​​ of Syensqo's areas of​​​‌ expertise. This involves characterizing​ the solubility of a​‌ solute in a set​​ of solvents, in order​​​‌ to determine the optimum​ solvent for that solute.​‌ This task, based on​​ visual, cognitive and manual​​​‌ expertise, is performed by​ a small number of​‌ expert technicians. Performing this​​ task relies on an​​​‌ empirical, tedious and sometimes​ dangerous process, motivating the​‌ distancing of technicians from​​ the experimental environment through​​ robotic assistance. Using this​​​‌ task as a case‌ study, the thesis of‌​‌ Erwann Landais aimed at​​ answering the following questions​​​‌ : on the one‌ hand, how can an‌​‌ operator's expertise be preserved​​ when performing a task​​​‌ using a teleoperated system‌ ? And on the‌​‌ other hand, how can​​ the suitability of a​​​‌ teleoperation solution for performing‌ an expert task be‌​‌ assessed ? To answer​​ these questions, a broad-spectrum​​​‌ literature review was carried‌ out and two experimental‌​‌ studies were conducted. While​​ the first study studied​​​‌ semi-automatic manipulation protocols, in‌ the second study, which‌​‌ restults were analysed in​​ 2024, a robot was​​​‌ designed to achieve a‌ range of motion similar‌​‌ to that observed in​​ technicians, and intuitive interfaces​​​‌ were used to define‌ the desired movement of‌​‌ the vial in real​​ time. The study shows​​​‌ that controlling the robot‌ via these interfaces does‌​‌ not achieve an efficiency​​ similar to that of​​​‌ the manual mode. However,the‌ performance achieved is encouraging,‌​‌ and the study identifies​​ several avenues of improvement​​​‌ for the efficient and‌ reliable deporting of the‌​‌ technical gesture in chemistry.​​ Finally, beyond the application​​​‌ framework, this work establishes‌ a comprehensive methodology for‌​‌ evaluating the performance of​​ teleoperation modalities.

8.3.2 Adaptive​​​‌ haptic guidance to assist‌ human during teleoperation

Participants:‌​‌ Alexis Boulay, Margot​​ Vulliez, David Daney​​​‌.

This work is‌ within the framework of‌​‌ the collaboration with the​​ Farm3 company and addresses​​​‌ issues of remote vertical‌ farming.Performing remote tasks through‌​‌ a teleoperation system can​​ be assisted through haptic​​​‌ guidance, a force feedback‌ computed based on a‌​‌ virtual geometric constraints to​​ help the user to​​​‌ follow a given behavior‌ (task trajectory, safety area,...).‌​‌

A user study showed​​ that the choice of​​​‌ guidance model depends on‌ the interaction context: task‌​‌ complexity, environmental clutter, user​​ preference, etc. 25.​​​‌ This initial result motivated‌ the development of a‌​‌ generic, adaptable online haptic​​ guidance that follows the​​​‌ dynamics of the interaction‌ to optimize human comfort.‌​‌

Adaptive guidance force profile.​​

We have developed a​​​‌ new adaptable haptic guidance‌ model, the dual adaptable‌​‌ model, which aims to​​ maximise user comfort by​​​‌ optimizing the force feedback‌ in real-time with respect‌​‌ to the surrounding environement.​​ A user study was​​​‌ conducted to evaluate this‌ model and compare it‌​‌ to other conventional models​​ in changing and partially​​​‌ known environments.

Adaptive virtual‌ guidance path.

Two new‌​‌ adaptive haptic guidance virtual​​ objects have been developed:​​​‌ the elastic band and‌ the predictive guide. Their‌​‌ purpose is to maximise​​ user comfort by adapting​​​‌ to the user's actions,‌ regardless of the knowledge‌​‌ of the environment. A​​ user study was conducted​​​‌ to evaluate these virtual‌ objects and compare them‌​‌ to a fixed virtual​​ object in changing and​​​‌ dynamic environments.

The results‌ are described in the‌​‌ thesis 14 and will​​ be published in a​​​‌ journal soon.

8.3.3 Unified‌ human-robot simulation for modulation‌​‌ of muscle activation

Participants:​​ Pierre Schegg, Pierre​​​‌ Puchaud, François Bailly‌.

Current robot-assisted physiotherapy‌​‌ often lacks explicit biomechanical​​​‌ integration in control systems.​ To address this, we​‌ develope a unified framework​​ co-simulating a musculoskeletal model​​​‌ of the upper limb​ and a collaborative robotic​‌ arm. Using Bioptim, we​​ formulated a single optimal​​​‌ control problem encompassing both​ human and robot variables​‌ to define assistive torque​​ trajectories. This approach allows​​​‌ for the modulation of​ specific muscle activations—specifically the​‌ Supraspinatus in a rotator​​ cuff rehabilitation scenario—via a​​​‌ single hyperparameter. Preliminary results​ demonstrate that the formulation​‌ reliably adapts the robot’s​​ control law. Rather than​​​‌ uniformly scaling torques, the​ controller non-trivially redistributes the​‌ load across robot joints​​ to achieve targeted reductions​​​‌ in muscle activation. This​ work validates the use​‌ of optimal control to​​ integrate biomechanical constraints into​​​‌ human-robot interaction, paving the​ way for personalized movement​‌ assistance in cases such​​ as muscle dystrophy or​​​‌ hemiplegia.

8.3.4 A Riemannian​ approach for Inverse Optimal​‌ Control

Participants: Ahmed-Manaf Dahamni​​, David Daney,​​​‌ François Charpillet.

The​ methods for solving Inverse​‌ Optimal Control that are​​ currently available in the​​​‌ literature are either computationally​ slow like the commonly​‌ used Bilevel, or approximative​​ methods that do not​​​‌ recovered the closest trajectory​ to the observation. To​‌ try and solve this​​ problem a new approach​​​‌ called the Projected IOC​ has been created. However,​‌ this method has encountered​​ solvability issues using modern​​​‌ solver. In our research,​ we have discovered that​‌ the solvability prolems stem​​ from a violation of​​​‌ the Mangasarian–Fromovitz constraint qualification​ (MFCQ).

Following this discovery,​‌ we have developed a​​ new method based on​​​‌ Riemannian optimization that has​ working principles similar to​‌ the Bilevel approach with​​ a faster run time.​​​‌ This method can compute​ the jacobian of the​‌ Direct Optimal Control problem​​ if proper conditions are​​​‌ met for the jacobian​ to exist. Gradient descent​‌ is then used to​​ minimize a distance to​​​‌ the observation.

8.4 Robotics​ and control

8.4.1 Model​‌ Predictive Control blending and​​ adaptive assistance for shared​​​‌ human-robot teleoperation

Participants: Elio​ Jabbour, Margot Vulliez​‌, Vincent Padois,​​ Célestin Préault.

Shared​​​‌ control aims at assisting​ human operators using robots​‌ in physically and cognitively​​ demanding tasks which cannot​​​‌ be automated as they​ require human expertise and​‌ deliberative abilities. Sharing control​​ for a given task​​​‌ typically involves blending algorithms​ that combine human control​‌ inputs and (pre)planed assistance​​ trajectories. Over the last​​​‌ year, we proposed a​ shared control architecture that​‌ combines a predictive approach​​ to blending and adaptation​​​‌ mechanisms to correct imperfect​ assistance inputs.

Model Predictive​‌ Control-based Blending (MPC-B) approach.​​

Conventional blending techniques, such​​​‌ as Linear Blending, compute​ a combined output but​‌ neither guarantee the feasibility​​ of the blended motion​​​‌ nor the optimality of​ the combined decision. We​‌ formulated the blending problem​​ as a constrained optimal​​​‌ control problem. Model Predictive​ Control is used to​‌ determine a feasible blended​​ trajectory through a receding​​​‌ horizon constrained optimization, ensuring​ compliance with task and​‌ safety limits while enabling​​ smooth control transitions. This​​​‌ new blending framework was​ validated in a 13-participant​‌ user study comparing the​​ proposed MPC method to​​ Linear Blending and unassisted​​​‌ teleoperation. The results demonstrated‌ significant improvements in safety‌​‌ (collision avoidance) and task​​ performance, as well as​​​‌ reduced physical and cognitive‌ workload for the operators‌​‌ with this new blending​​ method.

Adaptive assistance based​​​‌ on human corrective actions.‌

The assistance behavior is‌​‌ planned based on a​​ given model of the​​​‌ task environement. Some errors‌ in this model can‌​‌ induce conflicts between the​​ assistance trajectory and the​​​‌ actual user goals. We‌ developed a bi-level adaptive‌​‌ assistance mechanism that corrects​​ for model inaccuracies by​​​‌ treating the operator's input‌ as a corrective measurement.‌​‌ This framework integrates a​​ real-time Adaptive Kalman Filter​​​‌ to compensate for local,‌ transient errors and an‌​‌ online N-Point Procrustes Analysis​​ module to learn and​​​‌ correct for global, systematic‌ misalignments over time. The‌​‌ adaptive mechanism was validated​​ in a 12-user study​​​‌ involving scenarios with erroneous‌ assistance targets. Results showed‌​‌ that the adaptation mechanism​​ successfully corrected the model​​​‌ errors in real-time. Compared‌ to non-adaptive assistance, the‌​‌ new approach ensured zero​​ collisions, significantly reduced physical​​​‌ effort, and improved task‌ completion time.

8.4.2 Dynamic‌​‌ authority distribution in haptic​​ shared control

Participants: Jacques​​​‌ Zhong, Margot Vulliez‌, Jee-Hwan Ryu.‌​‌

An important challenge of​​ shared control lies in​​​‌ how two agents (i.e.‌ the human and the‌​‌ assistance) share the control​​ of the teleoperated robot,​​​‌ set through the level‌ of authority. However, there‌​‌ is currently no consensus​​ on the most relevant​​​‌ metric to use to‌ adjust this level of‌​‌ authority between the human​​ and the robot, as​​​‌ this is mainly context-dependent.‌ The arbitration is often‌​‌ set through an arbitrary​​ criteria defined by-hand and​​​‌ no global arbitration method‌ exists.

