EN FR
EN FR
COMPO - 2025

2025​​​‌Activity reportProject-TeamCOMPO​

RNSR: 202124080M
  • Research center​‌ Inria Centre at Université​​ Côte d'Azur
  • In partnership​​​‌ with:INSERM, Aix-Marseille Université,​ CNRS, CAC4 MARSEILLE -​‌ Institut Paoli-Calmettes
  • Team name:​​ COMPutational pharmacology and clinical​​​‌ Oncology
  • In collaboration with:​Centre de Recherche en​‌ Cancérologie de Marseille

Creation​​ of the Project-Team: 2021​​​‌ May 01

Each year,​ Inria research teams publish​‌ an Activity Report presenting​​ their work and results​​​‌ over the reporting period.​ These reports follow a​‌ common structure, with some​​ optional sections depending on​​​‌ the specific team. They​ typically begin by outlining​‌ the overall objectives and​​ research programme, including the​​​‌ main research themes, goals,​ and methodological approaches. They​‌ also describe the application​​ domains targeted by the​​​‌ team, highlighting the scientific​ or societal contexts in​‌ which their work is​​ situated.

The reports then​​​‌ present the highlights of​ the year, covering major​‌ scientific achievements, software developments,​​ or teaching contributions. When​​​‌ relevant, they include sections​ on software, platforms, and​‌ open data, detailing the​​ tools developed and how​​​‌ they are shared. A​ substantial part is dedicated​‌ to new results, where​​ scientific contributions are described​​​‌ in detail, often with​ subsections specifying participants and​‌ associated keywords.

Finally, the​​ Activity Report addresses funding,​​​‌ contracts, partnerships, and collaborations​ at various levels, from​‌ industrial agreements to international​​ cooperations. It also covers​​​‌ dissemination and teaching activities,​ such as participation in​‌ scientific events, outreach, and​​ supervision. The document concludes​​​‌ with a presentation of​ scientific production, including major​‌ publications and those produced​​ during the year.

Keywords​​​‌

Computer Science and Digital​ Science

  • A3.1.1. Modeling, representation​‌
  • A3.1.10. Heterogeneous data
  • A3.1.11.​​ Structured data
  • A3.2.3. Inference​​​‌
  • A3.3.2. Data mining
  • A3.3.3.​ Big data analysis
  • A3.4.​‌ Machine learning and statistics​​
  • A6.1.1. Continuous Modeling (PDE,​​​‌ ODE)

Other Research Topics​ and Application Domains

  • B1.1.2.​‌ Molecular and cellular biology​​
  • B1.1.7. Bioinformatics
  • B1.1.8. Mathematical​​​‌ biology
  • B1.1.10. Systems and​ synthetic biology
  • B2.2.3. Cancer​‌
  • B2.2.7. Virtual human twin​​
  • B2.4.1. Pharmaco kinetics and​​​‌ dynamics
  • B2.4.2. Drug resistance​

1 Team members, visitors,​‌ external collaborators

Research Scientists​​

  • Sebastien Benzekry [Team​​​‌ leader, INRIA,​ Researcher, HDR]​‌
  • Quentin Marcou [CNRS​​, Researcher]
  • Elias​​​‌ Ventre [INRIA,​ Researcher]

Faculty Members​‌

  • Dominique Barbolosi [AMU​​, Professor, HDR​​​‌]
  • David Boulate [​AP-HM, Professor,​‌ HDR]
  • Joseph Ciccolini​​ [AMU, Professor​​, HDR]
  • Raphaelle​​​‌ Fanciullino [AMU,‌ Professor, HDR]‌​‌
  • Florence Gattacceca [AMU​​, Associate Professor,​​​‌ HDR]
  • Laurent Greillier‌ [AMU, Professor‌​‌, HDR]
  • Arthur​​ Géraud [Institut Paoli​​​‌ Calmettes, Hospital Staff‌]
  • Athanassios Iliadis [‌​‌Aix-Marseille University, Emeritus​​, HDR]
  • Xavier​​​‌ Muracciole [CHU LA‌ TIMONE, Professor,‌​‌ HDR]
  • Anne Rodallec​​ [AMU, Associate​​​‌ Professor]
  • Sebastien Salas‌ [CHU LA TIMONE‌​‌, Professor, HDR​​]

Post-Doctoral Fellows

  • Madalenna​​​‌ Centani [Upssala University‌, from Dec 2025‌​‌]
  • Giada Fiandaca [​​INRIA, Post-Doctoral Fellow​​​‌, from Mar 2025‌ until Oct 2025]‌​‌

PhD Students

  • Salih BENAMARA​​ [SANOFI]
  • Anastasiia​​​‌ Bakhmach [INRIA]‌
  • Claire Berthaud [CRCL‌​‌]
  • Celestin Bigarre [​​Inria]
  • Mohamed Boussena​​​‌ [AMU]
  • Clarisse‌ Buton [AMU]‌​‌
  • Mathilde Dacos [APHM​​]
  • Erwan Diroff [​​​‌AMU, ESQlabs]
  • Romain‌ Ferrara [Institut Paoli‌​‌ Calmettes, from Sep​​ 2025]
  • Quentin Gerbault​​​‌ [AMU]
  • Hafida‌ Hamdache [INSERM]‌​‌
  • Govind Kallee [APHM​​]
  • Yann Maugé [​​​‌AMU, from Sep‌ 2025]
  • Linh Nguyen‌​‌ Phuong [AMU,​​ until Nov 2025]​​​‌
  • Loic Osanno [APHM‌]
  • Dorian Protzenko [‌​‌APHM]
  • Antonin Ronda​​ [APHM]
  • Lucas​​​‌ Wirtz [APHM,‌ from Aug 2025]‌​‌
  • Romain Zakrajsek [INRIA​​, from Mar 2025​​​‌]

Technical Staff

  • Simon‌ Charpigny [INRIA,‌​‌ Engineer, from Oct​​ 2025]
  • Giada Fiandaca​​​‌ [INRIA, Engineer‌, from Nov 2025‌​‌]
  • Victor Gertner [​​INRIA, Engineer,​​​‌ from May 2025 until‌ Sep 2025]
  • Sarah‌​‌ Giacometti [AMU,​​ Technician]
  • Linh Nguyen​​​‌ Phuong [INRIA,‌ Engineer, from Dec‌​‌ 2025]
  • Andrea Vaglio​​ [INRIA, Engineer​​​‌, until Oct 2025‌]

Interns and Apprentices‌​‌

  • Ambre Aubert [AMU​​, from Apr 2025​​​‌ until Jun 2025]‌
  • Zakaria Benslimane [AMU‌​‌, until Jul 2025​​]
  • Lucie Della-Negra [​​​‌ENSC, Intern,‌ from Mar 2025 until‌​‌ Aug 2025]
  • Catherine​​ Dubois [INRIA,​​​‌ Intern, from Apr‌ 2025 until Sep 2025‌​‌]
  • Romain Ferrara [​​UGA, Intern,​​​‌ from Mar 2025 until‌ Aug 2025]
  • Yacine‌​‌ Gomari [AMU,​​ from Feb 2025 until​​​‌ Jul 2025]
  • Anais‌ Hamzi [AMU,‌​‌ Intern, from Apr​​ 2025 until Jun 2025​​​‌]
  • Yann Maugé [‌ENS DE LYON,‌​‌ Intern, from Jun​​ 2025 until Aug 2025​​​‌]
  • Ester Tonon [‌Erasmus program, from‌​‌ Sep 2025, Student​​ sent by University of​​​‌ Turin (Italy)]

Administrative‌ Assistants

  • Sandrine Boute [‌​‌INRIA]
  • Carine Ganzin​​ [AMU, from​​​‌ Aug 2025]

External‌ Collaborators

  • Fabrice Barlési [‌​‌Institut Gustave Roussy]​​
  • René Bruno [Genentech​​​‌]
  • Anne-Sophie Chrétien [‌Institut Paoli Calmettes,‌​‌ from Aug 2025]​​
  • Alice Daumas [AMU​​​‌, until Aug 2025‌]
  • Alexandre Detappe [‌​‌CNRS, ICANS Strasbourg,​​​‌ Gustave Roussy]
  • Raynier​ Devillier [Institut Paoli​‌ Calmettes]
  • Alexander Kulesza​​ [ESQLabs]
  • Julien​​​‌ Nicolas [CNRS,​ Institut Galien, Paris]​‌
  • Laetitia Padovani [AP-HM​​]
  • Caroline Plazy [​​​‌CHU GRENOBLE-ALPES]
  • Thibaut​ Reichert [AMU]​‌
  • Geoffroy Venton [APHM​​]
  • Julien Vibert [​​​‌IGR]

2 Overall​ objectives

The Inria-Inserm COMPO​‌ joint project-team develops novel​​ mathematical, statistical, and computational​​​‌ tools to model data​ in oncology, with a​‌ focus on clinical data​​ from clinical studies and​​​‌ routine care. The team's​ objectives are: 1) to​‌ improve the quantitative understanding​​ of cancer diseases, 2)​​​‌ to assist drug development​ through biomarker identification, dosing​‌ regimen optimization, and clinical​​ trials decision support, and​​​‌ 3) to develop personalized​ medicine by providing clinicians​‌ with digital decision tools.​​

To achieve these goals,​​​‌ the team uniquely brings​ together mathematicians, computer scientists,​‌ pharmacologists, and medical oncologists.​​ It is integrated into​​​‌ the Center of Cancer​ Research of Marseille (Inserm​‌ U1068, CNRS UMR7258, Aix-Marseille​​ Université UM105, Institut Paoli-Calmettes)​​​‌ and located on the​ La Timone Health Science​‌ campus of the University​​ Hospitals of Marseille (AP-HM),​​​‌ close to the INCa-labeled​ center for early phase​‌ clinical trials (CLIP2).

Built​​ on strong expertise in​​​‌ mathematical modeling, pharmacometrics, and​ experimental and clinical oncology,​‌ the project-team is committed​​ to developing novel methodologies​​​‌ combining mechanistic and statistical​ learning ("mechanistic learning", see​‌ Figure 1) to​​ be ultimately applied at​​​‌ bedside.

Of note, in​ the Research Priorities document​‌ released by the American​​ Society of Clinical Oncology​​​‌ in February 2021, “Developing​ and Integrating Artificial Intelligence​‌ in Cancer Research”, “Identifying​​ Strategies That Predict Response​​​‌ and Resistance to Immunotherapies”​ and “Optimizing Multimodality Treatment​‌ for Solid Tumors” are​​ listed as top-priorities, which​​​‌ fit quite well with​ our research program.

Figure 1

Sketch​‌ of the Mechanistic Learning.​​

Figure 1: Mechanistic​​​‌ modeling and statistical learning​ for pharmacological and clinical​‌ oncology.

3 Research program​​

We address problems that​​​‌ (1) are clinically or​ biologically relevant, (2) come​‌ with accessible clinical and​​ / or biological data,​​​‌ and (3) where the​ mechanistic learning methodology is​‌ necessary or clearly beneficial.​​

The planned methodological advances​​​‌ span mechanistic learning for​ clinical data (axis 1),​‌ modeling multi-omics data (axis​​ 2) and pharmacometrics (axis​​​‌ 3).

The main challenges​ are linked to data​‌ heterogeneity, high dimensionality, and​​ the difficulty of validating​​​‌ complex models in clinical​ settings.

3.1 Axis 1:​‌ Mechanistic learning for clinical​​ data (SB, QM)

3.1.1​​​‌ (Automated) mechanistic modeling for​ longitudinal data

A major​‌ current open question in​​ quantitative modeling in oncology​​​‌ is the establishment of​ governing equations providing foundations​‌ for the derivation of​​ more advanced models or​​​‌ even, so-called "digital twins".​ We will continue our​‌ efforts in the discovery​​ of such fundamental laws,​​​‌ written as ordinary or​ partial differential equations. A​‌ specific domain of interest​​ will be immuno-oncology. Two​​​‌ approaches will be undertaken​ in parallel. The first​‌ is knowledge-driven and will​​ benefit not only from​​​‌ the medical and pharmacological​ knowledge in the team​‌ but also, crucially, from​​ the triple expertise of​​ Quentin Marcou (QM) in​​​‌ computational modeling, immunology, and‌ medicine. The second is‌​‌ data-driven and will explore​​ recent advances in the​​​‌ field of scientific machine‌ learning 56, 60‌​‌, 59. In​​ particular, we will further​​​‌ pursue ongoing efforts –‌ based on initial work‌​‌ by van der Schaar​​ 58 – that use​​​‌ agentic large language models‌ to discover not only‌​‌ structural forms of mechanistic​​ models but also the​​​‌ statistical model. Example of‌ an open problem in‌​‌ this area is to​​ integrate such algorithms within​​​‌ the context of nonlinear‌ mixed-effects modeling.

3.1.2 Causal‌​‌ inference and mechanistic modeling​​ for time-to-event data

Traditional​​​‌ data-centric machine learning approaches,‌ despite their ability to‌​‌ integrate complex data have​​ at identifying high-order correlations,​​​‌ including with confounding factors,‌ they fall short in‌​‌ generalizing findings beyond specific​​ cohorts, impeding their use​​​‌ in a clinical setting.‌ Causal inference offers promising‌​‌ solutions to these challenges,​​ potentially addressing issues related​​​‌ to explainability, robustness and‌ generalizability. While causal discovery‌​‌ (or causal graph inference)​​ methods from observational data​​​‌ have been developed and‌ used by systems biology‌​‌ researchers to infer large​​ gene networks from observational​​​‌ data, they have been‌ seldom applied to clinical‌​‌ and longitudinal data. Their​​ development in clinical oncology​​​‌ is an open avenue‌ and has emerged as‌​‌ a primary objective for​​ COMPO.

In particular, time-to-event​​​‌ (survival) data in the‌ presence of censoring or‌​‌ competing risks, constitutes a​​ special type of compound​​​‌ data that could trigger‌ artifactual causal structures or‌​‌ loss of statistical power​​ upon using off-the-shelf causal​​​‌ discovery algorithms. Leveraging QM's‌ knowledge in statistical causal‌​‌ inference, we aim to​​ investigate how causal discovery​​​‌ methods can be adapted‌ to more effectively handle‌​‌ such data. A further​​ objective is to combine​​​‌ these with the novel‌ methods developed by Sébastien‌​‌ Benzekry (SB) that proposed​​ a mechanistic modeling approach​​​‌ to such data [12,‌ 77] [NPP+20]. More broadly,‌​‌ clarifying the relationships between​​ causal inference and mechanistic​​​‌ modeling – two fields‌ that have so far‌​‌ remained isolated – is​​ an avenue we want​​​‌ to research.

3.2 Axis‌ 2: Multi-omics modeling (EV,‌​‌ QM)

3.2.1 Dynamic single-cell​​ modeling and causal inference​​​‌

A crucial challenge in‌ systems oncology is to‌​‌ unravel how individual cells​​ respond dynamically to therapeutic​​​‌ perturbations. Time series of‌ single-cell data provide a‌​‌ unique window to capture​​ cellular trajectories under treatment​​​‌ and to infer the‌ regulatory mechanisms driving phenotypic‌​‌ adaptation. In previous work,​​ Elias Ventre (EV) has​​​‌ developed methodologies to reconstruct‌ signaling networks by calibrating‌​‌ mechanistic dynamic models at​​ the single-cell level from​​​‌ longitudinal transcriptomics datasets. By‌ joining COMPO, EV aims‌​‌ to extend these methods​​ to learn from more​​​‌ complex datasets, containing multi-omics‌ and/or spatial information, by‌​‌ combining optimal transport with​​ statistical inference and machine​​​‌ learning to design causal‌ discovery algorithms consistent with‌​‌ mechanistic models. These novel​​ methods will be applied​​​‌ on tumoroids and clinical‌ data to address two‌​‌ central open questions in​​ the single-cell community:

  • how​​​‌ to robustly link molecular‌ alterations to phenotypic changes,‌​‌
  • how to account for​​​‌ inter-patient variability and integrate​ clinical covariates to derive​‌ predictive signatures.

These applications​​ will be carried in​​​‌ collaboration with the CRCM​ (E. Pasquier) and the​‌ CRCL in Lyon (L.​​ Broutier, M. Castets) on​​​‌ pediatric cancer tumoroids, and​ A.-S. Chrétien (CRCM) to​‌ identify causal drivers of​​ immune response heterogeneity.

3.2.2​​​‌ Analysis of the immune​ repertoire response to cancer​‌

Cancer neoantigens, generated by​​ non-synonymous somatic mutations in​​​‌ tumor cells, must be​ presented on major histocompatibility​‌ complexes (MHC) and specifically​​ recognized by T cell​​​‌ receptors (TCRs) to trigger​ cytotoxic immune responses. Thus,​‌ identifying which neoantigens drive​​ such recognition is essential​​​‌ to understand tumor immuno-editing,​ predict immune responses, and​‌ guide targeted therapies such​​ as cancer vaccines or​​​‌ adoptive T cell therapies.​ Yet, despite the advances​‌ in protein structure and​​ function prediction, Protein Language​​​‌ Models have shown limited​ predictive power for T​‌ cell recognition beyond a​​ few viral antigens and​​​‌ well-characterized MHC haplotypes. Drawing​ from his expertise in​‌ building mechanistic statistical models​​ capturing TCRs random generation​​​‌ process, QM aims to​ develop mechanistic and unsupervised​‌ machine learning approaches to​​ decode the adaptive immune​​​‌ response to cancer from​ patients cohorts and longitudinal​‌ sequencing of the adaptive​​ immune repertoire and cancer​​​‌ genome (tumor biopsy or​ tumor circulating nucleic acids).​‌ The developed approaches aim​​ to address key questions​​​‌ in cancer immuno-oncology:

  • Can​ we associate frequent neoantigens​‌ with their corresponding responsive​​ T-cells?
  • Using these neoantigen-T​​​‌ cell pairings, can we​ explain part of the​‌ heterogeneity in response to​​ Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor therapies?​​​‌ Can these associations be​ leveraged to develop large​‌ coverage vaccines and Adoptive​​ T Cell Therapies based​​​‌ on public neoantigens?
  • Can​ we develop pan-cancer immune​‌ repertoire sequencing signatures for​​ cancer screening and diagnostic?​​​‌
  • Can we quantify immune-selection​ pressure (immuno-editing) in early​‌ and late-stage tumors?

This​​ line of research will​​​‌ be pursued in synergy​ with ongoing COMPO projects​‌ on the LUCA-pi and​​ PIONeeR RHUs, in close​​​‌ collaboration with the CRCM​ bioinformatics community and Marseille's​‌ immunoinformatics researchers at CIML​​ (P. Milpied and T.​​​‌ Dupic).

3.3 Axis 3:​ Pharmacometrics and individualized dosing​‌ (JC, FG, AR, RF,​​ SB)

3.3.1 Pharmacokinetic (PK)​​​‌ / Pharmacodynamic (PD) modeling​ (AR, SB)

PK/PD modeling​‌ will remain as a​​ central research axis of​​​‌ our team, with a​ strong emphasis on its​‌ application to innovative therapeutic​​ entities such as liposomes,​​​‌ ADCs (antibody drug conjugates),​ antibody fragments, or nanopolymers,​‌ using real-world data from​​ the APHM and the​​​‌ Paoli Calmettes Institute. In​ such complex formulations, modeling​‌ efforts must often be​​ structurally adapted to account​​​‌ for multiple kinetic entities,​ requiring linked or semi-mechanistic​‌ models with multiple compartments​​ and inter-component transformations (e.g.,​​​‌ cleavage, activation).

