EN FR
EN FR

2025​​​‌Activity reportProject-TeamMATHERIALS‌

RNSR: 201421206U
  • Research center‌​‌ Inria Paris Centre
  • In​​ partnership with:Ecole Nationale​​​‌ des Ponts et Chaussées‌
  • Team name: MATHematics for‌​‌ MatERIALS
  • In collaboration with:​​Centre d'Enseignement et de​​​‌ Recherche en Mathématiques et‌ Calcul Scientifique (CERMICS)

Creation‌​‌ of the Project-Team: 2015​​ April 01

Each year,​​​‌ Inria research teams publish‌ an Activity Report presenting‌​‌ their work and results​​ over the reporting period.​​​‌ These reports follow a‌ common structure, with some‌​‌ optional sections depending on​​ the specific team. They​​​‌ typically begin by outlining‌ the overall objectives and‌​‌ research programme, including the​​ main research themes, goals,​​​‌ and methodological approaches. They‌ also describe the application‌​‌ domains targeted by the​​ team, highlighting the scientific​​​‌ or societal contexts in‌ which their work is‌​‌ situated.

The reports then​​ present the highlights of​​​‌ the year, covering major‌ scientific achievements, software developments,‌​‌ or teaching contributions. When​​ relevant, they include sections​​​‌ on software, platforms, and‌ open data, detailing the‌​‌ tools developed and how​​ they are shared. A​​​‌ substantial part is dedicated‌ to new results, where‌​‌ scientific contributions are described​​ in detail, often with​​​‌ subsections specifying participants and‌ associated keywords.

Finally, the‌​‌ Activity Report addresses funding,​​ contracts, partnerships, and collaborations​​​‌ at various levels, from‌ industrial agreements to international‌​‌ cooperations. It also covers​​ dissemination and teaching activities,​​​‌ such as participation in‌ scientific events, outreach, and‌​‌ supervision. The document concludes​​ with a presentation of​​​‌ scientific production, including major‌ publications and those produced‌​‌ during the year.

Keywords​​​‌

Computer Science and Digital​ Science

  • A6.1.1. Continuous Modeling​‌ (PDE, ODE)
  • A6.1.2. Stochastic​​ Modeling
  • A6.1.4. Multiscale modeling​​​‌
  • A6.1.5. Multiphysics modeling
  • A6.2.1.​ Numerical analysis of PDE​‌ and ODE
  • A6.2.2. Numerical​​ probability
  • A6.2.3. Probabilistic methods​​​‌
  • A6.2.4. Statistical methods
  • A6.2.7.​ HPC for machine learning​‌
  • A6.3.1. Inverse problems
  • A6.3.4.​​ Model reduction
  • A6.4.1. Deterministic​​​‌ control

Other Research Topics​ and Application Domains

  • B1.1.2.​‌ Molecular and cellular biology​​
  • B4.3.4. Solar Energy
  • B5.3.​​​‌ Nanotechnology
  • B5.5. Materials
  • B9.5.2.​ Mathematics
  • B9.5.3. Physics
  • B9.5.4.​‌ Chemistry

1 Team members,​​ visitors, external collaborators

Research​​​‌ Scientists

  • Claude Le Bris​ [Team leader,​‌ ENPC, Senior Researcher​​, HDR]
  • Sébastien​​​‌ Boyaval [ENPC,​ Senior Researcher, HDR​‌]
  • Eric Cancès [​​ENPC, Senior Researcher​​​‌, HDR]
  • Virginie​ Ehrlacher (Galland) [ENPC​‌, Senior Researcher,​​ HDR]
  • David Gontier​​​‌ [ENPC, Researcher​, HDR]
  • Frederic​‌ Legoll [ENPC,​​ Senior Researcher, HDR​​​‌]
  • Tony Lelièvre [​ENPC, Senior Researcher​‌, HDR]
  • Gabriel​​ Stoltz [ENPC,​​​‌ Senior Researcher, HDR​]
  • Urbain Vaes [​‌INRIA, ISFP]​​

Faculty Member

  • Francis Nier​​​‌ [UNIV PARIS XIII​, Professor Delegation,​‌ from Feb 2025 until​​ Jul 2025]

Post-Doctoral​​​‌ Fellows

  • Thomas Borsoni [​ENPC, Post-Doctoral Fellow​‌]
  • Lois Delande [​​INRIA, Post-Doctoral Fellow​​​‌, from Sep 2025​]
  • Antonin Dellanoce [​‌INRIA, Post-Doctoral Fellow​​]
  • Laura Grazioli [​​​‌ENPC]
  • Rodrigue Lelotte​ [ENPC, Post-Doctoral​‌ Fellow, until Oct​​ 2025]
  • Annamaria Massimini​​​‌ [ENPC, Post-Doctoral​ Fellow]
  • Giulia Merlini​‌ [ENPC, Post-Doctoral​​ Fellow, from Apr​​​‌ 2025]
  • Thomas Normand​ [INRIA, Post-Doctoral​‌ Fellow, until Aug​​ 2025]
  • Giulia Sambataro​​​‌ [ENPC, Post-Doctoral​ Fellow, until Jan​‌ 2025]

PhD Students​​

  • Noe Blassel [ENPC​​​‌]
  • Yann Bouchereau [​ENPC, from Sep​‌ 2025]
  • Louis Carillo​​ [ENPC]
  • Antonin​​​‌ Coatantiec [ENPC,​ from Oct 2025]​‌
  • Shiva Darshan [ENPC​​, until Sep 2025​​​‌]
  • François Escolan [​ENPC]
  • Sofiane Ezzehi​‌ [ENPC]
  • Raphael​​ Gastaldello [ENPC]​​​‌
  • Baptiste Guilbery [INRIA​, from Oct 2025​‌]
  • Clement Guillot [​​ENPC]
  • Jean-Baptiste Himbert​​​‌ [ENPC, from​ Sep 2025]
  • Alberic​‌ Lefort [ENPC,​​ until Oct 2025]​​​‌
  • Pierre Marmey [IFPEN​]
  • Alicia Negre [​‌INRIA]
  • Solal Perrin-Roussel​​ [ENPC, until​​​‌ Aug 2025]
  • Thaddeus​ Roussigne [Université Paris-Dauphine​‌]
  • Simon Ruget [​​INRIA, until Nov​​​‌ 2025]
  • Jonte Weixler​ [Université Paris-Dauphine,​‌ from Sep 2025]​​

Interns and Apprentices

  • Yann​​​‌ Bouchereau [ENPC,​ Intern, from Mar​‌ 2025 until Jul 2025​​]
  • Oscar Demont [​​​‌INRIA, Intern,​ from Mar 2025 until​‌ Sep 2025]
  • Thomas​​ Lambert [INRIA,​​​‌ Intern, from Apr​ 2025 until Sep 2025​‌]

Administrative Assistants

  • Derya​​ Gok [INRIA,​​​‌ from Nov 2025]​
  • Julien Guieu [INRIA​‌, until Nov 2025​​]

Visiting Scientists

  • Theron​​ Guo [MIT,​​​‌ from Nov 2025]‌
  • Theron Guo [MIT‌​‌, from Apr 2025​​ until Jul 2025]​​​‌
  • Panagiotis Parpas [IMPERIAL‌ COLLEGE LDN, until‌​‌ Feb 2025]
  • Wei​​ Zhang [Zuse Institute​​​‌ Berlin, from Feb‌ 2025 until Apr 2025‌​‌]

2 Overall objectives​​

The MATHERIALS project-team was​​​‌ created jointly by the‌ École nationale des ponts‌​‌ et chaussées (ENPC) and​​ Inria in 2015. It​​​‌ is the follow-up and‌ an extension of the‌​‌ former project-team MICMAC originally​​ created in October 2002.​​​‌ It is hosted by‌ the CERMICS laboratory (Centre‌​‌ d'Enseignement et de Recherches​​ en Mathématiques et Calcul​​​‌ Scientifique) at École des‌ Ponts. The permanent research‌​‌ scientists of the project-team​​ have positions at CERMICS​​​‌ and at two other‌ laboratories of École des‌​‌ Ponts: Institut Navier and​​ Laboratoire Saint-Venant. The scientific​​​‌ focus of the project-team‌ is to analyze and‌​‌ improve the numerical schemes​​ used in the simulation​​​‌ of computational chemistry at‌ the microscopic level and‌​‌ to create simulations coupling​​ this microscopic scale with​​​‌ meso- or macroscopic scales‌ (possibly using parallel algorithms).‌​‌ Over the years, the​​ project-team has accumulated an​​​‌ increasingly solid expertise on‌ such topics, which are‌​‌ traditionally not well known​​ by the community in​​​‌ applied mathematics and scientific‌ computing. One of the‌​‌ major achievements of the​​ project-team is to have​​​‌ created a corpus of‌ literature, authoring books and‌​‌ research monographs on the​​ subject 3, 4​​​‌, 5, 6‌, 8, 7‌​‌, 9 that other​​ scientists may consult in​​​‌ order to enter the‌ field.

3 Research program‌​‌

Our group, originally only​​ involved in electronic structure​​​‌ computations, continues to focus‌ on many numerical issues‌​‌ in quantum chemistry, but​​ now expands its expertise​​​‌ to cover several related‌ problems at larger scales,‌​‌ such as molecular dynamics​​ problems and multiscale problems.​​​‌ The mathematical derivation of‌ continuum energies from quantum‌​‌ chemistry models is one​​ instance of a long-term​​​‌ theoretical endeavour.

4 Application‌ domains

4.1 Electronic structure‌​‌ of large systems

Quantum​​ Chemistry aims at understanding​​​‌ the properties of matter‌ through the modelling of‌​‌ its behavior at a​​ subatomic scale, where matter​​​‌ is described as an‌ assembly of nuclei and‌​‌ electrons. At this scale,​​ the equation that rules​​​‌ the interactions between these‌ constitutive elements is the‌​‌ Schrödinger equation. It can​​ be considered (except in​​​‌ few special cases notably‌ those involving relativistic phenomena‌​‌ or nuclear reactions) as​​ a universal model for​​​‌ at least three reasons.‌ First it contains all‌​‌ the physical information of​​ the system under consideration​​​‌ so that any of‌ the properties of this‌​‌ system can in theory​​ be deduced from the​​​‌ Schrödinger equation associated to‌ it. Second, the Schrödinger‌​‌ equation does not involve​​ any empirical parameters, except​​​‌ some fundamental constants of‌ Physics (the Planck constant,‌​‌ the mass and charge​​ of the electron, ...);​​​‌ it can thus be‌ written for any kind‌​‌ of molecular system provided​​ its chemical composition, in​​​‌ terms of natures of‌ nuclei and number of‌​‌ electrons, is known. Third,​​​‌ this model enjoys remarkable​ predictive capabilities, as confirmed​‌ by comparisons with a​​ large amount of experimental​​​‌ data of various types.​ On the other hand,​‌ using this high quality​​ model requires working with​​​‌ space and time scales​ which are both very​‌ tiny: the typical size​​ of the electronic cloud​​​‌ of an isolated atom​ is the Angström (​‌10-10 meters),​​ and the size of​​​‌ the nucleus embedded in​ it is 10-​‌15 meters; the typical​​ vibration period of a​​​‌ molecular bond is the​ femtosecond (10-​‌15 seconds), and the​​ characteristic relaxation time for​​​‌ an electron is 10​-18 seconds. Consequently,​‌ Quantum Chemistry calculations concern​​ very short time (say​​​‌ 10-12 seconds)​ behaviors of very small​‌ size (say 10-​​27 m3)​​​‌ systems. The underlying question​ is therefore whether information​‌ on phenomena at these​​ scales is useful in​​​‌ understanding or, better, predicting​ macroscopic properties of matter.​‌ It is certainly not​​ true that all macroscopic​​​‌ properties can be simply​ upscaled from the consideration​‌ of the short time​​ behavior of a tiny​​​‌ sample of matter. Many​ of them derive from​‌ ensemble or bulk effects,​​ that are far from​​​‌ being easy to understand​ and to model. Striking​‌ examples are found in​​ solid state materials or​​​‌ biological systems. Cleavage, the​ ability of minerals to​‌ naturally split along crystal​​ surfaces (e.g. mica yields​​​‌ to thin flakes), is​ an ensemble effect. Protein​‌ folding is also an​​ ensemble effect that originates​​​‌ from the presence of​ the surrounding medium; it​‌ is responsible for peculiar​​ properties (e.g. unexpected acidity​​​‌ of some reactive site​ enhanced by special interactions)​‌ upon which vital processes​​ are based. However, it​​​‌ is undoubtedly true that​ many macroscopic phenomena originate​‌ from elementary processes which​​ take place at the​​​‌ atomic scale. Let us​ mention for instance the​‌ fact that the elastic​​ constants of a perfect​​​‌ crystal or the color​ of a chemical compound​‌ (which is related to​​ the wavelengths absorbed or​​​‌ emitted during optic transitions​ between electronic levels) can​‌ be evaluated by atomic​​ scale calculations. In the​​​‌ same fashion, the lubricative​ properties of graphite are​‌ essentially due to a​​ phenomenon which can be​​​‌ entirely modeled at the​ atomic scale. It is​‌ therefore reasonable to simulate​​ the behavior of matter​​​‌ at the atomic scale​ in order to understand​‌ what is going on​​ at the macroscopic one.​​​‌ The journey is however​ a long one. Starting​‌ from the basic principles​​ of Quantum Mechanics to​​​‌ model the matter at​ the subatomic scale, one​‌ finally uses statistical mechanics​​ to reach the macroscopic​​​‌ scale. It is often​ necessary to rely on​‌ intermediate steps to deal​​ with phenomena which take​​​‌ place on various mesoscales​. It may then​‌ be possible to couple​​ one description of the​​​‌ system with some others​ within the so-called multiscale​‌ models. The sequel indicates​​ how this journey can​​​‌ be completed focusing on​ the first smallest scales​‌ (the subatomic one), rather​​ than on the larger​​ ones. It has already​​​‌ been mentioned that at‌ the subatomic scale, the‌​‌ behavior of nuclei and​​ electrons is governed by​​​‌ the Schrödinger equation, either‌ in its time-dependent form‌​‌ or in its time-independent​​ form. Let us only​​​‌ mention at this point‌ that

  • both equations involve‌​‌ the quantum Hamiltonian of​​ the molecular system under​​​‌ consideration; from a mathematical‌ viewpoint, it is a‌​‌ self-adjoint operator on some​​ Hilbert space; both the​​​‌ Hilbert space and the‌ Hamiltonian operator depend on‌​‌ the nature of the​​ system;
  • also present into​​​‌ these equations is the‌ wavefunction of the system;‌​‌ it completely describes its​​ state; its L2​​​‌ norm is set to‌ one.

