EN FR
EN FR
MIND - 2025

2025Activity​​ reportProject-TeamMIND

RNSR:​​​‌ 202224253W

Creation​​ of the Project-Team: 2022​​​‌ April 01

Each year,​ Inria research teams publish​‌ an Activity Report presenting​​ their work and results​​​‌ over the reporting period.​ These reports follow a​‌ common structure, with some​​ optional sections depending on​​​‌ the specific team. They​ typically begin by outlining​‌ the overall objectives and​​ research programme, including the​​​‌ main research themes, goals,​ and methodological approaches. They​‌ also describe the application​​ domains targeted by the​​​‌ team, highlighting the scientific​ or societal contexts in​‌ which their work is​​ situated.

The reports then​​​‌ present the highlights of​ the year, covering major​‌ scientific achievements, software developments,​​ or teaching contributions. When​​​‌ relevant, they include sections​ on software, platforms, and​‌ open data, detailing the​​ tools developed and how​​​‌ they are shared. A​ substantial part is dedicated​‌ to new results, where​​ scientific contributions are described​​​‌ in detail, often with​ subsections specifying participants and​‌ associated keywords.

Finally, the​​ Activity Report addresses funding,​​​‌ contracts, partnerships, and collaborations​ at various levels, from​‌ industrial agreements to international​​ cooperations. It also covers​​​‌ dissemination and teaching activities,​ such as participation in​‌ scientific events, outreach, and​​ supervision. The document concludes​​​‌ with a presentation of​ scientific production, including major​‌ publications and those produced​​ during the year.

Keywords​​​‌

Computer Science and Digital​ Science

  • A3.1.1. Modeling, representation​‌
  • A6.2.4. Statistical methods
  • A6.2.6.​​ Optimization
  • A6.2.7. HPC for​​​‌ machine learning
  • A9.2. Machine​ learning
  • A9.2.1. Supervised learning​‌
  • A9.2.2. Unsupervised learning
  • A9.2.4.​​ Optimization and learning
  • A9.2.5.​​​‌ Bayesian methods
  • A9.2.6. Neural​ networks
  • A9.2.8. Deep learning​‌
  • A9.3. Signal processing
  • A9.7.​​ AI algorithmics

Other Research​​​‌ Topics and Application Domains​

  • B1.2. Neuroscience and cognitive​‌ science
  • B1.2.1. Understanding and​​ simulation of the brain​​​‌ and the nervous system​
  • B1.2.2. Cognitive science
  • B1.2.3.​‌ Computational neurosciences
  • B2.6.1. Brain​​ imaging

1 Team members,​​​‌ visitors, external collaborators

Research​ Scientists

  • Philippe Ciuciu [​‌Team leader, CEA​​, Researcher, HDR​​​‌]
  • Carlo Barbano [​INRIA, Starting Research​‌ Position, from Nov​​ 2025]
  • Mansour Benbakoura​​​‌ [INRIA, Starting​ Research Position]
  • Antoine​‌ Collas [INRIA,​​ Starting Research Position,​​​‌ until Jul 2025]​
  • Chaithya Giliyar Radhkrishna [​‌CEA, Researcher]​​
  • Thomas Moreau [INRIA​​​‌, Researcher, HDR​]
  • Bertrand Thirion [​‌INRIA, Researcher,​​ HDR]
  • Demian Wassermann​​​‌ [INRIA, Senior​ Researcher, HDR]​‌

Post-Doctoral Fellows

  • Pierre-Antoine Comby​​ [CEA, Post-Doctoral​​ Fellow, from Sep​​​‌ 2025]
  • Reuben Dorent‌ [INRIA, Post-Doctoral‌​‌ Fellow]
  • Merlin Dumeur​​ [CEA, Post-Doctoral​​​‌ Fellow, from Mar‌ 2025]
  • Fateme Ghayyem‌​‌ [INRIA, Post-Doctoral​​ Fellow, until Feb​​​‌ 2025]
  • Baptiste Goujaud‌ [INRIA, Post-Doctoral‌​‌ Fellow, until Aug​​ 2025]
  • Ce Ju​​​‌ [INRIA, Post-Doctoral‌ Fellow]
  • Romain Lacoste‌​‌ [INRIA, Post-Doctoral​​ Fellow, from Nov​​​‌ 2025]
  • Matthieu Terris‌ [INRIA, Post-Doctoral‌​‌ Fellow, until Mar​​ 2025]
  • Sheng Wang​​​‌ [CEA, Post-Doctoral‌ Fellow, until Jun‌​‌ 2025]
  • Houssam Zenati​​ [INRIA, Post-Doctoral​​​‌ Fellow, until Jan‌ 2025]

PhD Students‌​‌

  • Pierre-Louis Barbarant [INRIA​​]
  • Maxime Bertrait [​​​‌CEA]
  • Pierre-Antoine Comby‌ [CEA, until‌​‌ Mar 2025]
  • Celestin​​ Eve [UNIV PARIS​​​‌ SACLAY]
  • Theo Gnassounou‌ [INRIA, from‌​‌ Sep 2025 until Nov​​ 2025]
  • Theo Gnassounou​​​‌ [ENS PARIS-SACLAY,‌ until Aug 2025]‌​‌
  • Gabriela Pilar Gomez Jimenez​​ [INRIA]
  • Ambroise​​​‌ Heurtebise [UNIV PARIS‌ SACLAY, until Oct‌​‌ 2025]
  • Alexandre Le​​ Bris [INRIA]​​​‌
  • Leticia Levin Diniz [‌INRIA, from Jul‌​‌ 2025]
  • Leticia Levin​​ Diniz [INRIA,​​​‌ from Mar 2025 until‌ Jun 2025]
  • Jarod‌​‌ Levy [Meta]​​
  • Qiaoxin Li [CEA​​​‌, from Sep 2025‌]
  • Virginie Loison [‌​‌INRIA]
  • Sonia Mazelet​​ [CEA]
  • Florent​​​‌ Michel [UNIV PARIS‌ SACLAY, until Oct‌​‌ 2025]
  • Denis Hernando​​ Nunez Fernandez [CEA​​​‌]
  • Oumaima Ouaalouhoum [‌CEA, from Oct‌​‌ 2025]
  • Joseph Paillard​​ [Roche]
  • Caini​​​‌ Pan [CEA]‌
  • Ana Ponce Martinez [‌​‌INRIA]
  • Angel Reyero​​ Lobo [UNIV TOULOUSE​​​‌ III]
  • Victoria Shevchenko‌ [UNIV PARIS -‌​‌ CITE]
  • Asma Tanabene​​ [CEA]
  • Jad​​​‌ Yehya [INRIA,‌ from Apr 2025]‌​‌

Technical Staff

  • Himanshu Aggarwal​​ [INRIA, Engineer​​​‌]
  • Laure Caruso [‌CEA, Engineer,‌​‌ from Mar 2025]​​
  • Remi Gau [INRIA​​​‌, Engineer]
  • Lionel‌ Kusch [INRIA,‌​‌ Engineer, until Oct​​ 2025]
  • Soukaina Tichirra​​​‌ [CEA, Engineer‌, until Sep 2025‌​‌]
  • Hippolyte Verninas [​​INRIA, Engineer,​​​‌ from Oct 2025]‌
  • Jad Yehya [INRIA‌​‌, Engineer, until​​ Mar 2025]

Interns​​​‌ and Apprentices

  • Maxence Barneche‌ [INRIA, Intern‌​‌, from Apr 2025​​ until Jun 2025]​​​‌
  • Arthur De Rouck [‌INRIA, Intern,‌​‌ from Jun 2025 until​​ Aug 2025]
  • Albane​​​‌ Dourder-Lavie [CEA,‌ Intern, from Feb‌​‌ 2025 until Jul 2025​​]
  • Caterina Galata [​​​‌INRIA, Intern,‌ from Nov 2025]‌​‌
  • Melvine Nargeot [INRIA​​, Apprentice, until​​​‌ Sep 2025]
  • Lena‌ Oudjman [CEA,‌​‌ Apprentice]

Administrative Assistant​​

  • Marie Enee [INRIA​​​‌]

Visiting Scientist

  • Carlo‌ Barbano [UNIV Turin‌​‌, until Feb 2025​​]

External Collaborators

  • Thomas​​​‌ Bazeille [THOMAS BAZEILLE‌, from Jul 2025‌​‌]
  • Antoine Collas [​​​‌KARAVELA, from Jul​ 2025]
  • David Degras​‌ [Univ Massachusetts Boston​​, until Jun 2025​​​‌]
  • Benoit Dufumier [​CEA, from Nov​‌ 2025]
  • Elizabeth Dupre​​ [UNIV MONTREAL,​​​‌ from Jul 2025]​
  • Denis-Alexander Engemann [Roche​‌]
  • Remi Flamary [​​LIX, HDR]​​​‌
  • Alexandre Gramfort [Ministère​ Economie, until May​‌ 2025, HDR]​​
  • Jade Perdereau [AP/HP​​​‌]

2 Overall objectives​

The Mind team, which​‌ finds its origin in​​ the Parietal team, is​​​‌ uniquely equipped to impact​ the fields of statistical​‌ machine learning and artificial​​ intelligence (AI) in service​​​‌ to the understanding of​ brain structure and function,​‌ in both healthy and​​ pathological conditions.

AI with​​​‌ recent progress in statistical​ machine learning (ML) is​‌ currently aiming to revolutionize​​ how experimental science is​​​‌ conducted by using data​ as the driver of​‌ new theoretical insights and​​ scientific hypotheses. Supervised learning​​​‌ and predictive models are​ then used to assess​‌ predictability. We thus face​​ challenging questions like Can​​​‌ cognitive operations be predicted​ from neural signals? or​‌ Can the use of​​ anesthesia be a causal​​​‌ predictor of later cognitive​ decline or impairment?

To​‌ study brain structure and​​ function, cognitive and clinical​​​‌ neuroscientists have access to​ various neuroimaging techniques. The​‌ Mind team specifically relies​​ on non-invasive modalities, notably​​​‌ on one hand, magnetic​ resonance imaging (MRI) at​‌ ultra-high magnetic field to​​ reach high spatial resolution​​​‌ and, on the other​ hand, electroencephalography (EEG) and​‌ magnetoencephalography (MEG), which allow​​ the recording of electric​​​‌ and magnetic activity of​ neural populations, to follow​‌ brain activity in real​​ time. Extracting new neuroscientific​​​‌ knowledge from such neuroimaging​ data however raises a​‌ number of methodological challenges,​​ in particular in inverse​​​‌ problems, statistics and computer​ science. The Mindproject​‌ aims to develop the​​ theory and software technology​​​‌ to study the brain​ from both cognitive to​‌ clinical endpoints using cutting-edge​​ MRI (functional MRI, diffusion​​​‌ weighted MRI) and MEG/EEG​ data. To uncover the​‌ most valuable information from​​ such data, we need​​​‌ to solve a large​ panoply of inverse problems​‌ using a hybrid approach​​ in which machine or​​​‌ deep learning is used​ in combination with physics-informed​‌ constraints.

Once functional imaging​​ data is collected the​​​‌ challenge of statistical analysis​ becomes apparent. Beyond the​‌ standard questions (Where, when​​ and how can statistically​​​‌ significant neural activity be​ identified?), Mind is particularly​‌ interested in addressing driving​​ effect or the cause​​​‌ of such activity in​ a given cortical region.​‌ Answering these basic questions​​ with computer programs requires​​​‌ the development of methodologies​ built on the latest​‌ research on causality, knowledge​​ bases and high-dimensional statistics.​​​‌

The field of neuroscience​ is now embracing more​‌ open science standards and​​ community efforts to address​​​‌ the referenced to as​ “replication crisis” as well​‌ as the growing complexity​​ of the data analysis​​​‌ pipelines in neuroimaging. The​ Mindteam is ideally​‌ positioned to address these​​ issues from both angles​​​‌ by providing reliable statistical​ inference schemes as well​‌ as open source software​​ that are compliant with​​ international standards.

The impact​​​‌ of Mindwill be‌ driven by the data‌​‌ analysis challenges in neuroscience​​ but also by the​​​‌ fundamental discoveries in neuroscience‌ that presently inspire the‌​‌ development of novel AI​​ algorithms. The Parietal team​​​‌ has proved in the‌ past that this scientific‌​‌ positioning leads to impactful​​ research. Hence, the newly​​​‌ created Mind team formed‌ by computer scientists and‌​‌ statisticians with a deep​​ understanding of the field​​​‌ of neuroscience, from data‌ acquisition to clinical needs,‌​‌ offers a unique opportunity​​ to expand and explore​​​‌ more fully uncharted territories.‌

3 Research program

The‌​‌ scientific project of Mind​​ is organized around four​​​‌ core developments (machine learning‌ for inverse problems, heterogeneous‌​‌ data & knowledge bases,​​ statistics and causal inference​​​‌ in high dimension, and‌ machine Learning on spatio-temporal‌​‌ signals).

3.1 Machine learning​​ for inverse problems

Participants:​​​‌

P. Ciuciu, A. Gramfort,‌ T. Moreau, D. Wassermann‌​‌

Inverse problems are ubiquitous​​ in observational science. This​​​‌ necessitates the reconstruction of‌ a signal/image of interest,‌​‌ or more generally a​​ vector of parameters, from​​​‌ remote observations that are‌ possibly noisy and scarce.‌​‌ The link between the​​ parameters of interest and​​​‌ the observations is physics,‌ and is commonly well‌​‌ understood. Yet, the recovery​​ of parameters is challenging​​​‌ as the problem is‌ often ill-posed due to‌​‌ the ill-conditioning of the​​ forward model. Machine learning​​​‌ is now more frequently‌ used to address such‌​‌ problems, using likelihood-free inference​​ (LFI) to inverse nonlinear​​​‌ systems, or prior learning‌ using bi-level optimization and‌​‌ reinforcement learning to guide​​ the way to collect​​​‌ observations.

3.1.1 From linear‌ inverse problems to simulation‌​‌ based inference

Expected breakthrough:​​ Boosts in MR image​​​‌ quality and reconstruction speed‌ and in spatio-temporal resolution‌​‌ of M/EEG source imaging​​
Findings: Development of data-driven​​​‌ regularizing functions for inverse‌ problems, as well as‌​‌ deep invertible and cost-effective​​ network architectures amenable to​​​‌ solve nonlinear inverse problems‌ on neuroscience data.

Solving‌​‌ an inverse problem consists​​ in estimating the unobserved​​​‌ parameters at the origin‌ of some measurements. Typical‌​‌ examples are image denoising​​ or image deconvolution, where,​​​‌ given noisy or low‌ resolution data, the objective‌​‌ is to obtain an​​ underlying high-quality image. Inverse​​​‌ problems are pervasive in‌ experimental sciences such as‌​‌ physics, biology or neuroscience.​​ The common problem across​​​‌ these fields is that‌ the measurements are noisy‌​‌ and generally incomplete.

Mathematically​​ speaking, these inverse problem​​​‌ can be formulated as‌ estimating 𝐱 from 𝐲‌​‌=Γ(𝐱​​)+𝐛.​​​‌ Here, 𝐛 is an‌ additive noise and Γ‌​‌ is a (generally non-injective)​​ mapping to a lower-dimensional​​​‌ space. For example, in‌ magneto- and electroenchephalography (M/EEG),‌​‌ Γ is a real​​ linear mapping ΓM​​​‌/ EEG :ℝ‌NM‌​‌ and 𝐛 is considered​​ white and Gaussian, while​​​‌ in magnetic resonance imaging‌ (MRI), Γ is a‌​‌ complex linear mapping Γ​​ MRI :N​​​‌M and‌ 𝐛 is circular complex‌​‌ white Gaussian. Despite the​​ linearity of ΓM​​​‌/ EEG and Γ‌ MRI , estimating 𝐱‌​‌ is a challenging task​​​‌ when the measurements are​ incomplete, i.e., M≪​‌N and the problem​​ is ill-posed. This is​​​‌ often the case due​ to physical limitations on​‌ the measurement device (M/EEG)​​ or the acquisition time​​​‌ (MRI). Moreover, the linear​ Fourier operator Γ MRI​‌ only reflects an ideal​​ acquisition process and part​​​‌ of the acquisition artifacts​ (e.g. B0 inhomogeneity) can​‌ be compensated by considering​​ nonlinear models at the​​​‌ cost of estimating additional​ parameters along with the​‌ MR image.

To tackle​​ these inverse problems, using​​​‌ adequate regularization will promote​ the right structure for​‌ the data to be​​ recovered. Over the last​​​‌ decade the members of​ Mind have proposed state-of-the-art​‌ models and efficient algorithms​​ based on sparsity assumptions​​​‌ 97, 148,​ 120, 102,​‌ 149, 132,​​ 131, 118,​​​‌ 122, 119.​ MNE is the reference​‌ software developed by the​​ team that implements these​​​‌ methods for MEG/EEG data​ while pysap-mri proposes solvers​‌ for MR image reconstruction.​​

The field is now​​​‌ progressing with novel approaches​ based on deep learning​‌ by either learning the​​ regularization from data in​​​‌ the context of MRI​ reconstruction 171, 169​‌, or by considering​​ nonlinear models grounded in​​​‌ the physics underlying the​ data. The team has​‌ started to explore this​​ direction using so-called Likelihood-Free​​​‌ Inference (LFI) techniques built​ on deep invertible networks​‌ 172, 130.​​ A particular application has​​​‌ been on diffusion MRI​ (dMRI), where we have​‌ linked the dMRI signal​​ with physiological tissue models​​​‌ of grey matter tissue​ 130. Still in​‌ MRI but in susceptibility​​ weighted imaging, another approach​​​‌ 112 has consisted in​ directly estimating the B0​‌ field map from non-Cartesian​​ k-space data to correct​​​‌ for off-resonance effects in​ non-Fourier operators Γ MRI​‌ . The Mind project​​ will continue along this​​​‌ direction studying nonlinear simulators​ of imaging data as​‌ building blocks. A key​​ aspect of the work​​​‌ proposed is to exploit​ knowledge on the physics​‌ of the data generation​​ mechanisms.

3.1.2 Bi-level optimization​​​‌

Expected breakthrough: Efficient algorithms​ to select hyper-parameters and​‌ priors for source localisation​​ in MEG and image​​​‌ reconstruction in MRI/fMRI.
Findings:​ Bi-level optimization solvers exploiting​‌ gradients to scale with​​ the large number of​​​‌ samples and hyper-parameters.

In​ recent years, bi-level optimization​‌ – minimizing over a​​ parameter which is itself​​​‌ the solution of another​ optimization problem – has​‌ raised great interest in​​ the machine learning community.​​​‌ Indeed, many methods in​ ML reduce to this​‌ bi-level framework, typically the​​ problem of hyper-parameter optimization.​​​‌

In most practical cases,​ hyper-parameter selection is done​‌ using cross-validation (CV), which​​ basically consists in splitting​​​‌ the whole dataset in​ training and validation sets.​‌ The parameters of the​​ method are computed by​​​‌ minimizing a loss function​ on the training set,​‌ and the hyper-parameters are​​ then set by minimizing​​​‌ the loss function on​ the validation set. This​‌ approach is a bi-level​​ optimization problem.

Other instances​​​‌ of such problems can​ be found in dictionary​‌ learning, robust training of​​ neural networks or the​​ use of implicit layers​​​‌ in deep learning. In‌ all these applications, the‌​‌ model or the latent​​ variables are learned by​​​‌ minimizing some loss while‌ the parameters or the‌​‌ dictionary are updated by​​ minimizing a second optimization​​​‌ problem depending on the‌ outcome of the first‌​‌ problem. While theoretical results​​ were produced in the​​​‌ early 70's 111,‌ there are still many‌​‌ challenges related to bi-level​​ optimization that need to​​​‌ be addressed to produce‌ methods that are both‌​‌ theoretically well grounded and​​ computationally efficient. Recently, the​​​‌ members of Mind have‌ published several works related‌​‌ to the subject 79​​, 80, 92​​​‌, 104. We‌ intend to pursue this‌​‌ effort in the following​​ directions.

Stochastic bi-level solvers.​​​‌

Bi-level solvers require the‌ use of the whole‌​‌ training set before doing​​ an update on an​​​‌ outer-level problem: In this‌ sense, they are full-batch‌​‌ methods 92. We​​ propose to study stochastic​​​‌ methods for this task,‌ where some improvement on‌​‌ the optimization can be​​ achieved using only a​​​‌ few samples from the‌ training data. Stochastic algorithms‌​‌ are notoriously faster than​​ full-batch methods for large​​​‌ datasets, but are also‌ generally harder to analyse‌​‌ from a theoretical standpoint.​​ In addition to being​​​‌ fast, the proposed algorithm‌ should come with some‌​‌ statistical guarantees. These solvers​​ can have many applications,​​​‌ from stochastic prior learning‌ for inverse problem to‌​‌ hyper-parameters tuning in general​​ machine learning.

Neural Dictionary​​​‌ Learning.

Bi-level optimization framework‌ offers a canvas to‌​‌ advance the state of​​ the art in dictionary​​​‌ and prior learning. Indeed,‌ dictionary learning has long‌​‌ been seen as a​​ bi-level optimization problem 147​​​‌. Practical algorithms are‌ mainly based on alternate‌​‌ minimization and rarely account​​ for the sub-optimality of​​​‌ each sub-problem. With advances‌ in bi-level optimization and‌​‌ algorithm unrolling 79,​​ we aim at providing​​​‌ efficient and theoretically justified‌ dictionary learning algorithms, that‌​‌ will be able to​​ leverage the technologies of​​​‌ differentiable programming 77,‌ 165.

Deep Equilibrium‌​‌ Models.

The use of​​ Deep learning, and in​​​‌ particular unrolled algorithms 126‌, has introduced a‌​‌ quantum leap in the​​ resolution of inverse problems​​​‌ compared to variational approaches,‌ specifically in terms of‌​‌ computing efficiency and image/signal​​ recovery performance. However, these​​​‌ networks are very demanding‌ in memory for the‌​‌ training, which currently limits​​ their potential. Different methods​​​‌ exist to alleviate this‌ problem both on the‌​‌ modeling (gradient check-pointing, reversible​​ networks) and the implementation​​​‌ side (model parallelism, mixed‌ precision), but come at‌​‌ the expense of larger​​ computational cost. However, a​​​‌ promising research avenue, illustrated‌ by 123, is‌​‌ the use of Deep​​ Equilibrium Models. These models​​​‌ are defined implicitly and‌ amount to unrolling an‌​‌ infinite number of iterations,​​ thereby using much less​​​‌ memory. These implicit layers‌ constitute another instance of‌​‌ bi-level optimization problem and​​ we plan to work​​​‌ on these directions in‌ the near future as‌​‌ a means to address​​ DL image reconstruction in​​​‌ realistic 3D and 4D‌ multi-coil MRI setting, both‌​‌ for structural and functional​​​‌ imaging.