3.3.2 Physiologically-based​ Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling (FG)​‌

COMPO is involved in​​ projects aiming to provide​​​‌ relevant PBPK models guiding​ drug development. First, the​‌ international consortium built to​​ develop the TORNADO project​​​‌ will continue to collaborate​ and apply to European​‌ grants, and systemic and​​ tumoral in vivo PK​​​‌ data will continue to​ be collected as a​‌ basis to further develop​​ the PBPK model for​​ nanotherapeutics, with a focus​​​‌ on the tumor compartment.‌ Second, the PBPK model‌​‌ for mAbs will be​​ extended by adding a​​​‌ more predictive sub-cutaneous absorption‌ module in PK-Sim platform.‌​‌ Another project aims to​​ contribute to the challenge​​​‌ of predicting drugs' renal‌ elimination, currently in its‌​‌ infancy. We will combine​​ evaluation of renal elimination​​​‌ of small drugs and‌ nanotherapeutics on an innovative‌​‌ kidney-on-a-chip (KoC) system with​​ its modeling to provide​​​‌ a translational PBPK model‌ bridging the KoC data‌​‌ with in vivo PK.​​

3.3.3 Individualized dosing for​​​‌ clinical Oncology (JC, RF,‌ AR)

Understanding the sources‌​‌ of pharmacokinetic variability and​​ tailoring dosages, particularly in​​​‌ oncology, is a significant‌ challenge. Based upon the‌​‌ gained expertise over the​​ past 5 years, we​​​‌ propose to further apply‌ this strategy to the‌​‌ aforementioned newest entities in​​ clinical oncology. The latter​​​‌ also have complex inter-relationships‌ with the immune system‌​‌ that impact pharmacokinetics and,​​ ultimately, treatment response. Understanding​​​‌ their pharmacokinetics and identifying‌ exposure covariates will enable‌​‌ us to develop state-of-the-art​​ PK/PD/PGx models to personalize​​​‌ dosing, thus optimizing the‌ toxicity/efficacy ratio in patients.‌​‌ Such models will require​​ extra-skills due to the​​​‌ very nature of those‌ entities, such as the‌​‌ joint-PK of both intact​​ ADCs and released payload​​​‌ for instance, plus the‌ intrinsic characteristics of new‌​‌ entities such as bispecific​​ monoclonal antibodies, plus the​​​‌ rise of novel scaffolds‌ such as peptide-drug conjugates,‌​‌ trispecific antibodies, BITEs, DuoBodies,​​ bispecific ADCs – each​​​‌ coming with new challenges‌ to model their PK‌​‌ and to decipher their​​ PK/PD relationships, both as​​​‌ single agents or as‌ part of combinatorial strategies,‌​‌ such as the ADC/immunotherapy​​ combinations emerging in breast​​​‌ or in urothelial cancers.‌ This will be achieved‌​‌ through both real-world studies​​ and dedicated clinical trials,​​​‌ using customized compartmental analysis‌ to ensure a good‌​‌ identifiability of the parameters​​ and an efficacious transposition​​​‌ to bedside application.

4‌ Application domains

The COMPO‌​‌ research team's projects all​​ focus on a serial​​​‌ of complementary and inter-related‌ domains described in an‌​‌ itemized fashion below:

  • Health​​: all the models​​​‌ to be developed within‌ the framework of the‌​‌ COMPO team are related​​ to improving healthcare;
  • Cancer​​​‌: in particular, the‌ models will be developed‌​‌ to address specific issues​​ related to cancerous diseases;​​​‌
  • Precision Medicine: in‌ particular, in cancer the‌​‌ developed models will be​​ part of the implementation​​​‌ of precision medicine in‌ oncology focusing on the‌​‌ following items;
  • Combinatorial regimen​​: developing model-informed strategies​​​‌ to determine the optimal‌ modalities when combining several‌​‌ treatments altogether. With the​​ increasingly diversified arsenal of​​​‌ therapeutic approaches to treat‌ cancers (surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy,‌​‌ targeted and anti-angiogenic therapy​​ and immunotherapy), defining optimal​​​‌ combination protocols is highly‌ challenging 57. This‌​‌ spans the issues of​​ sequencing, scheduling and dosing​​​‌ of those therapies, which‌ are to date largely‌​‌ addressed using a trial-and-error​​ approaches. Consequently, too many​​​‌ combinatorial trials fail, and‌ attrition rate with combinatorial‌​‌ immunotherapy is now a​​ rising issue in clinical​​​‌ oncology and we hypothesize‌ that extensive modeling and‌​‌ pharmacometrics could help refining​​​‌ the way anticancer drugs​ are combined;
  • Tools for​‌ decision-making: developing model-informed​​ strategies to forecast clinical​​​‌ outcome, i.e., during clinical​ trials. Assessing the predictive​‌ power of markers not​​ only at baseline but​​​‌ also in their change​ over time is a​‌ current challenge. The information​​ available, on the basis​​​‌ of which decision is​ made, includes clinico-demographic variables,​‌ classical biomarkers (e.g., blood​​ counts, thyroglobulin, lactate dehydrogenase​​​‌ levels, etc...) but also​ an increasing amount of​‌ data from other sources​​ (e.g., immuno-monitoring, anatomical functional​​​‌ imaging or genomics) that​ require state-of-the-art modeling to​‌ analyze extremely dense and​​ longitudinal data;
  • Adaptive dosing​​​‌ strategies: developing model-informed​ strategies to customize dosing​‌ so as to ensure​​ an optimal toxicity-efficacy ratio.​​​‌ All anticancer agents are​ approved upon registration trials​‌ performed in highly selected​​ patients (i.e., with controlled​​​‌ lifestyle, little comorbidities, controlled​ polymedication and restricted range​‌ of age), thus smoothing​​ the interindividual variability. In​​​‌ real-world practice however, patients​ are all heavily co-treated​‌ with a wide variety​​ of other drugs plus​​​‌ herbal medications, likely to​ interact with drug metabolism​‌ and transport, and are​​ frequently older than in​​​‌ clinical trials. In addition,​ genetic polymorphisms affecting genes​‌ coding for drug transport​​ proteins or drug-metabolizing enzymes​​​‌ in the liver, or​ transcriptional factors can impact​‌ as well on dose-exposure​​ relationships. Consequently, standard dosing​​​‌ may not be suitable​ in non-standard patients to​‌ reach the adequate drug​​ exposure levels associated with​​​‌ optimal toxicity/efficacy balance;
  • Nanomedicines​: developing model-informed strategies​‌ to conceptualize drug-loaded nanoparticles​​ likely to improve the​​​‌ toxicity-efficacy ratio over conventional​ treatments. As of today,​‌ the biodistribution phase of​​ anticancer agents is totally​​​‌ aspecific, making "on-target off-site"​ actions an issue because​‌ it is associated with​​ drug-related side effects affecting​​​‌ healthy tissues. Nanoparticles present​ unique features likely to​‌ deliver specifically a high​​ amount of payload directly​​​‌ on a tumor site,​ thus improving the antiproliferative​‌ action while sparing healthy​​ tissues. In addition, nanoparticles​​​‌ are expected to reshape​ the tumor micro-environment, making​‌ them good candidates to​​ be further associated with​​​‌ immunotherapy (see Combinatorial Regimen​ above).

5 Social and​‌ environmental responsibility

5.1 Impact​​ of research results

Due​​​‌ to its unique composition​ including medical oncologists, clinical​‌ pharmacologists and mathematical modelers,​​ COMPO is at stake​​​‌ with important social challenges:​ oncology healthcare and innovation​‌ in drug development. The​​ software and results developed​​​‌ by COMPO are devoted​ to these challenges and​‌ aim to be directly​​ used by medical and​​​‌ pharmaceutical oncologists or by​ the biotech and pharmaceutical​‌ industry to help drug​​ development and biomarker discovery.​​​‌

To give a few​ examples:

  • the KineticsPro software​‌ historically developed by Pr​​ Iliadis is used daily​​​‌ by pharmacists to individually​ adapt the dose of​‌ anti-cancer drugs (e.g., for​​ methotrexate, cisplatin or busulfan);​​​‌
  • the compo.EDA package is​ used by physicians and​‌ biologists to produce automated​​ statistical reports, helping to​​​‌ analyze the data collected​ for specific medical questions;​‌
  • COMPO is in charge​​ of the biostatistical, machine​​​‌ learning and mechanistic modeling​ analysis of the large-scale​‌ PIONeeR RHU project to​​ identify biomarker signatures predictive​​ of the resistance to​​​‌ immunotherapy in lung cancer;‌
  • the LUCA-pi RHU, led‌​‌ by COMPO member Pr​​ Boulate, will conduct research​​​‌ to implement lung cancer‌ screening in France (currently‌​‌ not performed).

6 Highlights​​ of the year

  • The​​​‌ results of the RHU‌ PIONeeR (Precision Immuno-Oncology for‌​‌ advanced Non-Small Cell Lung​​ Cancer Patients with PD1(L1)​​​‌ ICI Resistance) biomarker study‌ have been published as‌​‌ a preprint 38.​​ This is the achievement​​​‌ of a 5-years long‌ effort with many COMPO‌​‌ members involved. The dataset​​ is one of the​​​‌ world's largest multi-modal dataset‌ on this topic. The‌​‌ main result is an​​ 18-biomarkers signature that outperfoms​​​‌ both standard-of-care clinical markers‌ (e.g., PDL1 expression) and‌​‌ state-of-the-art results of multi-modal​​ machine learning models for​​​‌ prediction of primary resistance‌ to immunotherapy in lung‌​‌ cancer. The paper is​​ published together with a​​​‌ companion website, which‌ contains an interactive dashboard‌​‌. Additionally, PIONeeR helped​​ to identify a threshold​​​‌ in Pembrolizumab plasma exposure‌ which proved to be‌​‌ a strong, independant predictor​​ of clinical efficacy, paving​​​‌ the way for implementation‌ of PK-guided dosing at‌​‌ bedside.
  • The results of​​ the VENETACIBLE Project which​​​‌ is a collaboration between‌ COMPO, the APHM and‌​‌ the University Hospital of​​ Nice, has demonstrated that​​​‌ Venetoclax administred as a‌ 14-days regime, outperforms the‌​‌ 28 days regimen in​​ patients with accute myeloid​​​‌ leukemia in terms of‌ efficacy and toxicity. Additionally,‌​‌ a threshold associated with​​ efficacy has been identified​​​‌ (trough levels 2500 ng/mL),‌ and allowed to perform‌​‌ PK-guided individualized dosing in​​ real-world patients (23​​​‌).
  • The CETUXiMAX project‌ is now completed. This‌​‌ multicentric PK study, led​​ by Sebastien Salas with​​​‌ several COMPO students and‌ senior members, established a‌​‌ relationship between cetuximab exposure​​ and disease control rate​​​‌ in head and neck‌ cancer patients, and allowed‌​‌ to build an original​​ pop-PK model describing the​​​‌ pharmacometrics of this drug‌ that could be used‌​‌ next to customize dosing​​ or scheduling.
  • The TORNADO​​​‌ project has made an‌ important step forward, with‌​‌ the publication of a​​ PBPK model for intact​​​‌ lipid nanocapsules labeled with‌ a specific signal (‌​‌16), in partnership​​ with the MINT group​​​‌ in the university of‌ Angers. The COMPO PhD‌​‌ student Jessica OU, who​​ defended her PhD thesis​​​‌ in 2024 was co-first‌ author of the work,‌​‌ which also involved a​​ previous COMPO M2 intern​​​‌ and F. Gattacceca who‌ supervised the development of‌​‌ the PBPK model.

6.1​​ Awards

  • Linh Nguyen-Phuong received​​​‌ the Lewis Sheiner award‌ at the 33th PAGE‌​‌ (Population Approach Group in​​ Europe) conference

7 Latest​​​‌ software developments, platforms, open‌ data

7.1 Latest software‌​‌ developments

7.1.1 ROOFS

  • Name:​​
    RObust biOmarker Feature Selection​​​‌
  • Keyword:
    Feature selection
  • Functional‌ Description:
    ROOFS is a‌​‌ Python package for benchmarking​​ feature selection (FS) methods,​​​‌ designed to help researchers‌ choose the most suitable‌​‌ FS method for their​​ predictive task. ROOFS executes​​​‌ bootstrap-based machine learning pipelines‌ that include the FS‌​‌ step and generates comprehensive​​ reports summarizing key evaluation​​​‌ metrics: downstream predictive performance‌ estimated with optimism correction,‌​‌ stability, reliability of individual​​​‌ features, and true positive​ and false positive rates​‌ assessed on semi-synthetic data​​ with simulated outcomes. ROOFS​​​‌ includes 30+ FS methods​ from different algorithmic families.​‌
  • News of the Year:​​
    Initial development of the​​​‌ package.
  • URL:
  • Publication:​
  • Contact:
    Sebastien Benzekry​‌
  • Participants:
    Sebastien Benzekry, Anastasiia​​ Bakhmach, Mohamed Boussena

7.1.2​​​‌ compo.EDA

  • Name:
    Exploratory Data​ Analysis and Biostatistics for​‌ Clinical Oncology Data
  • Keywords:​​
    Data Exploration, Biostatistics
  • Scientific​​​‌ Description:
    This library implements​ as an R package:​‌
    • Exploratory analysis:
      • Clinical characteristics​​ table
      • Kaplan-Meier estimation of​​​‌ the progression-free and overall​ survival
      • Clinical and biological​‌ features distribution
    • Classification analysis:​​
      • Univariate and multivariate logistic​​​‌ regression
      • Odds ratio
      • Area​ under ROC curve
      • t​‌ test / chi2 test​​
    • Survival analysis:
      • Univariate and​​​‌ multivariate Cox regression
      • Hazard​ ratio
      • Area under ROC​‌ curve
      • log-rank test
    • Data​​ visualization:
      • Correlation plots (Pearson​​​‌ correlation)
      • Volcano plots (p-value​ and adjusted p-value)
      • Boxplots​‌ (quantitative features) and barplots​​ (qualitative feaures)
      • Kaplan-Meier curves​​​‌
      • Automatic comprehensive and customizable​ statistical reports
  • Functional Description:​‌

    The package compoEDA aims​​ to provide a comprehensive​​​‌ exploratory analysis of data​ from clinical studies in​‌ oncology. These studies commonly​​ investigate biological markers able​​​‌ to reveal and distinguish​ different tumor profiles, in​‌ order to early adapt​​ the therapeutic strategy for​​​‌ patients.

    The objective of​ this software is to​‌ provide a simplified tool​​ for both computational scientists​​​‌ and clinical researchers to​ easily generate a graphical​‌ results and automatic reports​​ containing the following analyses:​​​‌

    • overview and visualization of​ clinical data and biological​‌ markers
    • univariate and multivariate​​ classification analysis (logistic regression)​​​‌
    • univariate and multivariate survival​ analysis (Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier​‌ analysis)
    • correlation analysis
    • statistical​​ tests
    • visualization of markers​​​‌ (boxplots, barplots, volcano plots,​ forest plots ...).
  • Release​‌ Contributions:

    Version 1.1 Summary​​ - compo.EDA

    Major updates:​​​‌

    - interactive tables

    -​ new dataset

    - improved​‌ book generation.

    Code quality​​ improvements

    - parameter normalization,​​​‌

    - extensive documentation

    -​ CI/CD

    - Docker support​‌

    Bug fixes: Windows compatibility,​​ dummification, p-value calculations, and​​​‌ plot display issues.

  • News​ of the Year:

    Key​‌ accomplishments:

    - Large repository​​ cleanup with notation harmonization​​​‌ and deprecated function removal​

    - Unified logistic and​‌ Cox regression outputs into​​ single results_table() function

    -​​​‌ Integrated new toy dataset​ from Zenodo

    - Established​‌ comprehensive GitLab CI/CD with​​ Docker containers and ARM64​​​‌ support

    - Improved code​ quality, reduced warnings, enhanced​‌ documentation and README

    -​​ Contributors (340 commits): Benzekry​​​‌ (architecture/documentation), Vaglio (refactoring/CI/CD), Nguyen​ (regression/visualization)

  • URL:
  • Contact:​‌
    Sebastien Benzekry
  • Participants:
    Sebastien​​ Benzekry, Linh Nguyen Phuong,​​​‌ Celestin Bigarre, Paul Dufosse,​ Melanie Karlsen, Andrea Vaglio​‌

7.1.3 compo.tidyML

  • Name:
    Machine​​ learning with tidymodels
  • Keywords:​​​‌
    Survival analysis, Machine learning,​ Data analysis, Oncology
  • Scientific​‌ Description:
    This software maximizes​​ the use of the​​​‌ R package tidymodels.
  • Functional​ Description:

    This package provides​‌ multiple functions to perform​​ machine learning analysis using​​​‌ the `tidymodels` framework. Tasks​ include: feature selection, plot​‌ feature importances, train, cross-validate,​​ apply supervised machine learning​​​‌ algorithms (classification or survival​ analyses) and unsupervised machine​‌ learning, evaluate metrics of​​ predictive performances, compute learning​​​‌ curves.

    Initial development was​ part of the `stats_pioneer`​‌ package (also called `pioneerPackage`)​​ and `ml.tidy` evolved as​​ a standalone package only​​​‌ in February 2023.

  • Release‌ Contributions:

    MAJOR ADDITIONS:

    -‌​‌ Complete ML pipeline with​​ automated report generation (create_ml_report,​​​‌ render_ml_report)

    - New models:‌ XGBoost (classification & survival),‌​‌ GBM, Logistic LASSO

    -​​ Feature selection: BoBoLASSO, BOLASSO,​​​‌ improved stepwise methods, LOO-CV‌

    - SHAP analysis integration‌​‌ for XGBoost models with​​ patient profiling

    VISUALIZATION ENHANCEMENTS:​​​‌

    - Stratified Kaplan-Meier plots‌ with optimal cutpoint methods‌​‌

    - Single marker predictive​​ metrics plotting with class​​​‌ proportions

    - Custom color‌ palettes, enhanced heatmaps, interactive‌​‌ tables (reactable)

    INFRASTRUCTURE:

    -​​ CI/CD pipeline (GitLab), Docker​​​‌ support (multi-architecture)

    - Removed‌ Pioneer dependencies, comprehensive documentation‌​‌ overhaul - R 4.2.2+​​ compatibility, improved package structure​​​‌

    TOTAL: 516 commits over‌ 3 years | Contributors:‌​‌ Andrea Vaglio, Sebastien Benzekry​​

  • News of the Year:​​​‌

    - Complete ML pipeline‌ with automated reporting

    -‌​‌ XGBoost/GBM models with SHAP​​ analysis

    - Single marker​​​‌ predictive metrics plotting

    -‌ CI/CD pipeline

    - Docker‌​‌ and dev container

    -​​ Dependency cleanup and R​​​‌ 4.2.2+ compatibility

    Total: 123‌ commits. Contributors: Andrea Vaglio,‌​‌ Sebastien Benzekry

  • URL:
  • Publications:
  • Contact:
    Sebastien‌ Benzekry
  • Participants:
    Andrea Vaglio,‌​‌ Sebastien Benzekry

7.1.4 compo.NLME​​

  • Name:
    R package for​​​‌ fitting and analyzing Non-Linear‌ Mixed Effects (NLME) models‌​‌ using Monolix.
  • Keywords:
    Monolix,​​ Nonlinear mixed effects models,​​​‌ Lixoft, Population approach
  • Scientific‌ Description:

    Available features:

    • Structural‌​‌ models
      • constant
      • linear
      • double​​ exponential
      • double exponential with​​​‌ dropout
      • hyperbolic
    • preprocess blood‌ marker datasets
    • preprocess tumor‌​‌ kinetics datasets
    • fit NLME​​ models using monolix API​​​‌
    • post-process of results

    Available‌ data:

    • Tumor Kinetics with‌​‌ dropout data. A simulated​​ dataset of tumor kinetics​​​‌ following the double-exponential model,‌ with parameters obtained from‌​‌ (Benzekry et al., PAGE​​ 20, 2022), which deals​​​‌ with the RECIST-based sum‌ of largest diameters (SLD,‌​‌ in mm) of lung​​ cancer treated with immune-checkpoint​​​‌ blockade (anti-PDL1 drug atezolizumab).‌ Dropout was also simulated‌​‌ using a Weibull survival​​ model.
    • Tumor and Blood​​​‌ marker Kinetics with dropout‌ data. A simulated dataset‌​‌ of joint tumor and​​ blood markers (albumin C-reactive​​​‌ protein, lactate dehydrogenase, neutrophils)‌ kinetics following the models‌​‌ and parameters established in​​ (Benzekry et al., PAGE​​​‌ 20, 2022). These are‌ monitoring data during immune-checkpoint‌​‌ blockade (anti-PDL1drug atezolizumab) in​​ lung cancer. Dropout was​​​‌ also simulated using a‌ Weibull survival model.
  • Functional‌​‌ Description:
    This R package​​ implements a framework to​​​‌ work with Non-linear Mixed‌ effects models in the‌​‌ context of clinical oncology​​ to predict relapse and​​​‌ survival using longitudinal data.‌
  • News of the Year:‌​‌

    Total commits: 42

    Contributors:​​ 2 (BENZEKRY Sebastien, Linh​​​‌ Nguyen)

    - Multivariate and‌ joint modeling: adapted BICC‌​‌ table for MV modeling,​​ time-to-event files, and observation​​​‌ type selection

    - Enhanced‌ run_monolix: new parameters for‌​‌ correlations, covariates, and random​​ effects removal

    - Improved​​​‌ postprocessing: standard errors table‌ with condition numbers, plotting‌​‌ functions with customizable aesthetics​​

    - Documentation and licensing:​​​‌ improved vignette, updated LICENSE‌ with IDDN, added Pandoc‌​‌ dependency

    - Bug fixes:​​ double exponential for concave​​​‌ curves, aesthetics issues, lixoftConnectors‌ >=2023 requirement

  • URL:
  • Publications:
  • Contact:
    Sebastien Benzekry
  • Participants:​​​‌
    Sebastien Benzekry, Celestin Bigarre,‌ Linh Nguyen Phuong, Ruben‌​‌ Taieb

7.1.5 SChISModeling

  • Name:​​​‌
    SChISM modeling
  • Keywords:
    SChISM,​ Statistical analysis, Biostatistics, Mechanistic​‌ modeling, Cancer
  • Scientific Description:​​
    • Preprocess
    • Exploratory data analysis​​​‌
    • Classification analysis (logistic regression)​
    • Survival analysis (Cox regression)​‌
    • Mixed-effects modeling analysis
    • Simulation​​ for ODE models for​​​‌ mechanistic modeling
  • Functional Description:​

    SChISModeling aims to analyze​‌ SChISM data (Size CfDNA​​ Immunotherapies Signature Monitoring). SChISM​​​‌ is a clinical study​ that introduces an innovative​‌ approach to quantify circulating​​ free DNA in cancer​​​‌ patients treated with immunotherapy.​ The study's objective is​‌ to early predict response​​ to immunotherapy in patients​​​‌ at an advanced/metastatic stage​ according to these quantitative​‌ cfDNA data.