We proposed a‌​‌ novel optimization-based framework that​​ dynamically arbitrates between different​​​‌ authorithy distibutions, with an‌ online adaptation mechanism with‌​‌ respect to the user​​ and the task. The​​​‌ arbitration policy is formulated‌ as a Quadratic Progam‌​‌ (QP) to combine different​​ metrics under constraints over​​​‌ the authority level evolution.‌ Bayesian optimization is used‌​‌ as a sample-efficient global​​ optimizer to adjust the​​​‌ policy parameters in a‌ few evaluations. We evaluated‌​‌ the proposed method on​​ a shared-controlled reaching task​​​‌ involving two typical situations:‌ non-conflictual and conflictual assistance.‌​‌ Compared to existing methods,​​ results show that the​​​‌ method yields significantly better‌ interaction quality (from both‌​‌ objective and subjective measures)​​ for non-conflictual scenarios, but​​​‌ not for conflictual scenarios‌ where the assistance goal‌​‌ is not aligned with​​ the actual human target.​​​‌

8.4.3 Scenario-based Model Predictive‌ Control for safe and‌​‌ effective human-robot collaboration

Participants:​​ Vincent Padois, Sebastien​​​‌ Kleff, Kloe Bonnet‌, Tianyi Jin,‌​‌ Raphael Gerin.

Human-robot​​ collaboration requires both safety​​​‌ and effectivness to be‌ considered as viable solution‌​‌ in situtations where human​​ working conditions could benefit​​​‌ from a robotic assistance.‌ These two objectives are‌​‌ somewhat antinomic. Achieving both​​ requires both an optimal​​​‌ control approach (i.e. one‌ that considers the long‌​‌ term consquences of the​​ control actions), online replanning​​​‌ (to constantly adapt to‌ changing objectives), as well‌​‌ as a way to​​​‌ consider the variability (and​ associated uncertainties) in the​‌ human motion strategies. To​​ combine these three characteristics,​​​‌ we have started to​ explore Scenario-based Model Predictive​‌ Control (SMPC) as a​​ way to formulate the​​​‌ control problem faced when​ considering Human-Robot collaboration. This​‌ work has been initiated​​ within the framework of​​​‌ Kloe Bonnet internship and​ is being pursued as​‌ part of the ANR​​ COURRIER research program with​​​‌ the PhD work of​ Tianyi Jin , co-advised​‌ by Sebastien Kleff and​​ Vincent Padois . Raphael​​​‌ Gerin provides support with​ the implementation of the​‌ proposed control approach within​​ an experimental set-up shared​​​‌ by the partners of​ the ANR project. He​‌ is also in charge​​ of implementing state-of-the art,​​​‌ lower-level, task-based control strategies​ allowing for the robust​‌ achievement of the task​​ and motion planning strategy​​​‌ emerging from the higher​ level SMPC controller. With​‌ this architecture he has​​ provided a ready-to-use simulation​​​‌ software to one of​ the COURRIER project partner​‌ (Onera) performing robot motion​​ prediction tests with humans.​​​‌

8.4.4 A Unified Tactile​ Servoing Framework based on​‌ Hybrid Force-Position Control

Participants:​​ Sebastien Kleff, Vincent​​​‌ Padois, Lucas Joseph​.

In robotics, traditional​‌ force control lacks local​​ contact information. Tactile sensors​​​‌ provide rich feedback on​ physical interaction, but remain​‌ notably difficult to integrate​​ into real-time control loops.​​​‌ The research we are​ initiating towards tactile based​‌ control and its application​​ to human-robot collaboration requires​​​‌ a solid grounding and​ we have proposed a​‌ unified tactile servoing formulation​​ that allows explicit control​​​‌ of contact pose and​ force at the Center​‌ of Pressure (CoP). Unlike​​ conventional tactile servoing techniques,​​​‌ which are tightly coupled​ to a specific sensor​‌ and often treat the​​ contact wrench as disturbance​​​‌ to be rejected, our​ approach relies on a​‌ generic and physically grounded​​ feature space. We derive​​​‌ a hybrid force-position control​ law based on the​‌ Jacobian at the CoP​​ that naturally decouples force​​​‌ and motion subspaces, ensuring​ geometric consistency during the​‌ contact interaction. Our framework,​​ validated on a robotic​​​‌ manipulator with vision-based tactile​ sensing, demonstrates robust contact​‌ maintenance and force tracking​​ capabilities, outperforming standard imagebased​​​‌ and pose-based controllers in​ tasks requiring precise regulation​‌ of the physical interaction.​​ This work has been​​​‌ submitted to the IEEE​ Robotics and Automation Letters​‌ 16.

8.4.5 Extended​​ Friction Models for the​​​‌ Physics Simulation of Servo​ Actuators

Participants: Marc Duclusaud​‌, Grégoire Passault,​​ Vincent Padois, Olivier​​​‌ Ly.

Accurate physical​ simulation is crucial for​‌ the development and validation​​ of control algorithms in​​​‌ robotic systems. Recent works​ in Reinforcement Learning (RL)​‌ take notably advantage of​​ extensive simulations to produce​​​‌ efficient robot control. State-of-the-art​ servo actuator models generally​‌ fail at capturing the​​ complex friction dynamics of​​​‌ these systems. This limits​ the transferability of simulated​‌ behaviors to real-world applications.​​ In this work, we​​​‌ present extended friction models​ that allow to more​‌ accurately simulate servo actuator​​ dynamics. We propose a​​​‌ comprehensive analysis of various​ friction models, present a​‌ method for identifying model​​ parameters using recorded trajectories​​ from a pendulum test​​​‌ bench, and demonstrate how‌ these models can be‌​‌ integrated into physics engines.​​ The proposed friction models​​​‌ are validated on four‌ distinct servo actuators and‌​‌ tested on 2R manipulators,​​ showing significant improvements in​​​‌ accuracy over the standard‌ Coulomb-Viscous model. Our results‌​‌ highlight the importance of​​ considering advanced friction effects​​​‌ in the simulation of‌ servo actuators to enhance‌​‌ the realism and reliability​​ of robotic simulations. This​​​‌ work has been published‌ at IEEE ICRA 2025‌​‌ 11.

8.4.6 Simulation,​​ Observability Analysis, and AI​​​‌ Methods for Tracking

Participants:‌ Jimmy Étienne, David‌​‌ Daney, François Charpillet​​.

Over the past​​​‌ year, I developed and‌ validated simulation and diagnostic‌​‌ tools for estimation, tracking,​​ and decision-making. Key contributions​​​‌ include the FIM Observability‌ Tool, an interactive simulator‌​‌ for analyzing Fisher Information​​ Matrix observability under bearing-only​​​‌ measurements, and a Passive‌ Hydrophone Array Simulator that‌​‌ synthesizes towed-array sonar scenes​​ with multi-hydrophone time series,​​​‌ bearing measurements, and ground-truth‌ metadata to accelerate acoustic‌​‌ tracking and localization prototyping.​​ In parallel, I contributed​​​‌ to early work on‌ a new platform for‌​‌ mobile robotics and delivered​​ new results through POMmeDaPy​​​‌ (Python POMDP implementations including‌ naive solvers, value functions,‌​‌ value iteration, and HSVI)​​ and machine-learning experiments using​​​‌ diffusion processes for trajectory‌ generation.

9 Bilateral contracts‌​‌ and grants with industry​​

9.1 Suez

Participants: Raphael​​​‌ Gerin, Margot Vulliez‌, Lucas Joseph,‌​‌ Vincent Padois.

A​​ collaboration agreement has been​​​‌ signed with Suez to‌ develop a robotic proof-of-concept‌​‌ for the secure diagnosis​​ of electric vehicle batteries,​​​‌ where different teleoperation modalities‌ will be tested and‌​‌ compared.

Project in a​​ nutshell:

  • Consortium: AUCTUS@Inria, Suez​​​‌
  • Funding: 50 keuros
  • Duration:‌ 2025-2026

9.2 ISP

Participants:‌​‌ Lucas Joseph, Vincent​​ Padois.

Within the​​​‌ ACHEAS project, the Auctus‌ team has provided its‌​‌ engineering and scientific expertise​​ to support ISP in​​​‌ improving robotic motion planning‌ for the automated disassembly‌​‌ of helicopter turbine brackets.​​ The collaboration focuses on​​​‌ integrating vision-based perception with‌ state-of-the-art, generic motion planning‌​‌ algorithms to generate collision-free​​ robot trajectories online, despite​​​‌ variable bracket configurations and‌ the absence of complete‌​‌ 3D models, while ensuring​​ computational efficiency and guaranteed​​​‌ safety distances during screw‌ removal operations.

Project in‌​‌ a nutshell:

  • Consortium: AUCTUS@Inria,​​ ISP, DIHNAMIC
  • Funding: 2.3​​​‌ keuros
  • Duration: 2025

9.3‌ Farm3

Participants: Alexis Boulay‌​‌, David Daney,​​ Margot Vulliez.

We​​​‌ collaborate with Farm3, a‌ start-up company specialized in‌​‌ vertical farming, since 2020.​​ The company develops a​​​‌ robotized vertical farm, the‌ Cube, to grow plants‌​‌ in a controlled environment​​ through ultrasound-based techniques. Agronomists​​​‌ and farmers can remotely‌ act on the plants‌​‌ through a teleoperation system,​​ to perform expert tasks​​​‌ (seedlings, pollinating flowers, measuring‌ data...) without polluting the‌​‌ sensitive growth environment.

After​​ preleminary results of a​​​‌ master's internship in 2021,‌ a contract was signed‌​‌ with Farm3 in 2022​​ to start a PhD​​​‌ project. This PhD thesis,‌ defended in 2025, led‌​‌ to the development of​​ haptic guidance for robotic​​​‌ teleoperation, aiming to assist‌ humans through guiding forces.‌​‌ It proposes a generic,​​​‌ online-adaptable haptic guidance framework​ capable of adjusting to​‌ the complexity of the​​ environment and the task.​​​‌ A new unified model,​ called ruling guidance, enables​‌ continuous combination and adaptation​​ of the main existing​​​‌ guidance models, and was​ validated through a user​‌ study and objective metrics​​ (performance, safety, comfort, and​​​‌ trust). The thesis also​ introduces an adaptive dual​‌ guidance model based on​​ optimization, as well as​​​‌ real-time adaptable virtual objects​ (elastic guide and predictive​‌ guide). Altogether, these contributions​​ form a comprehensive framework​​​‌ for dynamic haptic guidance​ in evolving environments.

Project​‌ in a nutshell:

  • Consortium:​​ AUCTUS@Inria, Farm3
  • Funding: Farm3,​​​‌ ANRT (CIFRE)
  • Duration: 2022-2025​

10 Partnerships and cooperations​‌

10.1 International initiatives

10.1.1​​ Inria associate team not​​​‌ involved in an IIL​ or an international program​‌

SHAARE Inria-KAIST associate team​​

Participants: Huseyin Tugcan Dinc​​​‌, Dong-Hyeon Kim,​ Kwang-Hyun Lee, Jee-Hwan​‌ Ryu, Alexis Boulay​​, Jacques Zhong,​​​‌ David Daney, Margot​ Vulliez.