The time-dependent equation‌​‌ is a first-order linear​​ evolution equation, whereas the​​​‌ time-independent equation is a‌ linear eigenvalue equation. For‌​‌ the reader more familiar​​ with numerical analysis than​​​‌ with quantum mechanics, the‌ linear nature of the‌​‌ problems stated above may​​ look auspicious. What makes​​​‌ the numerical simulation of‌ these equations extremely difficult‌​‌ is essentially the huge​​ size of the Hilbert​​​‌ space: indeed, this space‌ is roughly some symmetry-constrained‌​‌ subspace of L2​​(d)​​​‌, with d=‌3(M+‌​‌N), M​​ and N respectively denoting​​​‌ the number of nuclei‌ and the number of‌​‌ electrons the system is​​ made of. The parameter​​​‌ d is already 39‌ for a single water‌​‌ molecule and rapidly reaches​​ 106 for polymers​​​‌ or biological molecules. In‌ addition, a consequence of‌​‌ the universality of the​​ model is that one​​​‌ has to deal at‌ the same time with‌​‌ several energy scales. In​​ molecular systems, the basic​​​‌ elementary interaction between nuclei‌ and electrons (the two-body‌​‌ Coulomb interaction) appears in​​ various complex physical and​​​‌ chemical phenomena whose characteristic‌ energies cover several orders‌​‌ of magnitude: the binding​​ energy of core electrons​​​‌ in heavy atoms is‌ 104 times as‌​‌ large as a typical​​ covalent bond energy, which​​​‌ is itself around 20‌ times as large as‌​‌ the energy of a​​ hydrogen bond. High precision​​​‌ or at least controlled‌ error cancellations are thus‌​‌ required to reach chemical​​ accuracy when starting from​​​‌ the Schrödinger equation. Clever‌ approximations of the Schrödinger‌​‌ problems are therefore needed.​​ The main two approximation​​​‌ strategies, namely the Born-Oppenheimer-Hartree-Fock‌ and the Born-Oppenheimer-Kohn-Sham strategies,‌​‌ end up with large​​ systems of coupled nonlinear​​​‌ partial differential equations, each‌ of these equations being‌​‌ posed on L2​​(3)​​​‌. The size of‌ the underlying functional space‌​‌ is thus reduced at​​ the cost of a​​​‌ dramatic increase of the‌ mathematical complexity of the‌​‌ problem: nonlinearity. The mathematical​​ and numerical analysis of​​​‌ the resulting models has‌ been the major concern‌​‌ of the project-team for​​ a long time. In​​​‌ the recent years, while‌ part of the activity‌​‌ still follows this path,​​ the focus has progressively​​​‌ shifted to problems at‌ other scales.

As the‌​‌ size of the systems​​ one wants to study​​​‌ increases, more efficient numerical‌ techniques need to be‌​‌ resorted to. In computational​​​‌ chemistry, the typical scaling​ law for the complexity​‌ of computations with respect​​ to the size of​​​‌ the system under study​ is N3,​‌ N being for instance​​ the number of electrons.​​​‌ The Holy Grail in​ this respect is to​‌ reach a linear scaling,​​ so as to make​​​‌ possible simulations of systems​ of practical interest in​‌ biology or materials science.​​ Efforts in this direction​​​‌ must address a large​ variety of questions such​‌ as

  • how can one​​ improve the nonlinear iterations​​​‌ that are the basis​ of any ab initio​‌ models for computational chemistry?​​
  • how can one more​​​‌ efficiently solve the inner​ loop which most often​‌ consists in the solution​​ procedure for the linear​​​‌ problem (with frozen nonlinearity)?​
  • how can one design​‌ a sufficiently small variational​​ space, whose dimension is​​​‌ kept limited while the​ size of the system​‌ increases?

An alternative strategy​​ to reduce the complexity​​​‌ of ab initio computations​ is to try to​‌ couple different models at​​ different scales. Such a​​​‌ mixed strategy can be​ either a sequential one​‌ or a parallel one,​​ in the sense that​​​‌

  • in the former, the​ results of the model​‌ at the lower scale​​ are simply used to​​​‌ evaluate some parameters that​ are inserted in the​‌ model for the larger​​ scale: one example is​​​‌ the parameterized classical molecular​ dynamics, which makes use​‌ of force fields that​​ are fitted to calculations​​​‌ at the quantum level;​
  • while in the latter,​‌ the model at the​​ lower scale is concurrently​​​‌ coupled to the model​ at the larger scale:​‌ an instance of such​​ a strategy is the​​​‌ so called QM/MM coupling​ (standing for Quantum Mechanics/Molecular​‌ Mechanics coupling) where some​​ part of the system​​​‌ (typically the reactive site​ of a protein) is​‌ modeled with quantum models,​​ that therefore accounts for​​​‌ the change in the​ electronic structure and for​‌ the modification of chemical​​ bonds, while the rest​​​‌ of the system (typically​ the inert part of​‌ a protein) is coarse​​ grained and more crudely​​​‌ modeled by classical mechanics.​

The coupling of different​‌ scales can even go​​ up to the macroscopic​​​‌ scale, with methods that​ couple a microscopic representation​‌ of matter, or at​​ least a mesoscopic one,​​​‌ with the equations of​ continuum mechanics at the​‌ macroscopic level.

4.2 Computational​​ Statistical Mechanics

The orders​​​‌ of magnitude used in​ the microscopic representation of​‌ matter are far from​​ the orders of magnitude​​​‌ of the macroscopic quantities​ we are used to:​‌ the number of particles​​ under consideration in a​​​‌ macroscopic sample of material​ is of the order​‌ of the Avogadro number​​ 𝒩A6​​​‌×1023,​ the typical distances are​‌ expressed in Å (​​10-10 m),​​​‌ the energies are of​ the order of k​‌BT4​​×10-21​​​‌ J at room temperature,​ and the typical times​‌ are of the order​​ of 10-15​​​‌ s.

To give some​ insight into such a​‌ large number of particles​​ contained in a macroscopic​​ sample, it is helpful​​​‌ to compute the number‌ of moles of water‌​‌ on earth. Recall that​​ one mole of water​​​‌ corresponds to 18 mL,‌ so that a standard‌​‌ glass of water contains​​ roughly 10 moles, and​​​‌ a typical bathtub contains‌ 105 mol. On‌​‌ the other hand, there​​ are approximately 1018​​​‌ m3 of water‌ in the oceans, i.e.‌​‌7×1022​​ mol, a number comparable​​​‌ to the Avogadro number.‌ This means that inferring‌​‌ the macroscopic behavior of​​ physical systems described at​​​‌ the microscopic level by‌ the dynamics of several‌​‌ millions of particles only​​ is like inferring the​​​‌ ocean's dynamics from hydrodynamics‌ in a bathtub...

For‌​‌ practical numerical computations of​​ matter at the microscopic​​​‌ level, following the dynamics‌ of every atom would‌​‌ require simulating 𝒩A​​ atoms and performing O​​​‌(1015)‌ time integration steps, which‌​‌ is of course impossible!​​ These numbers should be​​​‌ compared with the current‌ orders of magnitude of‌​‌ the problems that can​​ be tackled with classical​​​‌ molecular simulation, where several‌ millions of atoms only‌​‌ can be followed over​​ time scales of the​​​‌ order of a few‌ microseconds.

Describing the macroscopic‌​‌ behavior of matter knowing​​ its microscopic description therefore​​​‌ seems out of reach.‌ Statistical physics allows us‌​‌ to bridge the gap​​ between microscopic and macroscopic​​​‌ descriptions of matter, at‌ least on a conceptual‌​‌ level. The question is​​ whether the estimated quantities​​​‌ for a system of‌ N particles correctly approximate‌​‌ the macroscopic property, formally​​ obtained in the thermodynamic​​​‌ limit N+‌ (the density being‌​‌ kept fixed). In some​​ cases, in particular for​​​‌ simple homogeneous systems, the‌ macroscopic behavior is well‌​‌ approximated from small-scale simulations.​​ However, the convergence of​​​‌ the estimated quantities as‌ a function of the‌​‌ number of particles involved​​ in the simulation should​​​‌ be checked in all‌ cases.

Despite its intrinsic‌​‌ limitations on spatial and​​ timescales, molecular simulation has​​​‌ been used and developed‌ over the past 50‌​‌ years, and its number​​ of users keeps increasing.​​​‌ As we understand it,‌ it has two major‌​‌ aims nowadays.

First, it​​ can be used as​​​‌ a numerical microscope,‌ which allows us to‌​‌ perform “computer” experiments. This​​ was the initial motivation​​​‌ for simulations at the‌ microscopic level: physical theories‌​‌ were tested on computers.​​ This use of molecular​​​‌ simulation is particularly clear‌ in its historic development,‌​‌ which was triggered and​​ sustained by the physics​​​‌ of simple liquids. Indeed,‌ there was no good‌​‌ analytical theory for these​​ systems, and the observation​​​‌ of computer trajectories was‌ very helpful to guide‌​‌ the physicists' intuition about​​ what was happening in​​​‌ the system, for instance‌ the mechanisms leading to‌​‌ molecular diffusion. In particular,​​ the pioneering works on​​​‌ Monte Carlo methods by‌ Metropolis et al.,‌​‌ and the first molecular​​ dynamics simulation of Alder​​​‌ and Wainwright were performed‌ because of such motivations.‌​‌ Today, understanding the behavior​​ of matter at the​​​‌ microscopic level can still‌ be difficult from an‌​‌ experimental viewpoint (because of​​​‌ the high resolution required,​ both in time and​‌ in space), or because​​ we simply do not​​​‌ know what to look​ for! Numerical simulations are​‌ then a valuable tool​​ to test some ideas​​​‌ or obtain some data​ to process and analyze​‌ in order to help​​ assessing experimental setups. This​​​‌ is particularly true for​ current nanoscale systems.

Another​‌ major aim of molecular​​ simulation, maybe even more​​​‌ important than the previous​ one, is to compute​‌ macroscopic quantities or thermodynamic​​ properties, typically through averages​​​‌ of some functionals of​ the system. In this​‌ case, molecular simulation is​​ a way to obtain​​​‌ quantitative information on a​ system, instead of resorting​‌ to approximate theories, constructed​​ for simplified models, and​​​‌ giving only qualitative answers.​ Sometimes, these properties are​‌ accessible through experiments, but​​ in some cases only​​​‌ numerical computations are possible​ since experiments may be​‌ unfeasible or too costly​​ (for instance, when high​​​‌ pressure or large temperature​ regimes are considered, or​‌ when studying materials not​​ yet synthesized). More generally,​​​‌ molecular simulation is a​ tool to explore the​‌ links between the microscopic​​ and macroscopic properties of​​​‌ a material, allowing one​ to address modelling questions​‌ such as “Which microscopic​​ ingredients are necessary (and​​​‌ which are not) to​ observe a given macroscopic​‌ behavior?”

4.3 Homogenization and​​ related problems

Over the​​​‌ years, the project-team has​ developed an increasing expertise​‌ on multiscale modeling for​​ materials science at the​​​‌ continuum scale. The presence​ of numerous length scales​‌ in material science problems​​ indeed represents a challenge​​​‌ for numerical simulation, especially​ when some randomness is​‌ assumed on the materials.​​ It can take various​​​‌ forms, and includes defects​ in crystals, thermal fluctuations,​‌ and impurities or heterogeneities​​ in continuous media. Standard​​​‌ methods available in the​ literature to handle such​‌ problems often lead to​​ very costly computations. Our​​​‌ goal is to develop​ numerical methods that are​‌ more affordable. Because we​​ cannot embrace all difficulties​​​‌ at once, we focus​ on a simple case,​‌ where the fine scale​​ and the coarse-scale models​​​‌ can be written similarly,​ in the form of​‌ a simple elliptic partial​​ differential equation in divergence​​​‌ form. The fine scale​ model includes heterogeneities at​‌ a small scale, a​​ situation which is formalized​​​‌ by the fact that​ the coefficients in the​‌ fine scale model vary​​ on a small length​​​‌ scale. After homogenization, this​ model yields an effective,​‌ macroscopic model, which includes​​ no small scale (the​​​‌ coefficients of the coarse​ scale equations are thus​‌ simply constant, or vary​​ on a coarse length​​​‌ scale). In many cases,​ a sound theoretical groundwork​‌ exists for such homogenization​​ results. The difficulty stems​​​‌ from the fact that​ the models generally lead​‌ to prohibitively costly computations​​ (this is for instance​​​‌ the case for random​ stationary settings). Our aim​‌ is to focus on​​ different settings, all relevant​​​‌ from an applied viewpoint,​ and leading to practically​‌ affordable computational approaches. It​​ is well-known that the​​​‌ case of ordered (that​ is, in this context,​‌ periodic) systems is now​​ well-understood, both from a​​ theoretical and a numerical​​​‌ standpoint. Our aim is‌ to turn to cases,‌​‌ more relevant in practice,​​ where some disorder is​​​‌ present in the microstructure‌ of the material, to‌​‌ take into account defects​​ in crystals, impurities in​​​‌ continuous media... This disorder‌ may be mathematically modeled‌​‌ in various ways.

Such​​ endeavors raise several questions.​​​‌ The first one, theoretical‌ in nature, is to‌​‌ extend the classical theory​​ of homogenization (well developed​​​‌ e.g. in the periodic‌ setting) to such disordered‌​‌ settings. Next, after homogenization,​​ we expect to obtain​​​‌ an effective, macroscopic model,‌ which includes no small‌​‌ scale. A second question​​ is to introduce affordable​​​‌ numerical methods to compute‌ the homogenized coefficients. An‌​‌ alternative approach, more numerical​​ in nature, is to​​​‌ directly attack the oscillatory‌ problem by using discretization‌​‌ approaches tailored to the​​ multiscale nature of the​​​‌ problem (the construction of‌ which is often inspired‌​‌ by theoretical homogenization results).​​ For a comprehensive account​​​‌ of many of the‌ research efforts of the‌​‌ team on these topics,​​ we refer to 1​​​‌, 2.

5‌ Highlights of the year‌​‌

5.1 Awards

Virginie Ehrlacher​​ was distinguished as “chevalier​​​‌ dans l’ordre national du‌ mérite”.

6 Latest software‌​‌ developments, platforms, open data​​

6.1 Latest software developments​​​‌

6.1.1 DFTK

  • Keywords:
    Molecular‌ simulation, Quantum chemistry, Materials‌​‌
  • Functional Description:
    DFTK, short​​ for the density-functional toolkit,​​​‌ is a Julia library‌ implementing plane-wave density functional‌​‌ theory for the simulation​​ of the electronic structure​​​‌ of molecules and materials.‌ It aims at providing‌​‌ a simple platform for​​ experimentation and algorithm development​​​‌ for scientists of different‌ backgrounds.
  • Release Contributions:
    In‌​‌ 2025 DFTK continued to​​ be actively developed, and​​​‌ it received several contributions‌ from members of MATHERIALS.‌​‌ The library has been​​ used for several publications​​​‌ both inside and outside‌ the project-team.
  • URL:
  • Contact:
    Antoine Levitt

7​​ New results

7.1 Electronic​​​‌ structure calculations and related‌ quantum-scale problems

Participants: Eric‌​‌ Cancès, Théo Duez​​, Mathias Dus,​​​‌ Virginie Ehrlacher, Laura‌ Grazioli, Clément Guillot‌​‌, Alfred Kirsch,​​ Claude Le Bris,​​​‌ Solal Perrin-Roussel, Etienne‌ Polack.