3.1.3 Reinforcement learning​ for active k-space sampling​‌

Expected breakthrough: New hardware​​ compliant under-sampling patterns in​​​‌ MRI k-space that accelerate​ anatomical and functional scans​‌ while optimizing MR image​​ quality.
Findings: Develop novel​​​‌ principles of active sampling​ in the reinforcement learning​‌ framework which optimizes a​​ sampling policy tightly linked​​​‌ to the reconstructed image​ quality.

Current under-sampling schemes​‌ in MRI allow for​​ shorter scan acquisition times,​​​‌ however at the cost​ of artifacts in various​‌ regions of the reconstructed​​ MR image. These artifacts​​​‌ arise due to uncertainties​ in some heavily under-sampled​‌ regions of the acquired​​ Fourier space (i.e. also​​​‌ called k-space). Modern reconstruction​ algorithms, with the use​‌ of strong priors, either​​ hand-crafted or learned, tend​​​‌ to reduce these uncertainties​ and behave as if​‌ the acquisition is fixed.​​

To go beyond the​​​‌ state of the art,​ we argue that there​‌ is a need to​​ jointly learn an algorithm​​​‌ that designs the optimal​ under-sampling pattern in k-space​‌ as well as the​​ reconstruction network.

As it​​​‌ can be summarized to​ learning a sequential decision​‌ algorithm, we will rely​​ on reinforcement learning (RL)​​​‌ to build up optimal​ k-space sampling patterns while​‌ enforcing physical constraints on​​ the MRI sequence, as​​​‌ originally proposed in 100​, 95, 140​‌.

The k-space acquisition​​ can be modeled by​​​‌ a sampling policy and​ the rewards for the​‌ joint network are based​​ on reconstructed image quality.​​​‌ Under this paradigm, after​ every fixed scan time,​‌ an instantaneous reconstruction can​​ be obtained and the​​​‌ Fourier space uncertainty maps​ analysed in depth. Based​‌ on this, the scan​​ can continue by actively​​​‌ sampling the k-space and​ enforcing denser samples in​‌ regions where uncertainty is​​ larger. In this way,​​​‌ the learned k-space trajectories​ may become more patient​‌ and organ specific. Further,​​ the trajectory can run​​​‌ and lead to instantaneous​ best results of reconstruction​‌ under a given variable​​ scan time budget. These​​​‌ aspects define one of​ the core directions we​‌ will investigate to produce​​ the next generation of​​​‌ state-of-the-art MR data sampling​ and image reconstruction algorithms.​‌ Recent contributions 185,​​ 166 only approach the​​​‌ problem in the Cartesian​ framework and hence perform​‌ 1D variable density sampling​​ along the phase encoding​​​‌ dimension. Given our expertise​ on non-Cartesian sampling in​‌ developing SPARKLING for both​​ for 2D and 3D​​​‌ MR imaging 140,​ 141, 98,​‌ we plan to extend​​ this framework to non-Cartesian​​​‌ acquisition setups while still​ remaining compatible with hardware​‌ constraints on the gradient​​ system. The access to​​​‌ various MRI scanners at​ CEA/NeuroSpin is necessary and​‌ an added advantage to​​ the success of the​​​‌ Mind team.

3.2 Heterogeneous​ Data & Knowledge Bases​‌

Participants:

B. Thirion, D.​​ Wassermann

Inferring the relationship​​​‌ between the physiological bases​ of the human brain​‌ and its cognitive functions​​ requires articulating different datasets​​​‌ in terms of their​ semantics and representation. Examples​‌ of these are spatio-temporal​​ brain images, tabular datasets,​​​‌ structured knowledge represented as​ ontologies, and probabilistic datasets.​‌ Developing a formalism that​​ can integrate all these​​ modalities requires constructing a​​​‌ framework able to represent‌ and efficiently perform computations‌​‌ on high-dimensional datasets as​​ well as to combine​​​‌ hybrid data representations in‌ deterministic and probabilistic settings.‌​‌ We will take on​​ two main angles to​​​‌ achieve this task: on‌ one hand, the automated‌​‌ inference of cross-dataset features,​​ or coordinated representations and​​​‌ on the other hand,‌ the use of probabilistic‌​‌ logic for knowledge representation​​ and inference. The probabilistic​​​‌ knowledge representation part is‌ now well advanced with‌​‌ the Neurolang project. It​​ is yet a long-term​​​‌ endeavor. The learning of‌ coordinated representations is less‌​‌ advanced.

3.2.1 Learning coordinated​​ representations

Expected breakthrough: Process​​​‌ semantic information together with‌ image data to bridge‌​‌ large-scale resources and knowledge​​ bases
Findings: Set up​​​‌ a learning model that‌ leverages heterogeneous data: Images,‌​‌ annotations, texts, and coordinate​​ tables.

Inference is the​​​‌ pathway that leads from‌ data to knowledge. One‌​‌ crucial aspect is that​​ in the context of​​​‌ neuroscience, data comes in‌ different forms: Full texts,‌​‌ images and tables. Annotations​​ may be full texts​​​‌ or simply tags associated‌ with observed images. One‌​‌ challenge is thus to​​ develop automated techniques that​​​‌ learn coordinated representations across‌ such heterogeneous data sources.‌​‌

This learning endeavor rests​​ on several key machine​​​‌ learning techniques: Compression, embeddings,‌ and multi-layer networks. Compression‌​‌ (sketching) consists in building​​ a reduced representation of​​​‌ some input that leads‌ from large sparse and‌​‌ complex representation to low-dimension​​ ones, while minimizing some​​​‌ distortion criterion. Embedding techniques‌ also create representations, but‌​‌ possibly bias them to​​ enhance some aspects of​​​‌ the data. It thus‌ incorporates prior information on‌​‌ data distribution or the​​ relevance of features. Finally,​​​‌ multi-layer networks create intermediate‌ representation of data that‌​‌ are suitable to achieve​​ a prediction goal. Such​​​‌ representations are rich enough‌ in particular in multi-task‌​‌ settings, where the outputs​​ of the network are​​​‌ multi-dimensional. Following 86,‌ we call such latent‌​‌ data models coordinated representations​​.

Deep learning is​​​‌ well suited to the‌ goal of learning intermediate‌​‌ representations. As an example,​​ we plan to develop​​​‌ a framework that coalesces‌ in one deep learning‌​‌ formulation, the task of​​ estimating brain structures, cognitive​​​‌ concepts, and their relationships.‌

Brain structures and cognitive‌​‌ concepts will appear as​​ intermediate representations responsible for​​​‌ linking brain activity to‌ observed behavior. However deep‌​‌ learning cannot be considered​​ as a standard means​​​‌ to understand coordinated representations,‌ due to the limited‌​‌ data available, their poor​​ signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and​​​‌ their heterogeneity. Deep learning‌ needs instead to be‌​‌ adapted by injecting our​​ expertise on statistical structure​​​‌ of the data (see‌ e.g. 128, 151‌​‌). Since the challenge​​ is to train such​​​‌ models on limited and‌ noisy data, we will‌​‌ extend our recent work​​ 84 that has developed​​​‌ regularization schemes for deep-learning‌ models: it relies on‌​‌ structured stochastic regularizations (a.k.a.​​ structured dropout). Such approaches​​​‌ are efficient, powerful and‌ can be used in‌​‌ wide settings. We will​​ enhance them with more​​​‌ generic, cross-layer, grouping schemes.‌ Additionally, we will develop‌​‌ two strategies: i) aggregation​​​‌ of predictors for variance​ reduction and stability of​‌ the model 128 and​​ ii) data augmentation –​​​‌ i.e. learning to augment,​ based on unlabeled data​‌ – to improve the​​ fit with limited data.​​​‌ For this we will​ consider plausible generative mechanisms.​‌

3.2.2 Probabilistic Knowledge Representation​​

Expected breakthrough: A domain-specific​​​‌ language (DSL) capable of​ articulating heterogeneous probabilistic data​‌ sources in neuroimaging is​​ a way to relate​​​‌ physiology to cognition.
Findings:​ Self-optimizing probabilistic solvers for​‌ discrete and continuous hierarchical​​ models able to scale​​​‌ for neuroimaging problems.

Neuroscientific​ data used to infer​‌ the relationships between physiology​​ of the human brain​​​‌ and its cognitive function​ goes well beyond text,​‌ image, and tables. Knowledge​​ graphs representing human knowledge,​​​‌ and the ability to​ encode reasoning strategies in​‌ neuroscience are also key​​ to effectively bridge current​​​‌ data-centric approaches and decades-old​ domain knowledge. A main​‌ challenge in performing inferences​​ combining demographic data-centric approaches,​​​‌ imaging measurements, and domain​ knowledge, is to be​‌ able to infer new​​ knowledge soundly and efficiently​​​‌ taking into account the​ noisy nature of demographic​‌ and imaging measurements, and​​ the common open-world assumption​​​‌ of ontologies and knowledge​ graphs. Such probabilistic hybrid​‌ logic approaches are known​​ to be, in general,​​​‌ intractable in the deterministic​ 82 as well as​‌ in the probabilistic case​​ 182. Nonetheless, there​​​‌ is an opportunity to​ be seized in identifying​‌ tractable segments of probabilistic​​ hybrid logic representations able​​​‌ to solve open neuroscientific​ questions.

A noticeable opportunity​‌ to incorporate all statistical​​ evidence gathered from noisy​​​‌ data into a usable​ knowledge base is to​‌ formalize the inferred relationships​​ into probabilistic symbolic representations​​​‌ 129. These representations​ are much better suited​‌ to simultaneously handle data​​ across topologies and logic​​​‌ systems, implementing inferential algorithms​ avoiding the brittleness of​‌ deterministic logic as well​​ as causal probabilistic reasoning.​​​‌

A typical application of​ such heterogeneous data processing​‌ is meta-analytic applications which​​ combine neuroimaging data with​​​‌ results found in the​ scientific literature. Current tools​‌ to perform this task​​ are NeuroSynth or Neuroquery​​​‌ (developed by the team).​ However, knowledge inferred by​‌ such tools is tremendously​​ limited by the expressive​​​‌ power of the language​ used to query the​‌ data. Current meta-analytic tools​​ are able to express​​​‌ queries relating test makers,​ article annotations, and their​‌ relationship with reported brain​​ activations, support propositional logic​​​‌ only. Propositional logic requires​ the user to explicitly​‌ express every desired term​​ with their characteristics and​​​‌ their relationships. Our goal​ is to extend the​‌ inference capabilities of such​​ applications by leveraging current​​​‌ advances in probabilistic logic​ languages and embedding them​‌ in the Neurolang language.​​ Neurolang enables the encoding​​​‌ of complex knowledge in​ terms of more expressive​‌ queries. Neurolang queries first-order​​ logic segment, FO¬​​​‌, with a​ tractable probabilistic extension allowing​‌ for high-dimensional and large​​ dataset computations. Such segment​​​‌ of first order logic​ enables formalising questions such​‌ as “what brain areas​​ are most likely reported​​​‌ active in a study​ specifically when terms related​‌ to consciousness are mentioned​​ in such study”, hence​​ being able to infer,​​​‌ amongst other tasks, specificity‌ and causality 183 of‌​‌ diverse neuroscience phenomena. To​​ disseminate our results allowing​​​‌ complex expressive searches of‌ massively aggregated diverse data,‌​‌ we will leverage Neurolang​​. The latter produces​​​‌ a domain-specific language (DSL)‌ for human neuroscience research,‌​‌ while being able to​​ combine imaging data, anatomical​​​‌ descriptions and ontologies. Three‌ main characteristics of the‌​‌ DSL are key to​​ fulfilling this goal: First,​​​‌ it represents neuroimaging-derived information‌ and spatial relationships in‌​‌ a syntax close to​​ natural language used by​​​‌ neuroscientists 184. Second,‌ through a back-end belonging‌​‌ to the Datalog±​​ family, it allows querying​​​‌ ontologies with the same‌ expressive power as current‌​‌ standards SPARQL and OWL​​ 88. Finally, we​​​‌ will extend Neurolang to‌ a probabilistic language able‌​‌ to express graphical models​​ allowing the implementation of​​​‌ a wide variety of‌ causal inference and machine‌​‌ learning algorithms 85 in​​ high-dimensional settings which are​​​‌ specific to neuroimaging research.‌ In sum, by leveraging‌​‌ recent advances in deductive​​ database systems 88 and​​​‌ this novel DSL 184‌ we will provide a‌​‌ more flexible tool to​​ express and infer knowledge​​​‌ on brain structure-function relationships.‌

3.3 Statistics and causal‌​‌ inference in high dimension​​

Participants:

A. Gramfort, T.​​​‌ Moreau, B. Thirion, D.‌ Wassermann

Statistics is the‌​‌ natural pathway from data​​ to knowledge. Using statistics​​​‌ on brain imaging data‌ involves dealing with high-dimensional‌​‌ data that can induce​​ intensive computation and low​​​‌ statistical power. Besides, statistical‌ models on large-scale data‌​‌ also need to take​​ potential confounding effects and​​​‌ heterogeneity into account. To‌ address these questions the‌​‌ Mind team will employ​​ causal modeling and post-selection​​​‌ inference. Conditional and post-hoc‌ inference are rather short-term‌​‌ perspectives, while the potential​​ of causal inference stands​​​‌ as a longer-term endeavor.‌

3.3.1 Conditional inference in‌​‌ high dimension

Expected breakthrough:​​ Obtain statistical guarantees on​​​‌ the parameters of very-high‌ dimensional generalized linear or‌​‌ non-parametric models.
Findings: Develop​​ computationally efficient procedures that​​​‌ allow inference for such‌ models, by leveraging structural‌​‌ priors on the solutions.​​

Conditional inference consists of​​​‌ assessing the importance of‌ a certain feature in‌​‌ a predictive model, while​​ taking into account the​​​‌ information carried by alternative‌ features. One motivation for‌​‌ using this inference scheme​​ is that brain regions​​​‌ that sustain behavior and‌ cognition are strongly interacting.‌​‌ Taking these interactions into​​ account is critical to​​​‌ avoid confusing correlation with‌ causation in brain/behavior analysis.‌​‌

Technical difficulties come when​​ the set of explanatory​​​‌ features 𝐗 becomes extremely‌ large as frequently met‌​‌ in neuroimaging: Conditioning on​​ many variables (or equivalently,​​​‌ high dimensional variables) is‌ computationally costly and statistically‌​‌ inefficient. The main solutions​​ to date are based​​​‌ either on linear model‌ debiasing 134, as‌​‌ well as simulation-based approaches​​ (knockoff inference 96 or​​​‌ conditional randomization tests 144‌). Importantly the latter‌​‌ involves simulating data with​​ statistical characteristics described explicitly​​​‌ (in a parametric family)‌ or implicitly (by samples).‌​‌ There remain two gaps​​ to bridge for these​​​‌ methods: i) The computational‌ gap, as the algorithmic‌​‌ complexity of these approaches​​​‌ is typically cubic in​ the number of samples,​‌ unless more efficient generative​​ mechanisms are available; ii)​​​‌ the power gap, related​ to the limited number​‌ of available samples. The​​ best solution thus far​​​‌ consists of associating these​ inference procedures with dimension​‌ reduction procedures 157.​​ The next step is​​​‌ adaptation to more general​ settings: Conditional inference has​‌ been formulated in the​​ linear framework, where it​​​‌ boils down to controlling​ that the corresponding coefficient​‌ is non-zero, hence it​​ has to be generalized​​​‌ to nonlinear models: Non-parametric​ models like random forests,​‌ then possibly deep networks.​​

3.3.2 Post-selection inference on​​​‌ image data

Expected breakthrough:​ Statistical control of false​‌ discovery proportion (FDP) for​​ data under arbitrary correlation​​​‌ structure.
Findings: A computationally​ efficient non-parametric statistical test​‌ procedure, and a benchmark​​ against alternative techniques.

Large-scale​​​‌ statistical testing is pervasive​ in many scientific fields,​‌ where high-dimensional datasets are​​ collected and compared with​​​‌ an outcome of interest.​ In such high-dimensional contexts,​‌ false discovery rate (FDR)​​ control 90 is attractive​​​‌ because it yields reasonable​ power, while providing an​‌ explicit and interpretable control​​ on false positives. Yet​​​‌ the FDR rate is​ the expectation of the​‌ FDP. Controlling the FDR​​ does not mean that​​​‌ the FDP is controlled,​ a distinction that is​‌ most often ignored by​​ practitioners. For the sake​​​‌ of scientific reproducibility, there​ is a need for​‌ methods controlling the FDP.​​

Such an approach has​​​‌ been developed in the​ context of neuroimaging, namely​‌ the all-resolution inference framework​​ 173 based on classical​​​‌ multiple correction error control​ bounds. Yet, the empirical​‌ behavior of this method​​ remains to be assessed.​​​‌ Moreover, it has been​ clearly established that the​‌ procedure is over-conservative in​​ some settings 93.​​​‌ Indeed, it relies on​ the Simes statistical bound,​‌ that is not adaptive​​ to the specific type​​​‌ of dependence for a​ particular data set. To​‌ bypass these limitations, 93​​ have proposed a randomization-based​​​‌ procedure known as λ​-calibration, which yields tighter​‌ mathematical bounds that are​​ adapted to the dependency​​​‌ observed in the dataset​ at hand. It rests​‌ on a non-parametric (permutation-based)​​ estimation of the null​​​‌ distribution, leading to tight​ and valid inference under​‌ general assumptions.

In this​​ research axis, we propose​​​‌ to fix some of​ the open issues with​‌ the approach described in​​ 93, namely the​​​‌ choice of a template​ family to calibrate the​‌ error distribution in the​​ permutation procedure. We hope​​​‌ to propose a practical​ choice for this family​‌ to avoid putting the​​ burden of choice on​​​‌ practitioners.

We will characterize​ by simulations and theoretical​‌ arguments the behavior of​​ these error control procedures​​​‌ and develop efficient computational​ methods for the use​‌ of these tools in​​ brain imaging analysis.

3.3.3​​​‌ Causal inference for population​ analysis

Expected breakthrough: Provide​‌ a reference methodology for​​ causal and mediation analysis​​​‌ in high-dimensional settings.
Findings:​ Benchmark state-of-the-art techniques and​‌ further adapt them to​​ the high-dimensional setting.

Modern​​​‌ health datasets present population​ characteristics with many variables​‌ and in multiple modalities.​​ They can ground prediction​​ and understanding of individual​​​‌ outcomes, using machine learning‌ techniques. Still, heterogeneous variables‌​‌ have complex relationships, making​​ it hard to tease​​​‌ apart each factor in‌ an outcome of interest.‌​‌ Potential outcome theory 175​​ provides a valuable framework​​​‌ to evaluate the impact‌ of treatment (interventions). Treatment‌​‌ effects can be heterogeneous.​​ In particular, interactions between​​​‌ background and treatment variables‌ have to be considered.‌​‌

The statistical behavior (consistency​​ and efficiency) under non-parametric​​​‌ models is actively investigated‌ 83, 159.‌​‌ However, their behavior in​​ high-dimensional settings, when both​​​‌ the number of features‌ and the number of‌​‌ samples are large, is​​ still poorly understood. Our​​​‌ objective is thus to‌ extend the theory and‌​‌ algorithms of causal inference​​ to noisy high-dimensional settings,​​​‌ where the noise level‌ implies that effects sizes‌​‌ are proportionally small, and​​ classic methods often become​​​‌ inefficient and potentially inaccurate‌ due to overfitting. More‌​‌ specifically, we plan to​​ explore the following directions.​​​‌

Mediation analysis and conditional‌ independence

Mediation analysis considers‌​‌ the question of whether​​ a variable z mediates​​​‌ all the effect of‌ another variable x onto‌​‌ a target variable y​​, a.k.a. outcome. It​​​‌ turns out that full-mediation‌ analysis amounts to testing‌​‌ whether xy​​|z (x​​​‌ is independent from y‌ given z), which‌​‌ is handled by a​​ conditional independence test. When​​​‌ the dimensions of these‌ variables (z in‌​‌ particular, but also x​​ and to some extent​​​‌ y) grow, the‌ underlying statistical inference procedures‌​‌ typically lose power, or​​ even possibly error control.​​​‌ We propose to leverage‌ our experience on such‌​‌ high-dimensional inference problems 105​​, 158 to set​​​‌ up computationally efficient and‌ accurate solutions to this‌​‌ problem.

Latent variable models​​ and confounders

The most​​​‌ important aspect of inferring‌ causal effects from observational‌​‌ data is the handling​​ of confounders, i.e., factors​​​‌ that affect both an‌ intervention and its outcome.‌​‌ For instance, age has​​ a clear impact on​​​‌ brain characteristics as well‌ as on behavior, potentially‌​‌ biasing brain/behavior statistical associations.​​ A carefully designed observational​​​‌ study attempts to measure‌ all important confounders. When‌​‌ one does not have​​ direct access to all​​​‌ confounders, there may exist‌ noisy and uncertain measurements‌​‌ of proxies for confounders.​​ A possible solution to​​​‌ this problem relies on‌ generative modeling, such as‌​‌ Variational Autencoders (VAE) and​​ Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs),​​​‌ to sample the unknown‌ latent space summarizing the‌​‌ confounders on datasets with​​ incomplete information; the seminal​​​‌ work of 146 is‌ promising, but still requires‌​‌ improvements to become usable​​ in realistic settings.

The​​​‌ quest of model selection‌ and validation

In the‌​‌ classical potential outcome theory​​ 175, causal effects​​​‌ are determined by both‌ factual and counterfactual outcomes,‌​‌ ground-truth effects can never​​ be measured in an​​​‌ observational study. In the‌ absence of such measures,‌​‌ how can we evaluate​​ the performance of causal​​​‌ inference methods? Addressing this‌ question is an important‌​‌ step for practical problems,​​ in which one has​​​‌ to determine if an‌ effect can safely be‌​‌ considered non-zero, or heterogeneous​​​‌ through a population. We​ propose to revisit the​‌ promising work of 81​​ analysing in detail the​​​‌ shortcomings of the procedure​ (regarding both bias and​‌ variance), especially when the​​ model becomes high-dimensional.

3.4​​​‌ Machine Learning on spatio-temporal​ signals

Participants:

P. Ciuciu,​‌ A. Gramfort, T. Moreau,​​ D. Wassermann, B.Thirion

The​​​‌ brain is a dynamic​ system. A core task​‌ in neuroscience is to​​ extract the temporal structures​​​‌ in the recorded signals​ as a means to​‌ linking them to cognitive​​ processes or to specific​​​‌ neurological conditions. This calls​ for machine learning methods​‌ that are designed to​​ handle multivariate signals, possibly​​​‌ mapped to some spatial​ coordinate system (e.g. like​‌ in fMRI).

3.4.1 Injecting​​ structural priors with Physics-informed​​​‌ data augmentation

Expected breakthrough:​ Obtain models with more​‌ predictive power when trained​​ on small datasets.
Findings:​​​‌ Efficient data-augmentation strategy tailored​ to brain signals.