  • Title:
    Shared​‌ Haptics for Augmented Assistive​​ Robot Expertise
  • Duration:
    2024​​​‌ -> 2026
  • Coordinators:
    Margot​ Vulliez (Auctus) and Jee-Hwan​‌ Ryu (IRiS lab director​​ @KAIST)
  • Partners:
    • IRiS lab​​​‌ - Korea Advanced Institute​ of Science and Technology​‌ (Daejeon, South Korea)
  • Summary:​​
    Haptic teleoperation is a​​​‌ promising method to enable​ Humans and robots to​‌ jointly perform an activity.​​ The human operator can​​​‌ safely and remotely control​ the robot while receiving​‌ feedback on the task​​ interaction. Recent shared-autonomy concepts​​​‌ have been proposed in​ the literature to transfer​‌ part of the task​​ from the human operator​​​‌ to the robotic agent​ to better assist him.​‌ Scientific challenges to tackle​​ in such shared control​​​‌ support the need for​ a generic shared haptic​‌ framework. It will merge​​ both haptic guidance (force​​​‌ feedback that assists the​ human to perform the​‌ task) and blending methods​​ (control strategy that combines​​​‌ the human inputs and​ robot assistive skills). This​‌ global framework is the​​ main research direction of​​​‌ the SHAARE associate team​ and will be our​‌ common baseline to share​​ different developments and control​​​‌ techniques. The joint works​ specifically aimed at augmenting​‌ robot assistive behavior in​​ haptic teleoperation by improving​​​‌ haptic guidance and by​ dynamically distributing the authority​‌ between the human-robot agents.​​

10.1.2 Visits to international​​​‌ teams

Research stays abroad​

Participants: Jacques Zhong.​‌

  • Visited institution:
    IRiS lab​​ - KAIST
  • Country:
    South​​​‌ Korea
  • Dates:
    September to​ November 2025
  • Context of​‌ the visit:
    In shared-control​​ approaches collaboration between humans​​​‌ and robots is done​ as combinations of their​‌ actions toward the goal,​​ weighted through a level​​​‌ of authority (more assistance​ or more human control).​‌ The associate team is​​ interested in how to​​​‌ distribute this authorithy level​ with respect to the​‌ interaction context, the task,​​ or other human factors.​​​‌ The research visit focused​ on developing and experimentally​‌ evaluating a new approach​​ for dynamic authority distribution,​​​‌ and was done in​ collaboration with Jee-Hwan Ryu​‌ (Full Professor @KAIST)
  • Mobility​​ program/type of mobility:
    Collaborative​​​‌ research visit - SHAARE​ associate team

Participants: Sebastien​‌ Kleff.

  • Visited institution:​​
    NYU, Columbia University
  • Country:​​
    USA
  • Dates:
    20th of​​​‌ April to 20th of‌ May
  • Context of the‌​‌ visit:
    The aim of​​ the visit was twofold:​​​‌ 1) pursue the collaboration‌ with Ludovic Righetti on‌​‌ force-feedback MPC and the​​ development of the associated​​​‌ software library 2) Discuss‌ about the tactile servoing‌​‌ topic together wit the​​ team of Matteo Ciocarlie.​​​‌
  • Mobility program/type of mobility:‌
    On-going collaboration with Ludovic‌​‌ Righetti at NYU and​​ initiation of a collaboration​​​‌ with Matteo Ciocarlie at‌ Columbia.

10.2 European initiatives‌​‌

10.2.1 Other european programs/initiatives​​

Assistance Generation Techniques for​​​‌ multipurpose robot

Participants: Vincent‌ Padois, Margot Vulliez‌​‌, Alexis Boulay,​​ Elio Jabbour.

This​​​‌ collaborative work with the‌ CEA LIST is part‌​‌ of the EUROfusion program,​​ and explores robotic teleoperation​​​‌ solutions to help in‌ the maintenance of the‌​‌ future DEMO fusion-energy power​​ plant. In the context​​​‌ of unplanned tasks, this‌ work intends to provide‌​‌ a set of assistive​​ generic tools and robot​​​‌ control solutions to help‌ the operator to overcome‌​‌ unexpected situations in maintenance​​ operations with a multipurpose​​​‌ robotic manipulator. User-interactive tools‌ should provide a way‌​‌ to the operator to​​ program remote handling tasks​​​‌ on the fly according‌ to the context, the‌​‌ type and geometry of​​ the equipment needing maintenance.​​​‌ Given the user-specified task,‌ predictive controllers aim at‌​‌ locally computing the robot​​ motion with respect to​​​‌ both the task trajectory‌ and the human input‌​‌ motion (from the teleoperation​​ device). Haptic feedback is​​​‌ generated to guide the‌ human on the planned‌​‌ trajectory.

Project in a​​ nutshell:

  • Consortium: CEA LIST,​​​‌ AUCTUS@Inria
  • Funding: EUROfusion
  • Budget‌ : 50 keuros for‌​‌ Auctus over the 2024-2025​​ period
  • Duration: 2024 -​​​‌

10.3 National initiatives

10.3.1‌ PEPR O2R - AS2,‌​‌ Robot motion with physical​​ interactions and social adaptation​​​‌

Participants: David Daney,‌ Vincent Padois, Margot‌​‌ Vulliez, Alicia Barsacq​​, Jean-Christophe Sarrazin.​​​‌

The objective of this‌ structuring action is to‌​‌ rethink the problem of​​ motion generation of robotic​​​‌ systems by addressing it‌ in its globality and‌​‌ by redefining the research​​ objectives in connection with​​​‌ the Human and Social‌ Sciences. It aims on‌​‌ the one hand to​​ develop technological solutions, innovative​​​‌ methods and software to‌ provide these new generation‌​‌ robots with advanced planning​​ and control capabilities of​​​‌ their movements and on‌ the other hand to‌​‌ guarantee that the motor​​ actions produced by these​​​‌ systems will be well‌ adapted to humans. These‌​‌ systems will have to​​ be able to interact​​​‌ physically with their environment‌ and with humans to‌​‌ perform a wide panel​​ of tasks ranging from​​​‌ agile locomotion to dexterous‌ manipulation through collaborative tasks.‌​‌ Among the key objectives​​ linked to these developments,​​​‌ these robots will have‌ to be able to‌​‌ anticipate their movements but​​ also to adapt them​​​‌ to react to unforeseen‌ events and to implement‌​‌ robust control strategies to​​ guarantee the successful execution​​​‌ of tasks and safety‌ for the human. The‌​‌ question of movement autonomy​​ of the machine and​​​‌ sharing of control during‌ collaborative tasks will also‌​‌ be essential with regard​​​‌ to applications and needs.​ In all cases, it​‌ will be necessary to​​ ensure the sustainability of​​​‌ the approaches developed with​ regard to environmental and​‌ societal challenges.

Project in​​ a nutshell:

  • Consortium: AUCTUS@Inria,​​​‌ Rainbow@inria, willow@inria, Onera, Lirmm,​ univ. Picardie, Cerca, Pprime​‌
  • Funding: France 2030 (PEPR​​ O2R)
  • Duration: 2024-2032

10.3.2​​​‌ PEPR Robotics : Dexterous​ Robotic Manipulation for Industry​‌

Participants: David Daney,​​ Vincent Padois, Margot​​​‌ Vulliez, Lucas Joseph​.

The PEPR Robotics​‌ program aims to develop​​ the foundations of high-performance,​​​‌ frugal, and responsible robotics​ to support societal and​‌ industrial transformations, by integrating​​ energy and environmental challenges​​​‌ while improving the productivity​ and sustainability of human​‌ activities. By accelerating research​​ from its earliest stages,​​​‌ the program seeks to​ develop a set of​‌ functional, software, and hardware​​ building blocks, enabling the​​​‌ emergence of innovative robotic​ systems or functions capable​‌ of delivering pre-maturation results​​ and fostering valorization within​​​‌ the strategic sectors targeted​ by France 2030.

Robotic​‌ manipulation capabilities are crucial​​ for industry but remain​​​‌ limited when dealing with​ complex, fragile, deformable, or​‌ size-varying objects. The DRMI​​ project aims to overcome​​​‌ these limitations by developing​ advanced manipulation solutions suited​‌ to constrained industrial environments.​​ It relies on the​​​‌ design of new versatile​ grippers integrating intelligent perception​‌ and adaptive control, capable​​ of continuously adjusting position,​​​‌ speed, force, and stiffness.​ The project revisits the​‌ entire design chain of​​ robotic manipulation systems, from​​​‌ mechanical structures to control​ algorithms. Aligned with a​‌ circular and frugal economy​​ approach, DRMI particularly targets​​​‌ recycling and remanufacturing applications,​ which require dexterous manipulation​‌ at multiple scales, from​​ millimeter-sized components to large​​​‌ objects.

Project in a​ nutshell:

  • Consortium: AUCTUS@Inria, Rainbow@Inria,​‌ LIRMM, PPRIME, CEA List,​​ ENSAM, Marie et Louis​​​‌ Pasteur Univ., Icube IMT​ Atlantique, Institut Pascal,
  • Funding:​‌ France 2030 (PEPR Robotique)​​
  • Duration: 2025-2032

10.3.3 ANR​​​‌ COURRIER, COopération hUmain Robot​ - Rôle des Intentions​‌ Exprimées par le Robot​​

Participants: Vincent Padois,​​​‌ Margot Vulliez, Lucas​ Joseph, Raphael Gerin​‌, Tianyi Jin,​​ Kloe Bonnet, Sebastien​​​‌ Kleff.