7.1.1 Density‌​‌ functional theory

The team​​ continued its long-standing project​​​‌ to study density functional‌ theory from an applied‌​‌ mathematics perspective.

In a​​ joint work with A.​​​‌ Levitt and J. Thomas‌ (University Paris Saclay), E.‌​‌ Cancès studies the decay​​ of the interatomic force​​​‌ constants (equivalently, the smoothness‌ properties of the dynamical‌​‌ matrix) in perfect crystals​​ both at finite electronic​​​‌ temperature, and for insulators‌ at zero temperature, within‌​‌ the reduced Hartree–Fock approximation​​ (also called Random Phase​​​‌ Approximation). This model is‌ obtained by setting to‌​‌ zero the exchange-correlation energy​​ functional is Kohn–Sham Density​​​‌ Functional Theory. At finite‌ temperature the electrons are‌​‌ mobile, leading to exponential​​ decay of the force​​​‌ constants. In insulators, there‌ is incomplete screening, leading‌​‌ to an algebraic decay​​ of dipole-dipole interaction type.​​​‌ This is the first‌ fully rigorous mathematical proof‌​‌ of a well-known phenomenon​​ in solid-state physics.

7.1.2​​​‌ Electronic excited states

Computing‌ excited states of many-body‌​‌ quantum Hamiltonians is a​​​‌ fundamental challenge in computational​ physics and chemistry, with​‌ state-of-the-art methods broadly classified​​ into variational (critical point​​​‌ search) and linear response​ approaches. The Kähler manifold​‌ formalism provides a uniform​​ framework which naturally accommodates​​​‌ both strategies for a​ wide range of variational​‌ models, including Hartree-Fock, CASSCF,​​ Full CI, and adiabatic​​​‌ TDDFT. In particular, this​ formalism leads to a​‌ systematic and straightforward way​​ to obtain the final​​​‌ equations of linear response​ theory for nonlinear models,​‌ which provides, in the​​ case of mean-field models​​​‌ (Hartree-Fock and DFT), a​ simple alternative to Casida's​‌ derivation. In a joint​​ work with Y. Hu​​​‌ (Ecole des Ponts IPP),​ E. Cancès and L.​‌ Grazioli detail the mathematical​​ structure of Hamiltonian dynamics​​​‌ on Kähler manifolds, establish​ connections to standard quantum​‌ chemistry equations, and provide​​ theoretical and numerical comparisons​​​‌ of excitation energy computation​ schemes at the Hartree-Fock​‌ level of theory.

7.1.3​​ Strongly-correlated systems

The treatment​​​‌ of strongly correlated quantum​ systems is a long-standing​‌ challenge in computational chemistry​​ and physics.

Quantum embedding​​​‌ methods enable the study​ of large, strongly correlated​‌ quantum systems by (usually​​ self-consistent) decomposition into computationally​​​‌ manageable subproblems, in the​ spirit of divide-and-conquer methods.​‌

The first contribution on​​ the mathematical and numerical​​​‌ analysis of this family​ of methods is concerned​‌ with the Dynamical Mean-Field​​ Theory (DMFT), the most​​​‌ famous quantum embedding methods​ method introduced by A.​‌ Georges and G. Kotliar​​ in 1992. In a​​​‌ previous contribution, E. Cancès,​ A. Kirsch and S.​‌ Perrin-Roussel had proven the​​ existence of a solution​​​‌ to the DMFT equations​ under the Iterated Perturbation​‌ Theory (IPT-DMFT) approximation. In​​ view of numerical simulations,​​​‌ these equations need to​ be discretized. In a​‌ follow-up contribution, they studied​​ a discretization of the​​​‌ IPT-DMFT functional equations, based​ on the restriction of​‌ the hybridization function and​​ local self-energy to a​​​‌ finite number of Matsubara​ frequencies. They first prove​‌ the existence of solutions​​ to the discretized equations​​​‌ in some parameter range​ depending on the Matsubara​‌ frequency cut-off. They then​​ prove uniqueness for a​​​‌ smaller range of parameters.​ They also study more​‌ in depth the case​​ of bipartite systems exhibiting​​​‌ particle-hole symmetry. In this​ case, the discretized IPT-DMFT​‌ equations have purely imaginary​​ solutions, which can be​​​‌ obtained by solving a​ real algebraic system. They​‌ provide a complete characterization​​ of the solutions in​​​‌ the simple case of​ the Hubbard dimer for​‌ discretizations on the lowest​​ two values of the​​​‌ Matsubara frequency cut-off and​ numerical simulations for larger​‌ values. First, they describe​​ how a conductor-to-insulator transition​​​‌ occurs in the Matsubara​ frequency discretized IPT-DMFT model​‌ in the small temperature​​ regime. Finally, they show​​​‌ that for some parameters​ (U,T​‌) of the considered​​ Hubbard model, this discretization​​​‌ method may provide values​ of the Green's function​‌ at the lowest Matsubara​​ frequencies which cannot be​​​‌ interpolated by a Pick​ function.

The second contribution​‌ is concerned with Density​​ Matrix Embedding Theory (DMET),​​​‌ a popular method in​ quantum chemistry introduced by​‌ Ksanyi and Chang in​​ 2012. DMET is an​​ efficient approach that enforces​​​‌ self-consistency at the level‌ of one-particle reduced density‌​‌ matrices (1-RDMs), facilitating applications​​ across diverse quantum systems.​​​‌ However, conventional DMET is‌ constrained by the requirement‌​‌ that the global 1-RDM​​ (low-level descriptor) be an​​​‌ orthogonal projector, limiting flexibility‌ in bath construction and‌​‌ potentially impeding accuracy in​​ strongly correlated regimes. In​​​‌ a joint work 58‌ with T. Ayral (Eviden,‌​‌ now Ecole Polytechnique), F.​​ Faulstich (RPI, USA), R.​​​‌ Kim and L. Lin‌ (UC Berkeley, USA), E.‌​‌ Cancès and A. Nègre​​ introduced a generalized DMET​​​‌ framework in which the‌ low-level descriptor can be‌​‌ an arbitrary 1-RDM and​​ the bath construction is​​​‌ based on optimizing a‌ quantitative criterion related to‌​‌ the maximal disentanglement between​​ different fragments. This yields​​​‌ an alternative yet controllable‌ bath space construction for‌​‌ generic 1-RDMs, lifting a​​ key limitation of conventional​​​‌ DMET. They demonstrate its‌ consistency with conventional DMET‌​‌ in appropriate limits and​​ exploring its implications for​​​‌ bath construction, downfolding (impurity‌ Hamiltonian construction), low-level solvers,‌​‌ and adaptive fragmentation. We​​ expect that this more​​​‌ flexible framework, which leads‌ to several new variants‌​‌ of DMET, can improve​​ the robustness and accuracy​​​‌ of DMET.

7.1.4 Electronic‌ structure of moiré materials‌​‌

Computing the electronic structure​​ of incommensurate materials is​​​‌ a central challenge in‌ condensed matter physics, requiring‌​‌ efficient ways to approximate​​ spectral quantities such as​​​‌ the density of states‌ (DoS). In a joint‌​‌ work with D. Massatt​​ (NJIT, USA), L. Meng​​​‌ ( Zhejiang University, China),‌ Etienne Polack (former member‌​‌ of Matherials, now at​​ CEA Grenoble) X. Zhang​​​‌ (Beijing Normal University, China),‌ E. Cancès numerically investigate‌​‌ two distinct approaches for​​ approximating the DoS of​​​‌ incommensurate Hamiltonians for small‌ values of the incommensurability‌​‌ parameters ϵ (e.g., small​​ twist angle, or small​​​‌ lattice mismatch): the first‌ employs a momentum-space decomposition,‌​‌ and the second exploits​​ a semiclassical expansion with​​​‌ respect to ϵ.‌ In particular, these two‌​‌ methods are compared using​​ a 1D toy model.​​​‌ We check their consistency‌ by comparing the asymptotic‌​‌ expansion terms of the​​ DoS, and it is​​​‌ shown that, for full‌ DoS, the two methods‌​‌ exhibit good agreement in​​ the small ϵ limit,​​​‌ while discrepancies arise for‌ less small ϵ,‌​‌ which indicates the importance​​ of higher-order corrections in​​​‌ the semiclassical method for‌ such regimes. These discrepancies‌​‌ are found to be​​ caused by oscillations in​​​‌ the DoS at the‌ semiclassical analogues of Van‌​‌ Hove singularities, which can​​ be explained qualitatively, and​​​‌ quantitatively for ϵ small‌ enough, by a semiclassical‌​‌ approach.

7.1.5 Optimal transport​​ and quantum chemistry

Recent​​​‌ research efforts have been‌ carried out in the‌​‌ team on the development​​ of efficient numerical methods​​​‌ for quantum chemistry using‌ optimal transport theory.

7.2‌​‌ Computational statistical physics

Participants:​​ Noé Blassel, Louis​​​‌ Carillo, Antonin Coatantiec‌, Shiva Darshan,‌​‌ Raphaël Gastaldello, Jean-Baptiste​​ Himbert, Tony Lelièvre​​​‌, Pierre Marmey,‌ Panos Parpas, Régis‌​‌ Santet, Gabriel Stoltz​​, Urbain Vaes,​​​‌ Wei Zhang.

The‌ aim of computational statistical‌​‌ physics is to compute​​​‌ macroscopic properties of materials​ starting from a microscopic​‌ description, using concepts of​​ statistical physics (thermodynamic ensembles​​​‌ and molecular dynamics). The​ contributions of the team​‌ can be divided into​​ five main topics: (i)​​​‌ the improvement of techniques​ to sample the configuration​‌ space; (ii) the development​​ of simulation methods to​​​‌ efficiently simulate nonequilibrium systems;​ (iii) the study of​‌ dynamical properties and rare​​ event sampling; (iv) the​​​‌ development of enhanced sampling​ methods using machine learning​‌ techniques; (v) the use​​ of particle methods for​​​‌ sampling and optimization.

7.2.1​ Sampling of the configuration​‌ space

There is still​​ a need to improve​​​‌ techniques to sample the​ configuration space, and to​‌ understand their performance. This​​ includes the development of​​​‌ sampling techniques, and their​ numerical analysis.

To quantify​‌ the performance of sampling​​ methods based on ergodic​​​‌ stochastic differential equations, bounds​ on the resolvent of​‌ the generator of the​​ dynamics under consideration are​​​‌ useful, as one can​ derive upper bounds on​‌ the asymptotic variance for​​ time averages. Such bounds​​​‌ can in turn be​ deduced from decay estimates​‌ on the semigroup. Together​​ with G. Brigati (ISTA,​​​‌ Austria), A. Wang (University​ of Warwick United-Kingdom) and​‌ L. Wang (NUS, Singapore),​​ G. Stoltz studied in​​​‌ 43 how to obtain​ constructive decay estimates for​‌ the semigroup associated with​​ hypoelliptic generators associated with​​​‌ Langevin dynamics, using hypocoercive​ techniques based on space​‌ time averages and Lions'​​ lemma, in the setting​​​‌ where a Poincaré inequality​ does not hold, but​‌ weak or weighted Poincaré​​ inequalities are satisfied by​​​‌ the marginal distributions in​ positions and momenta.

Besides,​‌ together with X. Lin​​ and P. Monmarché (Université​​​‌ Gustave Eiffel), T. Lelièvre​ explores in 57 a​‌ new approach to study​​ the convergence of free-energy-based​​​‌ adaptive biasing methods, such​ as Metadynamics and their​‌ variants. These are enhanced​​ sampling algorithms which are​​​‌ widely used in molecular​ simulations. Although their efficiency​‌ has been empirically acknowledged​​ for decades, providing theoretical​​​‌ insights via a quantitative​ convergence analysis is a​‌ difficult problem, in particular​​ for the kinetic Langevin​​​‌ diffusion, which is non-reversible​ and hypocoercive. They obtain​‌ the first exponential convergence​​ result for such a​​​‌ process, in an idealized​ setting where the dynamics​‌ can be associated with​​ a mean-field non-linear flow​​​‌ on the space of​ probability measures. A key​‌ of the analysis is​​ the interpretation of the​​​‌ (idealized) algorithm as the​ gradient descent of a​‌ suitable functional over the​​ space of probability distributions.​​​‌

7.2.2 Mathematical understanding and​ efficient simulation of nonequilibrium​‌ systems

Many systems in​​ computational statistical physics are​​​‌ not at equilibrium. This​ is in particular the​‌ case when one wants​​ to compute transport coefficients,​​​‌ which determine the response​ of the system to​‌ some external perturbation. For​​ instance, the thermal conductivity​​​‌ relates an applied temperature​ difference to an energy​‌ current through Fourier's law,​​ while the mobility coefficient​​​‌ relates an applied external​ constant force to the​‌ average velocity of the​​ particles in the system.​​​‌ The main limitations of​ usual methods to compute​‌ transport coefficients is the​​ large variance of the​​ estimators, which motivates searching​​​‌ for dedicated variance reduction‌ strategies. Let us next‌​‌ describe the efforts of​​ the team done in​​​‌ the previous year.