    This software​​ corresponds to the very​​​‌ first step of the​ data analysis, which is​‌ the statistical analysis. Some​​ of its functions aim​​​‌ at:

    • preprocessing the data​ (creation of clinical variables,​‌ dictionary, outcome variables, clinical​​ biomarkers, treatment of the​​​‌ variables types)
    • computing statistical​ tests, logistic or Cox​‌ regression, performing a correlation​​ analysis
    • visualizing the data​​​‌ (boxplots, barplots, survival curves,​ ROC curves, volcano plots)​‌
    • providing detailed and interactive​​ statistical reports on the​​​‌ data
    • simulation for ODE​ models for mechanistic modeling​‌
  • News of the Year:​​
    • Creation of data loading​​​‌ function and update of​ data preprocessing functions
    • Unsupervised​‌ analysis of baseline cfDNA​​ data (e.g., heatmaps)
    • Longitudinal​​​‌ visualization tools (spaghetti plots,​ etc.)
    • Visualization of mechanistic​‌ model outputs (individual fits,​​ goodness-of-fit diagnostics, etc.)
    • Functions​​​‌ for generating figures and​ tables for two research​‌ articles and the thesis​​ manuscript
  • URL:
  • Contact:​​​‌
    Sebastien Benzekry
  • Participants:
    Sebastien​ Benzekry, Linh Nguyen Phuong,​‌ Romain Zakrajsek, Lucie Della-Negra​​

7.1.6 metamats

  • Keyword:
    Mechanistic​​​‌ modeling
  • Functional Description:
    This​ R package is the​‌ implementation of a general​​ framework to build and​​​‌ use models of the​ metastatic process based on​‌ the initial model of​​ Iwata et al. (2000).​​​‌ The family of model​ that can be built​‌ describe the metastatic disease​​ with a partial differential​​​‌ equation (pde) on the​ size structured distribution of​‌ the tumors. These models​​ have three components, a​​​‌ function that characterize the​ growth of the primary​‌ tumor, a function that​​ characterize the growth of​​​‌ the metastases, and a​ dissemination function that decribes​‌ how new metastases are​​ produced.
  • Release Contributions:
    Features:​​​‌
    • Model structure
    • Direct computation​ of N(t​‌) (C++)
    • Individual fit​​ of cumulative size distribution​​​‌ (direct only)
    • Many diagnostic​ plots
  • News of the​‌ Year:

    1. Release v1.0.0​​ (Dec 14): Major milestone​​​‌ with significant improvements across​ the package.

    2. Package​‌ Merge: Consolidated metamatsModels into​​ metamats, including all growth​​​‌ and dissemination models (Gompertz,​ Exponential, Logistic, Power-law variants).​‌

    3. Documentation Suite: Added​​ comprehensive vignettes covering Getting​​​‌ Started, predefined models, parameter​ fitting, visualization, and custom​‌ model building.

    4. Testing​​ Framework: Implemented testthat test​​​‌ suite with comprehensive coverage​ of core functionality across​‌ all major components.

    5.​​ Error Handling: Established error​​​‌ class hierarchy with 25+​ dedicated stop_* functions organized​‌ by domain (param, model,​​ data, api, fit, domain​​​‌ errors).

    6. New Features:​ Added simulate() method for​‌ generating patient data, as_tibble()​​ for DataIndiv conversion, cpp_compute_N​​​‌ wrapper, and parameter ownership​ model.

    7. Code Quality:​‌ Migrated from deprecated tidyverse​​ functions, replaced variadic args​​ with explicit parameters, and​​​‌ added comprehensive input validation.‌

    8. Data Assets: Included‌​‌ three simulated breast cancer​​ datasets (breast_simple, breast_followup, breast_fitting)​​​‌ for educational examples.

    9.‌ Architecture: Documented comprehensive system‌​‌ architecture in ARCHITECTURE.md explaining​​ design patterns and class​​​‌ hierarchies.

    10. Bug Fixes:‌ Resolved ggplot2 import issues,‌​‌ parameter handling edge cases,​​ and CSD plotting for​​​‌ various data configurations.

  • URL:‌
  • Contact:
    Celestin Bigarre‌​‌
  • Participants:
    Sebastien Benzekry, Celestin​​ Bigarre

8 New results​​​‌

8.1 Axis 1: Mechanistic‌ learning for clinical data‌​‌

8.1.1 An integrative multimodal​​ machine learning signature of​​​‌ primary resistance to immunotherapy‌ in advanced non-small cell‌​‌ lung cancer: biomarker analysis​​ from the PIONeeR study​​​‌

Participants: Laurent Greillier,‌ Joseph Ciccolini, Anastasiia‌​‌ Bakhmach, Paul Dufossé​​, Andrea Vaglio,​​​‌ Mélanie Karlsen, Mohamed‌ Boussena, Celestin Bigarre‌​‌, Mourad Hamimed,​​ Sébastien Benzekry.

Funding​​​‌ and data: RHU‌ PIONeeR

Preprint: 38‌​‌

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors​​ (ICIs) have transformed the​​​‌ treatment landscape for advanced‌ non-small cell lung cancer‌​‌ (NSCLC), yet primary resistance​​ remains common, with only​​​‌  50% of patients responding‌ to first-line chemo-immunotherapy and‌​‌ 20–30% to monotherapy. Existing​​ biomarkers such as PD-L1​​​‌ expression and tumor mutational‌ burden (TMB) demonstrate limited‌​‌ predictive accuracy, underscoring the​​ need for more comprehensive,​​​‌ integrative approaches.

Methods: We‌ conducted a prospective, multicenter‌​‌ study involving 439 patients​​ with advanced NSCLC treated​​​‌ with anti-PD-(L)1 ICI across‌ first- and later-line settings.‌​‌ A total of 443​​ pre-treatment tumor and blood-derived​​​‌ biomarkers—including genomic alterations, immune‌ cell phenotypes, proteomic markers,‌​‌ and routine laboratory tests—were​​ profiled. Both traditional biostatistics​​​‌ and a rigorously benchmarked‌ machine learning (ML) pipeline‌​‌ were applied to identify​​ predictors of primary resistance​​​‌ (PrR).

Results: Single biomarkers‌ showed limited predictive utility,‌​‌ with PD-L1 (AUC 0.62),​​ TMB (AUC 0.55), and​​​‌ key gene mutations (e.g.,‌ STK11, KEAP1) failing to‌​‌ achieve significance after multiple​​ testing correction. A gradient​​​‌ boosting ML model integrating‌ 18 features yielded a‌​‌ corrected AUC of 0.73​​ and a positive predictive​​​‌ value (PPV) of 60%‌ for PrR, outperforming standard‌​‌ biomarkers. In first-line patients,​​ the model achieved a​​​‌ PPV of 51% and‌ negative predictive value (NPV)‌​‌ of 79% (baseline PrR​​ rate: 29.9%); in subsequent-line​​​‌ patients, PPV reached 64%‌ (PrR rate: 55.1%). Importantly,‌​‌ the signature also stratified​​ progression-free survival (PFS): high-risk​​​‌ patients had a median‌ PFS of 3.9 vs.‌​‌ 14.6 months in low-risk​​ patients (HR 0.307, p​​​‌ < 0.0001). Features from‌ routine blood tests—such as‌​‌ serum chloride, albumin, C-reactive​​ protein, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio​​​‌ (MLR)—accounted for half of‌ the final model and‌​‌ demonstrated independent associations with​​ both PrR and PFS​​​‌ (e.g., chloride: OR 0.616,‌ AUC 0.626; HR 0.685,‌​‌ C-index 0.61). SHAP-based individual-level​​ model explainability revealed heterogeneous​​​‌ and nonlinear biomarker contributions,‌ including cases where high‌​‌ CRP, low albumin, or​​ elevated MLR overrode favorable​​​‌ PD-L1 or Treg profiles.‌

Conclusions: Multimodal machine learning‌​‌ integration of clinical, genomic,​​ immune, and laboratory data​​​‌ enables improved prediction of‌ ICI resistance in NSCLC‌​‌ beyond current biomarkers. This​​ approach not only captures​​​‌ the multifaceted nature of‌ tumor–host interactions but also‌​‌ highlights the underrecognized predictive​​​‌ value of accessible blood-based​ markers, offering a path​‌ toward individualized immunotherapy decision-making.​​

8.1.2 The SChISM study:​​​‌ Circulating cell-free DNA size​ profiles as predictors of​‌ progression in advanced carcinoma​​ treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors​​​‌

Participants: Linh Nguyen Phuong​, Laurent Greillier,​‌ Romain Zakrasjek, Lucie​​ Della-Negra, Sébastien Benzekry​​​‌, Sébastien Salas.​

Funding and data:​‌ SChISM study. Trial registration​​ NCT05083494.

Preprint: 45​​​‌

Background: Circulating cell-free DNA​ (cfDNA) offers a promising​‌ noninvasive way to predict​​ resistance to immune-checkpoint inhibitors​​​‌ (ICI), for which robust​ biomarkers are still lacking.​‌

Methods: The SChISM (Size​​ CfDNA Immunotherapy Signature Monitoring)​​​‌ proof-of-concept study (NCT05083494) collected​ baseline plasmatic cfDNA size​‌ profiles from 126 ICI-treated​​ advanced carcinomas, quantified using​​​‌ the innovative, patented and​ standardized BIABooster device (Adelis).​‌ Fragmentome-derived variables and standard​​ clinical variables (including neutrophils-to-lymphocyte​​​‌ ratio, NLR) were analyzed​ for univariable associations with​‌ early progression (EP, progression​​ at first imaging) and​​​‌ progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariable​ analysis was carried through​‌ both unsupervised and supervised​​ learning. Twenty-six variable selection​​​‌ methods combined with 11​ models were benchmarked to​‌ derive a multivariable predictive​​ model relying on a​​​‌ minimal subset of variables.​

Results: Higher cfDNA concentration​‌ and high quantities of​​ short fragments (111–240 base​​​‌ pairs (bp)) were associated​ with poor response and​‌ reduced PFS, unlike long​​ fragments (> 300​​​‌ bp). The proportion of​ fragments longer than 1650​‌ bp exhibited the strongest​​ association, with non-EP odds​​​‌ ratio = 0.39 [95%​ CI: 0.25–0.62] and PFS​‌ hazard ratio = 0.54​​ [95% CI: 0.42–0.68]. Unsupervised​​​‌ learning identified four patient​ clusters significantly associated with​‌ EP (p=​​0.004,​​​‌ Pearson's Chi-squared test) and​ PFS (p=​‌0.001,​​ log-rank test). The multivariable​​​‌ machine learning analysis identified​ a subset of nine​‌ variables that shown greater​​ performances in a logistic​​​‌ regression model (AUCsignature​=88.5​‌±3.3​​%, EP positive​​​‌ predictive value PPVsignature​=69.4​‌±7.49​​%) compared to​​​‌ single marker (AUCR​>1650=73​‌.6±3​​.70%,​​​‌ PPVR>1650​=55.8​‌±7.46​​%, AUCNLR​​​‌=68.9​±5.02​‌%, PPVNLR​​=52.6​​​‌±8.75​%).

Conclusion: The​‌ cfDNA size profiles were​​ significantly associated with progression​​​‌ and PFS during ICI,​ and outperformed routinely used​‌ markers.

8.1.3 Mechanistic Modeling​​ of cfDNA Fragmentome Dynamics​​​‌ Predicts Progression to Immunotherapy​

Participants: Linh Nguyen Phuong​‌, Frédéric Fina,​​ Laurent Greillier, Pascale​​​‌ Tomasini, Jean-Laurent Deville​, Audrey Boutonnet,​‌ Frédéric Ginot, Jean-Charles​​ Garcia, Sebastien Salas​​​‌, Sébastien Benzekry.​

Funding and data:​‌ SChISM study. Trial registration​​ NCT05083494.

Preprint: 44​​​‌

Background: Plasma cell-free DNA​ (cfDNA) shows promise as​‌ predictive cancer biomarker, but​​ mechanisms governing cfDNA production/fragmentation/elimination​​​‌ dynamics, and their relationships​ with tumor burden and​‌ disease progression, remain poorly​​ understood.

Methods: We developed​​ a mechanistic model jointly​​​‌ describing short (75-<580 bp)‌ and long (≥580-1650 bp)‌​‌ cfDNA dynamics alongside tumor​​ kinetics in 112 advanced​​​‌ cancer patients receiving immune‌ checkpoint inhibition, using a‌​‌ population approach.

Results: The​​ model successfully described complex​​​‌ cfDNA patterns, including treatment-initiation‌ spikes. It revealed large‌​‌ inter-patient variability in kinetic​​ cfDNA parameters, and a​​​‌ 7.4-fold higher shedding rate‌ for short versus long‌​‌ fragments. A model-derived parameter​​ from 6-weeks data —​​​‌ reflecting enhanced release or‌ reduced elimination of short‌​‌ fragments — was significantly​​ associated with progression-free survival​​​‌ (PFS) (HR=1.6 [95% confidence‌ interval (CI): 1.2-2.2], p=0.001).‌​‌ Notably, adding this parameter​​ to baseline clinical prognostic​​​‌ variables improved PFS prediction‌ (C-index 0.78 [95% CI:‌​‌ 0.73-0.89] vs 0.80 [95%​​ CI: 0.74-0.90], p<0.0001).

Conclusion:​​​‌ Our model provides quantitative‌ insights into cfDNA biology‌​‌ and offers a non-invasive​​ way to monitor and​​​‌ predict resistance before imaging.‌

8.1.4 Metamats: A mechanistic‌​‌ software for the simulation,​​ inference and prediction of​​​‌ clinical metastasis

Participants: Célestin‌ Bigarré, Alice Daumas‌​‌, Laurent Greillier,​​ Xavier Muracciole, Laeticia​​​‌ Padovani, Sébastien Benzekry‌.

Funding and data‌​‌: Inria-Inserm, AP-HM

Publication​​: 40

The development​​​‌ of metastases is a‌ complex process that can‌​‌ be better understood and​​ predicted using mathematical mechanistic​​​‌ models. We propose "METAMATS",‌ a ready-to-use modeling framework‌​‌ implementing a semi-mechanistic model​​ for simulating the time​​​‌ dynamics of metastatic development,‌ including a primary tumor‌​‌ and a population of​​ metastatic tumors. It relies​​​‌ on a reduced set‌ of mathematical parameters: α‌​‌ (tumor proliferation rate), μ​​ ( dissemination rate), and​​​‌ γ (fractal scale parameter).‌ "METAMATS" supports both individual‌​‌ and population-level analyses.

At​​ the individual level, it​​​‌ can simulate metastatic dynamics,‌ infer parameters from longitudinal‌​‌ metastasis size data, and​​ predict the natural history​​​‌ of cancer both retrospectively‌ and prospectively. At the‌​‌ population level, leveraging nonlinear​​ mixed effects modeling, "METAMATS"​​​‌ performs inference of parameter‌ distributions and assessment of‌​‌ biologically interpretable covariate effects​​ on proliferation and/or dissemination,​​​‌ from distant metastasis-free survival‌ data. "METAMATS" also serves‌​‌ as a generative model​​ for simulating virtual patients​​​‌ or populations.

We demonstrate‌ its applicability for modeling,‌​‌ inference, prediction, and simulation​​ in a clinical setting:​​​‌ the dynamics of brain‌ metastases (BM) in small-cell‌​‌ lung cancer patients and​​ the impact of prophylactic​​​‌ cranial irradiation (PCI). Data‌ included two cohorts: 103‌​‌ patients from Assistance publique-Hôpitaux​​ de Marseille with longitudinal​​​‌ individual measurements of BM‌ sizes, and 100 patients‌​‌ from the CONVERT study​​ (NCT00433563). PCI was found​​​‌ to have an impact‌ on BM by significantly‌​‌ reducing metastatic appearance (parameter​​ μ), rather than​​​‌ metastatic growth (parameter α‌), a biological finding‌​‌ impossible to obtain by​​ means of classical survival​​​‌ analysis only.

8.1.5 ROOFS:‌ RObust biOmarker Feature Selection‌​‌

Participants: Anastasiia Bakhmach,​​ Paul Dufossé, Andrea​​​‌ Vaglio, Laurent Greillier‌, Sébastien Benzekry.‌​‌

Funding and data:​​ RHU PIONeeR

Preprint:​​​‌ 37

Feature selection (FS)‌ is essential for biomarker‌​‌ discovery and in the​​ analysis of biomedical datasets.​​​‌ However, challenges such as‌ high-dimensional feature space, low‌​‌ sample size, multicollinearity, and​​​‌ missing values make FS​ non-trivial. Moreover, FS performances​‌ vary across datasets and​​ predictive tasks. We propose​​​‌ ROOFS, a Python package​ available at webpage,​‌ designed to help researchers​​ in the choice of​​​‌ FS method adapted to​ their problem. ROOFS benchmarks​‌ multiple FS methods on​​ the user's data and​​​‌ generates reports that summarize​ a comprehensive set of​‌ evaluation metrics, including downstream​​ predictive performance estimated using​​​‌ optimism correction, stability, reliability​ of individual features, and​‌ true positive and false​​ positive rates assessed on​​​‌ semi-synthetic data with a​ simulated outcome. We demonstrate​‌ the utility of ROOFS​​ on data from the​​​‌ PIONeeR clinical trial, aimed​ at identifying predictors of​‌ resistance to anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy​​ in lung cancer. The​​​‌ PIONeeR dataset contained 374​ multi-source blood and tumor​‌ biomarkers from 435 patients.​​ A reduced subset of​​​‌ 214 features was obtained​ through iterative variance inflation​‌ factor pre-filtering. Of the​​ 34 FS methods gathered​​​‌ in ROOFS, we evaluated​ 23 in combination with​‌ 11 classifiers (253 models​​ in total) and identified​​​‌ a filter based on​ the union of Benjamini-Hochberg​‌ false discovery rate-adjusted p-values​​ from t-test and logistic​​​‌ regression as the optimal​ approach, outperforming other methods​‌ including the widely used​​ LASSO. We conclude that​​​‌ comprehensive benchmarking with ROOFS​ has the potential to​‌ improve the robustness and​​ reproducibility of FS discoveries​​​‌ and increase the translational​ value of clinical models.​‌

8.2 Axis 2: Multi-omics​​ modeling

8.2.1 Cell Trajectory​​​‌ Inference based on Schrödinger​ Problem and a Mechanistic​‌ Model of Stochastic Gene​​ Expression

Participants: Elias Ventre​​​‌, Olivier Gandrillon [ENS​ Lyon], Fabien Crauste​‌ [MAP5], Clémence Fournié​​ [MAP5], Aymeric Baradat​​​‌ [UCBL1], Ulysse Herbach​ [Inria Nancy].