Data​‌ augmentation consists of virtually​​ increasing dataset size during​​​‌ learning by applying random,​ yet plausible, transformations to​‌ the input data. In​​ computer vision, this means​​​‌ altering data by applying​ symmetries, rotations, geometric deformations​‌ etc. While such strategies​​ are reasonable for natural​​​‌ or medical images 164​, it is still​‌ unclear how neural or​​ BOLD signals can be​​​‌ augmented in order to​ improve prediction performance and​‌ robustness.

Some purely data​​ driven strategies have been​​​‌ proposed to augment EEG​ data using spectral transforms​‌ 145 or advanced strategies​​ such as channel, time​​​‌ or frequency masking or​ phase randomizations 139,​‌ 142. Although dozens​​ of transformations have been​​​‌ considered in the literature​ to augment EEG signals,​‌ it is now apparent​​ that different augmentation strategies​​​‌ should be applied to​ the data as a​‌ function of the prediction​​ task to be handled.​​​‌ For example when considering​ sleep stage classification or​‌ BCI applications, the spatial​​ sampling of electrodes and​​​‌ the duration of signals​ varies considerably, with the​‌ consequence being that different​​ augmentation parameters and even​​​‌ transformations need to be​ employed.

In this line​‌ of work we will​​ develop algorithms that can​​​‌ quickly identify the relevant​ augmentation techniques, building for​‌ example on 108,​​ 144. The aim​​​‌ is to provide a​ system that can automatically​‌ learn invariance within a​​ class and across subjects​​​‌ in order to maximize​ the prediction performance on​‌ unseen data. The methodology​​ developed will be relevant​​​‌ beyond neuroscience as long​ as a family of​‌ physics-informed transformations is available​​ for prediction tasks at​​​‌ hand.

3.4.2 Learning structural​ priors with self-supervised learning​‌

Expected breakthrough: Unveiling the​​ latent structure of brain​​​‌ signals from large datasets​ without human supervision as​‌ well as improving the​​ prediction performance when learning​​​‌ from limited data.
Findings:​ Self-supervised algorithms for multivariate​‌ brain signals.

Self-supervised learning​​ (SSL) is a recently​​​‌ developed area of research​ that provides a compelling​‌ approach for exploiting large​​ unlabeled datasets. With SSL,​​​‌ the structure of the​ data is used to​‌ turn an unsupervised learning​​ problem into a supervised​​​‌ one, called a “pretext​ task”, such as solving​‌ Jigsaw puzzles from images​​ 161 or learning how​​ to color gray-scaled images.​​​‌ The representation learned on‌ the pretext task can‌​‌ then be reused for​​ unsupervised data exploration or​​​‌ on a supervised downstream‌ task, with the potential‌​‌ to greatly reduce the​​ number of labeled examples​​​‌ required to train a‌ good predictive model.

In‌​‌ fields like computer vision​​ 161, 153 and​​​‌ time series processing 162‌, SSL has shown‌​‌ great promise in terms​​ of prediction performance but​​​‌ also in ease of‌ use. Indeed, SSL simplifies‌​‌ model selection and evaluation​​ as it relies on​​​‌ prediction scores and cross-validation,‌ contrarily to unsupervised learning‌​‌ methods like ICA 78​​.

Recently the team​​​‌ has applied SSL to‌ two large cohorts of‌​‌ clinical EEG data 87​​ revealing insights on the​​​‌ data without any human‌ supervision. However many challenges‌​‌ remain. For example in​​ Mind, we aim​​​‌ to explore novel SSL‌ strategies applicable to electrophysiology‌​‌ as well as to​​ haemodynamic signals measured with​​​‌ fMRI. As such, our‌ goal is to expand‌​‌ the recent multivariate method​​ we have introduced in​​​‌ the field for the‌ blind deconvolution of BOLD‌​‌ signals in both task-related​​ and resting-state experiments 103​​​‌.

While rather small‌ networks have been employed‌​‌ so far on EEG​​ data 99, 174​​​‌ due to limited sets‌ of annotations, the use‌​‌ of SSL tasks opens​​ the possibility to work​​​‌ with much larger labeled‌ datasets, and therefore many‌​‌ more overparametrized models. We​​ aim to explore these​​​‌ directions, hoping to reach‌ a state where pre-trained‌​‌ models could be available​​ for EEG or MEG​​​‌ signals as is presently‌ the case for images‌​‌ or for natural language​​ processing (NLP) tasks.

3.4.3​​​‌ Revealing spatio-temporal structures with‌ convolutional sparse coding and‌​‌ driven point processes

Expected​​ breakthrough: A novel way​​​‌ to study and quantify‌ temporal dependencies between neural‌​‌ processes, going beyond connectomes​​ based on spectral analysis.​​​‌
Findings: Temporal pattern finding‌ algorithms that scale to‌​‌ massive MEG/EEG datasets with​​ parallel processing and point-process​​​‌ inference algorithms.

The convolutional‌ sparse linear model is‌​‌ one established unsupervised learning​​ framework designed for signals.​​​‌ Using algorithms known as‌ convolutional sparse coding (CSC),‌​‌ this framework allows for​​ the learning of shift-invariant​​​‌ patterns to sparsely reconstruct‌ a time series. These‌​‌ patterns, also called atoms,​​ correspond to recurrent structures​​​‌ present in the data.‌ While some of our‌​‌ recent advances have improved​​ the computational tractability of​​​‌ these methods 155,‌ 154 and adapted them‌​‌ to neurophysiological data 133​​, 117, 103​​​‌, there are still‌ many shortcomings that make‌​‌ them unpractical for applications​​ beyond denoising.

Model validation​​​‌

The main challenge for‌ the evaluation of unsupervised‌​‌ convolutional models comes from​​ current theoretical limitations: What​​​‌ can we guarantee statistically‌ concerning the recovered atoms?‌​‌ Due to their non-convexity,​​ existing algorithms can only​​​‌ guarantee convergence to local‌ minima, which might be‌​‌ sub-optimal. In this setting,​​ it is challenging to​​​‌ quantify if the model‌ parameters are well estimated‌​‌ and if they are​​ actually representative of the​​​‌ signals. In Mind,‌ we aim to develop‌​‌ statistical quantification of the​​​‌ uncertainty associated with such​ models and in this​‌ regard, provide objective selection​​ criteria for the model​​​‌ and its parameters. This​ topic of research will​‌ benefit from our other​​ developments on bi-level optimization​​​‌ (cf. ssub:bilevel) and on​ FDR control (cf. ssub:postselection)​‌ as well as the​​ expertise of the team​​​‌ members on dictionary learning​ 155, 152,​‌ 154.

Capturing temporal​​ dependencies with point processes​​​‌

Another shortcoming of these​ models is that they​‌ do not capture temporal​​ dependencies between the occurrences​​​‌ of the different atoms.​ However, neural activity at​‌ level of the whole​​ brain is highly distributed.​​​‌ Different brain regions form​ networks that are characterized​‌ by the presence of​​ statistical dependencies in their​​​‌ activity 163. An​ interesting question to formulate​‌ is how one can​​ model and learn these​​​‌ time dependencies between brain​ areas from the MEG​‌ or EEG recordings using​​ an unsupervised event-based approach​​​‌ such as CSC. One​ of the approaches considered​‌ is based on point​​ processes (PP; 94,​​​‌ 127). PP are​ classical tools to study​‌ event trains (e.g. sequence​​ of spikes) and to​​​‌ model their dependency structure.​ We aim here to​‌ develop PP-based inference algorithms​​ as a means to​​​‌ capture network effects in​ different brain areas, but​‌ also to quantify how​​ experimental stimuli are affecting​​​‌ the temporal statistics of​ temporal patterns 163.​‌ To model this latter​​ scenario, we will develop​​​‌ the so-called driven PP.​ In a second stage,​‌ we aim to design​​ fully unsupervised methods to​​​‌ capture the connections between​ different brain areas leveraging​‌ the full temporal resolution​​ of non-invasive electrophysiological signals.​​​‌

4 Application domains

The​ four research axes we​‌ presented earlier have been​​ thought of in tight​​​‌ interaction with four main​ applications (large-scale predictive modeling,​‌ mapping cognition & brain​​ networks, modeling clinical endpoints,​​​‌ from brain images and​ bio-signals to quantitative biology​‌ and physics).

4.1 Population​​ modeling, large-scale predictive modeling​​​‌

4.1.1 Unveiling Cognition Through​ Population Modeling

Linking the​‌ human brain's structure and​​ function with cognitive abilities​​​‌ has been a research​ epicenter for the past​‌ 40 years. The sophistication​​ of brain mapping machinery​​​‌ such as MRI, EEG​ and MEG, has produced​‌ a treasure trove of​​ data. Nonetheless, the effect​​​‌ size of the phenomena​ leading to understanding cognition​‌ is often drowned out​​ by noise and inter-individual​​​‌ variability. A main goal​ of Mind is to​‌ simultaneously harness the power​​ of large-scale general purpose​​​‌ datasets, such as the​ Human Connectome Project (HCP)​‌ and the Adolescent Brain​​ Cognitive Development Study (ABCD),​​​‌ as well as small​ scale high precision ones,​‌ such as the Individual​​ Brain Charting (IBC) dataset​​​‌ 168, to understand​ the link between the​‌ human brain's architecture and​​ function, and cognition. Parietal​​​‌'s expertise has already​ been demonstrated in this​‌ field. Examples of this​​ include using diffusion MRI​​​‌ (dMRI) to link the​ brain's macrostructure with language​‌ comprehension 101, tissue​​ microstructure with cognitive control​​​‌ 150, functional gradients​ on the cortical surface​‌ 115 to functional territory​​ segregation 167.

Mind​​ project will continue this​​​‌ task by seizing our‌ core methodological developments, described‌​‌ in the previous section,​​ and our global collaborative​​​‌ network of cognitive scientists.‌

4.1.2 Imaging for health‌​‌ in the general population​​

Individual differences in brain​​​‌ function and cognition have‌ historically been investigated by‌​‌ studies carried out by​​ individual laboratories having access​​​‌ mainly to small sample‌ sizes. The growing availability‌​‌ of public large-scale data​​ of epidemiological dimensions curated​​​‌ by dedicated consortia (e.g.‌ UK Biobank) has enabled‌​‌ studying the relationship between​​ cognition and the brain​​​‌ with unparalleled granularity and‌ statistical power. These resources‌​‌ now allow researchers to​​ relate brain signals/images to​​​‌ rich descriptions of the‌ participants including behavioral and‌​‌ clinical assessments in addition​​ to social and lifestyle​​​‌ factors. Machine learning has‌ proven essential when modeling‌​‌ biomedical outcomes from the​​ large-scale and high-dimensional data​​​‌ brought by consortia and‌ biobanks. It is used‌​‌ to to build predictive​​ models of heterogenous biomedial​​​‌ outcomes (cognitive, social, clinical)‌ based on different neuroscientific‌​‌ modalities. Taken together, this​​ facilitates the study of​​​‌ lifestyle and health-related behavior‌ in the general population,‌​‌ potentially revealing risk factors​​ leading to biomarker discovery.​​​‌

Mind will greatly contribute‌ to this effort by‌​‌ focusing on population modeling​​ as a tool for​​​‌ enhancing the analysis of‌ clinical data and mental‌​‌ health.

4.1.3 Proxy measures​​ of brain health

Clinical​​​‌ datasets tend to be‌ small as sharing of‌​‌ data is not incentivized​​ or institutional and economic​​​‌ resources are missing. As‌ a consequence, the capacity‌​‌ of machine learning to​​ learn functions that relate​​​‌ complex-to-grasp biomedical outcomes to‌ heterogeneous data cannot be‌​‌ fully exploited. This has​​ stimulated growing interest in​​​‌ proxy measures of neurological‌ conditions derived from the‌​‌ general population, such as​​ individual biological aging. One​​​‌ counter-intuitive aspect of the‌ methodology is that measures‌​‌ of biological aging (e.g.​​ via brain imaging) can​​​‌ be obtained by focusing‌ on the age of‌​‌ a person, which is​​ known in advance and​​​‌ is, in itself not‌ interesting as a target.‌​‌ However, by predicting the​​ age, machine-learning can capture​​​‌ the relevant information about‌ aging. Based on a‌​‌ population of brain images,​​ it extracts the best​​​‌ guess for the age‌ of a person, indirectly‌​‌ positioning that person within​​ the population. Individual-specific prediction​​​‌ errors therefore reflect deviations‌ from what is statistically‌​‌ expected 181. The​​ brain of a person​​​‌ can look similar to‌ brains commonly seen in‌​‌ older (or younger) people.​​ The resulting brain-predicted age​​​‌ reflects physical and cognitive‌ impairment in adults 180‌​‌, 106, 116​​ and reveals neurodegenerative processes​​​‌ 143, 124,‌ which could be overlooked‌​‌ without using machine learning.​​

Mind will extend this​​​‌ line of research in‌ two directions: 1) Assessment‌​‌ of brain age using​​ EEG and non-brain data​​​‌ such as health-records and‌ 2) proxy measures of‌​‌ mental health beyond aging.​​

4.1.4 Studying brain age​​​‌ using electrophysiology

MRI is‌ not yet available in‌​‌ all clinical situations and​​ certain aspects of brain​​​‌ function are better understood‌ using electrophysiological modalities (M/EEG).‌​‌ Until recently, it was​​​‌ unclear if brain age​ can be meaningfully estimated​‌ from M/EEG. In a​​ recent study 121,​​​‌ we demonstrated, using the​ Cam-CAN cohort (n​‌=650), that​​ combining MRI and MEG​​​‌ enhanced detection of cognitive​ dysfunction. The proposed approach​‌ not only achieved integration​​ of brain signals from​​​‌ distinct modalities but explicitly​ handled the absence of​‌ MEG or MRI recordings,​​ adapting ideas from 136​​​‌. This is key​ for clinical translation where​‌ one cannot afford excluding​​ cases because one modality​​​‌ is missing. In the​ clinical setting, EEG is​‌ predominantly used (and not​​ MEG). Clinical recordings are​​​‌ far noisier than lab​ EEG and gold-standard source​‌ modeling with MRI is​​ rarely done outside the​​​‌ lab. Supported by theoretical​ analysis and simulations, we​‌ found through empirical benchmarks​​ 176 that Riemannian embeddings​​​‌ 1) capture individual head​ geometry 2) bring robustness​‌ to extreme noise and,​​ 3) enable good age​​​‌ prediction from clinical 20-channel​ EEG (n=1300) with performance​‌ close to 306-channel lab​​ MEG.

Mind will extend​​​‌ this line of research​ by translating EEG-based brain​‌ age measures into the​​ hospital setting and probe​​​‌ these in different patient​ populations in which ageing-related​‌ differences in brain structure​​ and function are part​​​‌ of the clinical picture,​ e.g., neurodevelopmental disorders, postoperative​‌ cognitive decline and dementia​​ (cf. MIND:subsec:MCE).

4.1.5 Proxy​​​‌ measures of mental health​ beyond brain aging

Quantitative​‌ measures of mental health​​ remain challenging despite substantial​​​‌ research efforts 137.​ Mental health, can only​‌ be probed indirectly through​​ psychological constructs, e.g. intelligence​​​‌ or anxiety gauged by​ valid and statistically relevant​‌ questionnaires or structured examinations​​ by a specialist. In​​​‌ practice, full neuropsychological evaluation​ is not an automated​‌ process but relies on​​ expert judgment to confront​​​‌ multiple responses and interpret​ them in the context​‌ of a larger environmental​​ context including the cultural​​​‌ background of the participant.​ Inspired by brain age,​‌ we set out to​​ build empirical measures of​​​‌ mental health 109 by​ predicting traditional and broadly​‌ used psychological constructs such​​ as fluid intelligence or​​​‌ neuroticism in the UK​ Biobank. Our results have​‌ shown that all proxies​​ captured the target constructs​​​‌ and were more useful​ than the original measures​‌ for characterizing real-world health​​ behavior (sleep, exercise, tobacco,​​​‌ alcohol consumption). In the​ long run, we anticipate​‌ that using proxies could​​ complement psychometric assessments by​​​‌ corroborating data and potentially​ providing more accurate data​‌ faster and more efficiently​​ for clinical populations.

Mind​​​‌ will expand this line​ of research by systematically​‌ searching for proxy measures​​ of physical and mental​​​‌ health derived from large​ clinical population using electronic​‌ health records or transcripts​​ from clinical interviews. We​​​‌ will propose a systematic​ causal analysis (treatment effect​‌ size and mediation) to​​ provide a clearer understanding​​​‌ of the relationships between​ the many variables that​‌ characterize mental health. We​​ will study more in​​​‌ detail the impact of​ general health markers on​‌ brain status, as this​​ may well fit much​​​‌ of the unexplained variance​ on brain health.

4.2​‌ Mapping cognition & brain​​ networks

4.2.1 Problem statement​​

Cognitive science and psychiatry​​​‌ aim at describing mental‌ operations: cognition, emotion, perception‌​‌ and their dysfunction. As​​ an investigation device, they​​​‌ use functional brain imaging,‌ that provides a unique‌​‌ window to bridge these​​ mental concepts to the​​​‌ brain, neural firing and‌ wiring. Yet aggregating results‌​‌ from experiments probing brain​​ activity into a consistent​​​‌ description faces the roadblock‌ that cognitive concepts and‌​‌ brain pathologies are ill-defined​​. Separation between them​​​‌ is often blurry. In‌ addition, these concepts (a.k.a.‌​‌ psychological constructs) may​​ not correspond to actual​​​‌ brain structures or systems.‌ To tackle this challenge,‌​‌ we propose to leverage​​ rapidly increasing data sources:​​​‌ text and brain locations‌ described in neuroscientific publications,‌​‌ brain images and their​​ annotations taken from public​​​‌ data repositories, and several‌ reference datasets.

4.2.2 What‌​‌ machine learning can do​​ for neuroscience

Recent works​​​‌ in computer vision 113‌ or natural language processing‌​‌ 107, 114 have​​ tackled predictions on a​​​‌ large number of classes,‌ getting closer to open-ended‌​‌ knowledge. These approaches, that​​ rely on uncovering some​​​‌ form of relational structure‌ across these classes, in‌​‌ effect capture the semantics​​ of the domain 107​​​‌, including the similarity‌ structure of the relevant‌​‌ classes and the ambiguities​​ across classes or the​​​‌ multiple aspects of a‌ class. Broadly speaking, these‌​‌ contributions converge to the​​ concept of representation learning​​​‌ 89, i.e. estimating‌ latent factors that reformulate‌​‌ a learning problem into​​ a new set of​​​‌ input features or output‌ classes that are more‌​‌ natural for the data​​ and help further analysis.​​​‌ These new tools enable‌ extraction of knowledge, for‌​‌ instance ontology induction, with​​ statistical learning 160.​​​‌ They are at the‌ root of heterogeneous data‌​‌ integration, such as multi-modal​​ machine learning 86.​​​‌ The machine learning challenges‌ that we aim to‌​‌ tackle are three-fold:

  • Existing​​ multi-modal machine learning techniques​​​‌ have been developed for‌ relatively abundant data, with‌​‌ overall high SNR: text,​​ natural images, videos, sound.​​​‌ These data are most‌ often non-ambiguous, while brain‌​‌ data typically are, due​​ to the low SNR​​​‌ per image and, more‌ crucially, poor annotation quality‌​‌. We propose to​​ tackle this by adapting​​​‌ machine learning solutions to‌ this low-SNR regime: introduction‌​‌ of priors, aggressive dimension​​ reduction, aggregation approaches and​​​‌ data augmentation to reduce‌ overfitting.
  • Leveraging implicit supervisory‌​‌ signals: While data​​ sources contain lots of​​​‌ implicit information that could‌ be used as targets‌​‌ in supervised learning, there​​ is most often no​​​‌ obvious way to extract‌ it. We propose to‌​‌ tackle this by using​​ additional, ill- or not-annotated​​​‌ data, relying on self-supervision‌ methods.
  • Model interpretability‌​‌: Our goal is​​ to provide clear assertions​​​‌ on the relationships between‌ brain structures and cognition:‌​‌ the inference should always​​ lead to an updated​​​‌ knowledge base, i.e. updated‌ relationships between concepts pertaining‌​‌ to neuroscience on one​​ hand, psychology on the​​​‌ other hand. Specifically, one‌ should be able to‌​‌ reason about the information​​ extracted within Mind.​​​‌ For this, we will‌ develop dedicated statistical, causal‌​‌ and formal (ontology-based) data​​​‌ analysis schemes.

Associating knowledge​ engineering with statistical learning​‌ to boost cognitive neuroimaging,​​ requires tackling the challenge​​​‌ of multimodal machine learning​ under noisy conditions with​‌ limited data. Doing so,​​ it will capture links​​​‌ between behavior and brain​ activity, and enable aggregating​‌ the information carried by​​ neuroimaging data to redefine​​​‌ and link concepts in​ psychology and psychiatry.

4.2.3​‌ Perspective taken: combine distributional​​ semantics with brain images​​​‌

In natural language processing​ (NLP), distributional semantics capture​‌ meanings of words using​​ similarities in the way​​​‌ they appear in their​ environment. We want to​‌ adapt these ideas to​​ learn data-driven organizations of​​​‌ psychological concepts. Importantly, applying​ these techniques solely to​‌ the psychology literature merely​​ captures the current status​​​‌ quo of the field.​ Including brain images is​‌ necessary to bring new​​ information.

To link observed​​​‌ cognition to brain activity,​ two typical statistical learning​‌ problems arise: encoding,​​ that seeks to describe​​​‌ brain activity from behavior;​ and decoding, that​‌ seeks the converse, predicting​​ behavior from brain activity​​​‌ 138. In addition,​ statistical modeling of each​‌ aspect of the data​​ on its own generates​​​‌ knowledge, typically spatial decompositions​ from resting-state data, and​‌ topic modeling on descriptions​​ of behavior. The research​​​‌ strategy followed in this​ proposal is to combine​‌ the different statistical learning​​ problems in a unified​​​‌ framework to extract core​ structures from the aggregation​‌ of neuroimaging data: on​​ one side brain structures,​​​‌ and on the other​ side semantic relationships and​‌ concepts in psychological sciences.​​

Mind will in particular​​​‌ publish automated functional meta-analyses​ to give a systematic​‌ assessment of the publicly​​ available data and question​​​‌ the limitations of the​ current conceptual framework of​‌ systems neuroscience as well​​ as of these resources.​​​‌

4.3 Modeling clinical endpoints​

When sufficient data is​‌ available, machine learning can​​ be employed to directly​​​‌ model various clinical endpoints​ (such as diagnosis, drug​‌ response, and neuropsychological scores)​​ from brain signals without​​​‌ the need for proxy​ measures. This approach has​‌ the potential to significantly​​ and meaningfully simplify statistical​​​‌ modeling in clinical research.​ Machine learning facilitates combining​‌ heterogeneous input data (different​​ modalities) and does not​​​‌ need high confidence in​ underlying generative models linking​‌ the data to the​​ clinical endpoint. As a​​​‌ consequence, the same class​ of models can be​‌ applied regardless of the​​ endpoint. Its focus is​​​‌ on bounding the approximation​ error of the endpoint​‌ instead of correct parameter​​ estimates. As such, it​​​‌ provides generalizing models that​ are more robust. Our​‌ team has pushed this​​ type of research program​​​‌ through several important collaborations​ with our European clinical​‌ partners using EEG and​​ MRI.