In‌ 53, R. Gastaldello,‌​‌ G. Stoltz and U.​​ Vaes proposed a variance​​​‌ reduction method for calculating‌ transport coefficients using an‌​‌ importance sampling method via​​ Girsanov's theorem applied to​​​‌ Green–Kubo's formula. They optimized‌ the magnitude of the‌​‌ perturbation applied to the​​ reference dynamics by means​​​‌ of a scalar parameter‌ α and proposed an‌​‌ asymptotic analysis to fully​​ characterize the long-time behavior​​​‌ in order to evaluate‌ the possible variance reduction.‌​‌ Theoretical results were corroborated​​ by numerical results and​​​‌ show that this method‌ allows for some reduction‌​‌ in variance, although rather​​ modest in most situations.​​​‌

In 17, S.‌ Darshan and G. Stoltz‌​‌ studied with A. Iacobucci​​ and S. Olla (CEREMADE,​​​‌ France) the behavior of‌ β-FPUT chains under‌​‌ time-periodic forcings. Recent works​​ proved a hydrodynamic limit​​​‌ for periodically forced atom‌ chains with harmonic interaction‌​‌ and pinning, together with​​ momentum flip. When energy​​​‌ is the only conserved‌ quantity, one would expect‌​‌ similar results in the​​ anharmonic case, as conjectured​​​‌ for the temperature profile‌ and energy flux. However,‌​‌ outside the harmonic case,​​ explicit computations are generally​​​‌ no longer possible, thus‌ making a rigorous proof‌​‌ of this hydrodynamic limit​​ difficult. This motivated the​​​‌ numerical investigation of the‌ plausibility of this limit‌​‌ for the particular case​​ of a chain with​​​‌ β-FPUT interactions and‌ harmonic pinning. The results‌​‌ suggest that the conjectured​​ PDE for the limiting​​​‌ temperature profile and Green–Kubo‌ type formula for the‌​‌ limiting energy current conjectured​​ are correct. This Green–Kubo​​​‌ type formula is then‌ used to investigate the‌​‌ relationship between the energy​​ current and period of​​​‌ the forcing. This relationship‌ is investigated in the‌​‌ case of significant rate​​ of momentum flip, small​​​‌ rate of momentum flip‌ and no momentum flip.‌​‌

7.2.3 Modeling and sampling​​ dynamical properties and rare​​​‌ events

Sampling transitions from‌ one metastable state to‌​‌ another is a difficult​​ task. The work of​​​‌ the team here consists‌ in analyzing and developing‌​‌ new numerical methods to​​ this end, and provide​​​‌ the associated mathematical analysis.‌

In 39 N. Blassel,‌​‌ T. Lelièvre and G.​​ Stoltz studied the optimization​​​‌ of the shape of‌ metastable states. The work‌​‌ is motivated by–and is​​ relevant to–the problem of​​​‌ finding optimal hyperparameters for‌ accelerated molecular dynamics algorithms.‌​‌ The definition of metastable​​ states is indeed an​​​‌ ubiquitous task in the‌ design and analysis of‌​‌ molecular simulation, and is​​ a crucial input in​​​‌ a variety of acceleration‌ methods for the sampling‌​‌ of long configurational trajectories.​​ Although standard definitions based​​​‌ on local energy minimization‌ procedures can sometimes be‌​‌ used, these definitions are​​ typically suboptimal, or entirely​​​‌ inadequate when entropic effects‌ are significant, or when‌​‌ the lowest energy barriers​​ are quickly overcome by​​​‌ thermal fluctuations. This work‌ proposed an approach to‌​‌ the definition of metastable​​ states, based on the​​​‌ shape-optimization of a local‌ separation of timescale metric‌​‌ directly linked to the​​​‌ efficiency of a class​ of accelerated molecular dynamics​‌ algorithms. To realize this​​ approach, analytic expressions were​​​‌ derived for shape-variations of​ Dirichlet eigenvalues for a​‌ class of operators associated​​ with reversible elliptic diffusions,​​​‌ and used to construct​ a local ascent algorithm,​‌ explicitly treating the case​​ of multiple eigenvalues. Two​​​‌ methods were proposed to​ make the method tractable​‌ in high-dimensional systems: one​​ based on dynamical coarse-graining,​​​‌ the other on recently​ obtained low-temperature shape-sensitive spectral​‌ asymptotics. The method was​​ validated on a benchmark​​​‌ biomolecular system, showcasing a​ significant improvement over conventional​‌ definitions of metastable states.​​

In 38 N. Blassel,​​​‌ T. Lelièvre and G.​ Stoltz derived novel sharp​‌ low-temperature asymptotics for the​​ spectrum of the infinitesimal​​​‌ generator of the overdamped​ Langevin dynamics. The novelty​‌ was that the operator​​ is endowed with homogeneous​​​‌ Dirichlet conditions at the​ boundary of a domain​‌ which depends on the​​ temperature, having in mind​​​‌ the shape optimization problem​ discussed in the previous​‌ paragraph. From the point​​ of view of stochastic​​​‌ processes, this gives information​ on the long-time behavior​‌ of the diffusion conditioned​​ on non-absorption at the​​​‌ boundary, in the so-called​ quasistationary regime. The results​‌ provide sharp estimates of​​ the spectral gap and​​​‌ principal eigenvalue, extending the​ Eyring–Kramers formula. The phenomenology​‌ is richer than in​​ the case of a​​​‌ fixed boundary and gives​ new insight into the​‌ sensitivity of the spectrum​​ with respect to the​​​‌ shape of the domain​ near critical points of​‌ the energy function.

7.2.4​​ Machine learning approaches in​​​‌ molecular dynamics

The team​ is investigating how machine​‌ learning techniques can be​​ used in order to​​​‌ design new sampling techniques.​ Indeed, neural networks can​‌ efficiently approximate high dimensional​​ functions which can then​​​‌ be used as importance​ functions in various sampling​‌ algorithms. Moreover, generative models​​ can complement standard sampling​​​‌ techniques in order to​ propose innovative moves.

In​‌ 60 T. Lelièvre and​​ G. Stoltz developed with​​​‌ C. Schönle (Ecole polytechnique),​ D. Carbone and M.​‌ Gabrié (ENS Paris) Monte-Carlo​​ samplers for metastable systems​​​‌ using non-local collective variable​ updates. This addresses the​‌ problem of sampling a​​ high dimensional multimodal target​​​‌ probability measure, assuming that​ a good proposal kernel​‌ to move only a​​ subset of the degrees​​​‌ of freedoms (also known​ as collective variables) is​‌ known a priori. This​​ proposal kernel can for​​​‌ example be built using​ normalizing flows. The work​‌ shows how to generalize​​ the extension of the​​​‌ move from the collective​ variable space to the​‌ full space and how​​ to implement an accept-reject​​​‌ step in order to​ get a reversible chain​‌ with respect to a​​ target probability measure –​​​‌ namely for situations when​ non-linear CVs and underdamped​‌ Langevin dynamics are considered.​​ Performance is demonstrated on​​​‌ several numerical examples, observing​ a substantial improvement compared​‌ to methods based on​​ overdamped Langevin dynamics as​​​‌ considered previously.

In 35​ G. Stoltz proposed together​‌ with F.-Z. Akhyar, W.​​ Zhang (ZIB, Germany) and​​​‌ C. Schütte (FU Berlin,​ Germany) a generative method​‌ for conditional probability distributions​​ on the level-sets of​​ collective variables. More precisely,​​​‌ given a probability distribution‌ μ in d‌​‌ represented by data, they​​ studied the generative modeling​​​‌ of its conditional probability‌ distributions on the level-sets‌​‌ of a collective variable​​ ξ. They developed​​​‌ a general and efficient‌ learning approach able to‌​‌ learn generative models on​​ different level-sets of ξ​​​‌ simultaneously. To improve the‌ learning quality on level-sets‌​‌ in low-probability regions, they​​ also proposed a strategy​​​‌ for data enrichment by‌ utilizing data from enhanced‌​‌ sampling techniques. They demonstrated​​ the effectiveness of the​​​‌ proposed learning approach through‌ concrete numerical examples, including‌​‌ molecular systems in biophysics.​​

7.2.5 Interacting particle methods​​​‌ for sampling

A number‌ of stochastic numerical methods‌​‌ for optimization and sampling​​ are based on interacting​​​‌ stochastic dynamics. Methods of‌ this type are convenient‌​‌ because they can usually​​ be implemented in parallel,​​​‌ and they may possess‌ desirable properties that single-replica‌​‌ methods do not enjoy,​​ such as faster convergence​​​‌ or invariance under affine‌ transformations.

A well-known numerical‌​‌ method based on an​​ interacting particle system is​​​‌ the ensemble Kalman filter,‌ a methodology for incorporating‌​‌ noisy data into complex​​ dynamical models to enhance​​​‌ predictive capability. This filter‌ is widely adopted in‌​‌ the geophysical sciences, and​​ is starting to be​​​‌ used throughout the sciences‌ and engineering, but there‌​‌ is no theory which​​ quantifies its accuracy as​​​‌ an approximation of the‌ true filtering distribution, except‌​‌ in the Gaussian setting.​​ Study of the statistical​​​‌ accuracy of the ensemble‌ Kalman filter is inherently‌​‌ technical, as it involves​​ the evolution of probability​​​‌ measures according to a‌ nonlinear and nonautonomous dynamical‌​‌ system. In 44,​​ U. Vaes together with​​​‌ E. Calvello (Caltech, USA),‌ José A. Carrillo (University‌​‌ of Oxford, United Kingdom),​​ Franca Hoffmann (Caltech, USA),​​​‌ P. Monmarché (Université Gustave‌ Eiffel) and Andrew M.‌​‌ Stuart (Caltech, USA) provide​​ an accessible overview of​​​‌ previous work in which‌ they took first steps‌​‌ to analyze the accuracy​​ of the filter beyond​​​‌ the linear Gaussian setting‌ 63.

In a‌​‌ different work 54,​​ U. Vaes together with​​​‌ N. J. Gerber (Hausdorff‌ Center for Mathematics, Germany),‌​‌ D. Kim (Caltech, USA)​​ and F. Hoffmann (Caltech,​​​‌ USA) prove a quantitative,‌ uniform-in-time propagation of chaos‌​‌ result for a consensus-based​​ optimization method, generalizing previous​​​‌ results in 64.‌ The analysis relies on‌​‌ the classical synchronous coupling​​ method by Sznitman and​​​‌ McKean, together with several‌ novel auxiliary results, including‌​‌ a stability estimate for​​ the weighted mean and​​​‌ novel concentration estimates for‌ the interacting particle system.‌​‌

In a third work​​ on interacting particle systems​​​‌ 55, U. Vaes‌ together with N. J.‌​‌ Gerber (Hausdorff Center for​​ Mathematics, Germany) establish uniform-in-time​​​‌ propagation of chaos for‌ the Cucker–Smale model, a‌​‌ well-known model for flocking​​ behavior. This extends an​​​‌ existing finite-time propagation of‌ chaos result from 62‌​‌ to infinite time horizons,​​ by leveraging long-time stability​​​‌ properties of the Cucker–Smale‌ interacting particle system. The‌​‌ result can be interpreted​​ as a long-time error​​​‌ estimate for a stochastic‌ particle method for the‌​‌ Vlasov–Fokker–Planck equation associated with​​​‌ the Cucker–Smale model.

7.3​ Homogenization

Participants: Yann Bouchereau​‌, Claude Le Bris​​, Albéric Lefort,​​​‌ Frédéric Legoll, Giulia​ Merlini, Simon Ruget​‌.

7.3.1 Homogenization theory​​

In collaboration with Yves​​​‌ Achdou (Université Paris Cité),​ C. Le Bris has​‌ pursued the study of​​ some homogenization problems for​​​‌ a class of stationary​ Hamilton-Jacobi equations in which​‌ the Hamiltonian is obtained​​ by perturbing an otherwise​​​‌ periodic Hamiltonian. Homogenization then​ leads to an effective​‌ Hamilton-Jacobi equation supplemented with​​ effective Dirichlet boundary conditions.​​​‌ After the case of​ a perturbation at the​‌ origin, the case of​​ a perturbation near a​​​‌ half-line of the state​ space has been considered.​‌ In all these cases,​​ the limiting problem belongs​​​‌ to the class of​ stratified problems introduced by​‌ Alberto Bressan and Yunho​​ Hong and later studied​​​‌ by Guy Barles and​ Emmanuel Chasseigne. The work​‌ has been published in​​ Nonlinear Differential Equations and​​​‌ Applications, Volume 32, 119​ (2025).

On the other​‌ hand, and this time​​ in a series of​​​‌ works in collaboration with​ Andrea Braides and Gianni​‌ Dal Maso (SISSA Trieste,​​ Italy), C. Le Bris​​​‌ has used the tools​ of Gamma convergence to​‌ study several homogenization problems​​ he has considered in​​​‌ the past using the​ tools of PDE theory,​‌ notably in collaboration with​​ Xavier Blanc (Université Paris​​​‌ Cité) and Pierre-Louis Lions​ (Collège de France). In​‌ a first work, the​​ stability of some classes​​​‌ of integrals, with respect​ to homogenization, was examined.​‌ Stability theorems in homogenization​​ which comprise the case​​​‌ of perturbations with zero​ average on the whole​‌ space were then deduced.​​ The results were also​​​‌ extended to the stochastic​ case, and several other​‌ cases. In a second​​ work, the stability with​​​‌ respect to homogenization of​ classes of integrals arising​‌ in the control-theoretic interpretation​​ of some Hamilton–Jacobi equations​​​‌ were investigated. The study​ revisits and, depending on​‌ the different assumptions, complements​​ results obtained by Pierre-Louis​​​‌ Lions and various collaborators​ using PDE techniques. This​‌ second work has been​​ accepted for publication in​​​‌ SIAM Journal on Mathematical​ Analysis. A third work,​‌ in the same vein,​​ is ongoing and this​​​‌ time addresses the case​ of viscous Hamilton-Jacobi equations.​‌

A third research effort,​​ also connected to the​​​‌ area of homogenization theory,​ has been conducted by​‌ C. Le Bris in​​ collaboration with Anthony T.​​​‌ Patera (MIT), Kento Kaneko​ (MIT) and Theron Guo​‌ (MIT). The general context​​ of the study is​​​‌ heat transfer, and more​ specifically the dunking problem:​‌ a solid body, at​​ uniform temperature and possibly​​​‌ with heterogeneous material composition,​ is placed in an​‌ environment characterized by far​​ field temperature and spatially​​​‌ uniform time independent heat​ transfer coefficient. The problem​‌ is described by a​​ heat equation with Robin​​​‌ boundary conditions. The crucial​ parameter is the Biot​‌ number – a nondimensional​​ heat transfer (Robin) coefficient.​​​‌ Various approximations were introduced,​ justified theoretically and tested​‌ numerically. Error estimates for​​ these approximations were also​​​‌ provided and companion numerical​ solutions of the heat​‌ equation confirm the effectiveness​​ of the error estimates​​ for small Biot number.​​​‌ The work is described‌ in the following three‌​‌ documents: a chapter submitted​​ to Springer MS&A series,​​​‌ a second preprint and‌ a manuscript submitted to‌​‌ ESAIM: M2AN.

V. Ehrlacher​​ and F. Legoll, together​​​‌ with A. Lesage and‌ A. Lebée (ENPC), have‌​‌ considered in 52 elasticity​​ equations posed in thin​​​‌ domains (such as plates)‌ and including highly oscillatory‌​‌ periodic coefficients. The aim​​ of the work is​​​‌ to establish strong convergence‌ results on the difference‌​‌ between the solution to​​ the reference oscillatory problem​​​‌ and its two-scale expansion.‌ Under some classical assumptions‌​‌ on the symmetries of​​ the elasticity tensor, the​​​‌ problem can be split‌ into two independent problems,‌​‌ the membrane problem and​​ the bending problem. The​​​‌ membrane case can actually‌ be addressed using a‌​‌ careful adaptation of classical​​ arguments. The bending case​​​‌ turned out to be‌ much more challenging. A‌​‌ different strategy of proof​​ is introduced to handle​​​‌ it.