The COURRIER​ project addresses the challenge​‌ of safe and efficient​​ human-robot collaboration in industrial​​​‌ environments. While collaborative robots​ are increasingly deployed, their​‌ opacity and limited predictability​​ remain major barriers to​​​‌ effective coordination and safety.​ Rather than relying solely​‌ on isolation or fully​​ autonomous intelligence, COURRIER proposes​​​‌ a complementary approach that​ leverages the human operator's​‌ ability to anticipate and​​ coordinate with robotic systems,​​​‌ provided that their behavior​ and intentions are intelligible.​‌ Grounded in cognitive science​​ and theories of joint​​​‌ action, the project investigates​ how the readability of​‌ a robot's intentions—at strategic,​​ task-specific, and motor levels—affects​​​‌ its predictability and, in​ turn, human performance, cognitive​‌ load, learning, and trust.​​ COURRIER combines robotics, control,​​​‌ cognitive psychology, and neuroscience​ to identify the minimal​‌ information required for humans​​ to build accurate mental​​​‌ models of robotic behavior.​ The project develops both​‌ methods for communicating robot​​ intentions through motion and​​​‌ control strategies, and objective​ metrics to quantify the​‌ impact of predictability on​​ coordination quality and cognitive​​ cost. The methodology relies​​​‌ on controlled human-robot collaboration‌ experiments, centered on a‌​‌ shared object-sorting task using​​ a collaborative robotic arm.​​​‌ Performance, subjective measures (trust,‌ perceived control, usability), and‌​‌ physiological indicators (EEG, eye​​ tracking) are jointly analyzed.​​​‌ The project is structured‌ around five work packages‌​‌ covering coordination, intention communication,​​ expressive control, performance evaluation,​​​‌ and learning and trust.‌ Inria, through the Auctus‌​‌ team, contributes core expertise​​ in robot control, predictive​​​‌ and constrained motion generation,‌ and human-robot interaction. Auctus‌​‌ is responsible for the​​ design and implementation of​​​‌ control architectures enabling the‌ expression and communication of‌​‌ robot intentions, as well​​ as the experimental robotic​​​‌ platform and simulation tools.‌ The team plays a‌​‌ central role in bridging​​ control theory, experimental validation,​​​‌ and cognitive modeling, ensuring‌ strong integration between robotics‌​‌ developments and human-centered evaluation.​​

Project in a nutshell:​​​‌

  • Consortium: ICNA/Onera (coordinator -‌ Jean-Christophe Sarrazin), INCIA/CNRS, Mnemosyne/Inria,‌​‌ Auctus/Inria (PI: Vincent Padois​​ )
  • Funding: ANR (367​​​‌ 800 Euros for Inria)‌
  • Duration: 2024-2028

10.3.4 Défi‌​‌ Transfert robotique, GRIP4ALL

Participants:​​ David Daney, Vincent​​​‌ Padois, Margot Vulliez‌, Lucas Joseph,‌​‌ Alexis Boulay, Erwann​​ Landais, Loic Mazou​​​‌.

As companies adapt‌ to changes in the‌​‌ Factory of the Future,​​ they need to modernise​​​‌ their working environments, in‌ particular to improve logistics‌​‌ and transform industrial sites​​ into flexible spaces incorporating​​​‌ intelligent machines and shared‌ with human operators. The‌​‌ aim of the Grip4All​​ project is to make​​​‌ industry more competitive by‌ developing a new palletising‌​‌ cell adapted to the​​ severe constraints imposed on​​​‌ the logistics flow when‌ handling mixed products (of‌​‌ varying dimensions and weight)​​ and arranging them on​​​‌ a pallet, without having‌ to sort them manually‌​‌ upstream. This new type​​ of palletising meets a​​​‌ strong demand from a‌ number of sectors, notably‌​‌ mass distribution and the​​ food industry. It meets​​​‌ the demand for handling‌ heterogeneous products without imposing‌​‌ constraints on their packaging,​​ which significantly improves productivity​​​‌ and eliminates tedious human‌ tasks. No similar solution‌​‌ currently exists on the​​ market. The flexible robotics​​​‌ issues addressed will be‌ transposable to other logistics‌​‌ processes in the factory​​ of the future. Grip4All​​​‌ is proposing a logistics‌ line design that breaks‌​‌ with the state of​​ the art, where lines​​​‌ are usually built by‌ aggregating specialised cells: by‌​‌ their very nature, these​​ limit the possibilities for​​​‌ logistics to evolve and‌ adapt to a wide‌​‌ variety of products, and​​ therefore also their sustainability​​​‌ in a context of‌ sustainable development. The Grip4All‌​‌ approach is based on​​ the use of the​​​‌ technological building blocks of‌ robotics and new technologies‌​‌ in gripping, dynamic movement​​ planning, AI perception and​​​‌ scheduling. The palletising cell‌ is made flexible by‌​‌ using one or more​​ 'augmented' manipulator arms with​​​‌ adaptive grippers, and by‌ arranging and controlling the‌​‌ manipulator arms collaboratively in​​ a dynamic environment. The​​​‌ system is based on‌ a reactive and predictive‌​‌ control mode, as well​​ as perception and scheduling​​​‌ algorithms that detect heterogeneous‌ products and calculate their‌​‌ positioning according to their​​​‌ nature. The aim is​ to be able to​‌ handle a wide variety​​ of products on the​​​‌ same pallet in real​ time, with adaptive gripping​‌ capabilities compatible with a​​ wide range of products​​​‌ (weight, shape, nature, packaging),​ including two-arm gripping, and​‌ with vision-based detection and​​ perception capabilities coupled with​​​‌ dynamic generation of movements​ for gripping and depositing​‌ products on the pallet.​​ To meet this challenge,​​​‌ the project brings together​ 4 complementary partners: 2​‌ industrial partners and 2​​ academic partners. The Fives​​​‌ industrial group, through its​ subsidiary FIVES Syleps, world​‌ leader in computerised and​​ robotised mixed palletising, is​​​‌ seeking to stay ahead​ of its competitors and​‌ open up new markets.​​ Subcontracting industrial partner Kannon​​​‌ MSD specialises in vision-based​ perception. The INRIA teams​‌ will contribute their technological​​ building blocks in the​​​‌ form of software dedicated​ to reactive control in​‌ dynamic and human environments​​ by Auctus, and to​​​‌ product scheduling by the​ Edge team. RoBioSS, a​‌ leading team in the​​ development of high dexterity​​​‌ robotic hands and grippers,​ will contribute its mechatronic​‌ design bricks to increase​​ robot flexibility. To ensure​​​‌ that the solution is​ acceptable and that human​‌ factors are taken into​​ account, the consortium will​​​‌ be supported by the​ CERCA laboratory, which is​‌ working closely with the​​ RoBioSS team has been​​​‌ working on this subject​ for over ten years.​‌

Project in a nutshell:​​

  • Consortium: AUCTUS@Inria (coordinator -​​​‌ David Daney), RoBioSS@Pprime (CNRS),​ Syleps@Fives
  • Funding: France 2030​‌ (952 000 Euros for​​ Auctus)
  • Duration: 2024-2027

10.3.5​​​‌ Défi Transfert robotique, Extender​

Participants: Esteban Cosserat,​‌ Vincent Padois, Margot​​ Vulliez, Lucas Joseph​​​‌.

Project in a​ nutshell: The EXTENDER project​‌ aims to help wheelchair​​ users perform daily tasks​​​‌ using a robotic arm​ by developing solutions that​‌ adapt to diverse sensory-motor,​​ cognitive, and socio-economic profiles.​​​‌ The project follows a​ co-design approach involving robotics​‌ labs, the industrial partner​​ ORTHOPUS, end users, medical​​​‌ teams, and socio-anthropology researchers.​ EXTENDER targets the growing​‌ assistive technology market, leveraging​​ recent advances in robot​​​‌ control and human-robot interaction​ to improve safety, robustness,​‌ efficiency, and ease of​​ use. The project integrates​​​‌ multimodal interfaces—joysticks, touch, motion,​ eye tracking, voice, and​‌ AR—and evaluates solutions through​​ lab experiments, healthcare center​​​‌ trials, and international competitions​ (Cybathlon 2025-2026), complemented by​‌ socio-anthropological observations. Inria's Auctus​​ team leads the adaptation​​​‌ of advanced control and​ interaction methods, ensuring safety,​‌ intuitiveness, and robustness in​​ real-world use. They also​​​‌ contribute to evaluation, personalization,​ and technology transfer, bridging​‌ research and industrial deployment​​ alongside ORTHOPUS and clinical​​​‌ partners.

  • Consortium: ISIR/Sorbonne Université​ (coordinator: Guillaume Morel), Orthopus,​‌ AUCTUS@Inria (PI: Vincent Padois​​ ), LAAS/CNRS, ESEAN, Université​​​‌ de Clermont
  • Funding: France​ 2030 (324 000 Euros​‌ for Auctus)
  • Duration: 2024-2027​​

10.3.6 ANR ASAP-HRC, Autonomy​​​‌ for Shared Action and​ Perception in Human-Robot Collaboration​‌

Participants: Vincent Padois,​​ Margot Vulliez, Jacques​​​‌ Zhong, Elio Jabbour​, Benjamin Camblor,​‌ Remi Lafitte, Célestin​​ Préault, Cécile Scotto​​​‌.

This collaborative ANR​ project started in 2021​‌ between the AUCTUS team​​ at Inria, the RoBioSS​​ team at the Pprime​​​‌ Institute (CNRS), and the‌ CeRCA laboratory (CNRS). It‌​‌ aims at rethinking autonomy​​ for shared action and​​​‌ perception in Human-Robot Collaboration,‌ through transverse studies in‌​‌ robotics and cognitive sciences.​​ More particularly, three scientific​​​‌ axes must be addressed‌ to develop a human-centered‌​‌ and generic shared-autonomy framework:​​ 1) study key features​​​‌ of Human-Robot perception-action mechanisms‌ and identify multisensory integration‌​‌ processes involved in Human-Robot​​ interaction. These human studies​​​‌ should constitute the baseline‌ of robotic developments and‌​‌ shape the shared-autonomy scheme;​​ 2) develop a shared​​​‌ perception between the different‌ actors (humans and collaborative‌​‌ robots),according to their sensory​​ data and involvement in​​​‌ the task. This shared‌ perception will be based‌​‌ on a multimodal (haptic,​​ visual) feedback mixture conveying​​​‌ information about the task,‌ the environment, and the‌​‌ collaborators; 3) combine Human-Robot​​ commands into a joint​​​‌ action toward the task‌ goal. The human inputs‌​‌ will first be used​​ to infer the operator​​​‌ intent and adapt the‌ robot behavior. Then, the‌​‌ shared action will combine​​ robot skills and human​​​‌ commands into a unified‌ and consistent control objective.‌​‌

Project in a nutshell:​​

  • Consortium: AUCTUS@Inria (coordinator -​​​‌ Margot Vulliez), RoBioSS@Pprime (CNRS),‌ Interactions@CeRCA (CNRS)
  • Funding: ANR‌​‌ Funding (287 840 Euros)​​
  • Duration: 2021-2026

10.3.7 LAAS-AUCTUS​​​‌ collaborations

Participants: Thomas Flayols‌, Nicolas Mansard,‌​‌ Vincent Bonnet, Virgile​​ Batto, Margot Vulliez​​​‌, David Daney.‌

We have built a‌​‌ close scientific relationship with​​ the Gepetto team at​​​‌ LAAS CNRS (Toulouse) these‌ past few years, through‌​‌ several collaborative projects:

Legged-robot​​ codesign (2022-2025): This PhD​​​‌ project aimed at developing‌ a generic codesign approach‌​‌ to cover the hardware​​ specification and dimensioning and​​​‌ the control strategy and‌ requirements at once. We‌​‌ proposed to leverage mastered​​ AI-based methods (simulation, planning,​​​‌ optimization) to guide the‌ mechatronic design cycles and‌​‌ to provide tools to​​ assist designers. The transversal​​​‌ approach was applied to‌ the design and prototyping‌​‌ of BIPETTO a new​​ parallel-actuated kid-size legged robot.​​​‌ Inverse Optimal Control: A‌ collaboration on Inverse Optimal‌​‌ Control problem has started​​ in pursuit of the​​​‌ results obtained previously.