Publication​‌: Submitted in Systems​​ Biology and Applications43​​​‌

Cellular differentiation is the​ biological process that leads​‌ a cell to opt​​ for a particular cellular​​​‌ identity. Recently, single-cell RNA-sequencing​ has enabled the simultaneous​‌ measurement of gene expression​​ levels at specific times​​​‌ for a large number​ of individual cells and​‌ a large number of​​ genes. Repeating such measurements​​​‌ at different time points​ gives then access to​‌ the temporal variation, or​​ transport, of a distribution​​​‌ on a gene expression​ space. The whole temporal​‌ trajectory of distributions thus​​ characterizes the differentiation process​​​‌ at population level, but​ trajectories of individual cells​‌ are still out of​​ reach since most measurement​​​‌ techniques are destructive.

The​ optimal transport theory that​‌ has been used so​​ far to infer cellular​​​‌ differentiation trajectories from time-stamped​ single-cell RNA-seq data involves​‌ solving the so-called Schrödinger​​ problem in its most​​​‌ common version. This implies​ assuming that cells move,​‌ in the gene expression​​ space, by diffusion. Yet,​​​‌ real gene dynamics are​ much more complex.

In​‌ the present work, we​​ assume that mRNA dynamics​​​‌ are characterized by brief​ and important production of​‌ RNA, with long periods​​ of inactivity in between,​​​‌ and consider the so-called​ Bursty model of gene​‌ dynamics. We use this​​ model to define a​​​‌ reference process for the​ Schrödinger problem. By comparing​‌ the solutions of the​​ Schrödinger problems with a​​ Diffusive and a Bursty​​​‌ reference process, under different‌ conditions, we show that‌​‌ the Bursty model provides​​ a better approximation of​​​‌ the underlying gene dynamics‌ than the standard Diffusive‌​‌ process when inferring cell​​ trajectories.

8.2.2 Global StationaryOT:​​​‌ Trajectory inference for aging‌ time courses of single-cell‌​‌ snapshots

Participants: Elias Ventre​​, Geoffrey Schiebinger [UBC]​​​‌, Cole Boyle [UBC]‌.

Publication: Submitted‌​‌ in Bioinformatics41

Trajectory​​ inference (TI) methods for​​​‌ single-cell snapshots of developmental‌ systems have yielded numerous‌​‌ insights into the gene​​ regulatory networks (GRNs) that​​​‌ control cell differentiation. Many‌ TI algorithms have been‌​‌ proposed for recovering cell​​ trajectories from single samples​​​‌ containing cells spanning a‌ spectrum of differentiation states;‌​‌ however, these methods cannot​​ leverage temporal information when​​​‌ a time course of‌ such diverse samples is‌​‌ available. As interest grows​​ in understanding how GRNs​​​‌ change as an organism‌ ages, current TI theory‌​‌ and methods must be​​ adapted to take advantage​​​‌ of all information in‌ aging time courses of‌​‌ single-cell data. In this​​ paper, we present our​​​‌ novel age-conscious method, Global‌ StationaryOT, which exploits the‌​‌ temporal information in aging​​ time courses to simultaneously​​​‌ reconstruct debiased cell trajectories‌ at all ages. We‌​‌ demonstrate that this first-of-its-kind​​ method achieves more accurate,​​​‌ biologically consistent trajectories in‌ synthetic and real biological‌​‌ contexts where data sparsity​​ produces significant noise in​​​‌ the outputs of current‌ TI methods when they‌​‌ are applied to time​​ course samples independently.

8.3​​​‌ Axis 3: Pharmacokinetic Modeling‌ for drug delivery

8.3.1‌​‌ THERMONANO

Participants: Anne Rodallec​​, Sophie Marolleau,​​​‌ Sébastien Benzekry.

Publication‌: communicated at PAGE‌​‌ 55 and CRS Benelux​​ & France LC 36​​​‌

Data: PK and‌ PD data on breast‌​‌ cancer bearing mice, Paris-Sud.​​

Background

Commercial Paclitaxel (PTX)​​​‌ formulations such as Taxol‌ are associated with adverse‌​‌ drug toxicities related to​​ the added emulsionizer. Therefore,​​​‌ PTX formulations have been‌ explored as they could‌​‌ increase efficacy and have​​ improved pharmacokinetic (PK) properties.​​​‌ Recently our partners have‌ developed a new polymer‌​‌ prodrug of PTX for​​ which we proposed that​​​‌ metronomic dosing could result‌ in an effective and‌​‌ tolerable anticancer treatment that​​ is simultaneously convenient for​​​‌ patients as it allows‌ for subcutaneous (SC) administration.‌​‌

Objective

The objective of​​ this study was to​​​‌ develop a PK/PD model‌ of a novel polymer‌​‌ prodrug subcutaneously injectable to​​ predict the best administration​​​‌ scheme.

Methods

Pharmacokinetics and‌ pharmacodynamics (PD) studies were‌​‌ done on MCF-7 bearing​​ mice using Monolix software.​​​‌ The PK model was‌ developed on both intravenous‌​‌ (IV) Ptx and SC​​ Ptx-PAAm (7mg/kg) data. The​​​‌ PD model was developed‌ on three PD data‌​‌ sets (control, IV Ptx,​​ SC Ptx-PAAm 15mg/kg), and​​​‌ validated on an independent‌ group (SC Ptx-PAAm 60mg/kg).‌​‌ Simulations explored multiple treatment​​ schedules, and the most​​​‌ effective ones were tested‌ in vivo.

Results

The‌​‌ optimal model included a​​ two-compartment PK structure and​​​‌ drug resistance in the‌ PD component. The in‌​‌ vivo results demonstrated excellent​​ agreement with the model​​​‌ predictions. A loading dose‌ followed by daily administration‌​‌ achieved 60% complete response,​​​‌ outperforming previous internal results​ (tumor volume reduced to​‌ 60 versus 1350 mm​​3), without additional​​​‌ toxicity.

Conclusion

: Our​ PK/PD model showed SC​‌ Ptx-PAAm with optimized regimens​​ significantly increased efficacy over​​​‌ standard schedules.

8.3.2 Injectable​ Gel–Based Subcutaneous Delivery of​‌ Antibody–Drug Conjugates

Participants: Anne​​ Rodallec, Yacine Gomari​​​‌, Joseph Ciccolini.​

Publication: communicated at​‌ Canceropole 51

Data:​​ PK and PD data​​​‌ on breast cancer bearing​ mice, Strasbourg.

Background

:​‌ Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs)​​ are increasingly used in​​​‌ oncology but are currently​ limited to intravenous (IV)​‌ delivery. Subcutaneous (SC) administration​​ could improve patient quality​​​‌ of life and was​ previously developed for large​‌ molecules. However, hyaluronidase, the​​ only SC option for​​​‌ monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), has​ limitations for ADCs SC​‌ delivery (local inflammation, toxicity,​​ cold storage) which were​​​‌ addressed in this project​ by developing a novel​‌ polymeric formulation.

Objective

:​​ The objective of this​​​‌ study was to develop​ a PK/PD model of​‌ a innovative subcutaneously injectable​​ to predict the best​​​‌ administration scheme.

Methods

:​ To evaluate its potential​‌ and guide further development,​​ a population pharmacokinetic (popPK)​​​‌ model of trastuzumab emtansine​ (T-DM1) polymeric formulation was​‌ developed using experimental pharmacokinetic​​ data from 60 BALB/c​​​‌ mice (4 T-DM1 groups:​ IV, SC, SC-polymer at​‌ two doses). Total trastuzumab​​ was quantified by HTRF​​​‌ (Homogeneous Time-Resolved Fluorescence) on​ plasma samples. Data were​‌ analyzed using MonolixSuite™ through​​ non-compartmental (NCA) and stepwise​​​‌ compartmental analyses (CA).

Results​

NCA showed IV parameters​‌ were consistent with literature​​ and SC-polymer absorption was​​​‌ saturated (bioavailability: 66% at​ 17.5 mg/kg; 55% at​‌ 30 mg/kg). A one-compartment​​ model with linear elimination,​​​‌ absorption lag time and​ a dose-dependent bioavailability term​‌ for SC-polymer was developed.​​ This term accounted for​​​‌ saturation by reducing bioavailability​ as dose increased. Goodness​‌ of fit was assessed​​ through graphical diagnostics, numerical​​​‌ observations and model robustness.​

Conclusion

: This validated​‌ model will support future​​ PK/PD modeling integrating tumor​​​‌ growth data to optimize​ T-DM1 SC-polymer administration scheduling.​‌

8.3.3 Preclinical Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Modeling​​ of Antibody Nanoconjugates for​​​‌ Breast Cancer Treatment

Participants:​ Anne Rodallec, Sebastien​‌ Benzekry, Joseph Ciccolini​​, Raphaelle Fanciullino.​​​‌

Publication: Preprint available​ 47

Data: Biodistribution​‌ and PD data on​​ breast cancer bearing mice.​​​‌

Background

: Over the​ past five years, the​‌ number of antibody–drug conjugates​​ (ADCs) entering the oncology​​​‌ market has surged. By​ contrast, the clinical use​‌ of immunoliposomes—nanoparticles that also​​ employ antibodies as targeting​​​‌ agents (i.e., antibody–nanoconjugates, ANCs)—has​ yet to receive approval.​‌ One possible reason is​​ the limited understanding of​​​‌ the relationship between ANC​ exposure and efficacy.

Objective​‌

: The objective of​​ this study was to​​​‌ develop a PK/PD model​ of an immunoliposome to​‌ predict the best administration​​ scheme.

Methods

: To​​​‌ address this gap, we​ developed a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD)​‌ model for a docetaxel–trastuzumab​​ ANC. PK and PD​​​‌ studies were conducted in​ MDA-MB-231 tumor–bearing mice, divided​‌ into three treatment groups:​​ (i) control, (ii) free​​​‌ docetaxel + free trastuzumab,​ and (iii) docetaxel–trastuzumab ANCs.​‌ PK data were obtained​​ by fluorescence imaging and​​ captured systemic and tumor​​​‌ distribution of ANCs, while‌ PD data were based‌​‌ on tumor growth measurements.​​ The PK model was​​​‌ built using data from‌ the ANC group, and‌​‌ the PD model was​​ developed across all three​​​‌ treatment groups, with a‌ leave-one-out cross validation strategy‌​‌ for predictive evaluation. Treatment​​ schedule simulations were then​​​‌ performed.

Results

: Using‌ a population nonlinear mixed-effects‌​‌ (NLME) approach, the final​​ PK model included a​​​‌ central and a tumor‌ compartment, each with independent‌​‌ elimination rates. Tumor growth​​ dynamics were best described​​​‌ by a reduced Gompertz‌ model coupled with a‌​‌ Simeoni resistance model. This​​ model demonstrated strong predictive​​​‌ performance. Using only data‌ from the first two‌​‌ treatment cycles (4 time​​ points) and Bayesian estimation​​​‌ in the test set,‌ it accurately predicted systemic‌​‌ and tumor ANC concentrations​​ across the subsequent four​​​‌ treatment cycles, with a‌ relative error (RE) below‌​‌ 15%. Prediction precision was​​ further improved (RE <5%)​​​‌ when data from one‌ additional treatment cycle were‌​‌ incorporated. Similar performance was​​ achieved for PD data,​​​‌ with tumor volume predictions‌ exhibiting RE < 15%‌​‌ and RE <7.5% when​​ implementing data from two​​​‌ and three treatment cycles,‌ respectively. The model was‌​‌ then applied to simulate​​ alternative treatment schedules. Interestingly,​​​‌ while systemic exposure remained‌ comparable across regimens, weekly‌​‌ administration yielded the greatest​​ tumor exposure compared to​​​‌ daily, every-5-day, and every-35-day‌ dosing (mean ± SD‌​‌ tumor AUC: 55.4 ±​​ 10.9 mg/kg·day vs. 47.6​​​‌ ± 9.38 mg/kg·day, 51.4‌ ± 11.5 mg/kg·day, and‌​‌ 44.6 ± 10.028 mg/kg·day,​​ respectively, one-way ANOVA, p​​​‌ < 0.001), highlighting the‌ importance of dosing frequency.‌​‌

Conclusion

: Overall, these​​ results illustrate how PK/PD​​​‌ modeling can refine intra-tumor‌ PK understanding and support‌​‌ preclinical development of innovative​​ formulations such as ANCs.​​​‌

8.3.4 Adaptive dosing of‌ high-dose busulfan in real-world‌​‌ adult patients undergoing haematopoietic​​ cell transplant conditioning

Participants:​​​‌ Dorian Protzenko, Joseph‌ Ciccolini.

Background

To‌​‌ evaluate the effectiveness of​​ a Bayesian adaptive dosing​​​‌ strategy in achieving target‌ busulfan exposure in adult‌​‌ patients undergoing haematopoietic cell​​ transplantation (HCT).

Patients and​​​‌ Methods

This study included‌ 71 adult patients scheduled‌​‌ to receive high-dose busulfan.​​ Busulfan was administered to​​​‌ achieve a cumulative area‌ under the curve (AUC)‌​‌ of 66.0 mg/L/h (16​​ 000 μM/min), 82.60 mg/L/h​​​‌ (20 000 μM/min) or‌ 87.6 mg/L/h (21 200‌​‌ μM/min) depending on the​​ regimen. Individual pharmacokinetic (PK)​​​‌ parameters of busulfan were‌ estimated from three blood‌​‌ samples using a one-compartment​​ model and Bayesian estimation​​​‌ after the first standard‌ dose. Individual PK parameters‌​‌ were used to adjust​​ subsequent doses to achieve​​​‌ the target exposure.

Results‌

All patients had their‌​‌ dose adjusted after the​​ first dose administration. The​​​‌ final deviation from the‌ target AUC was significantly‌​‌ improved compared to the​​ initial deviation after standard​​​‌ mg/kg dosing (mean absolute‌ deviation 19.5% vs 11.7%,‌​‌ P <.01​​). In addition, the​​​‌ proportion of patients with‌ marked deviation from target‌​‌ exposure (ie, >25​​%) decreased significantly from​​​‌ 31% after standard dosing‌ to 10% after PK-guided‌​‌ dosing (P <.​​​‌01). Canonical busulfan-related​ toxicity, specifically veno-occlusive disease,​‌ was observed in 5%​​ of patients who achieved​​​‌ successful PK-guided dosing. In​ contrast, one-third of patients​‌ with off-target exposure with​​ poor dosing experienced toxicity.​​​‌

Conclusion

The Bayesian adaptive​ dosing strategy significantly improves​‌ the accuracy of achieving​​ the target busulfan AUC​​​‌ in patients undergoing HCT.​ This approach not only​‌ reduces marked deviations from​​ target exposure, but also​​​‌ reduces the incidence of​ busulfan-related toxicity, thereby maintaining​‌ a favorable toxicity/efficacy ratio.​​

8.3.5 Overcoming immuno-resistance by​​​‌ rescheduling anti-VEGF/cytotoxics/anti-PD-1 combination in​ lung cancer model

Participants:​‌ Guillaume Sicard, Dorian​​ Protzenko, Sarah Giacometti​​​‌, Joseph Ciccolini,​ Raphaelle Fanciullino.

Background​‌

Many tumors are refractory​​ to immune checkpoint inhibitors,​​​‌ but their combination with​ cytotoxics is expected to​‌ improve sensitivity. Understanding how​​ and when cytotoxics best​​​‌ re-stimulate tumor immunity could​ help overcome resistance to​‌ immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Methods​​

In vivo studies were​​​‌ performed in C57BL/6 mice​ grafted with immune-refractory LL/2​‌ lung cancer model. A​​ longitudinal immunomonitoring study on​​​‌ tumor, spleen, and blood​ after multiple treatments including​‌ Cisplatin, Pemetrexed, and anti-VEGF​​ (either alone or in​​​‌ combination) was performed, spanning​ a period of up​‌ to 21 days, to​​ determine the optimal time​​​‌ window during which immune​ checkpoint inhibitors should be​‌ added. Finally, an efficacy​​ study was conducted comparing​​​‌ the antiproliferative performance of​ various schedules of anti-VEGF,​‌ Pemetrexed-Cisplatin doublet, plus anti-PD-1​​ (i.e., immunomonitoring-guided scheduling, concurrent​​​‌ dosing or a random​ sequence), as well as​‌ single agent anti-PD1.

Results​​

Immunomonitoring showed marked differences​​​‌ between treatments, organs, and​ time points. However, harnessing​‌ tumor immunity (i.e., promoting​​ CD8 T cells or​​​‌ increasing the T CD8/Treg​ ratio) started on day​‌ 7 and peaked on​​ day 14 with the​​​‌ anti-VEGF followed by cytotoxics​ combination. Therefore, a 14-day​‌ delay between anti-VEGF/cytotoxic and​​ anti-PD1 administration was considered​​​‌ the best sequence to​ test. Efficacy studies then​‌ confirmed that this sequence​​ achieved higher antiproliferative efficacy​​​‌ compared to other treatment​ modalities (i.e., -71% in​‌ tumor volume compared to​​ control).

Conclusions

Anti-VEGF and​​​‌ cytotoxic agents show time-dependent​ immunomodulatory effects, suggesting that​‌ sequencing is a critical​​ feature when combining these​​​‌ agents with immune checkpoint​ inhibitors. An efficacy study​‌ confirmed that sequencing treatments​​ further enhance antiproliferative effects​​​‌ in lung cancer models​ compared to concurrent dosing​‌ and partly reverse the​​ resistance to cytotoxics and​​​‌ anti-PD1.

8.3.6 Pegylated liposome​ encapsulating docetaxel using microfluidic​‌ mixing technique: Process optimization​​ and results in breast​​​‌ cancer models

Participants: Mathilde​ Dacos, Anne Rodallec​‌, Benoit Immordino,​​ Sarah Giacometti, Guillaume​​​‌ Sicard, Joseph Ciccolini​, Raphaelle Fanciullino.​‌

Background

The development of​​ nanoparticles could help to​​​‌ improve the efficacy/toxicity balance​ of drugs. This project​‌ aimed to develop liposomes​​ and immunoliposomes using microfluidic​​​‌ mixing technology.

Patients and​ Methods

Various formulation tests​‌ were carried out to​​ obtain liposomes that met​​​‌ the established specifications. The​ liposomes were then characterized​‌ in terms of size,​​ polydispersity index (PDI), docetaxel​​​‌ encapsulation rate and lamellarity.​ Antiproliferative activity was tested​‌ in human breast cancer​​ models ranging from near-negative​​ (MDA-MB-231), positive (MDA-MB-453) to​​​‌ HER2 positive. Pharmacokinetic studies‌ were performed in C57BL/6‌​‌ mice. Numerous batches of​​ liposomes were synthesized using​​​‌ identical molar ratios and‌ by varying the microfluidic‌​‌ parameters total flow rate​​ (TFR), flow rate ratio​​​‌ (FRR) and buffer.

Results‌

All synthesized liposomes have‌​‌ a size < 200​​ nm, but only Lipo-1,​​​‌ Lipo-6, Lipo-7, Lipo-8 have‌ a PDI < 0.2,‌​‌ which meets our initial​​ requirements. The size of​​​‌ the liposomes was correlated‌ with the total FRR,‌​‌ for a 1:1 FRR​​ the size is 122.2​​​‌ ± 12.3 nm, whereas‌ for a 1:3 FRR‌​‌ the size obtained is​​ 163.4 ± 34.0 nm​​​‌ (p = 0.019). Three‌ batches of liposomes were‌​‌ obtained with high docetaxel​​ encapsulation rates > 80​​​‌ %. Furthermore, in vitro‌ studies on breast cancer‌​‌ cell lines demonstrated the​​ efficacy of liposomes obtained​​​‌ by microfluidic mixing technique.‌ These liposomes also showed‌​‌ improved pharmacokinetics compared to​​ free docetaxel, with a​​​‌ longer half-life and higher‌ AUC (3-fold and 3.5-fold‌​‌ increase for the immunoliposome,​​ respectively).

Conclusions

This suggests​​​‌ that switching to the‌ microfluidic process will produce‌​‌ batches of liposomes with​​ the same characteristics in​​​‌ terms of in vitro‌ properties and efficacy, as‌​‌ well as the ability​​ to release the encapsulated​​​‌ drug over time in‌ vivo. This time-efficiency of‌​‌ the microfluidic technique is​​ critical, especially in the​​​‌ early stages of development.‌

8.3.7 Body mass index‌​‌ affects imatinib exposure: Real-world​​ evidence from TDM with​​​‌ adaptive dosing

Participants: Paul‌ Maroselli, Joseph Ciccolini‌​‌, Raphaelle Fanciullino.​​

Background

Imatinib is the​​​‌ treatment of elderly or‌ frail patients with chronic‌​‌ myeloid leukemia (CML). Trough​​ levels of around 1000​​​‌ ng/ml are considered as‌ the target exposure.