4.3.1 MRI-based modeling​​​‌ of clinical endpoints

Image​ based biomarkers can be​‌ objectively measured and are​​ a sign of normal​​​‌ or abnormal processes, of​ a condition or disease.​‌ Incorporating new potential imaging​​ biomarkers requires several steps,​​​‌ often in parallel and​ complementary to each other,​‌ to be undertaken for​​ translation into clinical practice.​​​‌ These can be divided​ into the following phases​‌ after identification: Development and​​ evaluation, validation, implementation, qualification,​​ and utilization. Our team​​​‌ aims to cross two‌ main translational gaps, that‌​‌ is, the translation from​​ patients first and then​​​‌ to practice. Our aim‌ through our current and‌​‌ active projects is to​​ ensure that potential biomarkers,​​​‌ like the clear delineation‌ of subterritories of the‌​‌ subthalamic nucleus (STN) in​​ pharmaco-resistant Parkinson's disease (PD)​​​‌ patients (i.e.candidates for implantation‌ of a deep brain‌​‌ stimulator) are `fit for​​ purpose' and associated with​​​‌ the clinical endpoint of‌ interest with the overarching‌​‌ goal being to demonstrated​​ efficacy and health impact.​​​‌ This process is key‌ to the translation into‌​‌ clinical practice and widespread​​ utilization.

Through the ANR​​​‌ VLFMRI grant we aim‌ to derive new MR‌​‌ imaging-based biomarkers related to​​ prematurity and abnormal neurodevelopment​​​‌ of hospitalized neonates at‌ low magnetic field (20‌​‌ mTesla). In this setup,​​ the objective is to​​​‌ perform an almost continuous‌ monitoring to detect early‌​‌ signs of adverse events​​ including ischemic stroke or​​​‌ encephalopathy (collaboration with Prof.‌ V. Biran, APHP Robert‌​‌ Debré Hospital). An additional​​ collaboration is already underway​​​‌ with the AP-HP Henri‌ Mondor Hospital (neuroradiologist Dr‌​‌ B. Bapst, doing part​​ of her PhD at​​​‌ NeuroSpin), to achieve high-resolution‌ susceptibility weighted imaging (600‌​‌ µisotropic) in a scan​​ time of 2m30s for​​​‌ an accurate delineation of‌ the STN in PD‌​‌ patients prior to surgical​​ planning. A database of​​​‌ 123 patients has already‌ been collected using both‌​‌ the standard SWI imaging​​ protocol and ours based​​​‌ on the SPARKLING technology.‌ This annotated database will‌​‌ be key to compare​​ the diagnosis power of​​​‌ our solution with that‌ of the current care,‌​‌ analyse to what extent​​ a higher image resolution​​​‌ is instrumental in providing‌ a more accurate clinical‌​‌ diagnostic, and finally make​​ our protocol more widely​​​‌ accepted in the clinical‌ practice.

Our key contribution‌​‌ in these projects is​​ to translate to the​​​‌ clinical realm both the‌ SPARKLING technology on the‌​‌ acquisition side 141,​​ 98 as well as​​​‌ our PySAP software 122‌ for MR image reconstruction.‌​‌ In this regard, the​​ recently accepted CEA postdoc​​​‌ funding should help us‌ move the technology to‌​‌ clinical 7T MR Systems​​ (Magnetom Terra Siemens-Healthineers) in​​​‌ the University hospital of‌ Poitiers through a nascent‌​‌ collaboration with Prof. Rémy​​ Guillevin. Their interest is​​​‌ to use the high-resolution‌ SPARKLING SWI protocol at‌​‌ 7T to better delineate​​ the anomalies along the​​​‌ central vein for the‌ diagnostic of multiple sclerosis‌​‌ as the number of​​ anomalies predicts the grade/severity​​​‌ of this inflammatory pathology.‌ On a longer perspective,‌​‌ we aim to generalize​​ the use of our​​​‌ recently DL networks for‌ MR image reconstruction 171‌​‌, 169 to multiple​​ acquisition setups and other​​​‌ downstream tasks (e.g. motion‌ correction and correction of‌​‌ off-resonance artifacts related to​​ B0 inhomogeneities).

4.4​​​‌ From brain images and‌ bio-signals to quantitative biology‌​‌ and physics

Thanks to​​ the developments in MIND:subsec:MLIP​​​‌ and MIND:subsec:MLSTP we aim‌ to approximate more accurately‌​‌ the biophysical models underlying​​ MRI and electrophysiological signals.​​​‌ By estimating quantities grounded‌ in the physics of‌​‌ the data (time, spatial​​​‌ localization, tissue properties) we​ ambition to offer more​‌ actionable outputs for cognitive,​​ clinical and pharmacological applications.​​​‌

Technologies like 4D SPARKLING​ should in the future​‌ allow us to carry​​ out both fast high​​​‌ resolution multi-parametric quantitative imaging​ (e.g. T1, T2 and​‌ proton density mapping) and​​ laminar (i.e. layer-based) functional​​​‌ imaging in BOLD-fMRI. First,​ in the mqMRI and​‌ fMRI setting, the fourth​​ dimension is respectively the​​​‌ weighting contrast and time​ axis. mqMRI imaging enables​‌ a precise quantification of​​ biomarkers such as iron​​​‌ stores in the pathological​ brain. Measuring these parameters​‌ intra-cortically in Parkinsonian patients​​ defines one of the​​​‌ key challenges in the​ coming years, especially at​‌ 7 Tesla, to earlier​​ stratify the PD patients​​​‌ and the evolution of​ their disease. Second, a​‌ particular attention will be​​ paid to the impact​​​‌ of the developments performed​ in MIND:subsec:MLIP on the​‌ statistical sensitivity of brain​​ activity detection, which eventually​​​‌ defines the final validation​ metric of the data​‌ acquisition/image reconstruction pipeline. For​​ this purpose, robust experimental​​​‌ activation protocols such as​ retinotopic mapping will be​‌ used for validation on​​ the 7T scanner and​​​‌ eventually on the 11.7T​ Iseult MR system. The​‌ finest target resolution is​​ 500 μm isotropic​​​‌ in 3D.

Novel development​ on bi-level optimization for​‌ hyper-parameter selection from ssub:bilevel​​ will bring state-of-the-art inverse​​​‌ methods to end users​ currently facing the difficulty​‌ of performing model selection​​ on empirical data efficiently.​​​‌ This will lead to​ more accurate quantitative assessments,​‌ in sub-millimeters and milliseconds,​​ of where neural activity​​​‌ occurs.

The line of​ work on inverse problems​‌ should also impact how​​ non-invasive neuroimaging and electrophysiology,​​​‌ based on MRI, EEG​ and MEG, is considered​‌ by more traditional neurophysiologists​​ working with animal data.​​​‌ By considering biophysical models​ of the data and​‌ aiming to estimate their​​ parameters from empirical recordings​​​‌ our hope is to​ present estimates of physical​‌ quantities (tissue properties, neural​​ interactions strengths, etc.). The​​​‌ line of work based​ on stochastic simulation based​‌ inference (SBI) can revolutionize​​ the way MEG, EEG​​​‌ and MRI data are​ apprehended. For this line​‌ of work we will​​ explore the inversion of​​​‌ the models as offered​ by major software such​‌ as The Virtal Brain​​ (TVB) 177 or the​​​‌ Human Neocortical Neurosolver (HNN)​ 156. A student​‌ from the group of​​ Prof. S. Jones at​​​‌ the origin of the​ HNN software visited the​‌ team in 2022.

5​​ Social and environmental responsibility​​​‌

The MIND team has​ not yet implemented specific​‌ guidelines for measuring carbon​​ emission related to its​​​‌ research activities. Team members​ maximize the use of​‌ train for travelling across​​ Europe and try to​​​‌ minimize the number of​ oversea flights per individual.​‌ The team also has​​ a preference for lightweight​​​‌ computation when possible.

6​ Latest software developments, platforms,​‌ open data

6.1 Latest​​ software developments

6.1.1 MNE​​​‌

  • Name:
    MNE-Python
  • Keywords:
    Neurosciences,​ EEG, MEG, Signal processing,​‌ Machine learning
  • Functional Description:​​
    Open-source Python software for​​​‌ exploring, visualizing, and analyzing​ human neurophysiological data: MEG,​‌ EEG, sEEG, ECoG, and​​ more.
  • Release Contributions:
    https://mne.tools/stable/whats_new.html​​
  • URL:
  • Contact:
    Alexandre​​​‌ Gramfort
  • Partners:
    HARVARD Medical‌ School, New York University,‌​‌ University of Washington, CEA,​​ Aalto university, Telecom Paris,​​​‌ Boston University, UC Berkeley,‌ Macquarie University, University of‌​‌ Oregon, Aarhus University

6.1.2​​ NeuroLang

  • Name:
    NeuroLang
  • Keywords:​​​‌
    Neurosciences, Probabilistic Programming, Logic‌ programming
  • Functional Description:
    NeuroLang‌​‌ is a probabilistic logic​​ programming system specialised in​​​‌ the analysis of neuroimaging‌ data, but not exclusively‌​‌ determined by it.
  • Release​​ Contributions:
    https://neurolang.github.io/
  • URL:
  • Contact:
    Demian Wassermann

6.1.3‌ Nilearn

  • Name:
    NeuroImaging with‌​‌ scikit learn
  • Keywords:
    Health,​​ Neuroimaging, Medical imaging
  • Functional​​​‌ Description:
    NiLearn is the‌ neuroimaging library that adapts‌​‌ the concepts and tools​​ of scikit-learn to neuroimaging​​​‌ problems. As a pure‌ Python library, it depends‌​‌ on scikit-learn and nibabel,​​ the main Python library​​​‌ for neuroimaging I/O. It‌ is an open-source project,‌​‌ available under BSD license.​​ The two key components​​​‌ of NiLearn are i)‌ the analysis of functional‌​‌ connectivity (spatial decompositions and​​ covariance learning) and ii)​​​‌ the most common tools‌ for multivariate pattern analysis.‌​‌ A great deal of​​ efforts has been put​​​‌ on the efficiency of‌ the procedures both in‌​‌ terms of memory cost​​ and computation time.
  • Release​​​‌ Contributions:

    HIGHLIGHTS - Updated‌ docs with a new‌​‌ theme using furo. -​​ permuted_ols and non_parametric_inference now​​​‌ support TFCE statistic. -‌ permuted_ols and non_parametric_inference now‌​‌ support cluster-level Family-wise error​​ correction. - save_glm_to_bids has​​​‌ been added, which writes‌ model outputs to disk‌​‌ according to BIDS convention.​​

    NEW - save_glm_to_bids has​​​‌ been added, which writes‌ model outputs to disk‌​‌ according to BIDS convention.​​ - permuted_ols and non_parametric_inference​​​‌ now support TFCE statistic.‌ - permuted_ols and non_parametric_inference‌​‌ now support cluster-level Family-wise​​ error correction. - Updated​​​‌ docs with a new‌ theme using furo.

    See‌​‌ all details in https://nilearn.github.io/stable/changes/whats_new.html​​

  • URL:
  • Contact:
    Bertrand​​​‌ Thirion
  • Participants:
    Pierre-Louis Barbarant,‌ Remi Gau, Himanshu Aggarwal,‌​‌ Bertrand Thirion, Gael Varoquaux​​

6.1.4 Benchopt

  • Keywords:
    Benchmarking,​​​‌ Machine learning, Optimization
  • Functional‌ Description:

    BenchOpt is a‌​‌ package to simplify, make​​ more transparent and more​​​‌ reproducible the comparisons of‌ optimization algorithms. It is‌​‌ written in Python but​​ it is available with​​​‌ many programming languages. So‌ far it has been‌​‌ tested with Python, R,​​ Julia and compiled binaries​​​‌ written in C/C++ available‌ via a terminal command.‌​‌ If it can be​​ installed via conda, it​​​‌ should just work!

    BenchOpt‌ is used through a‌​‌ simple command line and​​ ultimately running and replicating​​​‌ an optimization benchmark should‌ be as easy a‌​‌ cloning a repo and​​ launching the computation with​​​‌ a single command line.‌ For now, BenchOpt features‌​‌ benchmarks for around 10​​ convex optimization problems and​​​‌ we are working on‌ expanding this to feature‌​‌ more complex optimization problems.​​ We are also developing​​​‌ a website to display‌ the benchmark results easily.‌​‌

  • Release Contributions:
    https://github.com/benchopt/benchopt/releases/tag/1.8.0
  • News​​ of the Year:
    Building​​​‌ on the momentum of‌ the 2024 sprint, Benchopt’s‌​‌ development in 2025 focused​​ on maturing its infrastructure​​​‌ for large-scale machine learning‌ and industrial-grade workflows. A‌​‌ key highlight was the​​ "supercharging" of the parallel​​​‌ backend, particularly through the‌ SLURM executor, which now‌​‌ supports solver-specific overrides (allowing,​​​‌ for instance, GPU allocation​ only for specific methods)​‌ and better management of​​ parallel job limits. Machine​​​‌ learning support was significantly​ bolstered by the introduction​‌ of the collect command​​ for gathering distributed results,​​​‌ improved serialization for complex​ parameter spaces, and the​‌ integration of high-profile benchmarks​​ like NanoGPT and SLOPE.​​​‌ Furthermore, the framework moved​ toward a more robust​‌ ecosystem with the release​​ of version 1.7.0, featuring​​​‌ enhanced HTML result pages​ with interactive tables, improved​‌ Windows compatibility, and the​​ ability for objectives to​​​‌ produce multiple entries simultaneously—solidifying​ Benchopt as a comprehensive​‌ tool for both classical​​ optimization and modern deep​​​‌ learning research.
  • Publication:
  • Contact:
    Thomas Moreau
  • Participants:​‌
    Thomas Moreau, Mathurin Massias,​​ Hippolyte Verninas, Melvine Nargeot,​​​‌ Jad Yehya

6.1.5 Scikit-learn​

  • Keywords:
    Clustering, Classification, Regression,​‌ Machine learning
  • Scientific Description:​​
    Scikit-learn is a Python​​​‌ module integrating classic machine​ learning algorithms in the​‌ tightly-knit scientific Python world.​​ It aims to provide​​​‌ simple and efficient solutions​ to learning problems, accessible​‌ to everybody and reusable​​ in various contexts: machine-learning​​​‌ as a versatile tool​ for science and engineering.​‌
  • Functional Description:

    Scikit-learn can​​ be used as a​​​‌ middleware for prediction tasks.​ For example, many web​‌ startups adapt Scikitlearn to​​ predict buying behavior of​​​‌ users, provide product recommendations,​ detect trends or abusive​‌ behavior (fraud, spam). Scikit-learn​​ is used to extract​​​‌ the structure of complex​ data (text, images) and​‌ classify such data with​​ techniques relevant to the​​​‌ state of the art.​

    Easy to use, efficient​‌ and accessible to non​​ datascience experts, Scikit-learn is​​​‌ an increasingly popular machine​ learning library in Python.​‌ In a data exploration​​ step, the user can​​​‌ enter a few lines​ on an interactive (but​‌ non-graphical) interface and immediately​​ sees the results of​​​‌ his request. Scikitlearn is​ a prediction engine .​‌ Scikit-learn is developed in​​ open source, and available​​​‌ under the BSD license.​

  • URL:
  • Publications:
  • Contact:
    Gael Varoquaux
  • Participants:​​​‌
    Thomas Moreau, Jerome Dockes,​ Alexandre Gramfort, Bertrand Thirion,​‌ Gael Varoquaux, Loic Esteve,​​ Olivier Grisel, Guillaume Lemaitre,​​​‌ Jeremie Du Boisberranger, Julien​ Jerphanion
  • Partners:
    Axa, BNP​‌ Parisbas Cardif, Dataiku, Nvidia,​​ Chanel, Probabl

6.1.6 joblib​​​‌

  • Keywords:
    Parallel computing, Cache​
  • Functional Description:
    Facilitate parallel​‌ computing and caching in​​ Python.
  • URL:
  • Contact:​​​‌
    Thomas Moreau
  • Participants:
    Thomas​ Moreau, Loic Esteve, Olivier​‌ Grisel, Gael Varoquaux, Yoann​​ Coudert–Osmont
  • Partner:
    Probabl

6.1.7​​​‌ MRI-NUFFT

  • Keywords:
    Brain MRI,​ NUFFT, Trajectory Generation
  • Functional​‌ Description:

    MRI-NUFFT is a​​ python package that extends​​​‌ various NUFFT (Non-Uniform Fast​ Fourier Transform) python bindings​‌ used for MRI reconstruction.​​ It provides a unified​​​‌ interface with a large​ number of backends with​‌ implementations ranging from CPU​​ to GPU.

    In particular,​​​‌ it provides a unified​ interface for all the​‌ methods, with extra features​​ such as coil sensitivity,​​​‌ density compensated adjoint and​ off-resonance corrections (for static​‌ B0 inhomogeneities). Additionally, useful​​ IO tools like reading​​​‌ a k-space sampling trajectory​ and writing a binary​‌ file for run on​​ MR scanner is also​​​‌ offered. Finally, it helps​ algorithmically speed up MR​‌ image reconstruction algorithms through​​ fast ways to estimate​​ preconditioning weights, also known​​​‌ as density compensators for‌ a given sampling pattern.‌​‌

  • Release Contributions:
    MRI-NUFFT now​​ provides a physical model​​​‌ of the MRI acquisition‌ processes, including multi-coil acquisition‌​‌ and static-field inhomogeneities. This​​ model is compatible with​​​‌ the NUFFT libraries, and‌ can be used to‌​‌ simulate the acquisition of​​ MRI data, or to​​​‌ reconstruct data from a‌ given set of measurements.‌​‌ MRI-NUFFT comes with a​​ wide variety of non-Cartesian​​​‌ trajectory generation routines that‌ have been gathered from‌​‌ the literature. It also​​ provides ways to extend​​​‌ existing trajectories and export‌ them to specific formats,‌​‌ for use in other​​ toolkits and on MRI​​​‌ hardware. Finally, MRI-NUFFT provides‌ automatic differentiation for all‌​‌ NUFFT backends, with respect​​ to both gradients and​​​‌ data (image or k-space).‌ This enables efficient backpropagation‌​‌ through NUFFT operators and​​ supports research on learned​​​‌ sampling model and image‌ reconstruction network.
  • URL:
  • Contact:
    Chaithya Giliyar Radhkrishna​​

6.1.8 SPARKLING

  • Name:
    Spreading​​​‌ Projection Algorithm for Rapid‌ K-space sampLING
  • Keywords:
    Brain‌​‌ MRI, MRI, Optimization
  • Scientific​​ Description:
    This python package​​​‌ allows us to generate‌ "SPARKLING" curves as a‌​‌ new type of non-Cartesian​​ trajectories to perform a​​​‌ more efficient sampling in‌ 2D and 3D for‌​‌ anatomical imaging while using​​ the same number of​​​‌ samples for a limited‌ time budget. These segmented‌​‌ curves are obtained using​​ a projection method on​​​‌ measure sets which offers‌ three main advantages: i)‌​‌ generating segmented Non-Cartesian trajectories​​ along a chosen density,​​​‌ ii) meeting the hardware‌ constraints on the magnetic‌​‌ field gradients (magnitude, slew​​ rate), iii) performing a​​​‌ fast coverage of k-space.‌
  • Functional Description:
    This python‌​‌ package implements "SPARKLING": an​​ optimization driven method to​​​‌ obtain hardware compliant sampling‌ curves that globally satisfy‌​‌ a user specified target​​ sampling density. The resulting​​​‌ non-cartesian sampling curves can‌ be used to efficiently‌​‌ undersample and speed up​​ acquisitions on an MR​​​‌ scanner. This method is‌ generic enough that it‌​‌ can be applied to​​ any of the imaging​​​‌ modalities in MR.
  • Publications:‌
  • Contact:
    Chaithya Giliyar​​​‌ Radhkrishna

6.1.9 PySAP

  • Name:‌
    Python Sparse data Analysis‌​‌ Package
  • Keywords:
    Image reconstruction,​​ Image compression
  • Functional Description:​​​‌

    The PySAP (Python Sparse‌ data Analysis Package, https://github.com/CEA-COSMIC/pysap)‌​‌ open-source image processing software​​ package has been developed​​​‌ for the 3 years‌ between the Compressed Sensing‌​‌ group at Iniria-CEA Parietal​​ team led by Philippe​​​‌ Ciuciu and the CosmoStat‌ team (CEA/IRFU) led by‌​‌ Jean-Luc Statck. It has​​ been developed for the​​​‌ COmpressed Sensing for Magnetic‌ resonance Imaging and Cosmology‌​‌ (COSMIC) project. This package​​ provides a set of​​​‌ flexible tools that can‌ be applied to a‌​‌ variety of compressed sensing​​ and image reconstruction problems​​​‌ in various research domains.‌ In particular, PySAP offers‌​‌ fast wavelet transforms and​​ a range of integrated​​​‌ optimisation algorithms. It also‌ offers a variety of‌​‌ plugins for specific application​​ domains: on top of​​​‌ Pysap-MRI and PySAP-astro plugins,‌ several complementary modules are‌​‌ now in development for​​ electron tomography and electron​​​‌ microscopy for CEA colleagues.‌ In October 2019, PySAP‌​‌ has been released on​​​‌ PyPi (https://pypi.org/project/python-pySAP/, currently version​ 0.0.3) and in conda​‌ (https://anaconda.org/agrigis/python-pysap).

    The Pysap-MRI has​​ been advertised through a​​​‌ specific abstract accepted to​ the next workshop of​‌ ISMRM on Data Sampling​​ & Image Reconstruction in​​​‌ late January 2020. It​ will be presented during​‌ a power pitch session​​ together wih an hands-on​​​‌ demo session using JuPyter​ notebooks.