Project‌ in a nutshell:

  • Consortium:‌​‌ AUCTUS@Inria, GEPETTO@LAAS (CNRS)
  • Funding:​​ None
  • Duration: 2021-Ongoing

10.3.8​​​‌ National visits to the‌ team

  • Ludovic de Mattéis,‌​‌ LAAS-CNRS, PhD Student, Toulouse,​​ gave on April 28th​​​‌ 2025 a presentation on‌ "Optimal control of walkers‌​‌ with parallel actuation."

10.4​​ Regional initiatives

10.4.1 AAPR​​​‌ Perception-HRI, Improving perceptual information‌ in human-robot interaction

Participants:‌​‌ Margot Vulliez, Benjamin​​ Camblor, Remi Lafitte​​​‌, Cécile Scotto.‌

This regional project completes‌​‌ the ASAP-HRC ANR objectives​​ with additional cognitive studies​​​‌ to improve the exchange‌ of perceptive information during‌​‌ Human-Robot interactions. Such an​​ exchange of information between​​​‌ the agents is required‌ to communicate and coordinate‌​‌ together. We particularly focus​​ on visual and haptic​​​‌ feedbacks, related to the‌ task, the context, or‌​‌ the robot assistance, and​​ given through a teleoperation​​​‌ device to perform an‌ industrial task. Only a‌​‌ fine analysis and modeling​​ of the human multisensory​​​‌ perception and integration processes‌ can provide practical guidelines‌​‌ to determine the optimal​​​‌ mixture of feedbacks to​ implement in the human-robot​‌ interface. The project therefore​​ aims at developing personalized​​​‌ mathematical models of the​ perceptive and sensorimotor integration​‌ of visuo-haptic informations, in​​ interaction scenarios with a​​​‌ robot. We additionally investigate​ how different haptic guidance​‌ can be perceived by​​ a user, particularly studying​​​‌ the effect of legibility​ and predictability of a​‌ guidance path on performances,​​ comfort or trust in​​​‌ the assistance.

Project in​ a nutshell:

  • Consortium: AUCTUS@Inria​‌ (coordinator - Margot Vulliez),​​ RoBioSS@Pprime (CNRS), Interactions@CeRCA (CNRS)​​​‌
  • Funding: Région Nouvelle Aquitaine​
  • Duration: 2022-2025

11 Dissemination​‌

11.1 Promoting scientific activities​​

11.1.1 Scientific events: organisation​​​‌

General chair, scientific chair​
  • Margot Vulliez was Studio​‌ chair for the ACM​​ International Conference on Tangible,​​​‌ Embedded and Embodied Interaction,​ TEI 2025, Inria -​‌ CNRS - Université de​​ Bordeaux
  • Jean-Marc Salotti was​​​‌ the general chair of​ the European Mars Conference​‌ (EMC 2025), which was​​ held in Paris on​​​‌ 28–29 November 2025.
  • Pierre​ Puchaud led organization of​‌ the Webinar of R4-Robotique​​ since September 2025, 7​​​‌ webinars with high-quality national​ and international presenters, weekly-based​‌ online seminars. R4 site​​
Member of the organizing​​​‌ committees
  • Margot Vulliez co-organized​ the thematic session "Mechanical​‌ Design and Deformable Robotics"​​ at JNRR 2025

11.1.2​​​‌ Scientific events: selection

Member​ of the conference program​‌ committees
  • Vincent Padois is​​ associate editor for the​​​‌ IEEE International Conference on​ Robotics and Automation ICRA.​‌
Reviewer

List of conferences​​ for which Auctus members​​​‌ have review activities:

  • 2025​ IEEE International Conference on​‌ Robotics and Automation ICRA​​
  • 2025 IEEE/RSJ International Conference​​​‌ on Intelligent Robots and​ Systems IROS
  • 2025 Congrès​‌ annuel de la société​​ de biomécanique

11.1.3 Journal​​​‌

Reviewer - reviewing activities​

List of journals for​‌ which Auctus members have​​ review activities:

  • IEEE Transactions​​​‌ on Robotics
  • IEEE Robotics​ and Automation Letters
  • International​‌ Journal of Robotics Research​​
  • Mechanism and Machine Theory​​​‌
  • IEEE Transcations on Haptics​
  • Journal of Mechanisms and​‌ Robotics
  • International Journal of​​ Social Robotics
  • Journal of​​​‌ Field Robotics
  • IEEE Transactions​ on Biomedical Engineering
  • International​‌ Journal for Numerical Methods​​ in Biomedical Engineering

11.1.4​​​‌ Invited talks

  • Margot Vulliez​ : Joint GDR day,​‌ GDR Robotique and GDR​​ IHM, November. Toward human-centered​​​‌ haptic design.
  • Marot Vulliez​ , Alexis Boulay ,​‌ Elio Jabbour : GDR​​ day on Shared Control,​​​‌ TS4 Humans and Robots,​ January. Unified methodologies for​‌ adaptive shared control and​​ haptic guidance.
  • Alicia Barsacq​​​‌ : JNRR, Rennes, 30​ September, nvolvement of Predictive​‌ Mechanisms in Human-Robot Joint​​ Action: the Lens of​​​‌ Agency.
  • Sebastien Kleff :​ LAAS, Gepetto Team, Toulouse,​‌ May. From force-feedback MPC​​ to tactile servoing.
  • Sebastien​​​‌ Kleff : LIRMM, IDH​ Team, Montpellier, December. From​‌ force-feedback MPC to tactile​​ servoing.
  • Sebastien Kleff :​​​‌ CRISTAL, DEFROST Team, Lille,​ December. From force-feedback MPC​‌ to tactile servoing.
  • Jacques​​ Zhong : IRiS lab,​​​‌ KAIST, Daejeon (South Korea),​ October. Adapting robotic systems​‌ to humans through dynamic​​ shared control and multi-morphological​​​‌ simulation of virtual humans.​
  • Vincent Padois : Nov​‌ 2025 Invited seminar at​​ Longlab, Atlantic Technological University​​​‌ of Galway: Getting the​ Human in the control​‌ loop of the collaborative​​ robot (and vice-versa). Organizer:​​ Prof. Philip Long (ATU).​​​‌ Galway, Ireland
  • Vincent Padois‌ : Oct 2025 Invited‌​‌ seminar at the JNRR​​ workshop session (Journées Nationales​​​‌ de la Recherche en‌ Robotique): Getting the Human‌​‌ in the control loop​​ of the collaborative robot​​​‌ (and vice-versa). Organizer: Dr.‌ Claudio Pachierotti (CNRS). Rennes,‌​‌ France

11.1.5 Leadership within​​ the scientific community

  • Margot​​​‌ Vulliez is co-coordinator of‌ the Support Action "Hardware"‌​‌ of the PEPR Robotics​​ Acceleration together with Abderrahmane​​​‌ Kheddar (LIRMM) and Olivier‌ Ly (Labri Rhoban).
  • Pierre‌​‌ Puchaud is part of​​ the biomechanics groups within​​​‌ INRIA, responsible for software‌
  • Pierre Puchaud is in‌​‌ charge of the Bioptim​​ library: Maintainer, conducting weekly​​​‌ development reviews to guarantee‌ software robustness.
  • Vincent Padois‌​‌ : Leader of the​​ advisory committee for the​​​‌ creation of a University‌ Hub for Advanced Robotics‌​‌ Sciences (PULSAR) under the​​ SIN department of the​​​‌ University of Bordeaux.
  • Vincent‌ Padois member of the‌​‌ GDR Robotics thesis award​​ committee.
  • Vincent Padois Representative​​​‌ of the Inria program‌ agency and member of‌​‌ the creation committee of​​ the PEPR “Accélération Robotique”.​​​‌
  • Vincent Padois Co-leader of‌ the Priority Axis 1‌​‌ “Robotique et Sobriété” of​​ the GDR Robotics.
  • David​​​‌ Daney is a member‌ of the Scientific Council‌​‌ of the GDR Robotics,​​ the main organization for​​​‌ robotics researchers in France.‌
  • David Daney David participates‌​‌ in the Inria Master​​ Class.

11.1.6 Scientific expertise​​​‌

  • David Daney is a‌ member of the executive‌​‌ board of the "Aquitaine​​ robotics" cluster, which brings​​​‌ together robotics players in‌ Nouvelle-Aquitaine.
  • David Daney represents‌​‌ Inria on the board​​ of directors the "Aquitaine​​​‌ robotics" cluster.
  • David Daney‌ is the coordinator of‌​‌ 2 working groups (GT)​​ on the evaluation and​​​‌ on the creation of‌ 2 Inria Projet-Teams for‌​‌ the Inria Evaluation Committee.​​
  • Jean-Marc Salotti represents Ensc​​​‌ on the board of‌ directors of the "Aquitaine‌​‌ robotics" cluster.
  • Margot Vulliez​​ was external reviewer for​​​‌ the evaluation of a‌ research proposal at the‌​‌ Swiss National Science Foundation​​ SNSF, 2025
  • Vincent Padois​​​‌ was external reviewe for‌ the UP-SQUARED research call,‌​‌ PIA4 ExcellenceS Univ. Poitiers.​​
  • Jean-Marc Salotti was a​​​‌ scientific advisor for the‌ Cap Sciences exhibition dedicated‌​‌ to the exploration of​​ the Moon.