Methods‌​‌

We searched for baseline​​ parameters associated with imatinib​​​‌ pharmacokinetics, and studied the‌ clinical impact of subsequent‌​‌ adaptive dosing. We present​​ data from 60 adult​​​‌ CML patients upon imatinib‌ with therapeutic drug monitoring‌​‌ (TDM) and adaptive dosing.​​

Results

Mean trough levels​​​‌ after treatment initiation were‌ 994.2 ± 560.6 ng/ml‌​‌ (with 56% inter-patient variability).​​ Only 29% of patients​​​‌ were in the therapeutic‌ range. Body weight, height,‌​‌ body surface area, body​​ mass index (BMI), and​​​‌ age were associated with‌ imatinib plasma levels on‌​‌ univariate analysis. Age and​​ BMI remained the only​​​‌ parameters associated with imatinib‌ trough levels on multivariate‌​‌ analysis. As severe toxicities​​ have been previously reported​​​‌ in patients with low‌ BMI treated with standard‌​‌ imatinib, we evaluated the​​ extent to which low​​​‌ BMI may lead to‌ plasma overexposure. We found‌​‌ a statistically significant difference​​ in trough imatinib levels​​​‌ in patients with BMI‌ <18.5‌​‌ kg/m2, with exposure +61.5%​​ higher than in patients​​​‌ with 18.5 < BMI‌ 24.9 and +76.3%‌​‌ higher than in patients​​ with BMI 25.​​​‌ After TDM with adaptive‌ dosing, a statistically significant‌​‌ difference in dosing between​​ patients was observed, with​​​‌ doses ranging from 200‌ to 700 mg. No‌​‌ difference in toxicity or​​ efficacy was observed regardless​​​‌ of BMI after adaptive‌ dosing.

Conclusion

Our data‌​‌ suggest that low BMI​​​‌ has a significant impact​ on imatinib exposure but​‌ that pharmacokinetically-guided dosing limits​​ its clinical impact in​​​‌ patients.

8.3.8 Life-threatening toxicities​ upon Pembrolizumab intake: could​‌ pharmacokinetics be the bad​​ guy?

Participants: Mourad Hamimed​​​‌, Sophie Marolleau,​ Joseph Ciccolini.

Background​‌

We report the case​​ of an adult patient​​​‌ diagnosed with Hodgkin's lymphoma​ who was scheduled for​‌ Pembrolizumab after failure of​​ standard therapy. After three​​​‌ well-tolerated courses of Pembrolizumab,​ a PET scan showed​‌ a favorable outcome and​​ a fourth course of​​​‌ Pembrolizumab was started. Unexpectedly,​ extremely severe toxicities (i.e.,​‌ autoimmune peripheral hypothyroidism, rhabdomyolysis​​ and severe acute renal​​​‌ failure) occurred after this​ last course, requiring transfer​‌ to the intensive care​​ unit.

Methods

Therapeutic drug​​​‌ monitoring was performed to​ measure residual Pembrolizumab levels​‌ at intervals from the​​ last dose (i.e., 120​​​‌ and then 170 days),​ as well as pharmacogenetics​‌ investigations on the FCγR​​ gene.

Results

Pembrolizumab plasma​​​‌ concentrations that were still​ pharmacologically active months after​‌ the last administration, suggesting​​ impaired elimination of Pembrolizumab​​​‌ in this patient. Further​ pharmacokinetic modeling based on​‌ the population approach showed​​ that both half-life (47.8​​​‌ days) and clearance (0.12​ L/day) values were significantly​‌ different from the standard​​ values usually reported in​​​‌ patients. Further in silico​ simulations showed that pharmacologically​‌ active concentrations of Pembrolizumab​​ were maintained for up​​​‌ to 136 days after​ the last dose. The​‌ search for possible polymorphisms​​ affecting the genes coding​​​‌ for FCγR (i.e., rs1801274​ on FCGR2A and rs396991​‌ on FCGR3A gene) was​​ negative. Further TDM showed​​​‌ that Pembrolizumab could be​ detected up to 263​‌ days after the last​​ administration.

Conclusion

This case​​​‌ report suggests that persistent​ overexposure in plasma could​‌ lead to life-threatening toxicities​​ with Pembrolizumab.

8.3.9 Poor​​​‌ prognosis of SRSF2 gene​ mutations in patients treated​‌ with VEN-AZA for newly​​ diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia​​​‌

Participants: Raphaelle Fanciullino.​

Background

Mutations in spliceosome​‌ genes (SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1,​​ ZRSR2) correlate with inferior​​​‌ outcomes in patients treated​ with intensive chemotherapy for​‌ Acute Myeloid Leukemia. However,​​ their prognostic impact in​​​‌ patients treated with less​ intensive protocols is not​‌ well known.

Methods

This​​ study aimed to evaluate​​​‌ the impact of Spliceosome​ mutations in patients treated​‌ with Venetoclax and Azacitidine​​ for newly diagnosed acute​​​‌ myeloid leukemia (AML). 117​ patients treated in 3​‌ different hospitals were included​​ in the analysis.

Results​​​‌

Thirty-four harbored a mutation​ in at least one​‌ of the spliceosome genes​​ (splice-mut cohort). K/NRAS mutations​​​‌ were more frequent in​ the splice-mut cohort (47%​‌ vs 19%, p=0.0022). Response​​ rates did not differ​​​‌ between splice-mut and splice-wt​ cohorts. With a median​‌ follow-up of 15 months,​​ splice mutations were associated​​​‌ with a lower 18-month​ LFS (p=0.0045). When analyzing​‌ splice mutations separately, we​​ found SRSF2 mutations to​​​‌ be associated with poorer​ outcomes (p=0.034 and p=0.037​‌ for OS and LFS​​ respectively). This negative prognostic​​​‌ impact remained true in​ our multivariate analysis.

Conclusion​‌

We believe this finding​​ should warrant further studies​​​‌ aimed at overcoming this​ negative impact.

9 Bilateral​‌ contracts and grants with​​ industry

9.1 Research contracts​​

CIFRE PhD of S.​​​‌ Benamara
  • Title:
    Predicting monoclonal‌ antibody pharmacokinetics using PBPK‌​‌ modeling: towards an integrated​​ strategy to support first-in-human​​​‌ (FIH) clinical trials
  • Partner‌ Institutions:
    • D. Teutonico (Sanofi,‌​‌ Paris)
  • Date/Duration:
    2023 -​​ 2026
  • Funding:
    120k€, CIFRE​​​‌
  • Principal investigator:
    D. Teutonico‌ (Sanofi, Paris)
  • COMPO members‌​‌ involved:
    F. Gattacceca (co-supervisor).​​
NANOSTAP
  • Title:
    Development of​​​‌ dual nanoparticles in PDAC‌ models
  • Partner Institution:
    • Pancreas‌​‌ Team CRCM
    • EsqLabs
  • Date/Duration:​​
    2025-2028
  • Funding:
    30 K€​​​‌ Canceropole + CIFRE Grant‌
  • Principal investigator:
    J.Ciccolini
  • COMPO‌​‌ members involved:
    J. Ciccolini,​​ A. Rodallec, R. Fanciullino,​​​‌ E. Diroff (Ph.D. student)‌

9.2 Clinical trials

Participants:‌​‌ Joseph Ciccolini, Raphaelle​​ Fanciullino, Laurent Greillier​​​‌, Sebastien Salas.‌

CetuxiMAX
  • Registration: NCT4218136
  • Partner:‌​‌ Merck Serono
  • Title: Maximizing​​ Cetuximab efficacy in head​​​‌ and neck cancer patients‌ through PK/PD modeling
  • Funding:‌​‌ 40 k€
  • Duration: 2020​​ - 2025
  • Principal investigator:​​​‌ Sébastien Salas
ALTER
  • Registration:‌ in progress
  • Partner: IPC‌​‌
  • Title: A multicenter, randomized,​​ open-label phase II trial​​​‌ evaluating alternating sacituzumab govitecan‌ and trastuzumab deruxtecan in‌​‌ patients with metastatic or​​ locally advanced HER2-low triple-negative​​​‌ breast cancer.
  • Funding: PHRC-K‌ (INCa)
  • Duration: 2025-2028
  • COMPO‌​‌ Investigator: Joseph Ciccolini
PEMBOV​​
  • Registration: NCT03596281
  • Partner: INCa​​​‌
  • Title: Pembrolizumab in Combination‌ With Bevacizumab and Pegylated‌​‌ Liposomal Doxorubicin in Patients​​ With Ovarian Cancer (PEMBOV)​​​‌
  • Funding: 700 k€
  • Duration:‌ 2020-2025
  • Principal investigator: Judith‌​‌ Mitchels (IGR)
  • COMPO investigator:​​ Joseph Ciccolini
REZOLVE
  • Registration:​​​‌ ANZGOG-1101
  • Partner: Sydney Medical‌ Center Australia
  • Title: Pembrolizumab‌​‌ in Combination With Bevacizumab​​ and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin​​​‌ in Patients With Ovarian‌ Cancer (PEMBOV)
  • Funding: Aus$‌​‌ 800k
  • Duration: 2018-2026
  • Principal​​ investigator: Sonia Yip (Sydney​​​‌ University)
  • COMPO investigator: Joseph‌ Ciccolini
ZEN-CLL
  • Registration: ongoing‌​‌
  • Partner: IUCT Toulouse, University​​ Hospital of Lyon, University​​​‌ Hospital of Clermont Ferrand‌
  • Title: Search for Predictive‌​‌ Marker of Zanibrutinib in​​ CLL patients.
  • Funding: 300​​​‌ K€ (BeiGene)
  • Duration: 2025-2028‌
  • Principal investigator: Eloise Perrot‌​‌ (Lysarc Lyon)
  • COMPO investigator:​​ Joseph Ciccolini
PERSEE
  • Registration:​​​‌ EudraCT 2020-002626-86
  • Partner: CHRU‌ de Brest
  • Title: A‌​‌ trial comparing the pembrolizumab​​ platinum based chemotherapy combination​​​‌ with pembrolizumab monotherapy in‌ first line treatment of‌​‌ non small-cell lung cancer​​ (NSCLC) patients
  • Starting year:​​​‌ 2020
  • Principal investigator: Renaud‌ Descourt, Chantal Decroisette, Christos‌​‌ Chouaid
  • COMPO investigator: Laurent​​ Greillier
ELEVATE HNSCC
  • Registration:​​​‌ NCT04854499
  • Partner: Gilead Sciences‌
  • Title: Study of Magrolimab‌​‌ Combination Therapy in Patients​​ With Head and Neck​​​‌ Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Duration:‌ 2021-2025
  • COMPO investigator: Sébastien‌​‌ Salas
Iintune-1
  • Registration: NCT04420884​​
  • Partner: Takeda
  • Title: A​​​‌ Study of Dazostinag as‌ Single Agent and Dazostinag‌​‌ in Combination With Pembrolizumab​​ in Adults With Advanced​​​‌ or Metastatic Solid Tumors‌
  • Duration: 2020-2026
  • COMPO investigator:‌​‌ Sébastien Salas
ADAPTABLE
  • Registration:​​ NCT05781308
  • Partner: Intergroupe Francophone​​​‌ de Cancerologie Thoracique
  • Title:‌ Combination of Paclitaxel-bevacizumab ±‌​‌ Atezolizumab in Patients With​​ Advanced NSCLC Progressing After​​​‌ Immunotherapy & Chemotherapy
  • Duration:‌ 2023-2026
  • COMPO investigator: Laurent‌​‌ Greillier

10 Partnerships and​​ cooperations

10.1 International research​​​‌ visitors

10.1.1 Visits of‌ international scientists

Nov-Dec 2025:‌​‌ COMPO hosts Shav Chakraborty​​ from Perth University Medical​​​‌ School (Australia)

10.1.2 Visits‌ to international teams

Nov.‌​‌ 2025: Joseph Ciccolini was​​ an invited-speaker at Hanoi​​​‌ Oncology Hospital, VietNam, as‌ part of the initiation‌​‌ of a collaborative project​​​‌ on clinical pharmacokinetics and​ clinical pharmacology of anticancer​‌ agents.

Nov. 2025: Joseph​​ ciccolini was an invited​​​‌ speaker at Leiden Medical​ Center, Netherlands (Dirk Jan​‌ Moes Lab) as part​​ of the initiation of​​​‌ collaborative projects on the​ clinical pharmacokinetics of antibody​‌ drug conjugates.

10.2 National​​ initiatives

Note: COMPO seniors​​​‌ (respectively, juniors) are permanent​ (respectively, non-permanent) researchers.

10.2.1​‌ Axis 1: Mechanistic learning​​ for clinical data

Participants:​​​‌ Sebastien Benzekry, David​ Boulate, Xavier Muracciole​‌.

LUCA-pi RHU
  • Title:​​
    Lung cancer prevention and​​​‌ interception
  • Partner Institutions:
    • Gustave​ Roussy Institute (G. Kroemer,​‌ L. Zitvogel)
    • Therapanacea (N.​​ Paragios)
    • CIML (P. Milpied)​​​‌
  • Date/Duration:
    2023 - 2028​
  • Funding:
    10 M€,​‌ ANR
  • Principal investigator:
    D.​​ Boulate (COMPO)
  • COMPO seniors:​​​‌
    D. Barbolosi, S. Benzekry​
  • COMPO juniors:
    L. Nguyen-Phuong,​‌ A. Vaglio, R. Zakrasjek​​
DIGPHAT PEPR Digital Health​​​‌
  • Title:
    Digital pharmacological twin​
  • Partner Institutions:
    • JB Woillard​‌ (CHU Limoges)
    • C. Battail​​ (CEA Grenoble)
    • M. Ursino​​​‌ + S. Zohar (HEKA,​ Inria, Paris)
    • J. Josse​‌ (PREMEDICAL, Inria, Montpellier)
    • E.​​ Chatelut + M. White-Koning​​​‌ (IUCT, Toulouse)
  • Date/Duration:
    2023​ - 2028
  • Funding:
    Total​‌ 1.8 M€, COMPO 251k€​​
  • Principal investigator:
    JB Woillard​​​‌ (CHU Limoges)
  • COMPO senior:​
    S. Benzekry.
  • COMPO juniors:​‌
    A. Bakhmach, S. Charpigny​​
LABreX COALA
  • Title:
    Cure​​​‌ Oncogene-Addicted Lung Adenocarcinoma
  • Partner​ Institutions:
    15 constitutive national​‌ teams + 9 associated​​
  • Date/Duration:
    2024 - 2029​​​‌
  • Funding:
    Total 3M€, COMPO​ 130k€
  • Principal investigator:
    J.​‌ Mazières (CRCT, Toulouse)
  • COMPO​​ senior:
    S. Benzekry.
  • COMPO​​​‌ junior:
    A. Pottier
SChISM​
  • Title:
    Size CfDNA Immunotherapies​‌ Signature Monitoring
  • Partner Institutions:​​
    • APHM
    • M. Lavielle (XPOP​​​‌ – Inria)
    • Adelis
    • F.​ Fina (ID-Solutions Oncology)
  • Date/Duration:​‌
    2022 - 2025
  • Funding:​​
    120k€, APHM +​​​‌ PhD grant ICI -​ Laennec
  • Principal investigator:
    S.​‌ Benzekry, S. Salas
  • COMPO​​ junior:
    L. Nguyen Phuong​​​‌
METAMATS
  • Title:
    Mechanistic modeling​ for the prediction of​‌ metastatic relapse in breast​​ cancer
  • Partner Institutions:
    • F.​​​‌ Bertucci (IPC, Marseille)
    • G.​ MacGrogan (Institut Bergonié ,​‌ Bordeaux)
  • Date/Duration:
    2020 -​​ 2025
  • Funding:
    100k€,​​​‌ Inria-Inserm PhD grant
  • Principal​ investigator:
    S. Benzekry, X.​‌ Muracciole
  • COMPO members involved:​​
    C. Bigarre
AML
  • Title:​​​‌
    Prédiction de la Toxicité​ du Venetoclax dans la​‌ Population de Patients Agés​​ traités pour une LAM​​​‌
  • Partner Institutions:
    • AP-HM, Marseille​
  • Date/Duration:
    2023 - 2026​‌
  • Funding:
    30k€, GIRCI​​
  • Principal investigator:
    Sylvain Garciaz​​​‌ (IPC, Marseille)
  • COMPO members​ involved:
    S. Benzekry, R.​‌ Fanciullino, A. Bakhmach
Prevalung​​
  • Title:
    Epidemiological Study to​​​‌ Assess the Prevalence of​ Lung Cancer in patients​‌ with smoking-associated atherosclerotic cardiovascular​​ diseases
  • Partner Institution:
    • APHM,​​​‌ Gustave Roussy Institute
  • Date/Duration:​
    2019-2025
  • Funding:
    7M€​‌ Horizon Europe
  • Principal investigator:​​
    D. Boulate
  • COMPO members​​​‌ involved:
    D. Boulate, D.​ Barbolosi, C. Buton

10.2.2​‌ Axis 2: Multi-omics modeling​​

Participants: Sebastien Benzekry,​​​‌ Elias Ventre.

South-ROCK​
  • Title:
    South-research on cancer​‌ for kids
  • Partner Institutions:​​
    28 constitutive teams
    • P.​​​‌ Mehlen (Centre Léon Bérard​ + Hospices Civils de​‌ Lyon)
    • E. Pasquier (CRCM,​​ Marseille)
    • M. Castets (CRCL,​​​‌ Lyon)
  • Date/Duration:
    2023 -​ 2028
  • Funding:
    Total 2​‌ M€
  • Principal investigators:
    P.​​ Mehlen (CLB + HCL,​​​‌ Lyon), E. Pasquier (CRCM,​ Marseille), M. Castets (CRCL,​‌ Lyon)
  • COMPO seniors:
    S.​​ Benzekry, F. Gattacceca, J.Ciccolini​​
COPYCAT
  • Title:
    Combining Organoid​​​‌ technology with Mathematics to‌ develop innovative models mimicking‌​‌ tumor cellular heterogeneity and​​ plasticity for pediatric oncology​​​‌
  • Partner Institutions:
    • L. Broutier‌ (CRCL, Inserm, CNRS, UCBL,‌​‌ Lyon)
    • E. Pasquier (CRCM)​​
    • R. Mounier (INMG, Inserm,​​​‌ CNRS, UCBL, Lyon)
  • Date/Duration:‌
    2023 - 2027
  • Funding:‌​‌
    Total 922k€, COMPO 115k€​​ (INCa)
  • Principal investigator:
    L.​​​‌ Broutier (CRCL, Inserm, CNRS,‌ UCBL, Lyon)
  • COMPO seniors:‌​‌
    S. Benzekry, E. Ventre,​​ G. Fiandaca
  • COMPO junior:​​​‌
    G. Fiandaca
PhD H.‌ Hamdache
  • Title:
    Improving therapeutic‌​‌ efficacy and managing side​​ effects and sequelae in​​​‌ pediatric cancer through improved‌ and personalized nutritional programs‌​‌ using computer simulations
  • Partner​​ Institutions:
    • V. Pancaldi (IUCT,​​​‌ Inserm, Toulouse)
  • Date/Duration:
    2023‌ - 2026
  • Funding:
    120k€,‌​‌ Inria-Inserm PhD grant
  • Principal​​ investigator:
    V. Pancaldi (IUCT,​​​‌ Inserm, Toulouse)
  • COMPO members‌ involved:
    S. Benzekry (co-supervisor).‌​‌

10.2.3 Axis 3: Pharmacometrics​​ and individualized dosing

Participants:​​​‌ Sebastien Benzekry, Joseph‌ Ciccolini, Raphaelle Fanciullino‌​‌, Florence Gattacceca,​​ Anne Rodallec.