7.3.2 Inverse multiscale‌ problems

In the context‌​‌ of the PhD of​​ S. Ruget, C. Le​​​‌ Bris and F. Legoll‌ have completed their work‌​‌ on the question of​​ how to determine the​​​‌ homogenized coefficient of a‌ multiscale problem without explicitly‌​‌ performing a homogenization approach.​​ This work is a​​​‌ follow-up on earlier works‌ over the years in‌​‌ collaboration with Kun Li,​​ Simon Lemaire and Olga​​​‌ Gorynina. The robustness of‌ the proposed approach with‌​‌ respect to the available​​ data, and with respect​​​‌ to noise in measurements,‌ has been thoroughly investigated.‌​‌ In particular, an attractive​​ situation is to assume​​​‌ to only have access‌ to coarse information on‌​‌ the solution, such as​​ the global energy stored​​​‌ in the physical system‌ for any given load‌​‌ (such inverse problems with​​ partial information available are​​​‌ indeed relevant to engineering‌ situations). While the reconstruction‌​‌ of the microstructure is​​ known to be an​​​‌ ill-posed problem, the reconstruction‌ of effective parameters based‌​‌ only on this aggregated​​ information is possible. A​​​‌ manuscript collecting various theoretical‌ and numerical results is‌​‌ currently in preparation (see​​ also 34).

7.3.3​​​‌ Multiscale Finite Element approaches‌

From a numerical perspective,‌​‌ the Multiscale Finite Element​​ Method (MsFEM) is a​​​‌ classical strategy to address‌ the situation where the‌​‌ homogenized problem is not​​ known (e.g. in difficult​​​‌ nonlinear cases), or when‌ the scale of the‌​‌ heterogeneities, although small, is​​ not considered to be​​​‌ zero (and hence the‌ homogenized problem cannot be‌​‌ considered as a sufficiently​​ accurate approximation). The MsFEM​​​‌ approach uses a Galerkin‌ approximation of the problem‌​‌ on a pre-computed basis,​​ obtained by solving local​​​‌ problems mimicking the problem‌ at hand at the‌​‌ scale of mesh elements.​​

In the context of​​​‌ the PhD of A.‌ Lefort, C. Le Bris‌​‌ and F. Legoll have​​ undertaken the study of​​​‌ a multiscale, reaction-diffusion equation.‌ This problem is different‌​‌ from the equations previously​​ studied by the team​​​‌ by the fact that‌ it includes a large‌​‌ reaction term which competes​​ with the diffusive term.​​​‌ To start with, the‌ associated eigenvalue problem has‌​‌ been considered. A promising​​​‌ MsFEM-type approach, which uses​ an oversampling procedure based​‌ on filtering ideas investigated​​ by the team several​​​‌ years ago, has been​ introduced. This MsFEM approach​‌ has next been successfully​​ extended to vector-valued reaction-diffusion​​​‌ eigenvalue problems, a very​ relevant case from the​‌ application viewpoint which presents​​ the mathematical difficulty of​​​‌ being non self-adjoint. The​ time-dependent version of the​‌ problem has next been​​ investigated, using two possible​​​‌ approaches: a spectral approach,​ where the solution is​‌ written as a linear​​ combination of the eigenmodes​​​‌ of the stationary problem,​ or a time-marching scheme.​‌ A manuscript collecting the​​ theoretical and numerical results​​​‌ is currently being prepared.​

In the context of​‌ the M2 internship and​​ then PhD of Y.​​​‌ Bouchereau, C. Le Bris​ and F. Legoll have​‌ studied the wave equation​​ in heterogeneous periodic media.​​​‌ Classical homogenization results indicate​ that the solution to​‌ the wave equation converges​​ to the solution to​​​‌ a simple homogenized problem​ when the final time​‌ is fixed and independent​​ of the characteristic length​​​‌ ε of the medium.​ It is also well-known​‌ that, over larger time​​ horizons (say times of​​​‌ the order of ε​-2), the​‌ homogenized equation should be​​ complemented by corrective terms​​​‌ to remain an accurate​ approximation of the reference​‌ model. Y. Bouchereau, C.​​ Le Bris and F.​​​‌ Legoll have investigated how​ to design efficient MsFEM-type​‌ approaches in that context.​​ Adapted basis functions are​​​‌ introduced on the basis​ of the sole diffusion​‌ operator. A spatial Galerkin​​ approximation of the wave​​​‌ equation is then performed,​ leading to a second-order​‌ ODE which can be​​ integrated using different techniques.​​​‌ Different regimes of time​ horizons have been explored,​‌ as well as different​​ settings such as periodic,​​​‌ quasi-periodic and general heterogeneous​ media. Encouraging preliminary results​‌ have been obtained that​​ now need to be​​​‌ consolidated.

In parallel to​ the exploration of reaction-diffusion​‌ equations and wave equations,​​ another direction of research​​​‌ is devoted to hyperbolic​ multiscale conservation laws. From​‌ the viewpoint of asymptotic​​ analysis, it is known​​​‌ that introducing a vanishing​ viscosity in the conservation​‌ law leads to a​​ problem, the homogenized limit​​​‌ of which again reads​ as a conservation law​‌ with effective parameters defined​​ in terms of a​​​‌ corrector function, solution to​ an elliptic cell problem​‌ encoding the fine-scale structure​​ of the flux. Based​​​‌ on that observation, C.​ Le Bris, F. Legoll​‌ and G. Merlini have​​ considered a strategy aiming​​​‌ at efficiently computing an​ approximation of the numerical​‌ solution given by a​​ fine-scale finite volume scheme​​​‌ applied to the original​ hyperbolic multiscale conservation law.​‌ The idea is to​​ homogenize the numerical scheme​​​‌ discretizing the PDE, rather​ than the PDE itself,​‌ by exploiting the numerical​​ viscosity naturally present in​​​‌ the numerical scheme. This​ strategy has been first​‌ put in practice for​​ the classical Lax–Friedrichs scheme.​​​‌ Numerical results demonstrate that​ the resulting homogenized model​‌ provides an accurate and​​ computationally efficient approximation of​​​‌ the reference solution in​ one and two space​‌ dimensions for a broad​​ class of multiscale conservation​​ laws. Current and future​​​‌ works include extending this‌ strategy to higher-order numerical‌​‌ schemes and investigating specific​​ regimes or examples (such​​​‌ as shear flows), for‌ which the asymptotic homogenized‌​‌ model is not of​​ the form of a​​​‌ (standard) conservation law.

7.4‌ Various topics

7.4.1 Complex‌​‌ fluids

Participants: Sébastien Boyaval​​.

In 2025, S.​​​‌ Boyaval has pursued the‌ modelling of viscoelastic flows‌​‌ using symmetric-hyperbolic balance laws​​ consistent with polyconvex elastodynamics.​​​‌ In 65, he‌ proved with Na Wang‌​‌ and Yuxi Hu that​​ for one-dimensional flows, the​​​‌ symmetric-hyperbolic conservation laws are‌ asymptotically consistent with the‌​‌ standard viscous compressible Navier-Stokes​​ equaions, when the viscoelastic​​​‌ stress relaxes infinitely fast.‌ In 36, he‌​‌ investigated, with Emmanuel Audusse,​​ Virgile Dubos and Minh​​​‌ Hoang Le, the construction‌ of kinetic schemes for‌​‌ the numerical simulation of​​ (linear) elastodynamics, formulated as​​​‌ a symmetric-hyperbolic system of‌ PDEs.

In 61,‌​‌ S. Boyaval and his​​ co-authors Jean-Paul Travert, Cédric​​​‌ Goeury, Vito Bacchi and‌ Fabrice Zaoui study numerically,‌​‌ for various metrics, the​​ sensitivity to post-processing parameters​​​‌ of the SAR (images)‌ datas used for flood‌​‌ mapping.

7.4.2 Model-order reduction​​ methods

Participants: Sébastien Boyaval​​​‌, Virginie Ehrlacher,‌ Tony Lelièvre, Giulia‌​‌ Sambattaro.

The objective​​ of a model-order reduction​​​‌ method is the following:‌ it may sometimes be‌​‌ very expensive from a​​ computational point of view​​​‌ to simulate the properties‌ of a complex system‌​‌ described by a complicated​​ model, typically a set​​​‌ of PDEs. This cost‌ may become prohibitive in‌​‌ situations where the solution​​ of the model has​​​‌ to be computed for‌ a very large number‌​‌ of values of the​​ parameters involved in the​​​‌ model. Such a parametric‌ study is nevertheless necessary‌​‌ in several contexts, for​​ instance when the value​​​‌ of these parameters has‌ to be calibrated so‌​‌ that numerical simulations give​​ approximations of the solutions​​​‌ that are as close‌ as possible to some‌​‌ measured data. A reduced-order​​ model method then consists​​​‌ in constructing, from a‌ few complex simulations that‌​‌ were performed for a​​ small number of well-chosen​​​‌ values of the parameters,‌ a so-called reduced model‌​‌, much cheaper and​​ quicker to solve from​​​‌ a numerical point of‌ view, and which enables‌​‌ to obtain an accurate​​ approximation of the solution​​​‌ of the model for‌ any other values of‌​‌ the parameters.

In 12​​, R. Blel, T.​​​‌ Lelièvre and V. Ehrlacher‌ perform a numerical analysis‌​‌ of a variance reduction​​ technique for the computation​​​‌ of parameter-dependent expectations using‌ a reduced basis paradigm.‌​‌ The idea is to​​ build online a control​​​‌ variate using expectations computed‌ precisely in an offline‌​‌ stage, with a greedy​​ procedure to select the​​​‌ parameters where thoses expectations‌ are evaluated. Using concentration‌​‌ inequalities, they provide sufficient​​ conditions on the number​​​‌ of samples used for‌ the computation of empirical‌​‌ variances at each iteration​​ of the greedy procedure​​​‌ to guarantee that the‌ resulting method algorithm is‌​‌ a weak greedy algorithm​​ with high probability.

7.4.3​​​‌ Numerical approaches for SPDEs‌

Participants: Claude Le Bris‌​‌.

In collaboration with​​​‌ Ana Djurdjevac (FU Berlin)​ and Endre Suli (Oxford​‌ University), C. Le Bris​​ has considered some dedicated​​​‌ numerical approaches for a​ large class of parabolic​‌ SPDEs with multiplicative noise.​​ The specificity of the​​​‌ class considered is that​ it preserves positivity at​‌ the continuous level. Inspired​​ by well-established techniques for​​​‌ the deterministic case, a​ FEM discretization was introduced​‌ that both is accurate​​ and, unconditionally in the​​​‌ discretization parameters, also preserves​ positivity. Besides the numerical​‌ analysis of the semi-discrete​​ algorithm, some numerical experiments​​​‌ were provided, which illustrate​ the added value with​‌ respect to other approaches​​ in the literature. The​​​‌ work has been submitted​ to Stochastics and Partial​‌ Differential Equations: Analysis and​​ Computations. A follow-up, devoted​​​‌ to the analysis of​ the fully discrete scheme​‌ and presenting other numerical​​ experiments, has been concluded​​​‌ in collaboration with Ana​ Djurdjevac and Owen Hearder​‌ FU Berlin). It is​​ submitted to Communications in​​​‌ Applied Mathematics and Computational​ Science.

7.4.4 Quantum optimal​‌ transport and applications

Participants:​​ Thomas Borsoni, Virginie​​​‌ Ehrlacher.

In 41​, T. Borsoni has​‌ contributed to the current​​ development of quantum optimal​​​‌ transport formulations, by introducing​ the framework of folded​‌ optimal transport, which relies​​ on Choquet theory of​​​‌ boundary representations. This framework​ encompasses classical and entanglement-free​‌ quantum optimal transport Kantorovich​​ formulations. Also recovered is​​​‌ the semi-classical optimal transport​ cost, used in 40​‌ by T. Borsoni and​​ V. Ehrlacher to obtain​​​‌ an observability-type result for​ the von Neumann equation​‌ in a crystal setting.​​ In this work, various​​​‌ concepts are also developed​ to fit the periodic​‌ case, such as the​​ Husimi and Töplitz transforms.​​​‌

8 Bilateral contracts and​ grants with industry

Participants:​‌ Claude Le Bris,​​ Frédéric Legoll, Tony​​​‌ Leliève, Gabriel Stoltz​.

Many research activities​‌ of the project-team are​​ conducted in close collaboration​​​‌ with private or public​ companies: CEA, EDF, IFPEN,​‌ Sanofi, SAFRANTech. The project-team​​ is also supported by​​​‌ the Office of Naval​ Research and the European​‌ Office of Aerospace Research​​ and Development, for multiscale​​​‌ simulations of random materials.​ All these contracts are​‌ operated at and administrated​​ by the École des​​​‌ Ponts, except the contracts​ with IFPEN, which are​‌ administrated by Inria.

9​​ Partnerships and cooperations

9.1​​​‌ International initiatives

Other international​ visits to the team​‌
Wei Zhang
  • Status
    Researcher​​
  • Institution of origin:
    FU​​​‌ Berlin
  • Country:
    Germany
  • Dates:​
    Feb. 17th to April​‌ 17th
  • Context of the​​ visit:
    work with Frédéric​​​‌ Legoll, Tony Lelièvre and​ Gabriel Stoltz on the​‌ derivation of effective dynamics​​ for underdamped Langevin equations;​​​‌ as well as on​ deep generative and clustering​‌ methods, to be used​​ to sample multimodal probability​​​‌ measures as the ones​ arising in molecular dynamics​‌ (with Tony Lelièvre and​​ Gabriel Stoltz).
  • Mobility program/type​​​‌ of mobility:
    research stay,​ funded by Inria Paris​‌

9.1.1 Visits to international​​ teams

Research stays abroad​​​‌
  • In February 2025, Antonin​ Della Noce and Urbain​‌ Vaes visited the group​​ of Prof. Franca Hoffmann​​​‌ (Caltech, USA) for 10​ days.

9.2 European initiatives​‌

9.2.1 H2020 projects

EMC2​​

EMC2 project on cordis.europa.eu​​

  • Title:
    Extreme-scale Mathematically-based Computational​​​‌ Chemistry
  • Duration:
    From September‌ 1, 2019 to August‌​‌ 31, 2026
  • Partners:
    • INSTITUT​​ NATIONAL DE RECHERCHE EN​​​‌ INFORMATIQUE ET AUTOMATIQUE (INRIA),‌ France
    • ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FEDERALE‌​‌ DE LAUSANNE (EPFL), Switzerland​​
    • ECOLE NATIONALE DES PONTS​​​‌ ET CHAUSSEES (ENPC), France‌
    • CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA‌​‌ RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE CNRS (CNRS),​​ France
    • SORBONNE UNIVERSITE, France​​​‌
  • Summary:

    Molecular simulation has‌ become an instrumental tool‌​‌ in chemistry, condensed matter​​ physics, molecular biology, materials​​​‌ science, and nanosciences. It‌ will allow to propose‌​‌ de novo design of​​ e.g. new drugs or​​​‌ materials provided that the‌ efficiency of underlying software‌​‌ is accelerated by several​​ orders of magnitude.