11.1.7 Research​​​‌ administration

  • David Daney is‌ the Head of Science‌​‌ at Inria centre at​​ the University of Bordeaux​​​‌
  • David Daney is a‌ member of of the‌​‌ Inria Evaluation Committee.
  • David​​ Daney is a member​​​‌ of the France 2030‌ Robotics Committee.
  • David Daney‌​‌ is member of the​​ "Commission des Emplois de​​​‌ Recherche" for the Inria‌ centre at the University‌​‌ of Bordeaux.
  • David Daney​​ is member of the​​​‌ "Comité de Centre" of‌ the Inria centre at‌​‌ the University of Bordeaux.​​
  • David Daney is a​​​‌ member of the executive‌ board of R4, a‌​‌ regional robotics network involving​​ 12 research entities in​​​‌ the region of Nouvelle-Aquitaine,‌ France.
  • David Daney is‌​‌ the principal investigator of​​ DTR Grip4All ANR/France 2030​​​‌
  • David Daney is the‌ co-investigator of Topic Priority‌​‌ DRMI within the PEPR​​ Robotics
  • Margot Vulliez is​​​‌ member of the "Commission‌ des Emplois de Recherche"‌​‌ for Inria centre at​​​‌ the University of Bordeaux,​ since January 2024.
  • Pierre​‌ Puchaud is member of​​ the CUMI (Communauté des​​​‌ Utilisateurs des Moyens Informatiques):​ Representative for the Auctus​‌ team at the INRIA​​ Bordeaux center.
  • Vincent Padois​​​‌ is president of the​ Technological Developments Commission (CDT)​‌ at Inria Bordeaux.

11.2​​ Teaching - Supervision -​​​‌ Juries - Educational and​ pedagogical outreach

  • Licence: Margot​‌ Vulliez , Mechanical Design,​​ 24h éqTD, L1, BUT​​​‌ GMP, IUT of Bordeaux,​ France.
  • Licence: Margot Vulliez​‌ , Design Projects, 13h​​ éqTD, L2, BUT GMP,​​​‌ IUT of Bordeaux, France​
  • Licence: Benjamin Camblor ,​‌ Facteurs humains et Ergonomie,​​ L3 Mathématiques et Informatiques​​​‌ Appliquées aux Sciences Humaines​ et Sociales (MIASHS), Université​‌ de Bordeaux
  • Licence: Alicia​​ Barsacq , Structures arborescentes,​​​‌ 46h eqTD, L3, Enseirb,​ Bordeaux INP
  • Master: Benjamin​‌ Camblor , Facteurs humains​​ et interactions homme/machine, M1​​​‌ Sciences cognitives et Ergonomie,​ Université de Bordeaux
  • Master:​‌ Alexis Boulay , ROS​​ 2 Introduction 10heq TD,​​​‌ M2, Enseirb
  • Master: Alexis​ Boulay , Robotic Introduction​‌ 14.25heq TD, M2, Bordeaux​​ University
  • Master: Lucas Joseph​​​‌ , ROS 2 Introduction​ 20heq TD, M2, Enseirb​‌
  • Master: Lucas Joseph ,​​ Projet robotique 16heq TD,​​​‌ M2, CESI
  • Master: Jacques​ Zhong , Tutoring and​‌ jury member for IT​​ projects, ENSC
  • Master: Vincent​​​‌ Padois , INP Bordeaux,​ ENSEIRB-MATMECA (30 eqTD hours)​‌ — 3rd year robotics​​ option: responsible for robotics​​​‌ project UE and bibliographic​ research course initiated at​‌ my arrival in Bordeaux.​​
  • Master: Vincent Padois ,​​​‌ INP Bordeaux, ENSPIMA (25​ eqTD hours) — 3rd​‌ year: UE “Collaborative Robotics​​ and Gesture Assistance”
  • Master:​​​‌ Vincent Padois , University​ of Bordeaux, Master in​‌ Mechanical Engineering (3 eqTD​​ hours) — Introduction to​​​‌ industrial robotics in a​ process engineering UE, M1.​‌
  • Master: David Daney ,​​ Interactions Humains Robots, 6h​​​‌ eqTD, M2, Ecole Nationale​ Supérieure de Cognitique /​‌ Bordeaux INP, France.
  • Master:​​ David Daney , Numerical​​​‌ Methods for Robotics, 22h​ eqTD, M2, Enseirb/Ensc, Bordeaux​‌ INP, France.
  • Master: David​​ Daney , oral expression,​​​‌ 6h eqTD, M2, Enseirb/Ensc,​ Bordeaux INP, France.

11.2.1​‌ Supervision

PhD in progress​​
  • Ahmed-Manaf Dahmani (Inria), "Robust​​​‌ inverse optimal control for​ human motion analysis", funding:​‌ Inria, December 2023-, David​​ Daney , François Charpillet​​​‌ (Inria Nancy)
  • Alicia Barsacq​ (Inria), "Etude des méthodes​‌ de feedback pour une​​ interaction homme/robot agentive", funding:​​​‌ PEPR O2R, September 2024​ - , David Daney​‌ , Jean-Christophe Sarrazin (Onera)​​
  • Kevin Co , "Commande​​​‌ optimale pilotée par stimulation​ électrique fonctionnelle et modélisation​‌ de la fatigue.", ,​​ August 2022 -, Mickael​​​‌ Begon (Udem EKSAP), Florent​ Moissenet (a Kinesiology Laboratory​‌ and Biomechanics Laboratory, Geneva​​ University Hospitals and University​​​‌ of Geneva, Geneva,Switzerland), Pierre​ Puchaud
  • Tianyi Jin ,​‌ "Modular Model Predictive Control​​ Architecture for Human-Robot Collaboration",​​​‌ funding: ANR COURRIER, October​ 2025-, Vincent Padois, Sébastien​‌ Kleff. Modular Model Predictive​​ Control Architecture for Human-Robot​​​‌ Collaboration. Tianyi joined the​ summer school on Robust​‌ Model Predictive Control with​​ CasADi held by University​​​‌ Freiburg in Sept 2025​ as a prior to​‌ his PhD.
PhD defended​​
  • Alexis Boulay (Farm3, Cifre),​​​‌ "Assister l'humain par un​ guidage haptique adaptable, application​‌ à l'agriculture verticale téléopérée",​​ September 2025, David Daney​​ and Margot Vulliez
  • Virgile​​​‌ Batto (CNRS), "Systematic optimization‌ of bipedal leg architectures:‌​‌ from foot-centric performance metrics​​ to automated design", October​​​‌ 2025, Nicolas Mansard (LAAS-CNRS),‌ Thomas Flayols (LAAS-CNRS) and‌​‌ Margot Vulliez
  • Elio Jabbour​​ (Inria), "Shared-autonomy control for​​​‌ improving Human-Robot collaborarion in‌ haptic teleoperation", funding: ANR‌​‌ ASAP-HRC, November 2025, Margot​​ Vulliez , Célestin Préault​​​‌ (CESI) and Vincent Padois‌
  • Marc Duclusaud (Université de‌​‌ Bordeaux, Rhoban), "Approches modélisatoires​​ et apprentissage par renforcement​​​‌ pour la locomotion robuste‌ et autonome des robots‌​‌ humanoïdes en contextes dynamiques",​​ funding: RobSys, December 2025,​​​‌ Olivier Ly (Université de‌ Bordeaux), Grégoire Passault (Université‌​‌ de Bordeaux), Vincent Padois​​
Masters and Final Year​​​‌ Projects
  • Kloé Bonnet ,‌ 6 months Master 2‌​‌ internship on scenario-based Model-Predictive​​ Control for robust human-robot​​​‌ collaboration. Sebastien Kleff ,‌Vincent Padois
  • Khouloud Hamrouni‌​‌ , 6 months Master​​ 2 internship on setting​​​‌ up a robotics experimentation‌ platform. Lucas Joseph
  • Hoang-Vy‌​‌ Nguyen , 2 months​​ Master 1 internship in​​​‌ Cognitive Sciences on setting‌ up a user experiment‌​‌ about haptic guidance legibility/predictibility.​​ Benjamin Camblor
  • In the​​​‌ context of the exchange‌ program between Karunya University‌​‌ (India) and ENSC-Bordeaux INP,​​ Jean-Marc Salotti supervised the​​​‌ 2 months Internship of‌ 5 ENSC students, which‌​‌ were related to the​​ robotics domain.

11.2.2 Juries​​​‌

PhD
  • Margot Vulliez :‌ Sonia-Laure Hadj Sassi, Reviewer,‌​‌ Modèle Biomécanique pour l'amélioration​​ et la sécurisation de​​​‌ l'intéraction humain-robot, Université de‌ Toulouse, 2025/12/09
  • David Daney‌​‌ : Verlein Radwin, Reviewer,​​ Set-Membership Methods for the​​​‌ Registration Problem in Exploration‌ Robotics, Université de Montpellier,‌​‌ 2025/12/11
  • Vincent Padois :​​ Pierre La Rocca, President​​​‌ of the jury, Modélisation‌ conséquentielle et territoriale de‌​‌ l'empreinte carbone d'équipements numériques​​ pour l'agriculture et du​​​‌ réseau mobile associé, Université‌ de Bordeaux, 2025/12/15
  • Vincent‌​‌ Padois : M. Manzano,​​ President of the jury,​​​‌ Contributions à l'ergonomie et‌ aux stratégies de commande‌​‌ des exosquelettes de suppléance​​ du membre supérieur, Insa​​​‌ de Rennes, 2025/12/04
  • Vincent‌ Padois : M. Bamaarouf,‌​‌ President of the jury,​​ Development of a robotic​​​‌ system for assisting with‌ ultrasound examinations: Contact management,‌​‌ Université de Clermont, 2025/11/21​​
HDR
  • Vincent Padois :​​​‌ V. Bonnet, Reviewer, Capturing,‌ modeling and understanding human‌​‌ dynamics for assistive robotics,​​ Université de Toulouse, 2025/06/10​​​‌
Recruitment
  • Margot Vulliez participated‌ in recruitment jury MCF‌​‌ in Robotics, section 61,​​ Université de Technologie de​​​‌ Tarbes UTTOP, LGP, 2025‌
  • Margot Vulliez participated in‌​‌ recruitment jury MCF in​​ Robotics, section 61, Université​​​‌ de Toulon SeaTech, COSMER,‌ 2025
  • Margot Vulliez participated‌​‌ in recruitment jury MCF​​ in Robotics, section 60-61,​​​‌ Sorbonne Université, ISIR, 2025‌
  • Vincent Padois : President‌​‌ of the selection committee​​ for Associate Professor recruitment​​​‌ MCF61, position 250829 at‌ UTTOP (Tarbes)
  • Vincent Padois‌​‌ : Member of the​​ jury for the Inria​​​‌ Research Scientist (CR) competitive‌ recruitment, Bordeaux center
  • David‌​‌ Daney : Vice-President of​​ the jury for the​​​‌ Inria Research Scientist (CR)‌ competitive recruitment, Bordeaux center‌​‌
  • David Daney : Member​​ of the jury for​​​‌ the Senior Inria Research‌ Scientist (DR) competitive recruitment,‌​‌ Bordeaux center

11.2.3 Educational​​ and pedagogical outreach

  • As​​​‌ part of the "Fête‌ de la Science" week,‌​‌ Jean-Marc Salotti offered about​​​‌ thirty high school students​ a robotics game designed​‌ to help them better​​ understand the degrees of​​​‌ freedom of a robotic​ arm.