THERMONANO​​​‌
  • Title:
    Nanoassemblies for the‌ subcutaneous self-administration of anticancer‌​‌ drugs
  • Partner Institution:
    • Institut​​ Galien Paris-Saclay (UMR CNRS​​​‌ 8612)
  • Date/Duration:
    2019 -‌ 2024
  • Funding:
    1.8 M€,‌​‌ ERC
  • Principal investigator:
    J.​​ Nicolas (Institut Galien, Paris-Sud)​​​‌
  • COMPO members involved:
    A.‌ Rodallec, S. Benzekry, S.‌​‌ Marolleau.
ZEN-CLL
  • Title:
    Zanubrutinib​​ in chronic Lymphoid Leukemia:​​​‌ search for predictive biomarkers.‌
  • Partner Institution:
    • CHU Toulouse,‌​‌ CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CHU Lyon​​
  • Date/Duration:
    2025-2027
  • Funding:
    300​​​‌ K€, BeiGene
  • Principal investigator:‌
    E. Perrot (Lysarc, Lyon‌​‌ South Hospital)
  • COMPO members​​ involved:
    J. Ciccolini
ALTER​​​‌
  • Title:
    Testing Two Different‌ Drugs (Sacituzumab-govitecan and Trastuzumab-deruxtecan)‌​‌ Combinations Prescribed in an​​ Alterning Pattern to Patients​​​‌ With Metastatic or Locally‌ Advanced Triple-negative Breast Cancer‌​‌
  • Partner Institution:
    • Institut Paoli​​ Calmettes
  • Date/Duration:
    2025-2027
  • Funding:​​​‌
    700 K€, PHRC-K (INCa)‌
  • Principal investigator:
    A. de‌​‌ Nonneville (IPC)
  • COMPO members​​ involved:
    J. Ciccolini
BAP1​​​‌
  • Title:
    A phase II‌ trial evaluating the efficacy‌​‌ of temozolomide in patients​​ with advanced BAP1-mutant cutaneous​​​‌ melanoma.
  • Partner Institution:
    • APHM‌
  • Date/Duration:
    2025-2027
  • Funding:
    700‌​‌ K€, PHRC-K (INCa)
  • Principal​​ investigator:
    N. Mallissen
  • COMPO​​​‌ members involved:
    J. Ciccolini‌
PEMBOV
  • Title:
    Pembrolizumab in‌​‌ Combination With Bevacizumab and​​ Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in​​​‌ Patients With Ovarian Cancer‌
  • Partner Institution:
    • Institut Gustave‌​‌ Roussy (IGR)
  • Date/Duration:
    2021-2024​​
  • Funding:
    400 K€, PHRC-K​​​‌ (INCa)
  • Principal investigator:
    J.‌ Michels (IGR)
  • COMPO members‌​‌ involved:
    J. Ciccolini, M.​​ Hamimed
REZOLVE
  • Title:
    A​​​‌ phase 2 trial of‌ intraperitoneal bevacizumab to treat‌​‌ symptomatic ascites in patients​​ with chemotherapy-resistant, epithelial ovarian​​​‌ cancer
  • Date/Duration:
    2020-2025
  • Funding:‌
    total funding undisclosed, COMPO‌​‌ funding 40 K€
  • Principal​​ investigator:
    S. Yip (Sydney​​​‌ Medical Center Australia), J.Ciccolini‌
  • COMPO senior:
    J.Ciccolini
  • COMPO‌​‌ junior:
    C. Marin
COMPLICITY​​
  • Title:
    COMPutationaL tools for​​​‌ NanoBooster In Cancer ImmunoTherapY‌
  • Partner Institution:
    • Pharmaceutical Institute,‌​‌ Bonn University, GERMANY: A​​ Lamprecht M Shetab Boushehri​​​‌
  • Date/Duration:
    2023-2026
  • Funding:
    25k€‌ (Amidex Pepiniere), 30K€ (ARC),‌​‌ 2K€ (DAAD), 3K€ (Institut​​ LAENNEC)
  • Principal investigator:
    A.​​​‌ Rodallec
  • COMPO senior:
    A.‌ Rodallec, F. Gattacceca
  • COMPO‌​‌ junior:
    A. Aubert, Z.​​ Benslimane
MIPP Project Paris​​​‌ Saclay Cancer Cluster
  • Title:‌
    Clinical Pharmacokinetics Platform MIPP‌​‌
  • Partner Institution:
    • Paris Saclay​​ - APHM
  • Date/Duration:
    2025-2029​​​‌
  • Funding:
    3.2 M€ (PSCC)‌
  • Principal investigator:
    E. Vivier‌​‌ (PSCC)
  • COMPO members involved:​​​‌
    J. Ciccolini
TheranoImmuno
  • Title:​
    Injectable Hydrogel for Subcutaneous​‌ Delivery of ADCs to​​ Improve the Treatment of​​​‌ Solid and Hematological Tumors​
  • Partner Institution:
    • ICANS (Strasbourg),​‌ Gustave Roussy institute (Paris)​​
  • Date/Duration:
    2023-2028
  • Funding:
    ≃​​​‌ 1.5M€ ERC
  • Principal investigator:​
    A. Detappe (ICANS, Gustave​‌ Roussy Institute)
  • COMPO members​​ involved:
    A. Rodallec, J.​​​‌ Ciccolini, Y. Gomari
METOXIM​
  • Title:
    Early Prediction of​‌ impaired elimination of high​​ dose Methotrexate in neuro-oncology​​​‌
  • Partner Institution:
    • APHM -​ PetraNetwork
  • Date/Duration:
    2025-2027
  • Funding:​‌
    80 K€ (GIRCI +​​ AORC)
  • Principal investigator:
    E.​​​‌ Mamessier (APHM)
  • COMPO members​ involved:
    J. Ciccolini
NanImmuno​‌
  • Title:
    Immunomodulating properties of​​ anti-Her2 nanoparticles in breast​​​‌ cancer models
  • Partner Institution:​
    • Institut Roche - Genentech​‌
  • Date/Duration:
    2022-2026
  • Funding:
    80​​ K€ (Institut Roche)
  • Principal​​​‌ investigator:
    R. Fanciullino
  • COMPO​ members involved:
    J. Ciccolini,​‌ M. Dacos (Ph;D. student)​​
MOIO
  • Title:
    A non-inferiority​​​‌ randomized phase III trial​ of standard immunotherapy by​‌ checkpoint inhibitors vs. reduced​​ dose intensity in responding​​​‌ patients with metastatic cancer:​ the MOIO protocol study.​‌
  • Partner Institution:
    • Institut Paoli​​ Calmettes + 10 recruiting​​​‌ centers
  • Date/Duration:
    2023-2027
  • Funding:​
    800 K€, PHRC-K (INCa)​‌
  • Principal investigator:
    G. Gravis​​ (IPC)
  • COMPO members involved:​​​‌
    J. Ciccolini
VENETACIBLE
  • Title:​
    PK/PD relationships of Venetoclax​‌ in Leukemia paTIents
  • Partner​​ Institution:
    • University Hospital of​​​‌ Nice, APHM
  • Date/Duration:
    2023-2026​
  • Funding:
    80 K€ AORC​‌ (APHM)
  • Principal investigator:
    R.​​ Fanciullino
  • COMPO members involved:​​​‌
    J. Ciccolini, L. Osanno​ (Ph.D. student)
PROVIN
  • Title:​‌
    Phase I study of​​ a propranolol (hemangiol®) and​​​‌ oral metronomic vinorelbine (navelbine®)​ combination for children and​‌ teenagers with refractory, relapsing​​ solid tumors
  • Partner Institution:​​​‌
    • APHM + recruiting centers​
  • Date/Duration:
    2016-2026
  • Funding:
    400​‌ K€ PHRC-K (INCa)
  • Principal​​ investigator:
    N. André
  • COMPO​​​‌ members involved:
    J. Ciccolini.​
CEREAL
  • Title:
    Cladribine Dose​‌ Escalation in Conditioning Regimen​​ Prior to Allo-HSCT for​​​‌ Refractory Acute Leukemia and​ Myelodysplastic Syndromes (CEREAL)
  • Partner​‌ Institution:
    • IPC
  • Date/Duration:
    2018-2028​​
  • Funding:
    INCa
  • Principal investigator:​​​‌
    S. Furts (IPC)
  • COMPO​ members involved:
    J. Ciccolini,​‌ D. Protzenko (Ph.D. student)​​
DPDMAX
  • Title:
    DPD-MAX study:​​​‌ an open-label prospective cohort​ study aiming to analyze​‌ the influence of the​​ DPD phenotype on response​​​‌ to capecitabine treatment in​ patients with metastatic breast​‌ cancer.
  • Partner Institution:
    • Centre​​ Antoine Lacassagne Nice
  • Date/Duration:​​​‌
    2020-2026
  • Funding:
    INCa
  • Principal​ investigator:
    A. Creisson (CAL)​‌
  • COMPO members involved:
    J.​​ Ciccolini, G. Kallee (Ph.D.​​​‌ student)

11 Dissemination

Participants:​ Sebastien Benzekry, Joseph​‌ Ciccolini, Raphaelle Fanciullino​​, Florence Gattacceca,​​​‌ Quentin Marcou, Anne​ Rodallec, Elias Ventre​‌.

11.1 Promoting scientific​​ activities

11.1.1 Scientific events:​​​‌ organization

General chair, scientific​ chair
  • F. Gattacceca: President​‌ of GEPK (French Group​​ of Lecturers in PK),organized​​​‌ the 2025 annual meeting,​ Marseille, France, July 7-8,​‌ 2025
  • J.Ciccolini:
    • President of​​ the PAMM (Pharmacokinetics and​​​‌ Molecular Mechanism) at EORTC​ (European Organization of Research​‌ and Treatment for Cancer)​​
    • Board Member of the​​​‌ Cours St Paul in​ Digestive Oncology.
    • Board Member​‌ of the ADC &​​ Bispecifics Task Force at​​​‌ EORTC (European Organization of​ Research and Treatment for​‌ Cancer)
    • Board Member of​​ the Copil HN at​​​‌ Unicancer.
    • Board Member of​ TRANSFORM-O (Recherche Translationnelle et​‌ Formation Scientifique en Oncologie)​​ at the SFC (Société​​ Française du Cancer).
  • R.Fanciullino:​​​‌ Head of the Clinical‌ Pharmacy Workgroup at SFPO‌​‌ (Société Française des Pharmaciens​​ Oncologues)
Member of the​​​‌ organizing committees
  • F. Gattacceca:‌
    • GMP (Group of Metabolism‌​‌ and Pharmacokinetics) symposium (Paris,​​ October 2025), Chair of​​​‌ sessions "Replacing and refining‌ in vivo pharmacokinetic experiments"‌​‌ and "Artificial Intelligence and​​ Machine Learning shaping the​​​‌ Future of Drug Development"‌
    • F. Gattacceca: OSP community‌​‌ conference (Paris, September 2025),​​ Chair of session "Clinical​​​‌ applications/Development"
  • J.Ciccolini:
    • Organizing Commitee,‌ XXth GPCO-Unicancer symposium, Paris‌​‌ November 27-28, 2025
    • Organizing​​ Committee, PAMM EORTC 2025​​​‌ annual meeting, La Laguna,‌ Spain, April 4-5, 2025‌​‌
    • Organizing Committee, 4th Cours​​ St Paul, Nice, France,​​​‌ November 19-22, 2025
    • Organizing‌ Committee, TRANSFORM-O 2025 Edition,‌​‌ Sete France, October 3-5​​ 2025
  • A. Rodallec: CRS,​​​‌ CRS Benelux & France‌ LC
  • E. Ventre: Mathematics‌​‌ of single-cell datasets, CIRM​​

11.1.2 Journal

Member of​​​‌ the editorial boards
  • S.‌ Benzekry: JCO: Clinical Cancer‌​‌ Informatics, Mathematical Biosciences
  • J.Ciccolini:​​ Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology​​​‌ (Springer), Frontiers in Pharmacology‌ (Frontiers).
Reviewer - reviewing‌​‌ activities
  • S. Benzekry: Bioinformatics,​​ Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics,​​​‌ JCO: Clinical Cancer Informatics,‌ Journal of the Royal‌​‌ Society Interface
  • J.Ciccolini: Cancer​​ Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, Clinical​​​‌ Pharmacology and Therapeutics; Clinical‌ Pharmacology and Therapeutics psp;‌​‌ Bone Marrow Transplant, British​​ Journal of Cancer; Fundamental​​​‌ and clinical Pharmacology; Clinical‌ Pharmacokinetics; Frontiers in Immunology;‌​‌ Bioanalysis; Expert Review of​​ Anticancer Therapy; Scientific Reports;​​​‌ Expert Opinion On Drug‌ Safety; Bulletin du Cancer;‌​‌ Frontiers in Pharmacology; BMJ​​ Case Reports; Cancer Immunology,​​​‌ Immunotherapy; British Journal of‌ Clinical Pharmacology; Clinical Chemistry‌​‌ and Laboratory Medicine; Cancer​​ Drug Resistance; The Journal​​​‌ of Thoracic Disease; Frontiers‌ in Toxicology; Journal for‌​‌ Immunotherapy of Cancer.
  • F.​​ Gattacceca: Advances in therapy​​​‌
  • Q. Marcou: Immunoinformatics
  • E.‌ Ventre: Bioinformatics, Communications Biology,‌​‌ Science Advances, Systems Biology​​ and applications

11.1.3 Invited​​​‌ talks

  • S. Benzekry:
  • J.Ciccolini:
    • January 2025:‌ "ADCs et bispécifiques en‌​‌ oncologie digestive: mythe ou​​ réalité?", Journées ABCD, UCGI-Unicancer,​​​‌ Paris France.
    • January 2025:‌ "Impaired elimination of HD‌​‌ MTX: The METOXIM trial",​​ PETRA Network Symposium, Marseille​​​‌ France.
    • March 2025: "Pharmacometrics‌ as a decision-making tool‌​‌ with immune checkpoint inhibitors:​​ finding the perfect blend?",​​​‌ PAMM-EORTC Winter Meeting La‌ Laguna Spain.
    • March 2025:‌​‌ "Dosage pharmacologique avec les​​ inhibiteurs des points de​​​‌ contrôle de l’immunité, quel‌ intérêt ?", Symposium Scientifique‌​‌ Astra Zeneca, Nîmes France.​​
    • October 2025: "Clinical Pharmacology​​​‌ of Antibody Drug Conjugates",‌ Annual conference on Hospital‌​‌ Pharmacy, Hanoi, Vietnam.
    • November​​ 2025: "Update on TDM​​​‌ in oncology: a focus‌ on innovative therapies in‌​‌ cancer", IATDMCT Local Chapter,​​ Leiden Netherlands.
    • November 2025:​​​‌ "Innovations Pharmacologiques dans le‌ Digestif", 4ème Cours St‌​‌ Paul en Oncologie Digestive,​​ Nice France.
    • November 2025:​​​‌ "Precision Dosing in oncology:‌ where do we stand?",‌​‌ Hanoi 50th Anniversary Oncology​​ Hospital conference, Hanoi, Vietnam.​​​‌
    • December 2025: "ADCs in‌ Oncology: debunking the myth",‌​‌ Scienfic Symposium Servier Paris​​​‌ Saclay, Paris France.
    • December​ 2025: "Innovative drugs in​‌ lung cancer: PK and​​ PK/PD considerations", Atrium Thorax,​​​‌ Paris France.
  • R. Fanciullino:​
    • October 2025: "Clinical Pharmacy​‌ and Pharmaceutical Intervention", XVeme​​ Journées Nationales Actualités en​​​‌ Oncologie - Société Française​ du Pharmacien Oncologue (SFPO),​‌ St Malo France.
  • E.​​ Ventre:
    • July 2025: "Dynamical​​​‌ Optimal transport for trajectory​ inference from single-cell data",​‌ CIRM, Marseille
    • October 2025:​​ "Simulation and inference of​​​‌ gene regulatory networks", CompSysBio,​ Aussois
    • December 2025: "Characterizing​‌ cell state dynamics in​​ rhabdomyosarcoma tumoroid models", SouthRock​​​‌ congress, Lyon

11.1.4 Leadership​ within the scientific community​‌

  • J.Ciccolini: "National Reference Laboratory​​ For the Therapeutic Drug​​​‌ Monitoring of Monoclonal antibodies​ in Oncology" Label by​‌ the French Ministery of​​ Health (JORF n°0167 du​​​‌ 21 juillet 2021).

11.1.5​ Scientific expertise

  • F. Gattacceca:​‌ Scientific expert at ANSM​​ (Agence Nationale de Sécurité​​​‌ du Médicament, national drug​ agency), member of the​‌ permanent scientific committee "Quality​​ and safety of drugs"​​​‌ and of the working​ group "IA and organs-on-chips"​‌
  • J. Ciccolini: Scientific Expert​​ at ZonMw - Clinical​​​‌ Fellows Grant Application, the​ Netherlands.
  • J. Ciccolini: Scientific​‌ Expert at John Hopkins​​ Cancer Center - Professorship​​​‌ Application, Baltimore USA.
  • J.​ Ciccolini: Scientific Expert at​‌ INCa (Institut National du​​ Cancer) -ANSM - Agence​​​‌ Nationale de Sécurité du​ Médicament, national drug agency)​‌ "Déficit DPD et adaptation​​ posologique des fluoropyrimidines" Working​​​‌ Group Boulogne Billancourt France.​
  • J. Ciccolini: Scientific Expert​‌ at Canceropole IDF -​​ Emergence Grant Applications. Paris​​​‌ France.
  • J. Ciccolini: Member​ of the DSMB (Data​‌ Safety and Monitoring Board)​​ of the Revert Phase​​​‌ 2 clinical trial (SwissEthics)​ and the ONUVEN phase​‌ 2 clinical trial (Groupe​​ Francophone des Myelodysplasies).
  • J.​​​‌ Ciccolini: President of the​ HCERES (Evaluation recherche Enseignement​‌ supérieur) Evaluation committee, IntheRes​​ unit application, Ecole Nationale​​​‌ Vétérinaire de Toulouse and​ Toulouse University.

11.1.6 Research​‌ administration

  • F. Gattacceca: Member​​ of the scientific committee​​​‌ of the school of​ pharmacy
  • J. Ciccolini
    • Member​‌ of the Scientific Committee​​ of the School of​​​‌ Pharmacy
    • Member of the​ Commission Paritaire d'Etablissement of​‌ the School of Pharmacy​​
    • co-Director of the TRANSLATE-IT​​​‌ Department at CRCM.
    • Director​ of the SMARTc platform​‌ at CRCM.
    • Co-Director of​​ the MIPP joint-platform at​​​‌ APHM-Paris Saclay Cancer Cluster.​

11.2 Teaching - Supervision​‌ - Juries - Educational​​ and pedagogical outreach

11.2.1​​​‌ Teaching

  • S. Benzekry:
    • M2​ Biologie Santé – Parcours​‌ IA biomarqueurs (6h). M2​​ "Pharmacokinetics" (6h).
    • M2 PK​​​‌ "Fundamentals for modeling and​ simulation in pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics" (6h).​‌
  • A. Rodallec
    • Lectures in​​ MSc in Pharmacokinetics, MSc​​​‌ in Digipharm, MSc in​ Innovative Diagnostic and therapeutic​‌ Drug Products, DESU "Advances​​ courses in pharmacometrics", DESU​​​‌ in animal experiments, Pharm.D.​ studies (2nd, 3rd, 4th​‌ and 6th year), odonthology​​ studies -> 200 h​​​‌ a year
    • Teaching outside​ of AMU: additional lectures​‌ at University of Paris​​ Saclay and Wuhan University​​​‌ (China).
  • J. Ciccolini
    • Lectures​ at Aix Marseille Univ​‌ in: MSc (2nd year)​​ in Oncology, MSc (2nd​​​‌ year) in Oncogenetics, MSc​ (2nd year) in Pharmacokinetics,​‌ MSc (2nd year) in​​ Digipharm, MSc (1st year)​​​‌ in Drugs & Health​ Products, D.U. in Animal​‌ Experiments, D.U. in Genetic​​ Counseling, Master Class in​​ Lung Cancer, Pharm.D. studies​​​‌ (2nd, 3rd, 4th and‌ 6th year), CESU "Innovative‌​‌ immunotherapy" -> 230 h​​ a year.
    • Teaching outside​​​‌ of AMU: additional lectures‌ in pharmacokinetics at Université‌​‌ Catholique de Lyon, Leiden​​ Medical Center (NL), and​​​‌ the International School of‌ Metronomics. Lectures for Cours‌​‌ National Approfondissement DES Oncologie​​ Médicale and Phase d'Approfondissement​​​‌ Docteur Junior, Paris Saclay‌ University.
    • Founder and co-Chair‌​‌ of the "Digital Tools​​ for Pharmaceutical Sciences (Digipharm)"​​​‌ Master Degree, Aix Marseille‌ Univ.
  • R. Fanciullino
    • Lectures‌​‌ in: MSc (2nd year)​​ in Pharmacokinetics, MSc (2nd​​​‌ year) in Digipharm, CESU‌ in Oncogeriatry, DES in‌​‌ PK Variability, Pharm.D. studies​​ (3rd, 4th and 5th​​​‌ year) -> 190 h‌ a year.
    • Head of‌​‌ the CESU "Pharmacokinetics variability​​ in Oncology".
  • F. Gattacceca​​​‌
    • Lectures in pharmacokinetics and‌ pharmacometrics at Aix-Marseille University‌​‌ school of pharmacy (305h),​​ teaching in other universities​​​‌ (Nîmes, Angers, Montpellier): 90%‌ at a post-graduate level.‌​‌
    • Director of the master​​ program "Pharmacokinetics".
    • Director of​​​‌ two international post-graduate university‌ diplomas: "Modeling and simulation:‌​‌ population approaches in pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics"​​ and "Modeling and simulation:​​​‌ physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling for‌ pharmacology and toxicology".
    • Member‌​‌ of the national reflection​​ committee for the industry​​​‌ pharmacy studies and the‌ training steering committee of‌​‌ ICI (Immunology Cancer Institute).​​
    • Tutor of 3 sessions​​​‌ in the second (2025)‌ edition of the "Pharmacometrics‌​‌ Africa" training in French.​​
    • CIVIS International Summer School​​​‌ "Drug Design and Discovery",‌ Madrid, Spain 2025 (Lectures‌​‌ and hands-ons).
  • L. Greillier​​
    • Lectures in M2 Recherche​​​‌ clinique et Simulation en‌ Santé.
    • Lectures in oncology‌​‌ and pulmonology for 3rd–11th​​ year medical students.
  • Q.​​​‌ Marcou
    • M2 Artificial Intelligence‌ for Public Health (AI4PH)‌​‌ (9h).
    • M2 Digipharm (3h).​​
  • X. Muracciole
    • DIU radio-urology​​​‌ for resident medical students.‌
    • DCIU radio surgery for‌​‌ resident medical students.
  • L.​​ Nguyen Phuong
    • CESU "Fundamentals​​​‌ for modeling and simulation‌ in pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics" and Introduction‌​‌ to R for pharmacokinetic​​ modeling (9h).
    • M2 PK:​​​‌ Introduction to R for‌ pharmacokinetic modeling (20h).
  • S.‌​‌ Salas
    • Medical study/initial training:​​ Seminary in palliative care,​​​‌ Therapeutic module in pains,‌ Oncodigestive module, Cancerology (44h),‌​‌ for 3rd–6th year medical​​ students.
    • Medical and paramedical​​​‌ study: DU Supportive care‌ in oncology and palliative‌​‌ medicine, DU Wounds and​​ healing, DIU Supportive care​​​‌ in oncology and palliative‌ medicine, Master's in Advanced‌​‌ Practice Nursing (Cancerology, General,​​ and pains modules), CEU​​​‌ Service providers at home,‌ Home-based cancer care, DU‌​‌ Ambulatory shift Oncology module​​ (37h).