  • Contact:
    Philippe Ciuciu​‌
  • Partner:
    CEA

6.1.10 SNAKE​​

  • Name:
    Simulator from neuro-activation​​​‌ to K-space Exploration
  • Keywords:​
    FMRI, NUFFT
  • Functional Description:​‌
    We propose a new,​​ modular, open-source, Python-based 3D+time​​​‌ fMRI data simulation software,​ SNAKE-fMRI, which stands for​‌ Simulator from Neurovascular coupling​​ to Acquisition of K-space​​​‌ data for Exploration of​ fMRI acquisition techniques. Unlike​‌ existing tools, the goal​​ here is to simulate​​​‌ the complete chain of​ fMRI data acquisition, from​‌ the spatio-temporal design of​​ evoked brain responses to​​​‌ various multi-coil k-space data​ 3D sampling strategies, with​‌ the possibility of extending​​ the forward acquisition model​​​‌ to various noise and​ artifact sources while remaining​‌ memory-efficient. By using this​​ in silico setup, we​​​‌ are thus able to​ provide realistic and reproducible​‌ ground truth for fMRI​​ reconstruction methods in 3D​​​‌ accelerated acquisition settings and​ explore the influence of​‌ critical parameters, such as​​ the acceleration factor and​​​‌ signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), on​ downstream tasks of image​‌ reconstruction and statistical analysis​​ of evoked brain activity.​​​‌ We present three scenarios​ of increasing complexity to​‌ showcase the flexibility, versatility,​​ and fidelity of SNAKE-fMRI:​​​‌ From a temporally-fixed full​ 3D Cartesian to various​‌ 3D non-Cartesian sampling patterns,​​ we can compare —​​​‌ with reproducibility guarantees —​ how experimental paradigms, acquisition​‌ strategies and reconstruction methods​​ contribute and interact together,​​​‌ affecting the downstream statistical​ analysis.
  • URL:
  • Contact:​‌
    Philippe Ciuciu

6.2 Open​​ data

Participants: Main External​​​‌ Collaborators: Bertrand Thirion,​ Ana Fernanda Ponce,​‌ Himanshu Aggarwal, Ana-Luisa​​ Pinho [Western University, Canada]​​​‌, Lucie Hertz-Pannier [CEA/NeuroSpin]​.

The MIND is​‌ an an open data​​ provider as it produced​​​‌ the Individual Brain Charting​ (IBC) data set over​‌ the last year in​​ the context of the​​​‌ Human Brain Project. The​ IBC data set consists​‌ of anatomical and functional​​ brain MR images collected​​​‌ on twelve healthy volunteers.​ It is quite unique​‌ as approxilmately 50 to​​ 60 different behaviarol protocols​​​‌ have been run on​ these individuals. The IBC​‌ data set can be​​ uploaded here.

7​​​‌ New results

7.1 SPARKLING​ for fMRI

Participants: Zaineb​‌ Amor, Philippe Ciuciu​​.

Main External Collaborators:​​​‌ Alexandre Vignaud [CEA/NeuroSpin].​

Additionally, we have shown​‌ that 3D-SPARKLING is a​​ viable imaging technique and​​​‌ good alternative to Echo​ Planar Imaging for resting-state​‌ and task-based fMRI 2​​. This is illustrated​​​‌ in Fig. 1 during​ a retinotopic mapping experiment​‌ which consists in mapping​​ the retina to the​​​‌ primary visual cortex. These​ results have been obtained​‌ at a 1mm isotropic​​ resolution both for EPI​​​‌ and SPARKLING acquisitions.

Figure 1

The​ image shows brain activity​‌ data for two volunteers​​ (V3 and V4) using​​​‌ two imaging techniques (3D-EPI​ and 3D-SPARKLING). The data​‌ is presented both unsmoothed​​ and smoothed. The left​​ and right brain hemispheres​​​‌ are labeled L and‌ R, respectively. Red and‌​‌ blue spots indicate areas​​ of brain activity, with​​​‌ the left side of‌ the color sphere representing‌​‌ blue and the right​​ side representing red. (Description​​​‌ generated at February 6th,‌ 2026 by Albert AI‌​‌ with the model Mistral-Small-3.2-24B)​​

Figure 1: Projection​​​‌ of the BOLD phase‌ maps on the pial‌​‌ surface visualized on the​​ inflated surface for participants​​​‌ V#3 (3D-SPARKLING run first)‌ and V#4 (3D-EPI run‌​‌ first). 3D-SPARKLING yields​​ improved projected BOLD phase​​​‌ maps for V#3 in‌ comparison with 3D-EPI both‌​‌ on raw and spatially​​ smoothed data. Opposite results​​​‌ were found in favor‌ of 3D-EPI in V#4,‌​‌ notably on spatially smoothed​​ data.

7.2 Deep Learning​​​‌ for 3D Non-Cartesian MR‌ Image reconstruction

Participants: Asma‌​‌ Tanabene, Chaithya Giliyar​​ Radhakrishna, Philippe Ciuciu​​​‌.

External Collaborators: Aurélien‌ Massire [Siemens-Healthineers, France].‌​‌

Deep learning and notably​​ unrolled neural netowrk architectures​​​‌ have shown great promise‌ for MRI reconstruction from‌​‌ undersampled data. However, there​​ is a lack of​​​‌ research on validating their‌ performance in the 3D‌​‌ parallel imaging acquisitions with​​ non-Cartesian undersampling. In addition,​​​‌ the artifacts and the‌ resulting image quality depend‌​‌ on the under-sampling pattern.​​ To address this uncharted​​​‌ territory, in 2024 we‌ extended the Non-Cartesian Primal-Dual‌​‌ Network (NC-PDNet) 170,​​ to a 3D multi-coil​​​‌ acquisition setting. We evaluated‌ the impact of channel-specific‌​‌ versus channel-agnostic training configurations​​ and examined the effect​​​‌ of coil compression. Finally,‌ using the publicly available‌​‌ Calgary-Campinas dataset, we benchmarked​​ four distinct non-Cartesian undersampling​​​‌ patterns, with an acceleration‌ factor of six. Our‌​‌ results in Fig. 2​​ showed that NC-PDNet trained​​​‌ on compressed data with‌ varying input channel numbers‌​‌ achieves an average PSNR​​ of 42.98dB for 1​​​‌ mm isotropic 3- channel‌ whole-brain 3D reconstruction. With‌​‌ an inference time of​​ 4.95sec and a GPU​​​‌ memory usage of 5.49‌ GB, our approach demonstrates‌​‌ significant potential for clinical​​ research application.

Figure 2

The image​​​‌ consists of six brain‌ MRI scans displayed in‌​‌ two rows. The top​​ row shows full sagittal​​​‌ brain images with a‌ red square highlighting a‌​‌ specific area. The bottom​​ row shows magnified views​​​‌ of the highlighted area‌ from the top row.‌​‌ From left to right,​​ the columns represent different​​​‌ imaging techniques: Ground truth,‌ 3D Radial, 3D Cones,‌​‌ TPI, GoLF-SPARKLING, and GoLF-SPARKLING​​ (NO Coil Compression). Metrics​​​‌ (PSNR and SSIM) are‌ shown above each respective‌​‌ image, indicating image quality.​​ Red arrows in the​​​‌ 3D Radial and TPI‌ magnified views point to‌​‌ noticeable artifacts or differences​​ compared to the ground​​​‌ truth. (Description generated at‌ February 6th, 2026 by‌​‌ Albert AI with the​​ model Mistral-Small-3.2-24B)

Figure 2​​​‌: 3D multicoil NCPDNet‌ MRI reconstruction. Reconstruction results‌​‌ of the 90th slice​​ of file e14079s3 P09216.7​​​‌ from the test set‌ in Calgary-Campinas dataset. The‌​‌ top row shows reconstructions​​ using different methods, while​​​‌ the bottom row displays‌ zoomed-in regions outlined by‌​‌ red frames. Volume-wise PSNR​​ and SSIM scores are​​​‌ indicated at the top‌ of each image.

7.3‌​‌ Fast reconstructions of ultra-high​​​‌ resolution MR data from​ the 11.7T Iseult scanner​‌

Participants: Chaithya Giliyar Radhakrishna​​, Philippe Ciuciu.​​​‌

External Collaborators: Alexandre Vignaud​ [CEA/NeuroSpin], Franck Mauconduit​‌ [CEA/NeuroSpin].

Open-source MR​​ reconstruction tools often fail​​​‌ to efficiently utilize GPU​ resources and lack support​‌ for generalized GRAPPA implementations.​​ Many tools are limited​​​‌ to 2D or 3D​ reconstruction, and few incorporate​‌ advanced techniques such as​​ 2D-CAIPIRINHA, which enhances imaging​​​‌ capabilities. Our new open​ source gGRAPPA GPU accelerated​‌ Python package aims to​​ provide a fast, flexible,​​​‌ open-source tool for generalized​ GRAPPA/CAIPI reconstruction 47.​‌ Using PyTorch, gGRAPPA runs​​ multiple convolutional windows in​​​‌ batch mode to optimize​ GPU memory usage and​‌ accelerate reconstruction times. gGRAPPA​​ achieves up to a​​​‌ 65x speedup over CPU​ implementations and a 6x​‌ speedup compared to non-batched​​ GPU methods, enabling efficient​​​‌ and fast reconstruction of​ MRI scans. This tool​‌ has allowed us to​​ outperform the Siemens image​​​‌ reconstructor, in terms of​ speed, on the world​‌ premiere 11.7T MR system​​ (Iseult scanner available at​​​‌ NeuroSpin) to reconstruct the​ first in vivo T​‌2* weighted MR​​ images at a 200-µm​​​‌ in plane resolution.

Figure 3

The​ image shows two brain​‌ MRI scans side by​​ side. Both scans display​​​‌ axial cross-sections of the​ brain with visible structures​‌ like ventricles and gyri.​​ The left scan is​​​‌ labeled "gGRAPPA reconstruction" and​ the right one "Scanner​‌ reconstruction." The scans appear​​ similar but might show​​​‌ slight differences in image​ quality and clarity. (Description​‌ generated at February 6th,​​ 2026 by Albert AI​​​‌ with the model Mistral-Small-3.2-24B)​

Figure 3: Ultra-high​‌ resolution in vivo brain​​ MRI at 11.7T. Slice​​​‌ of a T2*-weighted 2D​ GRE scan at 11.7T​‌ from a healthy volunteer​​ (approved by the national​​​‌ ethical committee and ANSM,​ the French medical device​‌ regulatory authority), with a​​ resolution of 1024×​​​‌1024 at 0.2 mm​ isotropic and GRAPPA 2​‌×1. The​​ scan is reconstructed by​​​‌ gGRAPPA (left) and the​ scanner (right), both using​‌ identical GRAPPA parameters: a​​ kernel size of 3​​​‌×4 and a​ regularization strength of 1e-4.​‌ Comparable reconstruction quality is​​ observed between gGRAPPA and​​​‌ the scanner.

7.4 SNAKE-fMRI:​ A realistic fMRI data​‌ simulator for high resolution​​ functional imaging

Participants: Pierre-Antoine​​​‌ Comby, Philippe Ciuciu​.

External Collaborators: Alexandre​‌ Vignaud [CEA/NeuroSpin].

Functional​​ Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)​​​‌ has emerged as a​ powerful non-invasive tool in​‌ neuroscience, enabling neuroscientists to​​ understand human brain functions.​​​‌ However, fMRI acquisition and​ image reconstruction techniques are​‌ complex to optimize and​​ benchmark due to the​​​‌ lack of ground truth​ that produces absolute and​‌ quantitative metrics. Repeating in-vivo​​ experiments may face the​​​‌ issue of limited reproducibility,​ which is time-consuming and​‌ expensive. fMRI simulators have​​ been developed to generate​​​‌ synthetic fMRI images, where​ brain responses are artificially​‌ added to existing or​​ artificial data. However, they​​​‌ don’t simulate the complete​ MR acquisition process, lack​‌ flexibility, integration with post-processing,​​ and computational efficiency. Exploring​​​‌ new acceleration schemes in​ the acquisition setting and​‌ innovative reconstruction methods with​​ these tools is not​​ feasible. To address these​​​‌ unmet needs, in 20204‌ we have developed SNAKE-fMRI‌​‌ 15, an open-source​​ fMRI simulator that operates​​​‌ in both image and‌ k-space domains to yield‌​‌ realistic synthetic fMRI data.​​ Its flexibility allows us​​​‌ to investigate various acquisition‌ setups regarding SNR and‌​‌ acceleration factors to reach​​ higher spatial and temporal​​​‌ resolution and validate reconstruction‌ methods against those scenarios.‌​‌ Its key principles are​​ summarized in Fig. 4​​​‌ and some comparative results‌ are shown in Fig.‌​‌ 5.

Figure 4

The image​​ illustrates the process of​​​‌ MRI brain activity imaging‌ over time. At the‌​‌ top, a graph shows​​ simulated brain activity and​​​‌ its measurement intervals (TR‌ Vol.). The middle section‌​‌ depicts sequential brain images​​ (labeled 1 to 7)​​​‌ taken during these intervals.‌ Below this, a diagram‌​‌ explains how different tissue​​ types contribute to single-shot​​​‌ acquisitions in k-space, shown‌ as color-coded horizontal lines.‌​‌ The bottom part displays​​ the acquired k-space data​​​‌ over one TR volume,‌ correlating with the sequential‌​‌ images above. The overall​​ concept demonstrates how MRI​​​‌ captures brain activity by‌ assembling data from various‌​‌ tissue types over time.​​ (Description generated at February​​​‌ 6th, 2026 by Albert‌ AI with the model‌​‌ Mistral-Small-3.2-24B)

Figure 4:​​ SNAKE-fMRI simulator. Acquisition method​​​‌ implemented in SNAKE –‌ The case represented is‌​‌ simplified to a 2D​​ Cartesian case (e.g., a​​​‌ projected view of a‌ 3D non-accelerated EPI scheme).‌​‌ Each shot (i.e., a​​ plane in 3D EPI)​​​‌ of the k-space sampling‌ pattern is acquired separately‌​‌ from an on-the-fly simulated​​ volume in the image​​​‌ domain, as shown in‌ the blue frame. The‌​‌ shots are numbered here​​ from 1 to 7.​​​‌ The acquisition is performed‌ in parallel for each‌​‌ tissue type to apply​​ the T2* relaxation model.​​​‌
Figure 5

The image displays brain‌ scans in a 3x3‌​‌ grid, comparing different conditions​​ and methods. The top​​​‌ row is labeled "dynamic"‌ with conditions: COLD, REFINED,‌​‌ and WARM. The bottom​​ row is labeled "static"​​​‌ with the same conditions.‌ Each scan shows brain‌​‌ activity with color-coded z-scores,​​ indicating varying levels of​​​‌ activation. Additional brain outlines‌ with contour lines are‌​‌ overlaid on the scans​​ highlighting specific regions of​​​‌ interest. The side views‌ of the brain are‌​‌ also provided for better​​ spatial context. (Description generated​​​‌ at February 6th, 2026‌ by Albert AI with‌​‌ the model Mistral-Small-3.2-24B)

Figure​​ 5: Activations maps​​​‌ superimposed on the mean‌ fMRI image in the‌​‌ high-temporal (0.7s) imaging setup​​ using stack-of-spiral sampling and​​​‌ CS reconstruction. Top row:‌ activation maps where a‌​‌ tiume-varying sampling pattern has​​ been used. Bottom row:​​​‌ static sampling pattern, scan‌ and repeat strategy. From‌​‌ left to right: different​​ image reconstruction strategies (COLD,​​​‌ REFINED, WARM), which correspond‌ to different initialization in‌​‌ a framewise CS reconstruction​​ method. Detected activations surviving​​​‌ at p<0‌.001, uncorrected,‌​‌ thresholding are overlaid using​​ a colorjet map.

The​​​‌ interest of this simulator‌ will be to provide‌​‌ ground truth data to​​ train deep learning models​​​‌ for fMRI reconstruction in‌ 2025.

7.5 NeuroConText: Contrastive‌​‌ text-to-brain mapping for neuroscientific​​​‌ literature

Participants: Bertrand Thirion​, Demian Wassermann,​‌ Fatemeh Ghayem, Raphael​​ Meudec.

Hundreds of​​​‌ neuroscientific articles are published​ annually, highlighting the continuous​‌ growth and expansion of​​ knowledge in this field.​​​‌ These contributions from scientists​ and researchers provide new​‌ insights and findings that​​ enhance our understanding of​​​‌ brain functions. Meta-analysis is​ a statistical tool that​‌ combines results from multiple​​ studies to improve the​​​‌ reliability and generalizability of​ neuroscientific findings. It serves​‌ three key purposes: First,​​ it synthesizes information from​​​‌ the literature to build​ the state of the​‌ art by offering a​​ consolidated view of what​​​‌ is currently known. This​ allows researchers to see​‌ where the field stands​​ collectively and highlights consensus​​​‌ or inconsistencies. Second, meta-analysis​ provides context to interpret​‌ new results by comparing​​ novel experimental data with​​​‌ existing patterns in the​ meta-analysis of the literature,​‌ which clarifies how new​​ data align with or​​​‌ deviate from established findings.​ Third, meta-analysis generates hypotheses​‌ on candidate brain regions​​ or relevant cognitive domains​​​‌ by revealing patterns that​ might be central to​‌ a phenomenon.

In 67​​, we introduced NeuroConText,​​​‌ a novel coordinate-based meta-analysis​ (CBMA) tool to bridge​‌ the three heterogeneous modalities​​ commonly found in neuroscientific​​​‌ studies: text, reported brain​ activation coordinates, and brain​‌ images. NeuroConText uses neuroscientific​​ articles to extract their​​​‌ text and activation coordinates.​ We benefited from the​‌ embeddings of advanced large​​ language models (LLM) for​​​‌ text feature representation. Additionally,​ we used Kernel Density​‌ Estimation (KDE) to reconstruct​​ brain maps from the​​​‌ coordinates 179, 178​. To address the​‌ high dimensionality of the​​ brain images reconstructed by​​​‌ KDE, we employed the​ dictionary of functional modes​‌ (DiFuMo), a probabilistic atlas​​ that effectively reduces data​​​‌ dimensionality 110.

Then,​ NeuroConText defines a shared​‌ latent space between text​​ and coordinates, using contrastive​​​‌ learning to retrieve the​ brain activation coordinates corresponding​‌ to the input text.​​ NeuroConText can analyze long​​​‌ texts, leveraging the complete​ information in articles' text​‌ to enhance the accuracy​​ of text-to-brain associations. By​​​‌ incorporating advanced language models​ like Mistral-7B, it processes​‌ complex neuroscientific text and​​ extracts the semantic in​​​‌ the text 135.​ NeuroConText considerably outperforms existing​‌ regression-based state-of-the-art methods NeuroQuery​​ and Text2Brain in associating​​​‌ text with brain activations,​ achieving a threefold improvement​‌ in the retrieval task.​​ To improve our understanding​​​‌ of the internal mechanisms​ of the NeuroConText model,​‌ we also evaluated its​​ ability to reconstruct brain​​​‌ activation contrasts from text​ latent representations using descriptions​‌ of the NeuroVault dataset​​ 125. The quality​​​‌ of these reconstructed activation​ maps is found to​‌ be comparable with state-of-the-art​​ baselines.

Figure 6.a

(a) Training of​​​‌ NeuroConText contrastive model on​ neuroscientific publications.

Figure 6.b

(b) Brain​‌ encoding of a query​​ through the NeuroConText text​​​‌ latent representation.

The image​ displays six brain scans​‌ arranged in a 2x3​​ grid. Each scan shows​​​‌ colored areas overlaid with​ brain structure outlines. The​‌ top row represents dynamic​​ conditions labeled as "COLD,"​​​‌ "REFINED," and "WARM," while​ the bottom row shows​‌ static conditions with the​​ same labels. Color scales​​ on the right indicate​​​‌ z-scores ranging from -11‌ to 11, highlighting brain‌​‌ activity differences. The scans​​ reveal varying levels of​​​‌ brain activation under different‌ conditions. (Description generated at‌​‌ February 6th, 2026 by​​ Albert AI with the​​​‌ model Mistral-Small-3.2-24B)

The image‌ displays six brain scans‌​‌ arranged in a 2x3​​ grid. Each scan shows​​​‌ colored areas overlaid with‌ brain structure outlines. The‌​‌ top row represents dynamic​​ conditions labeled as "COLD,"​​​‌ "REFINED," and "WARM," while‌ the bottom row shows‌​‌ static conditions with the​​ same labels. Color scales​​​‌ on the right indicate‌ z-scores ranging from -11‌​‌ to 11, highlighting brain​​ activity differences. The scans​​​‌ reveal varying levels of‌ brain activation under different‌​‌ conditions. (Description generated at​​ February 6th, 2026 by​​​‌ Albert AI with the‌ model Mistral-Small-3.2-24B)

Figure 6‌​‌: NeuroConText: (a) We​​ train a contrastive model​​​‌ on a large corpus‌ to retrieve a shared‌​‌ latent space between coordinates​​ and text from neuroscientific​​​‌ articles. Pre-trained LLMs are‌ used to obtain an‌​‌ initial text embedding, and​​ a projection layer aligns​​​‌ this embedding with those‌ of coordinates. Snowflakes denote‌​‌ models with frozen weights.​​ (b) A decoder is​​​‌ trained from the text‌ latent space to reproduce‌​‌ brain images from any​​ query, enabling the mapping​​​‌ of queries into brain‌ representations.

7.6 Whole-brain modeling‌​‌ of dynamic causal circuits​​ in human cognition using​​​‌ amortized variational inference

Participants:‌ Demian Wassermann, Louis‌​‌ Rouillard, Letizia Levin-Diniz​​.

Main External Collaborators:​​​‌ Vinod Menon [Stanford University,‌ USA], Weidong Cai‌​‌ [Stanford University, USA],​​ Srikanth Ryali [Stanford University,​​​‌ USA], Luca Ambrogioni‌ [Donders Institute, Netherlands].‌​‌

Understanding dynamic mechanisms underlying​​ cognition remains a major​​​‌ challenge in human neuroscience.‌ Here, we develop, validate,‌​‌ and apply Multivariate Dynamical​​ Systems Identification with Amortized​​​‌ Variational Inference (MDSI-AVI), a‌ novel computational framework designed‌​‌ to address critical challenges​​ in capturing asymmetric, context-dependent,​​​‌ whole-brain directed interactions while‌ accounting for regional hemodynamic‌​‌ response variability in fMRI​​ data. MDSI-AVI, which is​​​‌ a methodological advancement related‌ to sections 3.2 and‌​‌ 3.3 of our research​​ program, leverages simulation-based inference​​​‌ through forward and reverse‌ variational inference to address‌​‌ the limitations of conventional​​ variational methods in high-dimensional​​​‌ settings and its based‌ on our previous developements.‌​‌ By averaging over uncertainty​​ in hemodynamic response parameters​​​‌ using forward simulation, MDSI-AVI‌ provides well-calibrated posteriors of‌​‌ directed connectivity that scale​​ efficiently to networks with​​​‌ hundreds of nodes. Applied‌ to Human Connectome Project‌​‌ data (N=728), MDSI-AVI reveals​​ new insights into working​​​‌ memory mechanisms, identifying the‌ dorsal anterior insula as‌​‌ a critical hub influencing​​ activity at the whole-brain​​​‌ level. We demonstrate task-dependent‌ modulation of causal influences,‌​‌ where the salience network​​ drives frontoparietal network activity,​​​‌ which differentially influences the‌ default mode and sensorimotor‌​‌ networks depending on working​​ memory load. These whole-brain​​​‌ causal interactions distinguish task‌ conditions with high accuracy‌​‌ and predict working memory​​ performance. Our framework, illustrated​​​‌ in Fig. 7,‌ demonstrates reproducible results across‌​‌ whole-brain parcellations, establishing MDSI-AVI​​ as a robust tool​​​‌ for advancing our understanding‌ of circuit dynamics in‌​‌ cognition and disease. This​​​‌ work is currently in​ press.