11.3 Popularization

11.3.1​‌ Specific official responsibilities in​​ science outreach structures

  • Vincent​​​‌ Padois : Assigned to​ scientific mediation for Inria​‌ Bordeaux and member of​​ the steering committee of​​​‌ the Aquitaine external scientific​ circuit

11.3.2 Productions (articles,​‌ videos, podcasts, serious games,​​ ...)

  • Jean-Marc Salotti took​​​‌ part in a video​ on the Curieux YouTube​‌ channel as part of​​ the presentation of the​​​‌ Cap Sciences exhibition dedicated​ to the exploration of​‌ the Moon. Youtube video​​
  • Margot Vulliez was interviewed​​​‌ for the content of​ Cap.Sciences workshop "Les Femmes​‌ Scientifiques" on Sciences.live, September​​ 2025
  • Margot Vulliez was​​​‌ interviewed for the Inria​ portrait series « Elles​‌ font le numérique »,​​ June 2025
  • Pierre Puchaud​​​‌ was speaker at the​ INRIA Diggest seminar, "Un​‌ parcours en Biomécanique pour​​ rejoindre Auctus", July 2025​​​‌

11.3.3 Participation in Live​ events

Festival sciences tout​‌ court(s)

26 interventions in​​ 13 primary schools about​​​‌ robotics, in the context​ of a young-audience festival​‌ for scientific documentary films​​ with the Bordeaux Academy,​​​‌ May 2025

  • Vincent Padois​ , Ecole de Saint-Laurent-Médoc​‌
  • Vincent Padois , Ecole​​ Mousset Pauillac
  • Vincent Padois​​​‌ , Ecole Jean de​ La Fontaine Gujan Mestras​‌
  • Vincent Padois Ecole Le​​ Delta Le Teich
  • Jacques​​​‌ Zhong , Ecole Jules​ Ferry Pessac
  • Sebastien Kleff​‌ , Ecole Ferdinand Buisson​​ Bègles
  • Sebastien Kleff ,​​​‌ Ecole Pasteur Carbon Blanc​
  • Margot Vulliez , Ecole​‌ de Macau
  • Margot Vulliez​​ , Ecole Pablo Picasso​​​‌ Moulis-en-Médoc
  • Margot Vulliez ,​ Ecole de Saint-Savin
  • Margot​‌ Vulliez , Ecole de​​ Générac
  • Lucas Joseph ,​​​‌ Ecole l'Aygue Marine Ayguemorte​ les Graves
  • Lucas Joseph​‌ , Ecole Jean de​​ La Fontaine Martignas sur​​​‌ Jalles
Un scientifique une​ classe – Chiche !​‌

Seminars to raise general​​ awareness of science and​​​‌ research careers for high​ school student secondary students​‌

  • Margot Vulliez, Lycée Maine​​ de Biran, Bergerac (24),​​​‌ February 2025
  • Vincent Padois,​ Lycée de Parentis-en-Born (40),​‌ January 2025
  • Alicia Barsacq,​​ Lycée polyvalent Gustave Eiffel,​​​‌ Bordeaux (33), December 2025​
Classe transplantée Robot -​‌ CapScience / Les petits​​ aventuriers du Numérique

Presentation​​​‌ of robotic research to​ primary school students

  • Jacques​‌ Zhong , CapScience, Côté​​ Sciences Air&Espace, Mérignac, February​​​‌ 2025
  • Sebastien Kleff ,​ CapScience, Côté Sciences Air&Espace,​‌ Mérignac, February 2025
  • Lucas​​ Joseph , CapScience, Côté​​​‌ Sciences Floirac, October 2025​
  • Vincent Padois , CapScience,​‌ Côté Sciences Floirac, Februrary​​ and October 2025
  • Margot​​​‌ Vulliez , Ecole Louise​ Michel, Bordeaux, November 2025​‌
  • Lucas Joseph , Ecole​​ Albert Schweitzer, Bordeaux, November​​​‌ 2025
Fête de la​ Science
  • Sebastien Kleff and​‌ Margot Vulliez , Hand-on​​ workshop to discover robotics,​​​‌ High-school students, "Mouvement de​ robots, comment construire un​‌ robot pour faire une​​ tâche ?", Circuit Sciences​​​‌ du Numérique en Nouvelle-Aquitaine,​ Aiguillon (47) and Terrasson​‌ (24), October 2025
Journée​​ des enseignants et enseignantes​​​‌ de NSI-SNT
  • Margot Vulliez​ , Talk about robotics​‌ research and possible applications​​ in high-school teachings, Inria​​​‌ Bordeaux research center, February​ 2025.

12 Scientific production​‌

12.1 Major publications

12.2​​ Publications of the year​​​‌

International journals

International peer-reviewed conferences

  • 11‌​‌ inproceedingsM.Marc Duclusaud​​, G.Grégoire Passault​​​‌, V.Vincent Padois‌ and O.Olivier Ly‌​‌. Extended Friction Models​​ for the Physics Simulation​​​‌ of Servo Actuators.‌ICRA 2025 - IEEE/RAS‌​‌ International Conference on Robotics​​​‌ and AutomationAtlanta, United​ States2025HALback​‌ to text
  • 12 inproceedings​​J.-M.Jean-Marc Salotti.​​​‌ Qualitative Analysis of Mars​ Entry and Descent Options​‌ for Manned Missions.​​Proceedings of the 11th​​​‌ European Conference for AeroSpace​ SciencesEUCASS 2025 -​‌ 11th European Conference for​​ AeroSpace SciencesRome, Italy​​​‌June 2025, 2797-2804​HAL

Edition (books, proceedings,​‌ special issue of a​​ journal)

  • 13 proceedingsJ.-M.​​​‌Jean-Marc Salotti, eds.​ Proceedings of the 2025​‌ European Mars Conference, EMC2025​​.EMC 2025 -​​​‌ European Mars ConferenceParis,​ FranceNovember 2025HAL​‌

Doctoral dissertations and habilitation​​ theses

  • 14 thesisA.​​​‌Alexis Boulay. Assisting​ humans through adaptive haptic​‌ guidance, application to remote-controlled​​ vertical farming.Université​​​‌ de BordeauxSeptember 2025​HALback to text​‌
  • 15 thesisE.Elio​​ Jabbour. Shared-autonomy control​​​‌ for improving Human-Robot collaboration​ in haptic teleoperation.​‌Université de BordeauxNovember​​ 2025HAL

Reports &​​​‌ preprints

Other scientific publications

  • 20​‌ inproceedingsA.Alicia Barsacq​​, D.David Daney​​​‌ and J.-C.Jean-Christophe Sarrazin​. Involvement of Predictive​‌ Mechanisms in Human-Robot Joint​​ Action: the Lens of​​​‌ Agency.JJCR 2025​ - Journée des Jeunes​‌ Chercheuses et Jeunes Chercheurs​​ en RobotiqueRennes, France​​​‌September 2025HAL
  • 21​ inproceedingsA.Alexis Boulay​‌ and R.Romain Schmitt​​. Toward a human-centered​​​‌ haptic guidance.Journée​ TS4 du GdR Robotique​‌Paris, FranceJanuary 2025​​HAL
  • 22 inproceedingsR.​​​‌Rémi Lafitte, M.​Margot Vulliez and C.​‌Cécile Scotto. Ambiguous​​ visuo-haptic integration in a​​​‌ teleoperation environment.IMRF​ 2025 - 23rd International​‌ Multisensory Research ForumDurham​​ (GB), United KingdomJuly​​​‌ 2025HALback to​ text