11.2.2 Supervision

•​​​‌ Postdoc

  • S. Benzekry and‌ E. Ventre
    • G. Fiandaca,‌​‌ 2025-2027: "Characterizing cell state​​ dynamics in rhabdomyosarcoma tumoroid​​​‌ models"
  • J. Ciccolini
    • M.‌ Centanni, 2025-2027: "PK-guided dand‌​‌ MIPD in oncology" co-supervision​​ with L. Friberg Uppsala​​​‌ University Sweden

Engineers‌

  • S. Benzekry
    • S. Charpigny‌​‌ (PEPR DIGPHAT)
    • L. Nguyen-Phuong​​ (RHU LUCA-pi)
    • A. Vaglio​​​‌ (RHU PIONeeR)
  • Q. Marcou‌
    • Mehdi Mansour (PharmIAge, hosted‌​‌ by the SESSTIM lab)​​

PhD students

  • S.​​​‌ Benzekry
    • A. Bakhmach (PEPR‌ Santé Numérique DIGPHAT), 2023‌​‌ - 2026: “Modeling and​​ statistical learning for pharmacology​​​‌ in oncology”, co-supervision with‌ R. Fanciullino (COMPO, APHM)‌​‌ and S. Garciaz (IPC)​​
    • M. Boussena (Institut Laënnec,​​​‌ AMU), 2023 - 2026:‌ “Machine learning methods for‌​‌ clinical oncology data: application​​​‌ to the prediction of​ immunotherapy response in lung​‌ cancer”, co-supervision with J.​​ Josse (Premedical, Inria) and​​​‌ L. Greillier (COMPO, APHM)​
    • C. Bigarré, 2020 -​‌ 2024: "Mathematical modeling for​​ prediction of metastatic relapse​​​‌ in breast cancer", co-supervision​ X. Muracciole, funding Inria​‌ – Inserm
    • L. Nguyen​​ Phuong, 2022 - 2025,​​​‌ SChISM: "Mechanistic modeling of​ circulating DNA combined to​‌ machine learning for prediction​​ of response and survival​​​‌ following immunotherapy", co-supervision S.​ Salas, funding Amidex ICI​‌ (Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy)​​ and Laënnec (Institute for​​​‌ AI and health)
    • R.​ Ferrara, 2025 - 2028:​‌ "Découverte automatique de modèles​​ mécanistiques pour la pharmaco-oncologie​​​‌ par apprentissage automatique :​ application à la radiothérapie​‌ interne vectorisée"
    • H. Hamdache,​​ 2023 - 2026: "Improving​​​‌ therapeutic efficacy and managing​ side effects and sequelae​‌ in pediatric cancer through​​ improved and personalized nutritional​​​‌ programs using computer simulations",​ co-supervision V. Pancaldi (IUCT,​‌ Inserm, Toulouse), funding Inria–Inserm.​​
  • D. Boulate
    • C. Buton​​​‌ (Institut Laënnec, AMU), 2024-2027:​ "Development of interactive expert​‌ software stratifying the risk​​ of lung cancer diagnosis​​​‌ in the setting of​ lung cancer screening based​‌ on mathematical modeling and​​ machine learning approaches", co-supervision​​​‌ with D. Barbolosi (COMPO)​
    • A. Todesco (CRCM -​‌ E19 - SMARTc), 2023-2026:​​ "Study of the maintenance​​​‌ of pulmonary and systemic​ vascular permeability: from physiology​‌ to pathology", co-supervision with​​ P. Habert (APHM)
    • E.​​​‌ Armand (CRCM), 2023-2026: "French​ screening programme: development of​‌ risk stratification tools"
  • J.​​ Ciccolini
    • A. Ronda, "Pembro​​​‌ Monitoring in real-world patients",​ funding APHM
    • G. Kallee,​‌ "DPD status and clinical​​ outcome", funding APHM
    • D.​​​‌ Protzenko, "PK-guided dosing in​ HCT conditioning", funding APHM​‌
    • L. Wirtz, "Improving the​​ drug delievery of natural​​​‌ products in oncology", funding​ APHM co-supervision A. Rodallec.​‌
    • E. Diroff, "development of​​ smart nanoparticles in PDAC",​​​‌ funding CIFRE, EsQlabs. co-supervision​ A. Rodallec.
    • B. Son​‌ Nhat, "PK/PD of immunosuppresive​​ drugs in leukemia patients",​​​‌ funding USTH Hanoi co-supervision​ Nguyen Thi Van Anh,​‌ University of Science and​​ Technology of Hanoi (USTH)​​​‌ and Vietnam Academy of​ Science and Technology (VAST)​‌
  • F. Gattacceca
    • S. Benamara,​​ 2023-2026:"Prediction of monoclonal antibody​​​‌ pharmacokinetics in humans using​ PBPK modeling: towards an​‌ integrated strategy to support​​ First-in-human (FIH) clinical trials",​​​‌ co-supervision with D. Teutonico​ (SANOFI), funding CIFRE
  • R.​‌ Fanciullino
    • M. Dacos, Development​​ of nanoparticles in HER2+​​​‌ breast cancer, funding APHM​
    • L. Osanno, PK/PD of​‌ nucleoside analogs in oncology-hematology,​​ funding APHM
    • Q. Gerbault,​​​‌ Pharmacometrics in leukemia patients,​ funding APHM
  • E. Ventre​‌
    • C. Berthaud (CRCL), 2024-2027:​​ "Bioinformatic approach to the​​​‌ impact of modulation of​ the respiratory chain SDH​‌ complex on cell states​​ dynamics in pediatric gliomas​​​‌ and rhabdomyosarcomas", co-supervision M.​ Castets (Inserm, CRCL), funding​‌ Ligue contre le cancer​​
    • Y. Maugé, 2025-2028: "Generative​​​‌ mechanistic models for subpopulations,​ trajectories and GRN inference​‌ from single-cell datasets", co-supervision​​ A-S. Chrétien (CRCM), funding​​​‌ ENS Lyon.

Interns​ (Master 2)

  • S. Benzekry​‌
    • L. Della-Negra (ENSC, Bordeaux)​​
    • R. Ferrara (M2 AIOH,​​​‌ Grenoble)
  • R. Fanciullino
    • Quentin​ Gerbeault M2RPK AMU
  • F.​‌ Gattacceca
    • Catherine Dubois (M2​​ PK, Lyon)
    • Ester Tonon​​​‌ (pharmacy master, Torino, Italy)​
  • Q. Marcou
    • Roufeida Segaoula​‌ (M2 MIAS Centrale Lille,​​ hosted by the SESSTIM​​ lab)
    • Mehdi Mansour (M2​​​‌ MALIA, Université Lyon 2,‌ hosted by the SESSTIM‌​‌ lab)
  • A. Rodallec
    • Yacine​​ Gomari(M2 PK, Marseille)
    • Zakaria​​​‌ Benslimane (M2 IA &‌ Biomarkers, Marseille)

11.2.3 Juries‌​‌

  • S. Benzekry
    • Reviewer PhD:​​ L. Vuduc (Paris Saclay​​​‌ Univ., CentraleSupelec); A. Pitoy‌ (Univ. Paris Cité)
    • Jury‌​‌ PhD: A. Gabaut (Bordeaux​​ Univ.)
  • J. Ciccolini
    • President​​​‌ of PharmD Dissertation Jury:‌ >20 thesis/year (AMU)
    • Reviewer‌​‌ of PhD Defense: P.​​ Claraz (Toulouse University), Dimitrios​​​‌ Papakonstantinou (Paris Saclay University)‌
    • Reviewer of PhD scientific‌​‌ evaluation committee: Stefan Nicolescu​​ (Montpellier University), Agnes Ducoulmombier​​​‌ (Nice University), M. Vahabi‌ (Amsterdam University NL).
  • F.‌​‌ Gattacceca
    • Reviewer in PhD​​ committee: M. Boulanger (Université​​​‌ de Toulouse)
    • Member of‌ PhD scientific evaluation committees:‌​‌ M. Godard (Université de​​ Montpellier), B. Cardozo (Aix​​​‌ Marseille Université), A. Baillot‌ (Université de Poitiers)
    • President‌​‌ of PharmD committee: Q.​​ Renou (Aix Marseille Université)​​​‌
  • Q. Marcou
    • Member of‌ PhD scientific evaluation committees:‌​‌ E. Hector (Aix Marseille​​ Université)
  • A. Rodallec
    • Member​​​‌ of PharmD committees (5-10‌ per year)
  • E. Ventre‌​‌
    • Member of PhD committee:​​ N. Ben Boina (Aix​​​‌ Marseille Université)

11.2.4 Educational‌ and pedagogical outreach

  • F.‌​‌ Gattacceca
    • PK Docs, creation​​ and organization of the​​​‌ international online monthly event‌ for PK PhD students‌​‌
    • Organization of PK national​​ Masters Class (Every Thursday,​​​‌ November-December 2025)
    • Tutor of‌ 3 sessions in the‌​‌ second (2025) edition of​​ the "Pharmacometrics Africa" training​​​‌ in French

11.3 Popularization‌

11.3.1 Productions (articles, videos,‌​‌ podcasts, serious games, ...)​​

  • J. Ciccolini:
    • Serious Game​​​‌ "Translational Research in Oncology"‌ TRANSFORM-O Société Française du‌​‌ Cancer: 20 selected resident​​ in Medical Oncology and​​​‌ Radiation Therapy/year.
    • Jury at‌ the Pharm'Innov Serious Game,‌​‌ School of Pharmacy of​​ Marseille.
  • S. Benzekry: Two​​​‌ online articles from an‌ interview with a journalist‌​‌ at the SophIA summit​​
  • F.‌​‌ Gattacceca:
    • Coordinator and co-author​​ of the book: "Pharmacie​​​‌ galénique - Pharmacocinétique -‌ L'enseignement en fiches", published‌​‌ in September 2025
    • Coach​​ and jury at the​​​‌ Pharm'Innov Serious Game, School‌ of Pharmacy of Marseille.‌​‌
  • A. Rodallec:
    • Coordinator of​​ the podcast "The POSTDOC​​​‌ Chronicles" by the BNLF‌ CRS LC, to dive‌​‌ into the science, stress,​​ and success that shape​​​‌ your journey as an‌ early-career scientist (4 episodes‌​‌ per year)
    • Jury at​​ the Pharm'Innov Serious Game,​​​‌ School of Pharmacy of‌ Marseille.

11.3.2 Participation in‌​‌ Live events

  • G. Fiandaca:​​
    • September 3-4, 2025: Contribution​​​‌ and participation to the‌ "dose-effect" game of the‌​‌ "Fête de la science"​​ in Aix en Provence​​​‌
  • F. Gattacceca:
    • September 3-4,‌ 2025: Creation and participation‌​‌ to the "dose-effect" game​​ of the "Fête de​​​‌ la science" in Aix‌ en Provence
    • October 6-7,‌​‌ 2025: Participation to the​​ "Rencontres étudiants-chercheurs" (Meetings between​​​‌ students and reseachers) in‌ Aix en Provence (Montperrin‌​‌ campus)
    • November 22, 2025:​​ Representation of the school​​​‌ of pharmacy at "Salon‌ de l'Etudiant" (Aix en‌​‌ Provence)
  • Q. Marcou: "Data,​​ nouveaux outils et Règlementation"​​​‌ round table, organized by‌ the Amicale des Actuaires‌​‌ du Sud
  • A. Rodallec​​
    • Participation to "Contre le​​​‌ Cancer j'apporte ma Pierre"‌ to popularize cancer in‌​‌ schools
    • Participation to "The​​​‌ talented researcher step on​ strategies" at Canceropole Seminaire​‌ in Saint-Raphael, France

11.3.3​​ Others science outreach relevant​​​‌ activities

  • E. Ventre: Participation​ to the programm CHICHE​‌ Inria (2h in Lycée​​ Marseilleveyre in November 2025​​​‌ and and 4h in​ Lycée Saint Exupéry in​‌ December 2025)

12 Scientific​​ production

12.1 Major publications​​​‌

  • 1 miscA.Anastasiia​ Bakhmach, P.Paul​‌ Dufossé, A.Andrea​​ Vaglio, F.Florence​​​‌ Monville, L.Laurent​ Greillier, F.Fabrice​‌ Barlési and S.Sébastien​​ Benzekry. ROOFS: RObust​​​‌ biOmarker Feature Selection.​2026HALDOI
  • 2​‌ miscF.Fabrice Barlesi​​, F.Florence Monville​​​‌, L.Laurent Greillier​, N.Natalie Ngoi​‌, J.Joseph Ciccolini​​, S.Stephane Garcia​​​‌, J.-P.Jean-Philippe Dales​, F.Florence Sabatier​‌, L.L. Arnaud​​, A.Amélie Pouchin​​​‌, F.Frédéric Vely​, S.S. Bokobza​‌, A.Anastasiia Bakhmach​​, P.Paul Dufossé​​​‌, A.Andrea Vaglio​, M.Mélanie Karlsen​‌, M.Mohamed Boussena​​, C.Celestin Bigarre​​​‌, M.Mourad Hamimed​, R.Richard Malkoun​‌, L.Lamia Ghezali​​, M.Maryannick Le​​​‌ Ray, M.Marie​ Roumieux, J.Julien​‌ Mazieres, M.Maurice​​ Perol, E.Eric​​​‌ Vivier, J.J.​ Fieschi-Meric and S.Sébastien​‌ Benzekry. An integrative​​ multimodal machine learning signature​​​‌ of primary resistance to​ immunotherapy in advanced non-small​‌ cell lung cancer: biomarker​​ analysis from the PIONeeR​​​‌ study.2025HAL​
  • 3 articleS.Sébastien​‌ Benzekry. Artificial Intelligence​​ and Mechanistic Modeling for​​​‌ Clinical Decision Making in​ Oncology.Clinical Pharmacology​‌ and TherapeuticsJune 2020​​HALDOI
  • 4 article​​​‌S.Sébastien Benzekry,​ M.Mélanie Karlsen,​‌ C.Célestin Bigarré,​​ A. E.Abdessamad El​​​‌ Kaoutari, B.Bruno​ Gomes, M.Martin​‌ Stern, A.Ales​​ Neubert, R.René​​​‌ Bruno, F.François​ Mercier, S.Suresh​‌ Vatakuti, P.Peter​​ Curle and C.Candice​​​‌ Jamois. Predicting Survival​ in Patients with Advanced​‌ NSCLC Treated with Atezolizumab​​ Using Pre‐ and on‐Treatment​​​‌ Prognostic Biomarkers.Clinical​ Pharmacology and Therapeutics116​‌4July 2024,​​ 1110–1120HALDOI
  • 5​​​‌ articleS.Sébastien Benzekry​, M.Michalis Mastri​‌, C.Chiara Nicolò​​ and J.John Ebos​​​‌. Machine-learning and mechanistic​ modeling of primary and​‌ metastatic breast cancer growth​​ after neoadjuvant targeted therapy​​​‌.PLoS Computational Biology​205May 2024​‌, e1012088HALDOI​​
  • 6 articleC.Célestin​​​‌ Bigarré, F.François​ Bertucci, P.Pascal​‌ Finetti, G.Gaëtan​​ Macgrogan, X.Xavier​​​‌ Muracciole and S.Sébastien​ Benzekry. Mechanistic modeling​‌ of metastatic relapse in​​ early breast cancer to​​​‌ investigate the biological impact​ of prognostic biomarkers.​‌Computer Methods and Programs​​ in Biomedicine231April​​​‌ 2023, 107401HAL​DOI
  • 7 articleR.​‌Rana Elfatairi, J.​​Jessica Ou, V.​​​‌Vincent Lebreton, M.​Mariam Mahdjoub, N.​‌Norraseth Kaeokhamloed, J.​​Jérôme Bejaud, G.​​​‌Grégory Hilairet, F.​Florence Gattacceca, E.​‌Emilie Roger and S.​​Samuel Legeay. Specific​​ quantification of intact lipid​​​‌ nanocapsules in rats using‌ FRET: biodistribution and PBPK‌​‌ model development.Nanomedicine​​2010April 2025​​​‌, 1101-1112HALDOI‌
  • 8 articleF.Florent‌​‌ Ferrer, R.Raphaelle​​ Fanciullino, G.Gérard​​​‌ Milano and J.Joseph‌ Ciccolini. Towards Rational‌​‌ Cancer Therapeutics: Optimizing Dosing,​​ Delivery, Scheduling, and Combinations​​​‌.Clinical Pharmacology and‌ Therapeutics1083August‌​‌ 2020, 458-470HAL​​DOI
  • 9 miscL.​​​‌Linh Nguyen Phuong,‌ F.Frédéric Fina,‌​‌ L.Laurent Greillier,​​ P.Pascale Tomasini,​​​‌ J.-L.Jean-Laurent Deville,‌ A.Audrey Boutonnet,‌​‌ F.Frédéric Ginot,​​ J.-C.Jean-Charles Garcia,​​​‌ S.Sebastien Salas and‌ S.Sébastien Benzekry.‌​‌ Mechanistic Modeling of cfDNA​​ Fragmentome Dynamics Predicts Progression​​​‌ to Immunotherapy.2025‌HAL
  • 10 miscL.‌​‌Linh Nguyen Phuong,​​ F.Frederic Fina,​​​‌ L.Laurent Greillier,‌ P.Pascale Tomasini,‌​‌ J.-L.Jean-Laurent Deville,​​ R.Romain Zakrasjek,​​​‌ L.Lucie Della-Negra,‌ A.Audrey Boutonnet,‌​‌ F.Frédéric Ginot,​​ J.-C.Jean-Charles Garcia,​​​‌ S.Sébastien Benzekry and‌ S.Sébastien Salas.‌​‌ The SChISM study: Cell-free​​ DNA size profiles as​​​‌ predictors of progression in‌ advanced carcinoma treated with‌​‌ immune-checkpoint inhibitors.September​​ 2025HAL
  • 11 misc​​​‌A.Anne Rodallec,‌ R.Randy Lee,‌​‌ J.Jingming Cao,​​ S.Sophie Marolleau,​​​‌ J.Julien Nicolas and‌ S.Sébastien Benzekry.‌​‌ Model-Driven Scheduling of Nanocarriers:​​ Application to an Anticancer​​​‌ Polymer Prodrug Administered Subcutaneously‌.2025HAL