Figure 7

The image details​‌ a framework for estimating​​ brain-wide task context-dependent dynamic​​​‌ causal interactions from fMRI​ using the MDSI-AVI model.​‌ Panel A explains the​​ estimation process, showing task​​​‌ design, observed and latent​ signals, and interaction strength​‌ analysis across brain regions.​​ Panel B presents the​​​‌ graphical representation of the​ MDSI-AVI model, including the​‌ generative model and the​​ hybrid inference method for​​​‌ parameter estimation. Panel C​ outlines the analytic approach​‌ for validating and applying​​ the MDSI-AVI model across​​​‌ three steps: simulated fMRI,​ rodent fMRI, and human​‌ task-fMRI, with goals, evaluations,​​ and experimental analyses specified​​​‌ for each step. (Description​ generated at February 25th,​‌ 2026 by Albert AI​​ with the model Mistral-Small-3.2-24B)​​​‌

Figure 7: MDSI-AVI​ framework and application to​‌ working memory. MDSI-AVI framework​​ and validation strategy for​​​‌ whole-brain causal modeling. (A)​ Conceptual overview. MDSI-AVI estimates​‌ task-dependent causal interactions across​​ the entire brain from​​​‌ fMRI data while accounting​ for regional variations in​‌ hemodynamic responses. (B) Model​​ architecture and inference strategy.​​​‌ MDSI-AVI employs a hybrid​ two-stage approach to overcome​‌ scalability and identifiability challenges​​ in whole-brain causal modeling.​​​‌ Stage 1 (Amortized Inference):​ An encoder and normalizing​‌ flow learn posterior distributions​​ of hyperparameters – including​​​‌ latent noise (q), observation​ noise (r), and regional​‌ hemodynamic response parameters (H)​​ – from observed fMRI​​​‌ signals. This step addresses​ the fundamental many-to-one mapping​‌ problem from neural activity​​ to fMRI observations by​​​‌ capturing uncertainty in these​ parameters. Stage 2 (Subject-specific​‌ Inference): Individual-level inference minimizes​​ reverse Kullback-Leibler divergence to​​​‌ estimate latent neural activity​ (X) and directed connectivity​‌ matrices (A), conditioned on​​ the learned hyperparameter distributions.​​​‌ This principled uncertainty marginalization​ significantly improves estimation of​‌ individual causal brain dynamics​​ and enhances prediction accuracy.​​​‌ (C) Three-stage validation and​ application strategy. We systematically​‌ validated MDSI-AVI using: (1)​​ simulated fMRI data with​​​‌ known ground truth to​ assess accuracy; (2) optogenetic​‌ rodent fMRI data to​​ evaluate specificity for stimulus-evoked​​​‌ causal interactions; and (3)​ human n-back working memory​‌ task data to demonstrate​​ scalability, reliability, and replicability​​​‌ across sessions and brain​ atlases. Finally, we examined​‌ the relation between causal​​ network interactions and working​​​‌ memory performance.

7.7 Brain-wide​ decoding of numbers and​‌ letters: Converging evidence from​​ multivariate fMRI analysis and​​​‌ probabilistic meta-analysis

Participants: Demian​ Wassermann, Gaston Zanitti​‌.

Main External Collaborators:​​ Vinod Menon [Stanford University,​​​‌ USA], Hyesang Chang​ [Stanford University, USA].​‌

Previous studies exploring category-sensitive​​ representations of numbers and​​​‌ letters have predominantly focused​ on individual brain regions.​‌ This study expands upon​​ this research through computationally​​​‌ rigorous whole-brain neural decoding​ using Elastic Net (ND-EN),​‌ facilitating the analysis of​​ neural patterns across the​​​‌ entire brain with greater​ precision. To establish the​‌ robustness and generalizability of​​ our results, we also​​​‌ conducted innovative probabilistic meta-analyses​ of the extant functional​‌ neuroimaging literature. The investigation​​ comprised both an active​​​‌ task, requiring participants to​ distinguish between numbers and​‌ letters, and a passive​​ task where they simply​​​‌ viewed these symbols. ND-EN​ revealed that, during the​‌ active task, a distributed​​ network—including the ventral temporal-occipital​​ cortex, intraparietal sulcus, middle​​​‌ frontal gyrus, and insula—actively‌ differentiated between numbers and‌​‌ letters. This distinction was​​ not evident in the​​​‌ passive task, indicating that‌ the task engagement level‌​‌ plays a crucial role​​ in such neural differentiation.​​​‌ Further, regional neural representational‌ similarity analyses within the‌​‌ ventral temporal-occipital cortex revealed​​ similar activation patterns for​​​‌ numbers and letters, indicating‌ a lack of differentiation‌​‌ in regions previously linked​​ to these visual symbols.​​​‌ Thus, our findings indicate‌ that category-sensitive representations of‌​‌ numbers and letters are​​ not confined to isolated​​​‌ regions but involve a‌ broader network of brain‌​‌ areas, and are modulated​​ by task demands. Supporting​​​‌ these empirical findings, probabilistic‌ meta-analyses conducted with NeuroLang,‌​‌ related to section 3.2​​ of the research program,​​​‌ and the Neurosynth database‌ reinforced our observations. Together,‌​‌ the convergence of evidence​​ from multivariate neural pattern​​​‌ analysis and meta-analysis advances‌ our understanding of how‌​‌ numbers and letters are​​ represented in the human​​​‌ brain. We illustrate this‌ contribution 21 in Fig.‌​‌ 8.

Figure 8

This image​​ outlines a study comparing​​​‌ brain responses to letters‌ and numbers. Panel A‌​‌ shows a sequence of​​ digits with quizzes. Panel​​​‌ B presents a checkerboard‌ task. Panel C depicts‌​‌ trials with letters and​​ digits. Panel D shows​​​‌ accuracy and response time‌ results, highlighting better performance‌​‌ with numbers. Panel E​​ explains brain analysis methods,​​​‌ including whole-brain decoding and‌ region-of-interest (ROI) analysis. Panel‌​‌ F describes forward meta-analysis.​​ Panel G lists cognitive​​​‌ tasks (CogAt) and reverse‌ meta-analysis methods. The study‌​‌ uses fMRI data and​​ statistical methods to decode​​​‌ brain activity related to‌ processing letters and numbers.‌​‌ (Description generated at February​​ 25th, 2026 by Albert​​​‌ AI with the model‌ Mistral-Small-3.2-24B)

Figure 8:‌​‌ Brain-wide decoding of numbers​​ and letters. Active and​​​‌ passive fMRI tasks were‌ used to investigate regional‌​‌ and distributed brain representations​​ of numbers and letters.​​​‌ (A–B) Active fMRI task:‌ Experimental condition. Numbers or‌​‌ letters were shown in​​ separate blocks, in which​​​‌ participants attended to a‌ series of 8 numbers‌​‌ or letters. During two​​ subsequent probe trials participants​​​‌ indicated whether they had‌ seen the presented number‌​‌ or letter in the​​ same block . (B)​​​‌ Active fMRI task: Control‌ condition. A checkerboard block,‌​‌ which had the same​​ total number of trials​​​‌ (10 trials) as the‌ experimental condition without administration‌​‌ of probe trials, was​​ used as the control​​​‌ condition. (C) Passive fMRI‌ task. Participants completed a‌​‌ change detection task in​​ which they indicated when​​​‌ the color of a‌ hashtag changed from white‌​‌ to red, in a​​ series of trials where​​​‌ visual numbers, letters, non-alphanumeric‌ symbols, and hashtags were‌​‌ presented. Adapted from. (D)​​ Behavioral performance in the​​​‌ active fMRI task. Participants‌ were significantly more accurate‌​‌ and faster in the​​ number compared to the​​​‌ letter condition. (E) Analysis‌ pipeline. Preprocessed fMRI data‌​‌ from the active task​​ were entered into a​​​‌ subject-level General Linear Model‌ (GLM) to obtain activation‌​‌ maps for number >​​ checkerboard contrast and letter​​​‌ > checkerboard contrast. These‌ two maps were used‌​‌ in whole-brain neural decoding​​​‌ with Elastic Net (ND-EN)​ and neural representational similarity​‌ (NRS) analysis. An Elastic​​ Net classifier was used​​​‌ in whole-brain ND-EN analysis.​ The Elastic Net penalizes​‌ voxels with low weights​​ and produces a weight​​​‌ (feature importance) map. The​ NRS analysis used a​‌ whole-brain searchlight algorithm with​​ 6-mm search radius. The​​​‌ passive task followed analogous​ analysis pipeline with relevant​‌ task contrasts. Literature-based regions​​ of interest (ROIs) were​​​‌ used for ROI-based analyses​ for active and passive​‌ fMRI tasks. (F–G) A​​ series of forward and​​​‌ reverse meta-analyses were performed​ based on the Neurosynth​‌ database. Terms and brain​​ regions identified at top​​​‌ 5% probability were considered​ significant results from meta-analyses.​‌ (F) Forward meta-analysis. The​​ probability of all voxels​​​‌ mentioned in a study​ where the first term​‌ was mentioned but the​​ second term was not​​​‌ mentioned was assessed. “digit”​ and “letter” terms were​‌ used as first and​​ second terms (or vice​​​‌ versa). (G) Reverse meta-analysis.​ The probability of each​‌ of 89 cognitive atlas​​ terms associated with the​​​‌ activation of a given​ ROI across extant fMRI​‌ literature was assessed. The​​ bilateral VTOC derived from​​​‌ the NRS analysis and​ literature-based number form area​‌ (NFA) and visual word​​ form area (VWFA) were​​​‌ used as ROIs (​p<.001​‌).

7.8 Improving physiological​​ signal processings for enhanced​​​‌ monitoring in general anaesthesia​

Participants: External Collaborators: Jade​‌ Perdereau, Virginie Loison​​, Thomas Moreau,​​​‌ Fabrice Vallée [APHP, Inserm]​, Jerome Cartailler [Inserm,​‌ APHP], Jona Joachim​​ [APHP, Inserm].

Monitoring​​​‌ vital signs during general​ anaesthesia is crucial for​‌ patient safety, yet current​​ approaches face significant limitations.​​​‌ Non-invasive blood pressure measurements​ suffer from poor temporal​‌ resolution, while invasive arterial​​ lines, despite their accuracy,​​​‌ carry substantial complication risks.​ To address this clinical​‌ need, we developed AnesthNet​​ 25, a deep​​​‌ learning architecture designed for​ real-time mean arterial pressure​‌ (MAP) estimation using exclusively​​ non-invasive sensors routinely available​​​‌ in operating rooms. By​ leveraging photoplethysmography (PPG), electrocardiogram​‌ (ECG), and other standard​​ monitoring signals, AnesthNet provides​​​‌ continuous MAP estimation with​ high temporal resolution while​‌ avoiding the risks associated​​ with invasive monitoring. The​​​‌ model was trained and​ validated on large-scale, open-source​‌ perioperative databases, demonstrating robust​​ performance and reproducibility across​​​‌ diverse patient populations. This​ approach represents a significant​‌ step toward safer and​​ more accessible hemodynamic monitoring​​​‌ in clinical practice.

The​ development of AnesthNet was​‌ made possible by our​​ collaboration with APHP Lariboisière,​​​‌ and our involvement in​ the development of a​‌ comprehensive perioperative data platform,​​ designed to support both​​​‌ real-time clinical applications and​ long-term machine learning research​‌ 70. To date,​​ it allowed to collect​​​‌ over 42 TB of​ data encompassing 122,815 cases​‌ across multiple specialties including​​ ICU and emergency settings.​​​‌ Beyond MAP estimation, this​ infrastructure supports other development​‌ in the team for​​ physiological event detection, for​​​‌ instance our work on​ the UNHaP (Unmix Noise​‌ from Hawkes Processes) method​​ 37, which jointly​​​‌ learns temporal structures in​ physiological events while removing​‌ spurious detections.

Figure 9

The image​​ depicts a system for​​ predicting mean arterial pressure​​​‌ (MAP) using photoplethysmogram (PPG)‌ and electrocardiogram (ECG) signals.‌​‌ The process involves several​​ steps: 1. **Input Signals**:​​​‌ PPG and ECG signals‌ are collected at 125‌​‌ Hz using a cuff​​ device. 2. **Signal Processing**:​​​‌ Signals are processed to‌ derive variables such as‌​‌ NRA, PI, and HR​​ at 1 Hz. 3.​​​‌ **Causal Convolutions**: The signals‌ undergo multiple layers of‌​‌ causal convolutions with increasing​​ dilation rates and dropout​​​‌ layers to extract features.‌ 4. **LSTM Blocks**: Processed‌​‌ signals are passed through​​ concatenation and LSTM blocks​​​‌ for further feature extraction‌ and temporal sequence learning.‌​‌ 5. **Prediction**: The final​​ output is the predicted​​​‌ MAP. The illustration includes‌ diagrams of convolutional layers,‌​‌ LSTM units, and an​​ initialization step for the​​​‌ hidden state in LSTM,‌ providing a comprehensive view‌​‌ of the predictive model.​​ (Description generated at February​​​‌ 6th, 2026 by Albert‌ AI with the model‌​‌ Mistral-Small-3.2-24B)

Figure 9:​​ The AnesthNet architecture design​​​‌ aims to leverage all‌ operating room monitoring signals‌​‌ for accurate and continuous​​ mean arterial pressure estimation.​​​‌ The architecture is able‌ to make real-time predictions‌​‌ by using causal convolutions,​​ and incorporates a calibration​​​‌ step based on intermittent‌ cuff-based measurements to ensure‌​‌ accuracy over time.

7.9​​ Clinical biomarkers for epilepsy​​​‌

Participants: Sheng H Wang‌, Philippe Ciuciu.‌​‌

External Collaborators: Matias Palva​​ [Aalto University, Finland],​​​‌ Satu Palva [Neuroscience Center,‌ Helsinki Institute of Life‌​‌ Science (HiLIFE), University of​​ Helsinki, Finland].

Postsurgical​​​‌ seizure freedom in drug-resistant‌ epilepsy (DRE) patients varies‌​‌ from 30% to 80%,​​ implying that in many​​​‌ cases the current approaches‌ fail to fully map‌​‌ the epileptogenic zone (EZ).​​ We aimed to advance​​​‌ a novel approach to‌ better characterize epileptogenicity and‌​‌ investigate whether the EZ​​ encompasses a broader epileptogenic​​​‌ network (EpiNet) beyond the‌ seizure zone (SZ) that‌​‌ exhibits seizure activity. We​​ first used computational modeling​​​‌ to test putative complex‌ systems-driven and systems neuroscience-driven‌​‌ mechanistic biomarkers for epileptogenicity.​​ We then used these​​​‌ biomarkers to extract features‌ from resting-state stereo-electroencephalograms recorded‌​‌ from DRE patients and​​ trained supervised classifiers to​​​‌ localize the SZ against‌ gold standard clinical localization.‌​‌ To further explore the​​ prevalence of pathological features​​​‌ in an extended brain‌ network outside of the‌​‌ clinically identified SZ, we​​ also used unsupervised classification.​​​‌ Supervised SZ classification trained‌ on individual features achieved‌​‌ accuracies of 0.6–.07 area​​ under the receiver operating​​​‌ characteristic curve (AUC).* Combining‌ all criticality and synchrony‌​‌ features further improved the​​ AUC to 0.85. Unsupervised​​​‌ classification discovered an EpiNet-like‌ cluster of brain regions,‌​‌ in which 51% of​​ brain regions were outside​​​‌ of the SZ. Brain‌ regions in the EpiNet-like‌​‌ cluster engaged in interareal​​ hypersynchrony and locally exhibited​​​‌ high-amplitude bistability and excessive‌ inhibition, which was strikingly‌​‌ similar to the high​​ seizure risk regime revealed​​​‌ by our computational modeling.‌ The finding that combining‌​‌ biomarkers improves SZ localization​​ accuracy indicates that the​​​‌ novel mechanistic biomarkers for‌ epileptogenicity employed here yield‌​‌ synergistic information. On the​​ other hand, the discovery​​​‌ of SZ-like brain dynamics‌ outside of the clinically‌​‌ defined SZ provides empirical​​​‌ evidence of an extended​ pathophysiological EpiNet.

Figure 10

The image​‌ shows brain activity analysis​​ comparing seizure-zone (SZ) and​​​‌ non-seizure-zone (nSZ) regions using​ SEEG (Stereo-EEG) traces. The​‌ top panels display the​​ broad band, 4.0 Hz,​​​‌ and 80.0 Hz frequency​ traces from the anterior​‌ cingulate (SZ) and mid-front​​ gyrus (nSZ). The middle​​​‌ panels illustrate Cohen's d​ values for various frequency​‌ bands, highlighting differences in​​ bistability, E/I balance, local​​​‌ efficiency, and eigenvector centrality.​ The bottom panel presents​‌ a classification outcome for​​ seizure zones using different​​​‌ feature sets, including criticality​ and synchronization metrics. The​‌ results indicate significant differences​​ in brain dynamics between​​​‌ SZ and nSZ regions.​ (Description generated at February​‌ 6th, 2026 by Albert​​ AI with the model​​​‌ Mistral-Small-3.2-24B)

Figure 10:​ Individual level evidence of​‌ differences between seizure zone​​ (SZ) and non-SZ (nSZ)​​​‌. Top: Five minutes​ of broadband and narrowband​‌ traces from (A) an​​ SZ contact and (B)​​​‌ an nSZ contact from​ the frontal region of​‌ a representative subject. Center:​​ Criticality and synchrony assessments​​​‌ differentiated seizure zone (SZ)​ and non-SZ (nSZ) on​‌ the population level using​​ band-collapsed criticality indices. Bottom:​​​‌ Achieving optimal seizure zone​ (SZ) classification by combining​‌ all criticality and synchrony​​ features.

7.10 Encoding of​​​‌ Numerosity With Robustness to​ Object and Scene Identity​‌ in Biologically Inspired Object​​ Recognition Networks

Participants: Thomas​​​‌ Chapalain, Bertrand Thirion​.

External Collaborators: Evelyn​‌ Eger [UNICOG-U992 - Neuroimagerie​​ cognitive - Psychologie cognitive​​​‌ expérimentale ].

Number​ sense, the ability to​‌ rapidly estimate object quantities​​ in a visual scene​​​‌ without precise counting, is​ a crucial cognitive capacity​‌ found in humans and​​ many other animals. Recent​​​‌ studies have identified artificial​ neurons tuned to numbers​‌ of items in biologically​​ inspired vision models, even​​​‌ before training, and proposed​ these artificial neural networks​‌ as candidate models for​​ the emergence of number​​​‌ sense in the brain.​ But real-world numerosity perception​‌ requires abstraction from the​​ properties of individual objects​​​‌ and their contexts, unlike​ the simplified dot patterns​‌ used in previous studies.​​ Using novel synthetically generated​​​‌ photorealistic stimuli, we show​ that deep convolutional neural​‌ networks optimized for object​​ recognition encode information on​​​‌ approximate numerosity across diverse​ objects and scene types,​‌ which could be linearly​​ read out from distributed​​​‌ activity patterns of later​ convolutional layers of different​‌ network architectures tested. In​​ contrast, untrained networks with​​​‌ random weights failed to​ represent numerosity with abstractness​‌ to other visual properties​​ and instead captured mainly​​​‌ low-level visual features. Our​ findings emphasize the importance​‌ of using complex, naturalistic​​ stimuli to investigate mechanisms​​​‌ of number sense in​ both biological and artificial​‌ systems, and they suggest​​ that the capacity of​​​‌ untrained networks to account​ for early-life numerical abilities​‌ should be reassessed. They​​ further point to a​​​‌ possible, so far underappreciated,​ contribution of the brain's​‌ ventral visual pathway to​​ representing numerosity with abstractness​​​‌ to other high-level visual​ properties.

Figure 11

The image depicts​‌ a study on neural​​ network models analyzing visual​​​‌ stimuli. Panel A shows​ the process of encoding​‌ input stimuli via a​​ Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)​​ and decoding it through​​​‌ ridge regression. Panel B‌ categorizes stimuli into natural‌​‌ and artificial animals and​​ tools, with coarse-grained generalization.​​​‌ Panels C and E‌ present graphs comparing the‌​‌ performance of trained and​​ untrained models in estimating​​​‌ features like numerosity and‌ area. Panel D contrasts‌​‌ congruent and incongruent stimuli​​ examples, illustrating how various​​​‌ features are represented. The‌ overall concept explores how‌​‌ well these models can​​ interpret and generalize visual​​​‌ information. (Description generated at‌ February 6th, 2026 by‌​‌ Albert AI with the​​ model Mistral-Small-3.2-24B)

Figure 11​​​‌: Numerosity information across‌ coarse changes in visual‌​‌ properties. (A) Overview of​​ analysis procedures. Encoding step:​​​‌ Stimuli are fed to‌ the CNN models. Their‌​‌ feature representations are extracted​​ for several convolutional layers​​​‌ (Conv1 to Conv5) and‌ undergo a feature selection.‌​‌ Decoding step: Ridge regression​​ is used to learn​​​‌ a linear mapping between‌ the CNN representations of‌​‌ the stimuli and the​​ logarithm of their numerosity.​​​‌ (B) Coarse-grained generalization scheme:‌ Decoders are trained and‌​‌ tested across different quadrants​​ of the stimulus space​​​‌ corresponding to coarse semantic‌ categories (red arrows). The‌​‌ performance is averaged for​​ the predictive scores across​​​‌ all four train-test combinations.‌ (C) Numerosity prediction performance‌​‌ (mean absolute error, MAE)​​ in the coarse-grained generalization​​​‌ scheme for the different‌ CNN architectures (markers) and‌​‌ layers (colors). Perfect performance​​ is 0, and simulated​​​‌ chance performance is indicated‌ by a dashed line.‌​‌ Error bars represent STD​​ of the MAE over​​​‌ all the train-test combinations‌ and cross-validation iterations. The‌​‌ subitizing range (y-axis) corresponds​​ to 1 to 4​​​‌ objects, whereas the estimation‌ range (x-axis) corresponds to‌​‌ 6 to 24 objects.​​ (D) Stimulus subsets to​​​‌ control for effects of‌ nonnumerical quantities. Stimuli from‌​‌ each quadrant are divided​​ into a congruent and​​​‌ an incongruent subset within‌ which the nonnumerical parameters‌​‌ (IA, TA, FA and​​ Spar) are either increasing​​​‌ or decreasing with numerosity,‌ respectively. Coarse-grained generalization is‌​‌ then tested between congruent​​ and incongruent subsets. (E)​​​‌ Numerosity decoding performance (MAE)‌ for the different models‌​‌ on stimulus subsets from​​ panel D), displayed as​​​‌ in panel C.