12.3 Cited publications​‌

  • 23 bookJ.Jack​​ Bernon, E.Evelyne​​​‌ Escriva and J. M.​Jean Michel Schweitzer.​‌ Agir sur la prévention​​ durable des TMS.​​​‌Anact2011back to​ text
  • 24 bookP.​‌Philippe Douillet. Agir​​ sur Prévenir les risques​​​‌ psychosociaux.Anact2013​back to text
  • 25​‌ articleA.Alexis Boulay​​, B.Benjamin Camblor​​​‌, M.Margot Vulliez​ and D.David Daney​‌. A new unified​​ and adaptive haptic guidance​​ method, an exploratory user​​​‌ study.2024back‌ to text
  • 26 article‌​‌F.Frédérique Bunlon,​​ J.-P.Jean-Pierre Gazeau,​​​‌ F.Floren Colloud,‌ P. J.Peter J‌​‌ Marshall and C. A.​​Cédric A Bouquet.​​​‌ Joint action with a‌ virtual robotic vs. human‌​‌ agent.Cognitive Systems​​ Research522018,​​​‌ 816--827back to text‌
  • 27 inproceedingsB.Benjamin‌​‌ Camblor, N.Nassim​​ Benhabib, D.David​​​‌ Daney, V.Vincent‌ Padois and J.-M.Jean-Marc‌​‌ Salotti. Task-Consistent Signaling​​ Motions for Improved Understanding​​​‌ in Human-Robot Interaction and‌ Workspace Sharing.ACM/IEEE‌​‌ International Conference on Human-Robot​​ InteractionMarch 2022HAL​​​‌back to text
  • 28‌ articleM. R.Mica‌​‌ R Endsley. Measurement​​ of situation awareness in​​​‌ dynamic systems.Human‌ factors3711995‌​‌, 65--84back to​​ text
  • 29 articleM.​​​‌ O.Marc O Ernst‌ and M. S.Martin‌​‌ S Banks. Humans​​ integrate visual and haptic​​​‌ information in a statistically‌ optimal fashion.Nature‌​‌41568702002,​​ 429--433back to text​​​‌
  • 30 incollectionS.S.‌ Haddadin and E.E.‌​‌ Croft. Physical Human-Robot​​ Interaction.Handbook of​​​‌ RoboticsSpringer Verlag2016‌, 1835--1874back to‌​‌ text
  • 31 articleS.​​Sue Hignett and L.​​​‌Lynn McAtamney. Rapid‌ Entire Body Assessment (REBA)‌​‌.Applied Ergonomics31​​2April 2000,​​​‌ 201--205URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687099000393DOI‌back to text
  • 32‌​‌ articleJ.Julien Jacquier-Bret​​, P.Philippe Gorce​​​‌, G.Genaro Motti‌ Lilian and N.Nadine‌​‌ Vigouroux. Biomechanical analysis​​ of upper limb during​​​‌ the use of touch‌ screen: motion strategies identification‌​‌.Ergonomics603​​March 2017, 358--365​​​‌URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1175671DOIback‌ to text
  • 33 inproceedings‌​‌L.L. Joseph,​​ V.V. Padois and​​​‌ G.G. Morel.‌ Towards X-ray medical imaging‌​‌ with robots in the​​ open: safety without compromising​​​‌ performances.Proceedings of‌ the IEEE International Conference‌​‌ on Robotics and Automation​​Brisbane, AustraliaMay 2018​​​‌, 6604--6610URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01614508/en‌DOIback to text‌​‌
  • 34 articleO.Osmo​​ Karhu, P.Pekka​​​‌ Kansi and I.Iikka‌ Kuorinka. Correcting working‌​‌ postures in industry: A​​ practical method for analysis​​​‌.Applied Ergonomics8‌4December 1977,‌​‌ 199--201URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003687077901648DOI​​back to text
  • 35​​​‌ articleD.Dohyung Kee‌ and W.Waldemar Karwowski‌​‌. LUBA: an assessment​​ technique for postural loading​​​‌ on the upper body‌ based on joint motion‌​‌ discomfort and maximum holding​​ time.Applied Ergonomics​​​‌324August 2001‌, 357--366URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687001000060‌​‌DOIback to text​​
  • 36 phdthesisX.X.​​​‌ Lamy. Conception d'une‌ Interface de Pilotage d'un‌​‌ Cobot.Université Pierre​​ et Marie Curie -​​​‌ Paris VIMarch 2011‌back to text
  • 37‌​‌ phdthesisE.Erwann Landais​​. La téléopération comme​​​‌ moyen d'expression à distance‌ du geste technique :‌​‌ application à la formulation​​ en chimie.Université​​​‌ de BordeauxDecember 2024‌HALback to text‌​‌
  • 38 articleM.Mingxing​​ Liu, Y.Yang​​​‌ Tan and V.Vincent‌ Padois. Generalized hierarchical‌​‌ control.Autonomous Robots​​​‌4012016,​ 17--31back to text​‌
  • 39 articleS. E.​​Svend Erik Mathiassen.​​​‌ Diversity and variation in​ biomechanical exposure: What is​‌ it, and why would​​ we like to know?​​​‌Applied Ergonomics374​Special Issue: Meeting Diversity​‌ in Ergonomics2006,​​ 419-427URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687006000482DOI​​​‌back to text
  • 40​ articleL.Lynn McAtamney​‌ and E. N.E​​ Nigel Corlett. RULA:​​​‌ a survey method for​ the investigation of work-related​‌ upper limb disorders.​​Applied ergonomics242​​​‌1993, 91--99back​ to text
  • 41 incollection​‌A.A. Meguenani,​​ V.V. Padois,​​​‌ J.J. Da Silva​, A.A. Hoarau​‌ and P.P. Bidaud​​. Energy-based control for​​​‌ safe Human-robot physical interactions​.Springer Proceedings in​‌ Advanced Robotics - The​​ 2016 International Symposium on​​​‌ Experimental RoboticsSpringer International​ Publishing AG2017,​‌ URL: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01398790/enDOIback​​ to text
  • 42 inbook​​​‌J.-P.Jean-Pierre Merlet and​ D.D. Daney.​‌ Appropriate Design of Parallel​​ Manipulators.Smart Devices​​​‌ and Machines for Advanced​ ManufacturingL.Lihui Wang​‌ and J.Jeff Xi​​, eds. LondonSpringer​​​‌ London2008, 1--25​URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-147-3_1DOIback​‌ to text
  • 43 article​​S.Selma Musić and​​​‌ S.Sandra Hirche.​ Control sharing in human-robot​‌ team interaction.Annual​​ Reviews in Control44​​​‌2017, 342--354back​ to text
  • 44 inproceedings​‌B.Bilge Mutlu,​​ A.Allison Terrell and​​​‌ C.-M.Chien-Ming Huang.​ Coordination mechanisms in human-robot​‌ collaboration.Proceedings of​​ the Workshop on Collaborative​​​‌ Manipulation, 8th ACM/IEEE International​ Conference on Human-Robot Interaction​‌Citeseer2013, 1--6​​back to text
  • 45​​​‌ articleD.D. Oetomo​, D.D. Daney​‌ and J.J. Merlet​​. Design Strategy of​​​‌ Serial Manipulators With Certified​ Constraint Satisfaction.IEEE​‌ Transactions on Robotics25​​1Feb 2009,​​​‌ 1-11URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2008.2006867DOI​back to text
  • 46​‌ bookA.Adina Panchea​​. Inverse optimal control​​​‌ for redundant systems of​ biological motion.Orléans​‌December 2015, URL:​​ http://www.theses.fr/2015ORLE2050back to text​​​‌
  • 47 articleL.Luka​ Peternel, T.Tadej​‌ Petrič, E.Erhan​​ Oztop and J.Jan​​​‌ Babič. Teaching Robots​ to Cooperate with Humans​‌ in Dynamic Manipulation Tasks​​ Based on Multi-modal Human-in-the-loop​​​‌ Approach.Autonomous Robots​361-2January 2014​‌, 123--136URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10514-013-9361-0​​DOIback to text​​​‌
  • 48 articleL.Luka​ Peternel, N.Nikos​‌ Tsagarakis, D.Darwin​​ Caldwell and A.Arash​​​‌ Ajoudani. Robot adaptation​ to human physical fatigue​‌ in human–robot co-manipulation.​​Autonomous Robots425​​​‌June 2018, 1011--1021​URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10514-017-9678-1DOIback​‌ to text
  • 49 article​​J. M.Jennifer M​​​‌ Riley, L. D.​Laura D Strater,​‌ S. L.Sheryl L​​ Chappell, E. S.​​​‌Erik S Connors and​ M. R.Mica R​‌ Endsley. Situation awareness​​ in human-robot interaction: Challenges​​​‌ and user interface requirements​.Human-Robot Interactions in​‌ Future Military Operations2010​​, 171--192back to​​​‌ text
  • 50 inproceedingsJ.​Jonathan Savin, R.​‌Raphaël Bousigues, P.​​Pauline Maurice, V.​​Vincent Padois, N.​​​‌Nasser Rezzoug and D.‌David Daney. Motor‌​‌ variability in human-robot interaction​​ during an assisted trajectory-tracking​​​‌ task: preliminary results from‌ the MOVER experiment.‌​‌Humanoids 2024 workshop -​​ Human movement modeling for​​​‌ Human-Robot interactionNancy, France‌November 2024HALback‌​‌ to text
  • 51 article​​J.Jonathan Savin,​​​‌ C.Clarisse Gaudez,‌ M. A.Martine A.‌​‌ A Gilles, V.​​Vincent Padois and P.​​​‌Philippe Bidaud. Evidence‌ of movement variability patterns‌​‌ during a repetitive pointing​​ task until exhaustion.​​​‌Applied Ergonomics962021‌, 103464HALDOI‌​‌back to text
  • 52​​ inproceedingsJ.Jonathan Savin​​​‌, M.Martine Gilles‌, C.Clarisse Gaudez‌​‌, V.Vincent Padois​​ and P.Philippe Bidaud​​​‌. Movement Variability and‌ Digital Human Models: Development‌​‌ of a Demonstrator Taking​​ the Effects of Muscular​​​‌ Fatigue into Account.‌Advances in Applied Digital‌​‌ Human Modeling and Simulation​​ChamSpringer International Publishing​​​‌2017, 169--179back‌ to text
  • 53 inproceedings‌​‌A.Antun Skuric,​​ N.Nasser Rezzoug,​​​‌ D.David Daney and‌ V.Vincent Padois.‌​‌ Common wrench capability evaluation​​ of a human-robot collaborative​​​‌ system.46th Congrès‌ de la Société de‌​‌ BiomécaniqueSaint Etienne, France​​October 2021HALback​​​‌ to text
  • 54 article‌M.Michael Sonne,‌​‌ D. L.Dino L.​​ Villalta and D. M.​​​‌David M. Andrews.‌ Development and evaluation of‌​‌ an office ergonomic risk​​ checklist: ROSA - Rapid​​​‌ Office Strain Assessment.‌Applied Ergonomics431‌​‌January 2012, 98--108​​URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687011000433DOIback​​​‌ to text
  • 55 article‌D.Divya Srinivasan and‌​‌ S. E.Svend Erik​​ Mathiassen. Motor variability​​​‌ in occupational health and‌ performance.Clinical Biomechanics‌​‌27102012,​​ 979-993URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003312001817DOI​​​‌back to textback‌ to text
  • 56 article‌​‌C.Carlos Viegas,​​ D.David Daney,​​​‌ M.Mahmoud Tavakoli and‌ A. T.Aníbal T.‌​‌ de Almeida. Performance​​ analysis and design of​​​‌ parallel kinematic machines using‌ interval analysis.Mechanism‌​‌ and Machine Theory115​​2017, 218-236URL:​​​‌ http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094114X17305700DOIback to‌ text
  • 57 bookJ.‌​‌ R.John R. Wilson​​ and S.Sarah Sharples​​​‌. Evaluation of Human‌ Work, Fourth Edition.‌​‌Google-Books-ID: uXB3CAAAQBAJCRC Press​​April 2015back to​​​‌ text
  1. 1In the‌ ISO TS 15066 technical‌​‌ specification on collaborative robotics,​​ human-robot physical interaction is​​​‌ allowed but perceived as‌ a situation to be‌​‌ avoided.