12.2‌​‌ Publications of the year​​

International journals

  • 12 article​​​‌S.Salih Benamara,‌ E.Erik Sjögren,‌​‌ F.Florence Gattacceca,​​ M.Marylore Chenel,​​​‌ A.Antoine Deslandes,‌ L.Laurent Nguyen and‌​‌ D.Donato Teutonico.​​ Prediction of Monoclonal Antibodies​​​‌ Pharmacokinetics in Human: Identification‌ of a Reference Neonatal‌​‌ Fc Receptor (FcRn) Binding​​ Affinity Using Physiologically Based​​​‌ Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling.‌ACS Pharmacology & Translational‌​‌ ScienceDecember 2025HAL​​DOI
  • 13 article S.​​​‌Salih Benamara, C.‌Carla Troisi, F.‌​‌Florence Gattacceca, E.​​Erik Sjögren, L.​​​‌Laurent Nguyen and D.‌Donato Teutonico. Cross-Species‌​‌ Extrapolation of Neonatal Fc​​ Receptor (FcRn) Binding Affinity​​​‌ to Predict Monoclonal Antibody‌ Pharmacokinetics in Humans Using‌​‌ Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling​​ (PBPK): Are We There​​​‌ Yet? ACS Pharmacology &‌ Translational Science 8 9‌​‌ August 2025 HAL DOI​​
  • 14 articleM.Michael​​​‌ Brunini, J.-M.Jean-Marie‌ Forel, X.Xavier‌​‌ Muracciole, A.Antoine​​ Roch, D.Dominique​​​‌ Barbolosi and L.Laurent‌ Papazian. Heterogenous treatment‌​‌ effect of neuromuscular blocking​​ agents for moderate-to-severe ARDS:​​​‌ a post hoc Markov‌ model re-analysis of the‌​‌ ACURASYS trial.Intensive​​ Care Medicine519​​​‌August 2025, 1615-1627‌HALDOI
  • 15 article‌​‌E.Erwann Collomb,​​ L.Laurent Bourguignon,​​​‌ A.Antoine Tichadou,‌ P.Pauline Roche,‌​‌ G.Guillaume Berton,​​ J.Joseph Ciccolini,​​​‌ J.Julien Colle,‌ L.Laure Farnault,‌​‌ R.Régis Costello,​​ R.Raphaëlle Fanciullino and​​​‌ G.Geoffroy Venton.‌ Impact of CDA Dynamics‌​‌ on Clinical Outcome of​​​‌ Patients With AML or​ High‐Risk MDS Treated With​‌ Nucleoside Analogs.Hematological​​ Oncology432March​​​‌ 2025HALDOI
  • 16​ articleR.Rana Elfatairi​‌, J.Jessica Ou​​, V.Vincent Lebreton​​​‌, M.Mariam Mahdjoub​, N.Norraseth Kaeokhamloed​‌, J.Jérôme Bejaud​​, G.Grégory Hilairet​​​‌, F.Florence Gattacceca​, E.Emilie Roger​‌ and S.Samuel Legeay​​. Specific quantification of​​​‌ intact lipid nanocapsules in​ rats using FRET: biodistribution​‌ and PBPK model development​​.Nanomedicine2010​​​‌April 2025, 1101-1112​HALDOIback to​‌ text
  • 17 articleA.​​Arthur Géraud, P.​​​‌Paul Gougis, A.​Alexandre de Nonneville,​‌ M.Mathilde Beaufils,​​ F.François Bertucci,​​​‌ E.Emilien Billon,​ G.Gabriel Brisou,​‌ G.Gwenaelle Gravis,​​ L.Laurent Greillier,​​​‌ M.Mathilde Guerin,​ E.Essia Mezni,​‌ E.Emmanuel Mitry,​​ R.Robin Noel,​​​‌ J.Joséphine Pignon,​ R.Renaud Sabatier,​‌ L.Lorène Seguin,​​ J.-P.Jean-Philippe Spano,​​​‌ C.Cécile Vicier,​ F.Frederic Viret,​‌ A.Anthony Goncalves and​​ J.Joseph Ciccolini.​​​‌ Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of​ antibody-drug conjugates, where do​‌ we stand?Cancer Treatment​​ Reviews135April 2025​​​‌, 102922HALDOI​
  • 18 articleG.Govind​‌ Kallee, G.Gerard​​ Milano and J.Joseph​​​‌ Ciccolini. Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase-Guided​ Dosing of 5-Fluorouracil: Prioritizing​‌ Precision Over Dose Reduction​​. JCO precision oncology​​​‌9October 2025HAL​DOI
  • 19 articleG.​‌Govind Kallee, G.​​Gérard Milano, F.​​​‌Florence Duffaud, L.​Laetitia Dahan and J.​‌Joseph Ciccolini. DPD​​ Ultra‐Rapid Metabolizer Status and​​​‌ Efficacy of 5‐Fluorouracil Treatment:​ A Real‐World Study.​‌Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology​​394July 2025​​​‌HALDOI
  • 20 article​L.Leo Karlsson,​‌ J.Joseph Ciccolini,​​ R.Rob ter Heine​​​‌ and M.Maddalena Centanni​. Eco Friendly and​‌ Budget Smart: An Economic​​ and Environmental Evaluation of​​​‌ Alternative PD-1 and PD-L1​ Inhibitor Dosing Regimens.​‌PharmacoEconomics4312September​​ 2025, 1433-1449HAL​​​‌DOI
  • 21 articleF.​François de Kermenguy,​‌ D.Daphné Morel,​​ M.Mohammed El-Aichi,​​​‌ D.Dominique Barbolosi,​ E.Eric Deutsch and​‌ C.Charlotte Robert.​​ Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia: From Mathematical​​​‌ Modeling Toward Mechanistic Learning​.International Journal of​‌ Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics​​August 2025HALDOI​​​‌
  • 22 articleL.Linh​ Nguyen Phuong, S.​‌Sébastien Salas and S.​​Sébastien Benzekry. Computational​​​‌ modeling for circulating cell-free​ DNA in clinical oncology​‌.JCO Clinical Cancer​​ Informatics9March 2025​​​‌HALDOI
  • 23 article​L.Loïc Osanno,​‌ L.Lucy Brocque,​​ L.Laurent Bourguignon,​​​‌ C.Carla Delpech,​ L.Laure Farnault,​‌ J.Julien Colle,​​ P.Pauline Roche,​​​‌ J.Jacques Chiaroni,​ C.Caroline Izard,​‌ R.Régis Costello,​​ M.Mathilde Dacos,​​​‌ C.Caroline Solas,​ C.Chems Djezzar,​‌ J.Joseph Ciccolini,​​ T.Thomas Cluzeau,​​​‌ G.Geoffroy Venton and​ R.Raphaëlle Fanciullino.​‌ Predicting the toxicity-efficacy ratio​​ of venetoclax in real-world​​ patients.Annals of​​​‌ Hematology10412December‌ 2025, 6327-6337HAL‌​‌DOIback to text​​
  • 24 articleC.Caroline​​​‌ Plazy, M.Mohamed‌ Boussena, L.Linh‌​‌ Nguyen Phuong, B.​​Baptiste Assié Jean,​​​‌ E.Emmanuel Grolleau,‌ V.Valerie Gounant,‌​‌ N.Nouha Chaabane,​​ C.Chantal Decroisette,​​​‌ E.Eric Dansin,‌ H.Hélène Babey,‌​‌ C.Catherine Daniel,​​ G.Giroux Leprieur Etienne​​​‌, D.David Planchard‌, M.Mariona Riuvadets‌​‌, A.Anthony Canellas​​, Y.Youssef Oulkhouir​​​‌, M.Maurice Pérol‌, A.-C.Anne-Claire Toffart‌​‌, S.Sebastien Benzekry​​ and E.Elisa Gobbini​​​‌. The Rechallenge Benefit‌ Score: A Clinical Decision‌​‌ Tool for Patients Progressing​​ After Immunotherapy.European​​​‌ Journal of CancerNovember‌ 2025HAL
  • 25 article‌​‌B. K.Benjamin K​​ Schneider, S.Sébastien​​​‌ Benzekry and J. P.‌Jonathan P Mochel.‌​‌ Optimizing First‐Line Therapeutics in​​ Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer:​​​‌ Insights From Joint Modeling‌ and Large‐Scale Data Analysis‌​‌.CPT: Pharmacometrics and​​ Systems PharmacologyJuly 2025​​​‌HALDOI
  • 26 article‌J.-B.Jean-Baptiste Woillard,‌​‌ S.Sébastien Benzekry,​​ J.Julie Josse,​​​‌ M.Mélanie White-Koning,‌ E.Etienne Chatelut,‌​‌ E.Emmanuelle Comets,​​ F.Florian Lemaitre,​​​‌ B.Bénédicte Franck,‌ M.Matthieu Grégoire,‌​‌ F.Françoise Stanke-Labesque,​​ S.Sarah Zohar,​​​‌ M.Moreno Ursino and‌ C.Christophe Battail.‌​‌ Digital Pharmacological Twins: Bridging​​ Multi-scale Modelling and Artificial​​​‌ Intelligence for Precision Medicine‌ : the DIGPHAT consortium‌​‌.Therapies2025HAL​​DOI
  • 27 articleF.​​​‌Fatima Zbib, A.‌Anthéa Deschamps, L.‌​‌Lionel Velly, O.​​Olivier Blin, R.​​​‌Romain Guilhaumou and F.‌Florence Gattacceca. Physiologically‌​‌ Based Pharmacokinetic Model of​​ Cefotaxime in Patients with​​​‌ Impaired Renal Function.‌Clinical Pharmacokinetics642‌​‌January 2025, 257-273​​HALDOI

Invited conferences​​​‌

  • 28 inproceedingsJ.Joseph‌ Ciccolini. Deconstructing the‌​‌ ADCs Paradigms.PAMM​​ EORTC 2025 Meeting -​​​‌ 45th Pharmacology and molecular‌ mechanisms group meetingLa‌​‌ Laguna, SpainApril 2025​​HAL

Conferences without proceedings​​​‌

  • 29 inproceedingsS.Salih‌ Benamara, E.Erik‌​‌ Sjögren, F.Florence​​ Gattacceca, M.Marylore​​​‌ Chenel, A.Antoine‌ Deslandes, L.Laurent‌​‌ Nguyen and D.Donato​​ Teutonico. Physiologically-Based Predictions​​​‌ of Monoclonal Antibody Pharmacokinetics:‌ Insights from a Large-Scale‌​‌ Data Analysis.PAGE​​ 33Thessaloniki, Greece2025​​​‌HAL
  • 30 inproceedingsJ.‌Joseph Ciccolini. Clinical‌​‌ Pharmacology of Antibody Drug​​ Conjugates.Annual Conference​​​‌ on Hospital Pharmacy 2025‌Hanoi (Vietnam), VietnamOctober‌​‌ 2025HAL
  • 31 inproceedings​​J.Joseph Ciccolini.​​​‌ Innovative drugs in lung‌ cancer: PK and PK/PD‌​‌ considerations.Atrium Thorax​​Paris, FranceDecember 2025​​​‌HAL
  • 32 inproceedings J.‌Joseph Ciccolini. Precision‌​‌ Dosing in oncology: where​​ do we stand? Hanoi​​​‌ Oncology Hospital Conference Hanoi‌ (Vietnam), Vietnam November 2025‌​‌ HAL
  • 33 inproceedingsJ.​​Joseph Ciccolini. Update​​​‌ on TDM in oncology:‌ a focus on innovative‌​‌ therapies in cancer.​​IATDMCT Local chapterLeiden​​​‌ (NL), NetherlandsNovember 2025‌HAL
  • 34 inproceedingsM.‌​‌Marie Fusella Giuntini and​​​‌ D.Dominique Barbolosi.​ Developing a Digital Decision-Support​‌ Tool for Personalized treatment​​ of Metastatic Thyroid Cancer:​​​‌ Developing a Digital Decision-Support​ Tool for Personalized treatment​‌ of Metastatic Thyroid Cancer​​.2025 International Cancer​​​‌ Research ConferenceSingapore, Singapore​March 2025HAL
  • 35​‌ inproceedingsL.Linh Nguyen​​ Phuong, F.Frederic​​​‌ Fina, R.Romain​ Zakrajsek, L.Lucie​‌ Della-Negra, P.Pascale​​ Tomasini, J.-L.Jean-Laurent​​​‌ Deville, L.Laurent​ Greillier, C.Caroline​‌ Gaudy-Marqueste, A.Audrey​​ Boutonnet, F.Frédéric​​​‌ Ginot, J.-C.Jean-Charles​ Garcia, S.Sébastien​‌ Salas and S.Sébastien​​ Benzekry. Mechanistic Modeling​​​‌ of Joint Circulating Cell-free​ DNA Concentration—Tumor Size Kinetics​‌ under Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in​​ Advanced Cancer.PAGE​​​‌ 2025 - 33th Annual​ meeting of the Population​‌ Approach Group of Europe​​Thessalokini, GreeceJune 2025​​​‌HAL
  • 36 inproceedingsA.​Anne Rodallec. Model-driven​‌ optimization of the scheduling​​ of a novel anti-cancer​​​‌ prodrug administered subcutaneously.​2025 CRS BNLLC -​‌ 2nd Controlled Release Society​​ BeNeLux & France Local​​​‌ chapter meetingLeiden (NL),​ NetherlandsOctober 2025HAL​‌back to text

Reports​​ & preprints

Other scientific publications

  • 49‌​‌ inproceedingsC.C. Buton​​, A.A. Bakhmach​​​‌, E.E. Armand‌, C.C. Caramella‌​‌, P.P. Habert​​, J.J. Issard​​​‌, P.P. Pradère‌, G.G. Dauriat‌​‌, S.S. Mussot​​, D.D. Mitilian​​​‌, O.O. Hache‌, L.L. Lamrani‌​‌, J.J. Le​​ Pavec, M.M.​​​‌ Zins, M.M.‌ Fidelle, J.J.‌​‌ Pluvy, G.G.​​ Brioude, A.A.​​​‌ Todesco, J.-B.J-B.‌ Lovato, J.J.‌​‌ Tronchetti, H.H.​​ Dutau, L.L.​​​‌ Greillier, D.D.‌ Trousse, X.-B.X-B.‌​‌ d'Journo, P.-A.P-A.​​ Thomas, S.S.​​​‌ Benzekry, E.E.‌ Fadel, S.S.‌​‌ Haulon, D.D.​​ Fabre, S.S.​​​‌ Ghostine, M.M.‌ Kloeckner, G.G.‌​‌ Kroemer, L.L.​​​‌ Zitvogel, B.B.​ Besse, O.O.​‌ Mercier, D.D.​​ Barbolosi and D.D.​​​‌ Boulate. A Markov​ Model Approach to Optimize​‌ Lung Cancer Screening and​​ Early Detection in Patients​​​‌ with Smoking-associated Diseases.​WCLC 2025 - World​‌ Conference of Lung Cancer​​2010Barcelone, Spain​​​‌October 2025, S124​HALDOI
  • 50 inproceedings​‌M.Mathilde Dacos,​​ L.Lea Plantureux,​​​‌ E.Erwan Diroff,​ S.Sarah Giacometti,​‌ J.Joseph Ciccolini and​​ R.Raphaelle Fanciullino.​​​‌ Abstract 6897: Development of​ immunomodulatory nanoparticles targeting HER2​‌ for breast cancer therapy​​.AACR Annual Meeting​​​‌ 2025 - American Association​ for Cancer Research annual​‌ meeting858_Supplement_1Chicago,​​ United StatesAACRApril​​​‌ 2025, 6897-6897HAL​DOI
  • 51 inproceedingsY.​‌Yacine Ghomari, G.​​Guillaume Jacquot, C.​​​‌Coralie Grange, J.​Joseph Ciccolini, A.​‌Alexandre Detappe and A.​​Anne Rodallec. Population​​​‌ Pharmacokinetic (popPK) Model for​ Subcutaneous Administration of Trastuzumab​‌ Emtansine in Mice.​​12e Séminaire Annuel du​​​‌ CanceropôleSaint-Raphaelle, FranceJuly​ 2025HALback to​‌ text
  • 52 inproceedingsP.​​Paul Maroselli, R.​​​‌Raphaelle Fanciullino, J.​Julien Colle, L.​‌Laure Farnault, P.​​Pauline Roche, G.​​​‌Geoffroy Venton, R.​Regis Costello and J.​‌Joseph Ciccolini. Abstract​​ 4362: Body mass index​​​‌ influences imatinib exposure in​ CML patients: Evidence fromTDM​‌ with adaptive dosing in​​ real-world patients.AACR​​​‌ Annual Meeting 2025 -​ American Association for Cancer​‌ Research annual meeting85​​8_Supplement_1Chicago, United States​​​‌AACRApril 2025,​ 4362-4362HALDOI
  • 53​‌ inproceedingsY.Yann Maugé​​ and E.Elias Ventre​​​‌. Benchmarking of the​ robustness of mechanistic generative​‌ models in cellular trajectory​​ and gene regulatory network​​​‌ joint inference.Journées​ de Biostatistique 2025Montpellier,​‌ FranceNovember 2025HAL​​
  • 54 inproceedingsL.Linh​​​‌ Nguyen Phuong, F.​Frederic Fina, R.​‌Romain Zakrajsek, L.​​Lucie Della-Negra, L.​​​‌Laurent Greillier, P.​Pascale Tomasini, J.-L.​‌Jean-Laurent Deville, A.​​Audrey Boutonnet, F.​​​‌Frédéric Ginot, J.-C.​Jean-Charles Garcia, S.​‌Sébastien Salas and S.​​Sébastien Benzekry. Cell-Free​​​‌ DNA Fragmentome Dynamics as​ a Biomarker for Immune-Checkpoint​‌ Inhibition in Advanced Carcinoma​​.AACR 2025 -​​​‌ Annual meeting of American​ Association for Cancer Research​‌Chicago, United StatesApril​​ 2025HALDOI
  • 55​​​‌ inproceedingsA.Anne Rodallec​, R.Randy Lee​‌, J.Jingming Cao​​, S.Sophie Marolleau​​​‌, J.Julien Nicolas​ and S.Sébastien Benzekry​‌. Model-driven scheduling of​​ a novel anti-cancer prodrug​​​‌ administered subcutaneously.PAGE​Thessalonic, GreeceJune 2025​‌HALback to text​​

12.3 Cited publications

  • 56​​​‌ articleS. L.Steven​ L. Brunton, J.​‌ L.Joshua L. Proctor​​ and J. N.J.​​​‌ Nathan Kutz. Discovering​ governing equations from data​‌ by sparse identification of​​ nonlinear dynamical systems.​​​‌Proceedings of the National​ Academy of Sciences113​‌152016, 3932--3937​​DOIback to text​​​‌
  • 57 articleJ.Joseph​ Ciccolini, D.Dominique​‌ Barbolosi, N.Nicolas​​ André, F.Fabrice​​ Barlesi and S.Sébastien​​​‌ Benzekry. Mechanistic Learning‌ for Combinatorial Strategies With‌​‌ Immuno-oncology Drugs: Can Model-Informed​​ Designs Help Investigators?JCO​​​‌ Precision Oncology4May‌ 2020, 486–491DOI‌​‌back to text
  • 58​​ articleS.Samuel Holt​​​‌, T.Tennison Liu‌ and M. v.Mihaela‌​‌ van der Schaar.​​ Automatically Learning Hybrid Digital​​​‌ Twins of Dynamical Systems‌.Advances in Neural‌​‌ Information Processing Systems37​​2025, 72170--72218back​​​‌ to text
  • 59 article‌Z.Zhaozhi Qian,‌​‌ K.Krzysztof Kacprzyk and​​ M. v.Mihaela van​​​‌ der Schaar. D-CODE:‌ Discovering closed-form odes from‌​‌ observed trajectories.ICLR​​2023back to text​​​‌
  • 60 articleC.Christopher‌ Rackauckas, Y.Yingbo‌​‌ Ma, J.Julius​​ Martensen, C.Collin​​​‌ Warner, K.Kirill‌ Zubov, R.Rohit‌​‌ Supekar, D.Dominic​​ Skinner, A.Ali​​​‌ Ramadhan and A.Alan‌ Edelman. Universal Differential‌​‌ Equations for Scientific Machine​​ Learning.arXiv2020​​​‌DOIback to text‌