8‌ Bilateral contracts and grants‌​‌ with industry

Participants: Philippe​​ Ciuciu, Asma Tanabene​​​‌, Thomas Moreau.‌

8.1 Bilateral contracts with‌​‌ industry

8.1.1 Siemens Healthineers​​ & AI lab (Princeton,​​​‌ USA)

Since Fall 2019,‌ Philippe Ciuciu has actively‌​‌ collaborated with the Siemens-Healthineers​​ AI lab, led by​​​‌ Mariappan Nadar. In this‌ context, a new CIFRE‌​‌ PhD student, Mrs Asma​​ Tanabene, has joint the​​​‌ MIND team as a‌ CIFRE PhD student under‌​‌ their joint supervision to​​ work on 3D sclalable​​​‌ deep learning architecture for‌ high-resolution multicoil MR image‌​‌ reconstruction at 3 Tesla​​ and beyond. On top​​​‌ of the PhD funding,‌ this contract has generated‌​‌ 50k€ for Mind,​​ a grant that is​​​‌ hosted at CEA/NeuroSpin.

8.1.2‌ Saint Gobain Research (SGR)‌​‌

There is currently a​​ consulting contract between SGR​​​‌ and Mind (Thomas Moreau)‌ to provide an expertise‌​‌ in machine learning to​​ process temporal data, numerical​​​‌ optimization and scientific computing.‌ The expertise is provided‌​‌ one half-day per month,​​​‌ in SGR offices, and​ it consists in scientific​‌ discussion sessions on the​​ ML projects leaded by​​​‌ SGR data scientists.

8.1.3​ Apple

A research collaboration​‌ between Apple (Pierre Ablin)​​ and Mind (Thomas Moreau)​​​‌ has been established. The​ goal is to develop​‌ research ideas on bilevel​​ optimization, in particular for​​​‌ the problem of data​ curation for the training​‌ of large models with​​ massive and heterogeneous datasets.​​​‌ This collaboration is being​ funded by Apple (150k€)​‌ and allowed to hire​​ a post-doc (Baptiste Goujaud).​​​‌

8.2 Bilateral Grants with​ Industry

8.2.1 Google

Mind​‌ (Thomas Moreau) received a​​ 30k€ donation from Google​​​‌ to support its open​ source activity around benchopt​‌. In particular, the​​ grant aims to support​​​‌ the organization of coding​ and benchmarking sprints around​‌ benchopt, the development of​​ visualization tools, and the​​​‌ benchmarking of bilevel solvers,​ in particular the ones​‌ using jaxopt.

9​​ Partnerships and cooperations

9.1​​​‌ International initiatives

9.1.1 Inria​ associate team not involved​‌ in an IIL or​​ an international program

DANDI​​​‌

Participants: Bertrand Thirion,​ Pierre-Louis Barbarant, Rémi​‌ Gau, Elizabeth Dupré​​.

  • Title:
    DANDI: Domain​​​‌ Adaptation for Neural Data​ Integration
  • Partner Institution(s):
    Université​‌ de Montréal, Canada
  • Date/Duration:​​
    2025-2027
  • Additionnal info/keywords:
  • abstract​​​‌

    We propose to evaluate​ our ability to recover​‌ from a known distribution​​ shift when transferring from​​​‌ a healthy to a​ clinical population, assessing the​‌ impact of data availability​​ and methods for domain​​​‌ adaptation procedures. Specifically, we​ will evaluate whether training​‌ models on individual participants​​ can effectively transfer information​​​‌ (1) within a source​ population, and (2) from​‌ a source population to​​ a target population. For​​​‌ such approaches to scale​ on high-dimensional datasets, the​‌ best approach is the​​ joint specification of transformation​​​‌ models mapping a learned​ template to individual datasets.​‌ To assess the feasibility​​ of the procedure, we​​​‌ will rely on exceptionally​ rich brain imaging data​‌ available to the participants:​​ the Courtois-Neuromod dataset and​​​‌ the target dataset, the​ Psychosis Research using Integrated​‌ Serial Measurements (PRISME), was​​ collected from 12 participants​​​‌ who currently have or​ who previously had a​‌ diagnosis of active psychosis,​​ with clinical and neuroimaging​​​‌ data collected monthly for​ a year, suing the​‌ same sequences as Courtois​​ Neuromod.

    The associate team​​​‌ is also strongly involved​ insoftware development, in particular​‌ with the development of​​ Nilearn.

9.2 European initiatives​​​‌

9.2.1 Horizon Europe

EBRAINS​ 2.0

EBRAINS 2.0 project​‌ on cordis.europa.eu

  • Title:
    EBRAINS​​ 2.0: A Research Infrastructure​​​‌ to Advance Neuroscience and​ Brain Health
  • Duration:
    From​‌ January 1, 2024 to​​ December 31, 2026
  • Partners:​​​‌
    • INSTITUT NATIONAL DE RECHERCHE​ EN INFORMATIQUE ET AUTOMATIQUE​‌ (INRIA), France
    • MEDIZINISCHE UNIVERSITAET​​ WIEN, Austria
    • CONVELOP -​​​‌ COOPERATIVE KNOWLEDGE DESIGN GMBH,​ Austria
    • REGION HOVEDSTADEN (REGIONH),​‌ Denmark
    • HEINRICH-HEINE-UNIVERSITAET DUESSELDORF (UDUS),​​ Germany
    • THE CHANCELLOR MASTERS​​​‌ AND SCHOLARS OF THE​ UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE, United​‌ Kingdom
    • INSTITUT NATIONAL DE​​ LA SANTE ET DE​​​‌ LA RECHERCHE MEDICALE (INSERM),​ France
    • INSTITUT NATIONAL DE​‌ LA SANTE ET DE​​ LA RECHERCHE MEDICALE (INSERM),​​​‌ France
    • UNIVERSITE LYON 1​ CLAUDE BERNARD, France
    • KUNGLIGA​‌ TEKNISKA HOEGSKOLAN (KTH), Sweden​​
    • THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER​​ (UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER), United​​​‌ Kingdom
    • EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF‌ NEUROLOGY, Austria
    • FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM JULICH‌​‌ GMBH (FZJ), Germany
    • KONINKLIJKE​​ NEDERLANDSE AKADEMIE VAN WETENSCHAPPEN​​​‌ - KNAW (KNAW), Netherlands‌
    • UNIVERSITEIT GENT (UGent), Belgium‌​‌
    • TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITAET MUENCHEN (TUM),​​ Germany
    • COMMISSARIAT A L​​​‌ ENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX‌ ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES (CEA), France‌​‌
    • EBRAINS (EBRAINS), Belgium
    • ASSISTANCE​​ PUBLIQUE HOPITAUX DE PARIS,​​​‌ France
    • RUPRECHT-KARLS-UNIVERSITAET HEIDELBERG (UHEI),‌ Germany
    • ATHINA-EREVNITIKO KENTRO KAINOTOMIAS‌​‌ STIS TECHNOLOGIES TIS PLIROFORIAS,​​ TON EPIKOINONION KAI TIS​​​‌ GNOSIS (ATHENA - RESEARCH‌ AND INNOVATION CENTER), Greece‌​‌
    • UNIVERSITAET BERN, Switzerland
    • RISE​​ RESEARCH INSTITUTES OF SWEDEN​​​‌ AB (RISE), Sweden
    • UNIVERSITA‌ DEGLI STUDI DI TORINO‌​‌ (UNITO), Italy
    • UNIVERSITEIT MAASTRICHT,​​ Netherlands
    • HITS GGMBH (HITS),​​​‌ Germany
    • ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FEDERALE‌ DE LAUSANNE (EPFL), Switzerland‌​‌
    • UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI​​ PADOVA (UNIPD), Italy
    • CENTRE​​​‌ HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE VAUDOIS (CHUV),‌ Switzerland
    • NORGES MILJO-OG BIOVITENSKAPELIGE‌​‌ UNIVERSITET (NMBU), Norway
    • LIETUVOS​​ SVEIKATOS MOKSLU UNIVERSITETAS (LSMU),​​​‌ Lithuania
    • UNIVERSITAT TRIER, Germany‌
    • MEDIZINISCHE UNIVERSITAT INNSBRUCK (MUI),‌​‌ Austria
    • TAMPEREEN KORKEAKOULUSAATIO SR​​ (TAMPERE UNIVERSITY), Finland
    • UNIVERSITE​​​‌ GRENOBLE ALPES (UGA), France‌
    • CONSIGLIO NAZIONALE DELLE RICERCHE‌​‌ (CNR), Italy
    • UNIVERSITE DE​​ BORDEAUX (UBx), France
    • UNIVERSITA​​​‌ DEGLI STUDI DI PAVIA‌ (UNIPV), Italy
    • FONDAZIONE PER‌​‌ LA RICERCA BIOMEDICA AVANZATA​​ ONLUS (VIMM), Italy
    • EIDGENOESSISCHE​​​‌ TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE ZUERICH (ETH‌ Zürich), Switzerland
    • CHARITE -‌​‌ UNIVERSITAETSMEDIZIN BERLIN, Germany
    • UNIVERSITAETSKLINIKUM​​ HAMBURG-EPPENDORF (UKE), Germany
    • UNIVERSITETET​​​‌ I OSLO (UNIVERSITY OF‌ OSLO), Norway
    • POLITECNICO DI‌​‌ MILANO (POLIMI), Italy
    • UNIVERSITA​​ DEGLI STUDI DI MILANO​​​‌ (UMIL), Italy
    • KAROLINSKA INSTITUTET‌ (KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE), Sweden
    • FONDEN‌​‌ DEMOCRACY X (DEMOCRACY X),​​ Denmark
    • KLINIKUM DER TECHNISCHEN​​​‌ UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN (TUM KLINIKUM)‌ (TUM-MED), Germany
    • PROTISVALOR MEDITERRANEE‌​‌ SAS (PVM), France
    • UNIVERSIDAD​​ REY JUAN CARLOS (URJC),​​​‌ Spain
    • UNIVERSITE D'AIX MARSEILLE‌ (AMU), France
    • UNIVERSITY COLLEGE‌​‌ LONDON, United Kingdom
    • CINECA​​ CONSORZIO INTERUNIVERSITARIO (CINECA), Italy​​​‌
    • UNIVERSITAETSKLINIKUM FREIBURG (UKLFR), Germany‌
    • CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA‌​‌ RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE CNRS (CNRS),​​ France
    • KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN​​​‌ (KU Leuven), Belgium
    • CODEMART‌ SRL (CODEMART), Romania
    • UNIVERSIDAD‌​‌ POLITECNICA DE MADRID (UPM),​​ Spain
    • LABORATORIO EUROPEO DI​​​‌ SPETTROSCOPIE NON LINEARI (LENS),‌ Italy
    • AZIENDA SANITARIA UNIVERSITARIA‌​‌ FRIULI CENTRALE (AZIENDA SANITARIA​​ UNIVERSITARIA FRIULI CENTRALE), Italy​​​‌
    • TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITAET DRESDEN (TUD),‌ Germany
  • Inria contact:
    Bertrand‌​‌ Thirion
  • Coordinator:
  • Summary:
    EBRAINS​​ is a collaborative European​​​‌ Research Infrastructure designed to‌ advance and accelerate progress‌​‌ in neuroscience and brain​​ health. This innovative infrastructure,​​​‌ a legacy of the‌ Human Brain Project (HBP),‌​‌ is an ecosystem where​​ researchers, clinicians and experts​​​‌ from various disciplines converge‌ to explore and analyze‌​‌ brain complexity – from​​ molecular and cellular levels​​​‌ to the functioning of‌ the entire organ. Therefore,‌​‌ the project aims to​​ create a new standard​​​‌ for brain atlases from‌ the micro- to the‌​‌ macro-scale, link foundational multi-level​​ data and connectomes in​​​‌ the healthy and pathological‌ brain with atlases and‌​‌ models, create digital twins​​ through modelling and simulation​​​‌ as well as unique,‌ excellent, and preferred services‌​‌ for FAIR neuroscience data.​​ The overarching goal of​​​‌ EBRAINS 2.0 is to‌ foster a deeper understanding‌​‌ of brain structure and​​ function with dedicated and​​​‌ mature software tools, to‌ facilitate the development of‌​‌ more effective treatments, new​​ drugs, diagnostics and preventive​​​‌ measures for neuro-psychiatric disorders.‌ We expect that EBRAINS‌​‌ 2.0 catalyzes progress in​​​‌ the field of large-scale​ models running on HPC​‌ towards Exascale and leads​​ to innovative solutions for​​​‌ neuro-inspired computing, and cognitive​ technologies such as neurorobotics​‌ and AI. Sophisticated digital​​ modeling and data analytics​​​‌ capabilities will benefit communities​ beyond neuroscience, such as​‌ biomedicine. We will advance​​ EBRAINS technology, platform services​​​‌ and the base infrastructure​ roadmap, educate and train​‌ a new community of​​ users and developers from​​​‌ academia, industry and SMEs,​ and ensure knowledge transfer.​‌ EBRAINS 2.0 will become​​ the neuroscience hub in​​​‌ the European infrastructure landscape,​ through building strong links​‌ with the European data​​ spaces, EOSC and EuroHPC​​​‌ JU, centers of excellences​ and other initiatives. Globally,​‌ EBRAINS 2.0 will make​​ a strong contribution to​​​‌ the new era of​ digital neuroscience and foster​‌ European leadership in this​​ field.
SafeREG

SafeREG project​​​‌ on cordis.europa.eu

  • Title:
    Probabilistic​ Non-Rigid Registration for Safe​‌ Brain Tumor Resection
  • Duration:​​
    From August 1, 2024​​​‌ to July 31, 2026​
  • Partners:
    • INSTITUT NATIONAL DE​‌ RECHERCHE EN INFORMATIQUE ET​​ AUTOMATIQUE (INRIA), France
  • Inria​​​‌ contact:
    Demian Wassermann
  • Coordinator:​
  • Summary:

    Brain tumors strike​‌ people in the prime​​ of life. Surgical resection​​​‌ is the initial treatment​ for nearly all brain​‌ tumors and aims at​​ maximizing the extent of​​​‌ tumor resection while preserving​ the patient's cognitive function.​‌ To optimize this tradeoff,​​ neuronavigation systems have been​​​‌ developed to provide intraoperative​ guidance to surgeons. These​‌ systems allow for the​​ visualization of the position​​​‌ of surgeons' surgical tools​ relative to the tumor​‌ and critical brain areas​​ visible in preoperative Magnetic​​​‌ Resonance Imaging. However, these​ systems become inaccurate as​‌ the surgery progresses since​​ they do not account​​​‌ for brain deformation and​ tissue resection occurring during​‌ surgery.

    In an interdisciplinary​​ effort, project SafeREG combines​​​‌ the researcher's background to​ the expertise of computational​‌ scientists from INRIA and​​ clinicians from Parisian hospitals.​​​‌ Its objective is to​ invent a novel image​‌ registration methodology with intraoperative​​ ultrasound that is rich​​​‌ enough to capture complex​ deformations occurring at the​‌ tumor and resection cavity​​ boundaries, fast enough to​​​‌ be employable clinically, and​ interpretable enough for informed​‌ decision-making by neurosurgeons. This​​ will be accomplished by​​​‌ pushing the envelope of​ scientific knowledge in (1)​‌ cross-modality domain adaptation for​​ weakly- and unsupervised image​​​‌ segmentation; (2) modality-invariance representation​ learning using contrastive learning;​‌ (3) non-rigid registration with​​ discrete probabilistic methods; (4)​​​‌ simulated-based variational inference for​ registration uncertainty quantification that​‌ leverages biomechanical knowledge. This​​ research has the potential​​​‌ to deliver accurate and​ informed image-guided surgery, conferring​‌ a lower risk of​​ new neurologic deficits and​​​‌ improved patient prognosis. Beyond​ neurosurgery, it has broad​‌ applications to additional areas​​ of image-guided therapy, including​​​‌ spine, liver, and prostate​ surgery.

9.3 National initiatives​‌

CEA Audace at-risk research​​ program
  • Title:
    BrainSync
  • Duration:​​​‌
    11/2024 -> 04/2029
  • Coordinator:​
    Philippe Ciuciu (CEA/DRF/JOLIOT/NEUROSPIN/MIND), Saclay​‌
  • Partners:
    • CEA/DRF/JOLIOT/NEUROSPIN (BAOBAB, UNICOG),​​ Saclay
    • CEA/DRT/LETI/CLINATEC, Grenoble
    • CEA/DRT/LIST/DSCIN,​​​‌ Grenoble
    • Inria-CEA MIND, Palaiseau​
    • APHP, FHU NeuroVasc, Paris-Nord​‌
    • GHU Paris Neuroscience &​​ Psychiatry
    • CHU Grenoble-Alpes
    • LPNC,​​​‌ University Grenoble-Alphes & CNRS​
    • CHU St Etienne
  • Inria​‌ contact:
    Philippe Ciuciu
  • Summary:​​

    The project aims to​​ understand the learning mechanisms​​​‌ that enable the human‌ brain to adapt to‌​‌ cognitive demand via the​​ flexible recruitment of different​​​‌ regions and connections, thus‌ enabling exploration of an‌​‌ uncertain and changing environment.​​ Understanding these mechanisms in​​​‌ healthy subjects, coupled with‌ the creation of a‌​‌ high-resolution anatomical-functional digital brain​​ atlas of a cohort​​​‌ of post-acute stroke patients‌ (MOTIF-STROKE clinical trial), will‌​‌ enable us to propose​​ AI models predictive of​​​‌ upper limb motor recovery‌ in these patients, and‌​‌ therapeutic innovations (use of​​ neuroprostheses) for a small​​​‌ number of them in‌ a second clinical trial.‌​‌ Clinical evaluation of relearning​​ processes will be based​​​‌ on the use of‌ incremental and adaptive artificial‌​‌ intelligence (AI) algorithms linked​​ to neuroplasticity processes.

    This​​​‌ project has received a‌ funding of 5M€ for‌​‌ a period of 4.5​​ years starting in November​​​‌ 2024 with a go/no-go‌ positioned after a period‌​‌ of 30 months (04/30/2027).​​

CEA BlueSky project
  • Title:​​​‌
    Brain & Computers
  • Duration:‌
    2023 -> 2026
  • Coordinator:‌​‌
    Philippe Ciuciu (CEA/DRF/JOLIOT/NEUROSPIN/MIND), Saclay​​
  • Partners:
    • CEA/DRF/JOLIOT/NEUROSPIN (BAOBAB, UNICOG),​​​‌ Saclay
    • CEA/DRT/LETI/CLINATEC, Grenoble
    • CEA/DRT/LIST/DSCIN,‌ Grenoble
  • Inria contact:
    Philippe‌​‌ Ciuciu
  • Summary:

    Artificial Intelligence​​ (AI) is now capable​​​‌ of approaching human performance‌ in tasks such as‌​‌ visual recognition, classification (i.e.,​​ decision-making), and even textual​​​‌ or visual production (e.g.,‌ GPT-4). Understanding the human‌​‌ brain mechanisms of learning​​ and decision-making in an​​​‌ uncertain environment remains a‌ major scientific challenge in‌​‌ neuroscience. This understanding will​​ enable the development of​​​‌ AI architectures that replicate‌ brain circuits. Additionally, in‌​‌ clinical applications, it can​​ lead to a generational​​​‌ leap in the design‌ of neuroprostheses. These neuroprostheses‌​‌ hold great promise for​​ improving the quality of​​​‌ life for individuals affected‌ by spinal cord injuries‌​‌ (approximately 30% of cases).​​

    The two main objectives​​​‌ of this BlueSky project‌ complement each other. On‌​‌ one hand, in healthy​​ subjects, the goal is​​​‌ to design computational models‌ based on AI that‌​‌ encode these cerebral functions​​ to gain a more​​​‌ precise understanding of the‌ associated brain activity. On‌​‌ the other hand, the​​ objective is to enable​​​‌ a greater number of‌ patients to control neuroprostheses‌​‌ autonomously through AI, making​​ these medical devices more​​​‌ widely accepted as a‌ therapeutic solution for motor‌​‌ rehabilitation. Tackling such a​​ challenge is not without​​​‌ risks and requires expanding‌ knowledge in neuroscience, surpassing‌​‌ current technological and clinical​​ limits. It also calls​​​‌ for strong synergies among‌ the various CEA institutes‌​‌ involved (Joliot, LETI, and​​ LIST) and their academic​​​‌ (Inserm, Inria, Universities Paris-Saclay,‌ and Grenoble Alpes) and‌​‌ clinical partners (CHU Grenoble-Alpes).​​