    The​​​‌ ambition of the EMC2‌ project is to achieve‌​‌ scientific breakthroughs in this​​ field by gathering the​​​‌ expertise of a multidisciplinary‌ community at the interfaces‌​‌ of four disciplines: mathematics,​​ chemistry, physics, and computer​​​‌ science. It is motivated‌ by the twofold observation‌​‌ that, i) building upon​​ our collaborative work, we​​​‌ have recently been able‌ to gain efficiency factors‌​‌ of up to 3​​ orders of magnitude for​​​‌ polarizable molecular dynamics in‌ solution of multi-million atom‌​‌ systems, but this is​​ not enough since ii)​​​‌ even larger or more‌ complex systems of major‌​‌ practical interest (such as​​ solvated biosystems or molecules​​​‌ with strongly-correlated electrons) are‌ currently mostly intractable in‌​‌ reasonable clock time. The​​ only way to further​​​‌ improve the efficiency of‌ the solvers, while preserving‌​‌ accuracy, is to develop​​ physically and chemically sound​​​‌ models, mathematically certified and‌ numerically efficient algorithms, and‌​‌ implement them in a​​ robust and scalable way​​​‌ on various architectures (from‌ standard academic or industrial‌​‌ clusters to emerging heterogeneous​​ and exascale architectures).

    EMC2​​​‌ has no equivalent in‌ the world: there is‌​‌ nowhere such a critical​​ number of interdisciplinary researchers​​​‌ already collaborating with the‌ required track records to‌​‌ address this challenge. Under​​ the leadership of the​​​‌ 4 PIs, supported by‌ highly recognized teams from‌​‌ three major institutions in​​ the Paris area, EMC2​​​‌ will develop disruptive methodological‌ approaches and publicly available‌​‌ simulation tools, and apply​​ them to challenging molecular​​​‌ systems. The project will‌ strongly strengthen the local‌​‌ teams and their synergy​​ enabling decisive progress in​​​‌ the field.

9.3 National‌ initiatives

The project-team is‌​‌ involved in several ANR​​ projects:

  • F. Legoll is​​​‌ a member of the‌ ANR Anohona (2024-2028), on‌​‌ Advanced nonlinear homogenization for​​ structural analysis. PI: N.​​​‌ Lahellec (LMA Marseille).
  • G.‌ Stoltz is the PI‌​‌ of the ANR project​​ SINEQ (2022-2025), whose aim​​​‌ is to improve the‌ mathematical understanding and numerical‌​‌ simulation of nonequilibrium stochastic​​ dynamics, in particular their​​​‌ linear response properties. This‌ project involves researchers from‌​‌ CEREMADE, Université Paris-Dauphine and​​ the SIMSART project-team of​​​‌ Inria Rennes.
  • U. Vaes‌ is the PI of‌​‌ the ANR project ISPO​​ (2024-2025). The main objectives​​​‌ of this project are‌ to improve, implement and‌​‌ mathematically analyze sampling and​​ optimisation methods based on​​​‌ interacting particle systems.

The‌ project-team is a partner‌​‌ of the DIM QuanTiP​​. It is also​​​‌ involved in the Projet‌ CNRS Recherche à risque‌​‌ et à impact (RI)2​​​‌ “Nouvelles approches mathématiques pour​ des systèmes quantiques en​‌ interaction (MAQUI)”, lead PI:​​ M. Lewin (CEREMADE, CNRS​​​‌ and University Paris-Dauphine PSL),​ co-PI: E. Cancès, J.​‌ Toulouse (LCT, SU).

The​​ project-team is also involved​​​‌ in PEPR projects:

  • T.​ Lelièvre is responsible of​‌ the node "Ecole des​​ Ponts" of the project​​​‌ MAMABIO of PEPR B-BEST​ (Biomass, Biotechnologies & Environmentally​‌ Sustainable Technologies for chemicals​​ and fuels; 2023-2028), to​​​‌ which G. Stoltz also​ participates.
  • E. Cancès, C.​‌ Le Bris , T.​​ Lelièvre and G. Stoltz​​​‌ are part of the​ node "MATHERIALS" of the​‌ project EpiQ of PEPR​​ Quantique, which is part​​​‌ of Plan France 2030.​

Members of the project-team​‌ are participating in the​​ following GdR or RT:​​​‌

  • AMORE (Advanced Model Order​ REduction),
  • DYNQUA (time evolution​‌ of quantum systems),
  • MathGeoPhy​​ (MAthematics for GeoPhysics), now​​​‌ RT Terre et Energies,​
  • MANU (MAthematics for NUclear​‌ applications), now RT Terre​​ et Energies,
  • GDM (Geometry​​​‌ and Mechanics),
  • IAMAT (Artificial​ Intelligence for MATerials),
  • MASCOT-NUM​‌ (stochastic methods for the​​ analysis of numerical codes),​​​‌
  • MEPHY (multiphase flows),
  • NBODY​ (electronic structure),
  • REST (theoretical​‌ spectroscopy).

10 Dissemination

10.1​​ Promoting scientific activities

S.​​​‌ Boyaval

  • is the director​ of Laboratoire d’Hydraulique Saint-Venant​‌ (Ecole des Ponts ParisTech​​ - EDF R&D -​​​‌ CEREMA), since September 2021;​
  • is currently a member​‌ of the RA1 (scientific​​ committee) and CODIR+ (executive​​​‌ committee) of E4C.​

E. Cancès

  • is a​‌ member of the editorial​​ boards of Mathematical Modelling​​​‌ and Numerical Analysis (2006-​), SIAM Multiscale​‌ Modeling and Simulation (2012-)​​, the Journal of​​​‌ Computational Mathematics (2017-), and​ the Journal of Computational​‌ Physics (2023-);
  • is a​​ member of the Scientific​​​‌ Committee of the MFO​ (Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach​‌);
  • is a member​​ of the Scientific Committees​​​‌ of the GdR DynQua​ (quantum dynamics) and NBody​‌ (N-body quantum​​ problem in chemistry and​​​‌ physics);
  • has co-organized (with​ E. Fromager, E. Giner,​‌ P.-F. Loos, and J.​​ Toulouse) a summer school​​​‌ on Mathematics for theoretical​ chemistry and physics, Paris,​‌ May 19-21, 2025;
  • has​​ been a member of​​​‌ the 2025 John Todd​ Award election committee.

V.​‌ Ehrlacher

  • is a member​​ of the editorial boards​​​‌ of Mathematical Modelling and​ Numerical Analysis (2024-)​‌, Acta Applicandae Mathematicae​​ (2024-) and Mathematics of​​​‌ Computation (2024-);
  • is​ head of the Modelisation,​‌ Analysis and Simulation team​​ of the applied mathematics​​​‌ department (CERMICS) at Ecole​ des Ponts (since Sep.​‌ 2024);
  • is member of​​ the board of the​​​‌ SMAI-SIGMA group;
  • is co-chair​ of the European Mathematical​‌ Society Topic Activity Group​​ on "Scientific Machine Learning";​​​‌
  • is an expert for​ the Scientific Committee of​‌ IFPEN (since 2024);
  • is​​ a member of the​​​‌ Programme INRIA Quadrant (PIQ)​ (since 2024);
  • is a​‌ member of the “Conseil​​ d'Administration” of Ecole des​​​‌ Ponts;
  • is a member​ of the “Conseil d'Administration”​‌ of the COMUE Paris-Est;​​
  • was a member of​​​‌ the evaluation committee of​ the Weierstrass Institute for​‌ Applied Analysis and Stochastics​​ (WIAS), Berlin, Germany;
  • is​​​‌ a member of the​ scientific committee of the​‌ SMAI 2025 conference;
  • has​​ been a member of​​ the SMAI-GAMNI PhD prize​​​‌ selection committee.

C. Le‌ Bris

  • is co-editor in‌​‌ chief (2024-) of Journal​​ de Mathématiques Pures et​​​‌ Appliquées;
  • is a member‌ of the editorial boards‌​‌ of Annales mathématiques du​​ Québec (2013-), Archive for​​​‌ Rational Mechanics and Analysis‌ (2004-), Calcolo (2019-), Communications‌​‌ in Partial Differential Equations​​ (2022-), COCV (Control, Optimization​​​‌ and Calculus of Variations)‌ (2003-), Mathematics in Action‌​‌ (2008-), Networks and Heterogeneous​​ Media (2007-), Nonlinearity (2005-),​​​‌ Pure and Applied Analysis‌ (2018-);
  • is a member‌​‌ of the editorial boards​​ of the monograph series​​​‌ Mathématiques & Applications, Springer‌ (2008-), Modelling, Simulations and‌​‌ Applications, Springer (2009-), Springer​​ Monographs in Mathematics, Springer​​​‌ (2016-);
  • is the president‌ (2016-2024) of the scientific‌​‌ advisory board of the​​ Institut des Sciences du​​​‌ calcul et des données,‌ Sorbonne Université, and a‌​‌ member (2020-) of the​​ Scientific Advisory Committee of​​​‌ the Institute for Mathematical‌ and Statistical Innovation, University‌​‌ of Chicago;
  • is a​​ member (2019-) of the​​​‌ scientific advisory board of‌ Framatome;
  • is the Vice-director‌​‌ of the French Education​​ Committee for the China-France​​​‌ Mathematics Talents Class, Université‌ Paris Cité, 2024-2029.

F.‌​‌ Legoll

  • is a member​​ of the editorial boards​​​‌ of SIAM MMS (2012-),‌ ESAIM: Proceedings and Surveys‌​‌ (2012-) and the Journal​​ of Machine Learning for​​​‌ Modeling and Computing (2024-);‌
  • has co-organized (with A.‌​‌ Lozinski) a winter school​​ and a workshop on​​​‌ Reduced-Order Modeling for Complex‌ Engineering Problems within the‌​‌ IMSI institute in Chicago,​​ January 29 – February​​​‌ 7, 2025.

T. Lelièvre‌

  • is a member of‌​‌ the editorial boards of​​ SIAM/ASA Journal of Uncertainty​​​‌ Quantification (2017-), IMA: Journal‌ of Numerical Analysis (2018-),‌​‌ Communications in Mathematical Sciences​​ (2019-), Journal of Computational​​​‌ Physics (2019-), ESAIM:M2AN (2020-),‌ and Foundations of Computational‌​‌ Mathematics (2022-);
  • is an​​ expert for the Scientific​​​‌ Committee of IFPEN (since‌ 2022);
  • is the Chair‌​‌ of the External Advisory​​ Board, Mathematical Theory of​​​‌ Radiation Transport: Nuclear Technology‌ Frontiers (MaThRad) (since 2023);‌​‌
  • is an external member​​ of the Conseil Scientifique​​​‌ et de Prospective of‌ the Institut de Mathématiques‌​‌ de Toulouse (since 2023).​​
  • is an external member​​​‌ of the scientific committee‌ of ComplexCité (Université Paris‌​‌ Cité) (since 2025).
  • co-organized​​ the 4-week program New​​​‌ trends and applications around‌ generalized Fokker-Planck operators,‌​‌ Bernoulli Center, 16th June-11th​​ July 2025 (with Omar​​​‌ Mohsen, Francis Nier, and‌ Shu Shen).
  • co-organized and‌​‌ was the head of​​ the scientific committee for​​​‌ the IP Paris Research‌ Day, Telecom Paris, 1st‌​‌ December 2025 (with Philippe​​ Ciblat, Fabien Leurent, Catherine​​​‌ Lepers, Nathanaëlle Schneider, Marieke‌ Stein, and Gauthier Vermandel).‌​‌

G. Stoltz

  • is the​​ head of the applied​​​‌ mathematics department (CERMICS) at‌ Ecole des Ponts (since‌​‌ Sep. 2024);
  • is a​​ member of the editorial​​​‌ board of Journal of‌ Computational Dynamics;
  • is‌​‌ a member of the​​ Executive Board of GdR​​​‌ IAMAT (Artificial Intelligence and‌ Materials Science);
  • is a‌​‌ member of the "Conseil​​ d'Enseignement et de Recherche"​​​‌ of Ecole des Ponts;‌
  • co-organized in June the‌​‌ workshop “Dimensionality reduction techniques​​ for molecular dynamics” at​​​‌ ICMS, Edinburgh, togather with‌ Lucie Delemotte (KTH), Andrew‌​‌ Ferguson (Univ. Chicago), Stefan​​​‌ Klus (Heriott Watt), Ben​ Leimkuhler (Univ. Edinburgh) and​‌ Edina Rosta (UCL);
  • co-organized​​ in July the CECAM​​​‌ research school “Sampling High-Dimensional​ Probability Measures with Applications​‌ in (Non)Equilibrium Molecular Dynamics​​ and Statistics” at Birmingham,​​​‌ UK, together with Xiaocheng​ Shang (Birmingham);
  • co-organized in​‌ October the closing workshop​​ of ANR SINEQ at​​​‌ GSSI, L’Aquila, together with​ Alessandra Iacobucci (CEREMADE), Elisa​‌ Marini (CERMADE), Stefano Olla​​ (CEREMADE) and Lu XU​​​‌ (GSSI);

10.2 Teaching -​ Supervision - Juries

10.2.1​‌ Teaching

The members of​​ the project-team have taught​​​‌ the following courses.

At​ École des Ponts 1st​‌ year (equivalent to L3):​​

  • Équations aux dérivées partielles:​​​‌ approches variationnelles, 15h (S.​ Darshan, T. Duez, F.​‌ Legoll)
  • Mécanique des milieux​​ continus fluides, 25h (S.​​​‌ Boyaval)
  • Mécanique quantique, 15h​ (E. Cancès, A. Negre)​‌
  • Mise à niveau en​​ mathématiques, 16h (E. Cancès)​​​‌
  • Modèles et équations aux​ dérivées partielles, 18h (L.​‌ Carillo, T. Duez, T.​​ Lelièvre, G. Merlini)
  • Pratique​​​‌ du calcul scientifique, 18h​ (L. Carillo, U. Vaes)​‌
  • Programmation en Python, 24h​​ (L. Carillo, G. Sambataro)​​​‌
  • Projets de première année,​ 15h (L. Carillo, T.​‌ Duez, R. Gastaldello, A.​​ Negre, S. Ruget)

At​​​‌ École des Ponts 2nd​ year (equivalent to M1):​‌

  • Contrôle de systèmes dynamiques​​ et équations aux dérivées​​​‌ partielles, 18h (E. Cancès)​
  • Problèmes d'évolution, 10h (F.​‌ Legoll)

At the M2​​ “Mathématiques de la modélisation”​​​‌ of Sorbonne Université:

  • Introduction​ to computational statistical physics,​‌ 20h (G. Stoltz and​​ T. Lelièvre)
  • Méthodes de​​​‌ tenseurs par la résolution​ d'équations aux dérivées partielles​‌ en grande dimension, 20h​​ (V. Ehrlacher)
  • Principes de​​​‌ modélisation, 30h (F. Legoll)​
  • Théorie spectrale et méthodes​‌ variationnelles, 10h (E. Cancès)​​

At other institutions:

  • Aléatoire​​​‌ (MAP361), 40h, Ecole Polytechnique​ (V. Ehrlacher)
  • Calcul Différentiel​‌ et Optimisation, 36h, Université​​ Paris-Dauphine, PSL (D. Gontier)​​​‌
  • Gestion des incertitudes et​ analyse de risque (MAP568),​‌ 20h, Ecole Polytechnique (T.​​ Lelièvre)
  • Introduction to Machine​​​‌ Learning, 64h, Institut polytechnique​ Paris, M1 Applied mathematics​‌ and statistics (G. Stoltz)​​
  • Modal de Mathématiques Appliquées​​​‌ (MAP473D), 15h, Ecole Polytechnique​ (T. Lelièvre)
  • Modélisation de​‌ phénomènes aléatoires (MAP432), 40h,​​ Ecole Polytechnique (V. Ehrlacher,​​​‌ T. Lelièvre)
  • Optimisation et​ Transport Optimal, 38h, ENS​‌ Paris (S. Perrin-Roussel)
  • Numerical​​ Analysis, 56h, NYU Paris​​​‌ (U. Vaes)

10.2.2 Supervision​

The following PhD theses​‌ supervised by members of​​ the project-team have been​​​‌ defended:

  • Noé Blassel, funding​ ERC Synergy EMC2, Analysis​‌ and sampling of metastable​​ and nonequilibrium stochastic dynamics,​​​‌ Ecole des Ponts, co-supervised​ by T. Lelièvre and​‌ G. Stoltz, defended in​​ December.
  • Shiva Darshan, funding​​​‌ ANR SINEQ, Linear response​ of constrained stochastic dynamics,​‌ co-supervised by G. Stoltz​​ and S. Olla (Université​​​‌ Paris-Dauphine), defended in December.​
  • Arthur Guillot – Le​‌ Goff, funding ENPC, Hydrodynamic​​ and microbiological modelling of​​​‌ urban water bodies for​ the prevention of health​‌ risks in open water​​ bathing, Ecole des Ponts,​​​‌ co-supervised by B. Vinçon​ Leite, R. Carmigniani and​‌ S. Boyaval, defended in​​ December.
  • Abbas Kabalan, thèse​​​‌ CIFRE SAFRANTech, Reduced-order models​ for problems with non-parametric​‌ geometrical variations, co-supervised by​​ V. Ehrlacher and F.​​​‌ Casenave (SAFRANTech), defended in​ December.
  • Albéric Lefort, funding​‌ CERMICS-ENPC, Multiscale approaches for​​ reaction-diffusion equations and applications,​​ Ecole des Ponts, co-supervised​​​‌ by F. Legoll and‌ C. Le Bris, defended‌​‌ in December.
  • Simon Ruget,​​ funding Inria, Effective approximations​​​‌ for multiscale PDEs based‌ on limited information, Ecole‌​‌ des Ponts, co-supervised by​​ F. Legoll and C.​​​‌ Le Bris, defended in‌ December.
  • Jean-Paul Travert, funding‌​‌ CIFRE EDF, Data assimilation​​ for flood predictions, since​​​‌ November 2022, supervised by‌ S. Boyaval (and C.‌​‌ Goeury, F. Zaoui and​​ V. Bacchi from EDF),​​​‌ defended in October.

The‌ following PhD theses supervised‌​‌ by members of the​​ project-team are ongoing:

  • Yann​​​‌ Bouchereau, funding ENPC, Multiscale‌ approaches in neutronics, and‌​‌ related problems, Institut Polytechnique​​ de Paris, since September​​​‌ 2025, co-supervised by F.‌ Legoll and C. Le‌​‌ Bris
  • Thomas Brunel, funded​​ by ANR Neptune, Paddle​​​‌ sports physics: Velocity–stroke rate‌ and active drags, supervised‌​‌ by S. Boyaval (and​​ R. Carmigniani from ENPC)​​​‌
  • Louis Carillo, funded by‌ a CDSN fellowship with‌​‌ additional funding from ENPC,​​ Mathematical analysis and numerical​​​‌ methods for metastable systems‌ in statistical physics, since‌​‌ September 2024, co-supervised by​​ T. Lelièvre and U.​​​‌ Vaes
  • Charlotte Chapellier, funding‌ CIFRE Sanofi, Generative methods‌​‌ for drug design, since​​ October 2023, co-supervised by​​​‌ T. Lelièvre and G.‌ Stoltz
  • Antonin Coatantiec, funding‌​‌ AMX, Mathematical and numerical​​ analysis for sampling metastable​​​‌ dynamics, since October 2025,‌ co-supervised by T. Lelièvre‌​‌ and G. Stoltz
  • Théo​​ Duez, funding CNRS, Contributions​​​‌ to the development of‌ new approximations and numerical‌​‌ methods for Time-Dependent Density-Functional​​ Theory (TDDFT) for molecules​​​‌ and materials, since October‌ 2024, co-supervised by E.‌​‌ Cancès and M. Lewin​​ (CEREMADE, CNRS and Université​​​‌ Paris-Dauphine PSL)
  • François Escolan,‌ funding ERC HighLEAP, Stochastic‌​‌ particle methods for optimal​​ transport, since November 2024,​​​‌ co-supervised by V. Ehrlacher,‌ J. Reygner (CERMICS) and‌​‌ A. Alfonsi (MATHRISK).
  • Sofiane​​ Ezzehi, funding Région Île-de-France​​​‌ and IFPEN, Nonlinear reduced-order‌ modeling techniques for underground‌​‌ CO2 storage applications, since​​ November 2024, co-supervised with​​​‌ G. Enchéry (IFPEN).
  • Raphaël‌ Gastaldello, funding CNRS, Variance‌​‌ reduction methods for the​​ computation of transport coefficients,​​​‌ since December 2023, co-supervised‌ by G. Stoltz and‌​‌ U. Vaes
  • Baptiste Guilbery,​​ funding Inria, Applications of​​​‌ model reduction techniques to‌ thermo-hydro-mechanical simulations in porous‌​‌ media, since November 2025,​​ co-supervised by S. Boyaval​​​‌ and G. Enchéry (IFPEN)‌
  • Clément Guillot, funding ENPC,‌​‌ Space-time variational principles for​​ the Schrödinger equation in​​​‌ large dimension, since November‌ 2023, co-supervised by V.‌​‌ Ehrlacher and M. Dupuy​​ (Sorbonne Université)
  • Jean-Baptiste Himbert,​​​‌ funding Ministry of Ecology,‌ Machine learning for molecular‌​‌ dynamics in materials science,​​ since September 2025, co-supervised​​​‌ by T. Lelièvre and‌ G. Stoltz
  • Pierre Marmey,‌​‌ funding IFPEN, Evaluation of​​ reaction constants using approaches​​​‌ coupling machine learning and‌ quantum chemistry, since October‌​‌ 2023, co-supervised by T.​​ Lelièvre and P. Raybaud​​​‌ (IFPEN), together with G.‌ Stoltz and M. Corral-Valero‌​‌ (IFPEN)
  • Alicia Negre, funding​​ Inria, Quantum computing for​​​‌ quantum embedding methods, since‌ October 2023, co-supervised by‌​‌ E. Cancès and T.​​ Ayral (Ecole Polytechnique)
  • Solal​​​‌ Perrin-Roussel, funding ENPC and‌ ERC Synergy EMC2, Mathematical‌​‌ analysis and numerical simulation​​ of electronic transport in​​​‌ moiré materials, since September‌ 2022, co-supervised by É.‌​‌ Cances and by D.​​​‌ Gontier
  • Henri Pinsolle, funding​ Onera, Calcul quantique appliqué​‌ à la résolution d’équations​​ aux dérivées partielles linéaires​​​‌ et non linéaires, since​ November 2024, co-supervised by​‌ E. Cancès and F.​​ Renac (Onera)
  • Thaddeus Roussigne,​​​‌ funding Université Paris-Dauphine, Etude​ mathématique des distorsions dans​‌ le graphene, since Septembre​​ 2023, co-supervised by D.​​​‌ Gontier and E. Séré​ (Université Paris-Dauphine).
  • Jean Ruel,​‌ funding ENS-Saclay, Certified and​​ robust reduced models for​​​‌ the simulation of elongated​ structures, Ecole des Ponts,​‌ since October 2023, co-supervised​​ by F. Legoll, L.​​​‌ Chamoin (ENS Paris-Saclay) and​ A. Lebée (Ecole des​‌ Ponts)
  • Jonte Weixler, funding​​ Studienstiftung scholarship, New spectral​​​‌ methods for eigenvalue optimization,​ since Septembre 2025, co-supervised​‌ by D. Gontier and​​ J. Dolbeault (Université Paris-Dauphine).​​​‌

10.2.3 Juries

Project-team members​ have participated in the​‌ following PhD juries:

  • T.​​ Lelièvre, PhD of Nicolaï​​​‌ Gouraud ("Stochastic algorithms for​ high-dimensional sampling in molecular​‌ dynamics: mathematical analysis and​​ scalable implementation"), defended at​​​‌ Sorbonne Université in June​ (examiner)
  • T. Lelièvre, PhD​‌ of Loïs Delande ("Hypocoercivité​​ semiclassique et loi d'Eyring-Kramers​​​‌ pour des opérateurs de​ Fokker-Planck dégénérés") defended at​‌ Université de Bordeaux in​​ June (examiner)

Project-team members​​​‌ have participated in the​ following habilitation juries:

  • E.​‌ Cancès, HdR of Ivan​​ Duchemin ("Algorithms and Methodologies​​​‌ for Large Scale Simulations​ in Many Body Perturbation​‌ Theory"), defended at Université​​ Grenoble Alpes in June​​​‌ (referee)

Project-team members have​ participated in the following​‌ selection committees:

  • T. Lelièvre,​​ professor position at Ecole​​​‌ Polytechnique

10.3 Conference participation​

Members of the project-team​‌ have delivered lectures in​​ the following seminars, workshops​​​‌ and conferences:

  • N. Blassel,​ "QSD and applications" workshop,​‌ CERMICS, May
  • N. Blassel,​​ SMAI 2025, Carcans-Maubuisson, June​​​‌
  • N. Blassel, "New trends​ and applications around generalized​‌ Fokker–Planck operators" program, Bernoulli​​ center (Lausanne), July
  • N.​​​‌ Blassel, "Sampling High-Dimensional Probability​ Measures with Applications in​‌ (Non)Equilibrium Molecular Dynamics and​​ Statistics” CECAM Summer School,​​​‌ Birmingham, July
  • N. Blassel,​ ANR SINEQ final conference,​‌ l'Aquila, October
  • T. Borsoni,​​ OxPDE seminar, Oxford, December​​​‌
  • T. Borsoni, Séminaire d'Analyse​ Numérique, Rennes (IRMAR), November​‌
  • T. Borsoni, Workshop NewOT,​​ Orsay (IMO), November
  • T.​​​‌ Borsoni, Conference ArpiLYSM2, Arpino​ (Roma), November
  • T. Borsoni,​‌ Workshop LYSacadéMie, Allumiere (Roma),​​ June
  • T. Borsoni, Séminaire​​​‌ ANCS, Besançon (LMB), June​
  • T. Borsoni, Conference WASCOM,​‌ Parma, June
  • T. Borsoni,​​ Seminar at the University​​​‌ of Novi Sad, Serbia,​ April
  • S. Boyaval, Groupe​‌ de travail "Schémas de​​ Boltzmann sur réseau", Orsay,​​​‌ February
  • S. Boyaval, GT​ CalVa, Orsay, March
  • S.​‌ Boyaval, 7th ECCOMAS Conference​​ MSF 2025, Split (Croatia),​​​‌ June
  • S. Boyaval, 6th​ IAHR Conference ISSF 2025,​‌ Torino (Italy), September
  • E.​​ Cancès, Oberwolfach workshop on​​​‌ Mathematical Methods in Quantum​ Chemistry, March
  • E. Cancès,​‌ PTEROSOR workshop on emerging​​ electronic structure methods for​​​‌ excited states, Toulouse, April​
  • E. Cancès, Moiré Materials​‌ Magic workshop, Flatiron Institute,​​ New York, USA, May​​​‌
  • E. Cancès, WATOC 2025​ (invited lecture), Oslo, Norway,​‌ June
  • E. Cancès, IHP​​ seminar on Spectral problems​​​‌ in mathematical physics, Institut​ Henri Poincaré, Paris, December​‌
  • L. Carillo, Journée de​​ la physique statistique, ENS,​​​‌ January
  • L. Carillo, Stochastic​ processes: Inferences in complex​‌ systems, Cecam HQ, Lausanne,​​ May
  • L. Carillo, QSD​​ and related field, ENPC,​​​‌ June
  • L. Carillo, Sampling‌ High-Dimensional Probability Measures with‌​‌ Applications in (Non)Equilibrium Molecular​​ Dynamics and Statistics, CECAM​​​‌ Summer School, Birmingham, July‌
  • L. Carillo, CECAM Moser‌​‌ grant day, ESPCI, December​​
  • L. Delande, Séminaire d'analyse,​​​‌ LMJL, November
  • L. Delande,‌ Séminaire PM-EDP, LAGA, December‌​‌
  • A. Della Noce, CMX​​ Seminar, Caltech, USA, Febuary​​​‌
  • D. Gontier, Topological Transport‌ and Magnetic Matter Conference,‌​‌ Roma, June
  • R. Gastaldello,​​ SMAI 2025, Carcans-Maubuisson, June​​​‌
  • R. Gastaldello, "Sampling High-Dimensional‌ Probability Measures with Applications‌​‌ in (Non)Equilibrium Molecular Dynamics​​ and Statistics” CECAM Summer​​​‌ School, Birmingham, July
  • R.‌ Gastaldello, ANR SINEQ final‌​‌ conference, l'Aquila, October
  • L.​​ Grazioli, Oberwolfach workshop on​​​‌ Mathematical Methods in Quantum‌ Chemistry, March
  • L. Grazioli,‌​‌ WATOC 2025, Oslo, Norway,​​ June
  • L. Grazioli, STC​​​‌ 2025, Berlin, Germany, September‌
  • C. Guillot, Interdisciplinary conference‌​‌ on many-body theory, Faculté​​ des Sciences et Technologies,​​​‌ Nancy, June
  • C. Guillot,‌ OMG-DMV-2025, Johannes Kepler University‌​‌ Linz (JKU), Linz
  • C.​​ Le Bris, Workshop in​​​‌ honor of Anders Szepessy‌ 65th birthday, KTH Stockholm,‌​‌ Sweden, August
  • C. Le​​ Bris, 8th Najman conference,​​​‌ Centre for Advanced Academic‌ Studies, Dubrovnik, Croatia, September‌​‌
  • A. Lefort, SMAI biannual​​ meeting, Carcans-Maubuisson, June
  • F.​​​‌ Legoll, 8th ENPC –‌ U. Tokyo workshop on‌​‌ Multiscale Analysis of Materials​​ (online), March
  • F. Legoll,​​​‌ Workshop “Computational Multiscale Methods”,‌ Oberwolfach, 28 April –‌​‌ 2 May
  • F. Legoll,​​ ADMOS conference, Barcelona, June​​​‌
  • F. Legoll, CM3P conference,‌ Porto, July
  • F. Legoll,‌​‌ ENUMATH conference, Heidelberg, September​​
  • F. Legoll, SIAM GS25​​​‌ conference, Baton Rouge, October‌
  • F. Legoll, MORTech workshop,‌​‌ Zaragoza, November
  • T. Lelièvre,​​ LIA CNRS - UIUC​​​‌ Meeting, Hauteluce, January
  • T.‌ Lelièvre, BCAM seminar, Bilbao,‌​‌ January
  • T. Lelièvre, Colloquium,​​ Université d’Evry, January
  • T.​​​‌ Lelièvre, Recent Advances in‌ Modelling Rare Events, RARE‌​‌ 2025, Khajuraho, India, March​​
  • T. Lelièvre, GAMM Annual​​​‌ Meeting, Poznań, Poland, April‌
  • T. Lelièvre, Groupe de‌​‌ travail a3,​​ Sorbonne Université, May
  • T.​​​‌ Lelièvre, CECAM workshop, University‌ of Chicago Center in‌​‌ Paris, June
  • T. Lelièvre,​​ Plenary speaker at the​​​‌ SMAI biannual meeting, Carcans-Maubuisson,‌ June
  • T. Lelièvre, H2020‌​‌ ENGAGE conference, ESRF Grenoble,​​ June
  • T. Lelièvre, Bernoulli​​​‌ program “New trends and‌ applications around generalized Fokker-Planck‌​‌ operators”, Bernoulli center (Lausanne),​​ June
  • T. Lelièvre, Conference​​​‌ in honor of Anders‌ Szepessy, KTH, August
  • T.‌​‌ Lelièvre, ANR SINEQ final​​ conference, Aquila, October
  • T.​​​‌ Lelièvre, Bernoulli conference, “Particles,‌ Flows & Maps for‌​‌ Sampling Complex Distributions”, Bernoulli​​ center (Lausanne), November
  • T.​​​‌ Lelièvre, Conference “Navigating Rugged‌ Landscape”, JNCASR, Bengaluru, November‌​‌
  • T. Lelièvre, Conference “Mesures​​ de Gibbs, Turbulence d’onde​​​‌ et EDP stochastiques”, Université‌ Evry-Paris Saclay, December
  • G.‌​‌ Merlini, Conference SIMAI, Trieste,​​ September
  • S. Perrin-Roussel, GAMM​​​‌ Annual Meenting, Poznań, Poland,‌ April
  • S. Perrin-Roussel, Journées‌​‌ du DMA, Guerlédan, June​​
  • S. Ruget, SMAI biannual​​​‌ meeting, Carcans-Maubuisson, June
  • S.‌ Ruget, Seminar of the‌​‌ Navier laboratory multiscale team,​​ ENPC, November
  • G. Stoltz,​​​‌ CECAM workshop “Data-driven, low-dimensional,‌ and generative models for‌​‌ molecular and materials discovery​​ and design”, UChicago Center​​​‌ in Paris, Paris, June‌
  • G. Stoltz, Bernoulli program‌​‌ “New trends and applications​​ around generalized Fokker-Planck operators”,​​​‌ Lausanne (Bernoulli center), Switzerland,‌ July
  • G. Stoltz, CECAM‌​‌ summer school “Sampling High-Dimensional​​​‌ Probability Measures with Applications​ in (Non)Equilibrium Molecular Dynamics​‌ and Statistics”, Birmingham, UK,​​ July
  • G. Stoltz, SCALES​​​‌ Conference, Mainz, Germany, September​
  • G. Stoltz, workshop "CoMPASs:​‌ computational materials science and​​ mathematics at the particle​​​‌ and atomistic scales", ICMS,​ Edinburgh, UK, November
  • U.​‌ Vaes, CMX Seminar, Caltech,​​ USA, February
  • U. Vaes,​​​‌ Ulm University Mathematics Seminar,​ Ulm, Germany, June
  • U.​‌ Vaes, “Sampling High-Dimensional Probability​​ Measures with Applications in​​​‌ (Non)Equilibrium Molecular Dynamics and​ Statistics” CECAM Summer School,​‌ Birmingham, UK, July
  • U.​​ Vaes, ENUMATH conference, Heidelberg,​​​‌ Germany, September
  • U. Vaes,​ Groupe de travail “Algorithmes​‌ stochastiques”, Champs-sur-Marne, December

Members​​ of the project-team have​​​‌ delivered the following series​ of lectures:

  • E. Cancès,​‌ Numerical methods for the​​ quantum many-body problem, Spring​​​‌ School on Sparsity and​ Singular Structures (4h), Rolduc,​‌ The Netherlands, May
  • E.​​ Cancès, Mathematical foundations of​​​‌ electronic structure calculation, Modern​ Wavefunction Methods in Electronic​‌ Structure Theory (MWM 2025)​​ Summer School, Pisa, Italy,​​​‌ September
  • D. Gontier, Eigenvalue​ optimization, online lecture at​‌ School of Mathematics &​​ Statistics, Central China Normal​​​‌ University, Wuhan, China, November.​
  • T. Lelièvre, Programme New​‌ trends and applications around​​ generalized Fokker-Planck operators, "Metastability​​​‌ and partial differential equations"​ (6h), Bernoulli Center, June​‌
  • G. Stoltz, (Un)supervised learning​​ with applications to molecular​​​‌ dynamics, 9h lecture, 7th​ edition of the Mini-school​‌ on mathematics for theoretical​​ chemistry and physics, Sorbonne​​​‌ Université, Paris, France, May​

Members of the project-team​‌ have presented posters in​​ the following seminars, workshops​​​‌ and international conferences:

  • S.​ Ruget, Workshop "Reduced-Order Modeling​‌ for Complex Engineering Problems",​​ Chicago, USA, February

Members​​​‌ of the project-team have​ participated (without giving talks​‌ nor presenting posters) in​​ the following seminars, workshops​​​‌ and international conferences:

  • T.​ Borsoni, Conference Kinetic theory​‌ and fluid mechanics, CIRM,​​ April
  • S. Boyaval, IVth​​​‌ ECCOMAS Conference CMCS 2025,​ Champs-sur-Marne, May
  • A. Coatantiec,​‌ Bernoulli conference, “Particles, Flows​​ & Maps for Sampling​​​‌ Complex Distributions”, Bernoulli center​ (Lausanne), November
  • J.-B. Himbert,​‌ AdONE Summer School, Heilbronn,​​ June
  • J.-B. Himbert, LIA​​​‌ CNRS - UIUC Meeting,​ Hauteluce, January
  • C. Le​‌ Bris, Workshop “Computational Multiscale​​ Methods”, Oberwolfach, 28 April​​​‌ – 2 May
  • G.​ Merlini, Workshop HyBOX, ENSTA,​‌ December

10.4 Popularization

  • A.​​ Della Noce, Parole de​​​‌ Chercheuses et Chercheurs, Lycée​ Jean-Pierre Vernant, Sèvres, Febuary​‌
  • D. Gontier gave a​​ talk on "Puzzles" for​​​‌ secondary school students visiting​ CERMICS, ENPC, February
  • D.​‌ Gontier animated several sessions​​ on "Puzzles" for "Fête​​​‌ de la Science", ENPC,​ October
  • T. Lelièvre did​‌ 1 session of CHICHE​​ at Lycée Louise Michel​​​‌ (Champigny-sur-Marne)
  • G. Stoltz did​ 10 sessions of CHICHE​‌ at lycées international Palaiseau,​​ Hélène Boucher (Paris), Turgot​​​‌ (Paris) and Montesquieu (Herblay-sur-Seine)​
  • G. Stoltz did “AI​‌ improv sessions” at the​​ Science feast of Ecole​​​‌ des Ponts (Marne-la-Vallee, October​ 2025)
  • G. Stoltz chaired​‌ with Adèle Mazurek the​​ “Flash science” session at​​​‌ the Double Science festival​ (Ground Control, Paris, June​‌ 2025)
  • G. Stoltz did​​ presentation sessions for high​​​‌ school interns (Inria and​ Ecole des Ponts, June​‌ 2025)
  • S. Perrin-Roussel did​​ presentation sessions for primary​​​‌ school pupils at Groupe​ scolaire Irène and Fréderic​‌ Joliot (Champs-sur-Marne)

11 Scientific​​ production

11.1 Major publications​​

  • 1 bookX.Xavier​​​‌ Blanc and C.Claude‌ Le Bris. Homogénéisation‌​‌ en milieu périodique... ou​​ non.88Mathématiques​​​‌ et ApplicationsSpringer International‌ Publishing2022HALDOI‌​‌back to text
  • 2​​ bookX.Xavier Blanc​​​‌ and C.Claude Le‌ Bris. Homogenization Theory‌​‌ for Multiscale Problems.​​21MS&ASpringer Nature​​​‌ Switzerland2023HALDOI‌back to text
  • 3‌​‌ miscE.Eric Cancès​​, M.Mireille Defranceschi​​​‌, W.Werner Kutzelnigg‌, C.Claude Le‌​‌ Bris and Y.Yvon​​ Maday. Computational Quantum​​​‌ Chemistry: A Primer.‌2003back to text‌​‌
  • 4 bookE.Eric​​ Cancès, C.Claude​​​‌ Le Bris and Y.‌Yvon Maday. Mathematical‌​‌ Methods in Quantum Chemistry.​​ An Introduction. (Méthodes mathématiques​​​‌ en chimie quantique. Une‌ introduction.).Mathématiques et‌​‌ Applications (Berlin) 53. Berlin:​​ Springer. xvi, 409~p. 2006​​​‌back to text
  • 5‌ bookI.Isabelle Catto‌​‌, C.Claude Le​​ Bris and P.-L.Pierre-Louis​​​‌ Lions. The Mathematical‌ Theory of Thermodynamic Limits:‌​‌ Thomas-Fermi Type Models.​​Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford:​​​‌ Clarendon Press. xiii, 277~p.‌1998back to text‌​‌
  • 6 bookJ.-F.J.-F.​​ Gerbeau, C.Claude​​​‌ Le Bris and T.‌Tony Lelièvre. Mathematical‌​‌ Methods for the Magnetohydrodynamics​​ of Liquid Metals.​​​‌Numerical Mathematics and Scientific‌ Computation. Oxford: Oxford University‌​‌ Press., 324~p.2006back​​ to text
  • 7 book​​​‌C.Claude Le Bris‌ and P.-L.Pierre-Louis Lions‌​‌. Parabolic Equations with​​ Irregular Data and Related​​​‌ Issues: Applications to Stochastic‌ Differential Equations.4‌​‌De Gruyter Series in​​ Applied and Numerical Mathematics​​​‌2019back to text‌
  • 8 bookC.Claude‌​‌ Le Bris. Multi-scale​​ Analysis. Modeling and Simulation.​​​‌ (Systèmes multi-échelles. Modélisation et‌ simulation.).Mathématiques et‌​‌ Applications (Berlin) 47. Berlin:​​ Springer. xi, 212~p.2005​​​‌back to text
  • 9‌ bookT.Tony Lelièvre‌​‌, M.Mathias Rousset​​ and G.Gabriel Stoltz​​​‌. Free Energy Computations:‌ A Mathematical Perspective.‌​‌Imperial College Press, 458~p.​​2010back to text​​​‌

11.2 Publications of the‌ year

International journals

International peer-reviewed conferences

  • 31​​ inproceedingsJ.Jonas Aparicio​​​‌, V.Virginie Ehrlacher‌, G.Gwendal Cumunel‌​‌, T.Tien Hoang​​ and G.Gilles Foret​​​‌. Enhancing Vibration-Based Tension‌ Measurement in External Prestressing‌​‌ Tendons Using a Monte​​ Carlo Markov Chain Algorithm​​​‌.Lecture Notes in‌ Civil EngineeringEvaces 2025‌​‌ - 11th International Conference​​ on Experimental Vibration Analysis​​​‌ for Civil Engineering Structures‌675Lecture Notes in‌​‌ Civil EngineeringPorto, Portugal​​Springer Nature SwitzerlandOctober​​​‌ 2025, 268-277HAL‌DOI
  • 32 inproceedingsE.‌​‌Elisa Beteille, S.​​Sébastien Boyaval, F.​​​‌Frédérique Larrarte and E.‌Eric Demay. Experimental‌​‌ analysis on the influence​​ of urban forms on​​​‌ unsteady urban flooding.‌Proceedings of the 12th‌​‌ International Conference on Fluvial​​ Hydraulics, Liverpool, UK, 2nd-​​​‌ 6th September, 2024River‌ Flow 2024 - 12th‌​‌ International Conference on Fluvial​​ HydraulicsLiverpool, United Kingdom​​​‌April 2025HAL
  • 33‌ inproceedingsJ.Jean Ruel‌​‌, F.Frédéric Legoll​​, A.Arthur Lebée​​​‌ and L.Ludovic Chamoin‌. Vers une nouvelle‌​‌ stratégie PGD pour la​​ simulation numérique de structures​​​‌ élancées.CFM 2025‌ - 26e Congrès Français‌​‌ de MécaniqueMetz, France​​August 2025HAL

Doctoral​​​‌ dissertations and habilitation theses‌

Reports &​​​‌ preprints

11.3 Cited‌​‌ publications

  • 62 articleF.​​François Bolley, J.​​​‌ A.José A. Cañizo‌ and J. A.José‌​‌ A. Carrillo. Stochastic​​ mean-field limit: non-Lipschitz forces​​​‌ and swarming.Math.‌ Models Methods Appl. Sci.‌​‌21112011,​​ 2179--2210URL: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202511005702DOI​​​‌back to text
  • 63‌ miscE.Edoardo Calvello‌​‌, P.Pierre Monmarché​​​‌, A. M.Andrew​ M. Stuart and U.​‌Urbain Vaes. Accuracy​​ of the Ensemble Kalman​​​‌ Filter in the Near-Linear​ Setting.September 2024​‌HALback to text​​
  • 64 articleN. J.​​​‌Nicolai Jurek Gerber,​ F.Franca Hoffmann and​‌ U.Urbain Vaes.​​ Mean-field limits for Consensus-Based​​​‌ Optimization and Sampling.​ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and​‌ Calculus of Variations31​​December 2023, 74​​​‌HALDOIback to​ text
  • 65 miscN.​‌Na Wang, S.​​Sébastien Boyaval and Y.​​​‌Yuxi Hu. Global​ solutions and uniform convergence​‌ stability for compressible Navier-Stokes​​ equations with oldroyd-type constitutive​​​‌ law.June 2024​HALback to text​‌