    This project has received​​​‌ a funding of 1.5M€‌ for the 2023-2025 period.‌​‌

ANR DARLING
  • Title:
    DARLING:​​ Distributed adaptation and learning​​​‌ over graph signals
  • Duration:‌
    2020 -> 2025 (extended)‌​‌
  • Coordinator:
    Cédric Richard (cedric.richard@unice.fr),Professor​​ 3IA Senior Chair in​​​‌ UCA
  • Partners:
    • Université Côte‌ d'Azur Nice, France
    • CNRS,‌​‌ École Normale Supérieure, Lyon,​​ France
    • Gipsa-lab, UMR 5216,​​​‌ CNRS, UGA, Grenoble, France‌
    • CentraleSupélec, University of Paris-Saclay,‌​‌ Gif-sur-yvette, France
  • Inria contact:​​
    Philippe Ciuciu
  • Summary:
    The​​​‌ DARLING project will aim‌ to propose new adaptive‌​‌ learning methods, distributed and​​​‌ collaborative on large dynamic​ graphs in order to​‌ extract structured information of​​ the data flows generated​​​‌ and/or transiting at the​ nodes of these graphs.​‌ In order to obtain​​ performance guarantees, these methods​​​‌ will be systematically accompanied​ by an in-depth study​‌ of random matrix theory.​​ This powerful tool, never​​​‌ exploited so far in​ this context although perfectly​‌ suited for inference on​​ random graphs, will thereby​​​‌ provide even avenues for​ improvement. Finally, in addition​‌ to their evaluation on​​ public data sets, the​​​‌ methods will be compared​ with each other using​‌ two advanced imaging techniques​​ in which two of​​​‌ the partners are involved:​ radio astronomy with the​‌ giant SKA instrument (Obs.​​ Côte d'Azur) and MEG​​​‌ brain imaging (Inria MIND​ at NeuroSpin, CEA Saclay).​‌ Sheng Wang as a​​ postdoc in MIND and​​​‌ Merlin Dumeur as a​ MIND PhD student in​‌ co-tutelle with Matias Palva​​ from Aalto University, Finland​​​‌ are actually involved in​ the processing of MEG​‌ and S/EEG time series​​ on graphs, notably to​​​‌ analyze scale-free (i.e. critical​ and bistability) phenomena across​‌ these graphs and extract​​ potentially new biomarkers for​​​‌ characterizing the pathophysiology of​ epileptogenic zone (EZ) in​‌ drug resistant epilepsy.
ANR​​ VLFMRI
  • Title:
    VLFMRI: Very​​​‌ low field MRI for​ babies
  • Duration:
    2021 ->​‌ 2025
  • Coordinator:
    Claude Fermon​​ (CEA Saclay, DRF/IRAMIS/SPECT)
  • Partners:​​​‌
    • CEA/SHFJ/BIOMAPS, Orsay, France
    • CEA/NeuroSpin,​ Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    • APHP Robert​‌ Debré hospital, Paris, France​​
    • APHP Bicêtre hospital, Kremlin-Bicêtre,​​​‌ France
  • Inria contact:
    Philippe​ Ciuciu
  • Summary:
    VLFMRI aims​‌ at developing a very​​ low-field Magnetic Resonance Imaging​​​‌ (MRI) system as an​ alternative to conventional high-field​‌ MRI for continuous imaging​​ of premature newborns to​​​‌ detect hemorrhages or ischemia.​ This system is based​‌ on a combination of​​ a new generation of​​​‌ magnetic sensors based on​ spin electronics, optimized MR​‌ acquisition sequences (based on​​ the SPARKLING patent, Inria-CEA​​​‌ MIND team at NeuroSpin)​ and a open and​‌ compatible system with an​​ incubator that will allow​​​‌ to achieve an image​ resolution of 1mm3​‌ on a whole baby​​ body in a short​​​‌ scan time. This project​ is a partnership of​‌ three academic partners and​​ two hospital departments. The​​​‌ different stages of the​ project are the finalization​‌ of the hardware development​​ and software system, preclinical​​​‌ validation on small animals​ and clinical validation. Kumari​‌ Pooja has been hired​​ in January 2022 as​​​‌ research engineer in MIND​ to interact with the​‌ coordinator of this ANR​​ project, Claude Fermon and​​​‌ design new accelerated acquisition​ methods for verly low​‌ field MRI. Preliminary encouraging​​ results allow us to​​​‌ retrospectively accelerate MRI acquisition​ by a factor of​‌ 10 without degrading image​​ quality at 2mm isotropic​​​‌ resolution.
ANR MICBrainPres
  • Title:​
    MicBrainPres: Distributed adaptation and​‌ learning over graph signals​​
  • Duration:
    2023 -> 2026​​​‌
  • Coordinator:
    Demian Wassermann
  • Partners:​
    • Brain and Spine Institute,​‌ Paris, France
    • CNRS, Université​​ de Paris, Paris, France​​​‌
  • Inria contact:
    Demian Wassermann​
  • Summary:
    The main goal​‌ of this project is​​ to harness the latest​​​‌ advances on machine learning-based​ neuroimage processing technologies to​‌ improve function-preserving brain tumour​​ resection. Identifying eloquent brain​​ regions is fundamental to​​​‌ performing tumour resection while‌ preserving a maximum level‌​‌ of cognitive function. Despite​​ the sustained advance in​​​‌ predicting subject-level cognitive abilities‌ from neuroimaging data, current‌​‌ approaches lack sensitivity and​​ specificity in identifying eloquent​​​‌ brain regions. This hinders‌ neuroimaging's usefulness for pre-surgical‌​‌ planning as a tool​​ to predict the preservation​​​‌ of cognitive function after‌ tumour resection. In this‌​‌ project, we propose that​​ using subject-specific parcellations, derived​​​‌ from functional and diffusion‌ MRI through deep-learning technologies,‌​‌ will achieve the needed​​ sensitivity and specificity to​​​‌ locate eloquent areas pre-surgically‌ and to predict cortical‌​‌ reshaping after tumour resection.​​
ANR EBUL
  • Title:
    EBUL:​​​‌ Event-based Unsupervised Learning for‌ Physiological Signals
  • Duration:
    2023‌​‌ -> 2027
  • Coordinator:
    Thomas​​ Moreau
  • Partners:
    • INRIA MIND,​​​‌ Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • Inria contact:‌
    Thomas Moreau
  • Summary:

    Sensor-based‌​‌ body monitoring is now​​ routine clinical care. The​​​‌ resulting records are called‌ physiological signals. While enormous‌​‌ quantities of signals are​​ collected every day, the​​​‌ cost and time necessary‌ to clean and annotate‌​‌ them is prohibitive to​​ constitute large labeled databases.​​​‌ When working with physiological‌ signals, extra sources of‌​‌ information are the events​​ surrounding the recordings. Events​​​‌ are external phenomena that‌ impact the signal and‌​‌ can correlate with the​​ prediction task considered. EBUL​​​‌ propose to develop novel‌ unsupervised learning techniques to‌​‌ process such records based​​ on the notion of​​​‌ events, and to apply‌ them to process general‌​‌ anesthesia records collected in​​ Paris hospital Lariboisière. The​​​‌ methodology of the project‌ relies on the development‌​‌ of novel point process​​ models adapted to capture​​​‌ the distribution of physiological‌ events, and their coupling‌​‌ with event detection algorithms.​​ This will provide novel​​​‌ signal representations based on‌ the distribution of events‌​‌ inside them, which are​​ simpler to analyze and​​​‌ fine tune to derive‌ predictive bio-markers.

    The EBUL‌​‌ project is organized around​​ 3 objectives:

    • Develop novel​​​‌ point process models for‌ physiological signals
    • Learn joint‌​‌ models for signals and​​ events
    • Develop high-quality models​​​‌ for general anesthesia that‌ can reach clinical research‌​‌
ANR BenchArk
  • Title:
    BenchArk:​​ An efficient and robust​​​‌ benchmarking suite for AI‌
  • Duration:
    2024 -> 2028‌​‌
  • Coordinator:
    Thomas Moreau, Mathurin​​ Massias, Joseph Salmon
  • Partners:​​​‌
    • INRIA MIND, Gif-sur-Yvette, France‌
    • INRIA OCKHAM, Lyon, France‌​‌
    • Université de Montpellier, Montpellier,​​ France
  • Inria contact:
    Thomas​​​‌ Moreau
  • Summary:
    Numerical evaluation‌ of novel methods, a.k.a.‌​‌ benchmarking, is a pillar​​ of the scientific method​​​‌ in machine learning. However,‌ due to practical and‌​‌ statistical obstacles, the reproducibility​​ of published results is​​​‌ currently insufficient: many details‌ can invalidate numerical comparisons,‌​‌ from insufficient uncertainty quantification​​ to improper methodology. In​​​‌ 2022, the benchopt initiative‌ provided an open source‌​‌ Python package together with​​ a framework to seamlessly​​​‌ run, reuse, share and‌ publish benchmarks in numerical‌​‌ optimization. In this project,​​ we aim at bringing​​​‌ benchopt to the whole‌ machine learning community, making‌​‌ it a new standard​​ in benchmarking by empowering​​​‌ researchers and practitioners with‌ efficient and valid benchmarking‌​‌ methods. Our goal is​​ to ensure reproducibility and​​​‌ consistency in model evaluation.‌ We will federate the‌​‌ machine learning community to​​​‌ develop informative and statistically​ valid benchmarks, while providing​‌ methods to reduce identified​​ hurdles in implementing such​​​‌ practices. The results of​ the project will be​‌ integrated in the open​​ source benchopt library.
Brain​​​‌ Health Trajectories
  • Title:
    Brain​ Health Trajectories
  • Duration:
    2023​‌ -> 2028
  • Coordinator:
    Viktor​​ Jirsa, INS Marseille
  • Partners:​​​‌
    • INSERM Délégation Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur​ et Corse
    • CNRS IDF​‌ Sud (Gif)
    • Université d'Aix-Marseille​​
    • CHU de Grenoble
    • CEA,​​​‌ DRF, Joliot, Neurospin
    • INSTITUT​ NATIONAL DE RECHERCHE EN​‌ INFORMATIQUE ET AUTOMATIQUE
  • Inria​​ contact:
    Bertrand Thirion
  • Summary:​​​‌

    This project is part​ of PEPR Santé Numérique.​‌ The Brain Health Trajectories​​ project is part of​​​‌ the PEPR Santé numérique​ program, a major research​‌ initiative of the French​​ government as part of​​​‌ the France 2030 investment​ plan.

    The project prioritizes​‌ the early identification of​​ individuals at risk of​​​‌ developing a disease, so​ they can receive appropriate​‌ treatment before the disease​​ develops or at least​​​‌ adapt their lifestyle to​ delay the onset of​‌ the pathology and slow​​ down the progression of​​​‌ impairment. It aims to​ develop tools to characterize​‌ individuals' brain health and​​ lay the foundation for​​​‌ a platform for screening,​ decision-making within the population,​‌ and prognostic monitoring of​​ treatment efficacy.

ANR VITE​​​‌
  • Title:
    VITE: Explainable AI​ through Variable Importance Tests​‌
  • Duration:
    2024 -> 2027​​
  • Coordinator:
    Bertrand Thirion
  • Partners:​​​‌
    • INRIA MIND, Gif-sur-Yvette, France​
    • Université de Toulouse, Toulouse,​‌ France
    • Université de Montpellier,​​ Montpellier, France
  • Inria contact:​​​‌
    Bertrand Thirion
  • Summary:
    The​ VITE project aims to​‌ develop new statistical methods​​ to interpret complex machine​​​‌ learning models, particularly in​ high-dimensional settings such as​‌ neuroimaging and genomics. The​​ focus will be on​​​‌ creating variable importance tests​ that can provide insights​‌ into the contributions of​​ individual features to model​​​‌ predictions. By leveraging recent​ advances in statistical theory​‌ and computational techniques, the​​ project seeks to enhance​​​‌ the interpretability of AI​ models, making them more​‌ transparent and trustworthy for​​ applications in healthcare and​​​‌ other critical domains.
ANR​ SPEAKOUT
  • Title:
    SPEAKOUT: Statistical​‌ and machine learning methods​​ for decoding speech from​​​‌ brain signals
  • Duration:
    2025​ -> 2028
  • Coordinator:
    Anne-Lise​‌ Giraud
  • Partners:
    • INRIA MIND,​​ Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    • Institut de​​​‌ l'audition, Paris, France
    • institut​ du cerveau, Paris, France​‌
  • Inria contact:
    Bertrand Thirion​​
  • Summary:
    The SPEAKOUT project​​​‌ aims to develop advanced​ statistical and machine learning​‌ methods to decode speech​​ from brain signals. By​​​‌ analyzing neural activity associated​ with speech production and​‌ perception, the project seeks​​ to create models that​​​‌ can accurately interpret and​ reconstruct spoken language from​‌ brain data. This research​​ has the potential to​​​‌ revolutionize communication for individuals​ with speech impairments, enabling​‌ them to express themselves​​ through brain-computer interfaces. The​​​‌ project will leverage cutting-edge​ techniques in signal processing,​‌ deep learning, and neuroscience​​ to achieve its goals.​​​‌

10 Dissemination

Participants: Demian​ Wassermann, Bertrand Thirion​‌, Philippe Ciuciu,​​ Thomas Moreau, Chaithya​​​‌ Giliyar Radhakrishna.

10.1​ Promoting scientific activities

10.1.1​‌ Scientific events: organisation

10.1.2 Journal​​​‌

Member of the editorial‌ boards
Reviewer‌​‌ - reviewing activities
  • P.​​ Ciuciu
    IEEE Transactions on​​​‌ Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions‌ on Cloud Computing, Magnetic‌​‌ Resonance in Medicine, NeuroImage.​​
  • B. Thirion
    NeuroImage, MEdIA,​​​‌ IEEE Transactions on Medical‌ Imaging, Brain Structure and‌​‌ Function, Human Brain Mapping,​​ Nature Communications.
  • C. Giliyar​​​‌ Radhakrishna
    Magnetic Resonance in‌ Medicine, IEEE Transactions on‌​‌ Medical Imaging.
  • T. Moreau​​
    IEEE Transactions on Signal​​​‌ Processing.
  • Demian Wassermann:
    Reviewer‌ for Funding Institutions: H2020,‌​‌ ANR (France), Netherlands Organisation​​ for Scientific Research, National​​​‌ Agency for Scientific and‌ Technological Promotion (Argentina). Reviewer‌​‌ for NeuroImage, Nature Communications,​​ Nature Communications Biology, IEEE​​​‌ Transactions in Medical Imaging,‌ Medical Image Analysis.

10.1.3‌​‌ Invited talks

  • B.Thirion

     

    • April​​ 2025: Invited talk at​​​‌ Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey.‌
    • March 2025: Invited talk‌​‌ at the deep phenotyping​​ workshop, Paris, France.
    • January​​​‌ 2025: Invited talk at‌ the Académie des Sciences,‌​‌ Paris, France.
    • June 2025:​​ Invited talk at Sanofi,​​​‌ Gentilly, France.
    • April 2025:‌ Invited talk at Université‌​‌ Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.​​
    • December 2025: Invited talk​​​‌ at the Morocco Academy‌ of Sciences, Rabat, Morocco.‌​‌
    • March 2025: presentation of​​ Nilearn development at OSCII​​​‌ workshop, Aussois, France.
    • June‌ 2025: presentation at ASIC‌​‌ workshop, Saint Gervais, France.​​
  • Philippe Ciuciu:

     

    • Invited speaker​​​‌ for the 50th anniversary‌ of IRISA (Rennes, FR,‌​‌ 12/2025, .www)
    • FORTH​​ WS on Comput. Intell.​​​‌ in Imag. Inv. Prob.‌ (Heraklion, GR, 09/2025, .www‌​‌)
    • WS on Inv.​​ Prob. and AI in​​​‌ Medicine (Bath, UK, 07/2025,‌ .www)
  • Thomas Moreau:‌​‌

     

    • November 2025 – Joint​​ invited talk for the​​​‌ Open Science Days and‌ journée de la recherche‌​‌ frugale, Grenoble
    • September 2025​​ – Inverse Problem and​​​‌ Imaging, CIRM, Luminy
    • June‌ 2025 – Plenary talk‌​‌ for Journée de la​​ donnée, AMDAC Ministère de​​​‌ la santé, Paris
  • Demian‌ Wassermann:

     

    • 2025: Neurofunctional Imaging‌​‌ Group – Université de​​ Bordeaux 2025: Neuroscience Through​​​‌ the Lens of Machine‌ Learning
    • 2025: UCL Department‌​‌ of Computer Science (UK):​​ Linking Neuroimaging and Cognition:​​​‌ from Automated Meta Analyses‌ to Subject-Specific Prediction Through‌​‌ Probabilistic Modelling

10.1.4 Scientific​​ expertise

  • B.Thirion

     

    • Expert for​​​‌ the European Research Council‌ (ERC) in the panel‌​‌ PE6
    • Member of the​​ Inria-Académie des Sciences joint​​​‌ committee for yearly prizes‌

10.1.5 Research administration

  • P.‌​‌ Ciuciu

     

    • Member of the​​​‌ Board of Directors at​ NeuroSpin (CEA).
    • Member of​‌ the team leaders committee​​ at Inria Saclay Ile-de-France​​​‌
    • Member of the steering​ committee of the CEA​‌ cross-disciplinary research program on​​ numerical simulation and AI.​​​‌
  • B. Thirion

     

    • Délégué Scientifique​ of Inria Saclay Center​‌ until September 2025.
    • Member​​ of ENS Paris-Saclay Scientific​​​‌ Council
    • Member of Telecom​ Sud Paris Scientific Council​‌
    • Member of Inria Commission​​ évaluation
  • D. Wassermann

     

    • Deputy​​​‌ Director of the DataIA​ Institute (Université Paris Saclay)​‌

10.2 Teaching - Supervision​​ - Juries - Educational​​​‌ and pedagogical outreach

  • P.​ Ciuciu

     

    • Tutorial presenter at​‌ the 2024 EUSIPCO conference​​: Computational MRI in​​​‌ the Deep Learning Era:​ The Two Facets of​‌ Acquisition and Image Reconstruction​​.
    • Lecturer at the​​​‌ Institut d'Optique Graduate School​ (3rd year, Signal &​‌ Images major).
    • Lecturer at​​ the M2 ATSI (CentraleSupelec,​​​‌ ENS Paris-Saclay): Medical imaging​ course.
  • D. Wassermann

     

    • Master​‌ MVA (École Polytechnique, École​​ Normale Superiore, Centrale Supelec):​​​‌ Graphical Models
    • Master in​ Biomedical Engineering (Université Paris​‌ Descartes): Quantification in NeuroImaging.​​
  • T. Moreau

     

    • Master Data​​​‌ Science (IPP/UP Saclay): Datacamp.​
  • B.Thirion

     

    • MVA Master (École​‌ Polytechnique, École Normale Superiore,​​ Centrale Supelec): Brain Function​​​‌ ; 12h
    • NeuroEngineering Master​ (UPSaclay): fMRI data analysis;​‌ 2h

10.2.1 Supervision

  • P.​​ Ciuciu

     

    • Merlin Dumeur (with​​​‌ M. Palva, Aalto Univ),​ PhD in cotutelle (4y),​‌ 2020-2025 (defense in Feb​​ 2025)
    • Pierre-Antoine Comby (with​​​‌ A. Vignaud, CEA), PhD​ 2021-2025 (defense in March​‌ 2025)
    • Serge Brosset, (with​​ Z. Saghi, CEA) PhD​​​‌ 2022-2025
    • Asma Tanabene (with​ C. Giliyar-Radhakrishna), PhD 2024-2027​‌
    • Caini Pan (w. A.​​ Vignaud & C. Giliyar-Radhakrishna),​​​‌ PhD 2024-2027
    • Caini Pan,​ M2, Telecom ParisTech, (Apr​‌ - Oct 2024, with​​ C. Giliyar-Radhakrishna)
  • B. Thirion​​​‌

     

    • Thomas Chapalain, PhD 2021-2025​ (with E.Eger, CEA)
    • Nicolas​‌ Salvy, PhD 2023-2026 (with​​ H.Talbot, CentraleSupelec)
    • Joseph Paillard,​​​‌ 2024-2027 (with D.Engemann, Roche)​
    • Angel Reyero Lobo, 2024-2027​‌ (with P.Neuvial, CNRS)
    • Sonia​​ Mazelet, 2024-2027 (with R.Flamary,​​​‌ IPParis)
    • Pierre-Louis Barbarant, 2024-2027​ (with F.Meyniel, CEA)
    • Fernanda​‌ Ponce, 2024-2027 (with D.Wassermann,​​ Inria)
  • D. Wassermann

     

    • Alexandre​​​‌ Le Bris, PhD 2022-2025​
    • Gabriela Gomez Jimenez, PhD​‌ 2023-2026 (with J. Valette​​ CEA)
  • T. Moreau

     

    • J.​​​‌ Perdereau (with F. Vallée,​ APHP), PhD 2022-2025
    • V.​‌ Loison (with J. Cartailler,​​ APHP), PhD 2023-2026
    • C.​​​‌ Eve (with G. Varoquaux,​ Inria), PhD 2024-2027

10.2.2​‌ Juries

  • B. Thirion

     

    • reviewer​​ for Mathieu Gilson's habilitation​​​‌ defense on September 25th,​ Marseille, France
    • Examiner for​‌ Julie Carlier's PhD defense​​ on Nov 26th, Paris,​​​‌ France
    • Examiner for Ulysse​ Klatzmann's PhD defense on​‌ Nov 26th, Paris, France​​
    • Reviewer for 's PhD​​​‌ defense on December 15th,​ Sophia Antipolis, France
    • Examiner​‌ for Shizhe Wu's public​​ defense on Jan 24th,​​​‌ Geneva, Switzerland

10.3 Popularization​

10.3.1 Participation in Live​‌ events

  • February 2025
    Inria​​ interviewed Demian Wassermann in​​​‌ French to discuss how​ we will soon be​‌ able to predict thoughts​​.
  • March 2025
    Demian​​​‌ Wassermann gave talks at​ different Parisian high-schools within​‌ the Chiche! program.
  • March​​ 10, 2025
    During Brain​​​‌ Week, Anne Legall, a​ science journalist at France​‌ Info, interviewed Philippe Ciuciu​​ about the BrainSync research​​​‌ project; see Le billet​ Sciences.
  • June 2025​‌
    An article was published​​ on the Inria website​​ about the BrainSync project​​​‌ led by Philipe Ciuciu,‌ titled: Et si l’IA‌​‌ aidait le cerveau à​​ réapprendre après un AVC​​​‌ ?
  • September 2025
    An‌ interview with Philippe Ciuciu‌​‌ was published in the​​ monthly specialist newspaper "Pharmaceutiques"​​​‌ in French, discussing how‌ AI can help improve‌​‌ the care of stroke​​ patients.
  • October 2025
    As​​​‌ deputy director of the‌ DataIA institute, Demian Wassermann‌​‌ was interviewed in Big​​ Data & AI Exhibition​​​‌ Paris to discuss how‌ AI contributes to decoding‌​‌ the brain and opening​​ the path to precision​​​‌ medicine.
  • October 2025
    Bertrand‌ Thirion was invited by‌​‌ Café-éco des clubs Rotary​​ from the Aube region​​​‌ in the eastern part‌ of France.
  • November 2025‌​‌
    Demian Wassermann was invited​​ to discuss AI and​​​‌ sovereignty at VivaTech 2025‌.

11 Scientific production‌​‌

11.1 Major publications

11.2​​​‌ Publications of the year​

International journals

International peer-reviewed conferences‌​‌

  • 30 inproceedingsJ.Judith​​ Abécassis, H.Houssam​​​‌ Zenati, S.Sami‌ Boumaïza, J.Julie‌​‌ Josse and B.Bertrand​​ Thirion. CO11.2 -​​​‌ Explorer les fonctions cognitives‌ dans UK Biobank avec‌​‌ une analyse de médiation​​ causale.EPICLIN 2025​​​‌ - Conférence francophone d’EPIdémiologie‌ CLINique73Bordeaux, France‌​‌May 2025, 203025​​HALDOI
  • 31 inproceedings​​​‌A.Alexandre Blain,‌ B.Bertrand Thirion and‌​‌ P.Pierre Neuvial.​​ False Coverage Proportion Control​​​‌ for Conformal Prediction.‌Proceedings of the 42‌​‌ nd International Conference on​​ Machine Learning, Vancouver, Canada.​​​‌ PMLR 267, 2025ICML‌ 2025 - 42 nd‌​‌ International Conference on Machine​​ LearningVancouver (BC), Canada​​​‌June 2025HAL
  • 32‌ inproceedingsP.-A.Pierre-Antoine Comby‌​‌, M.Matthieu Terris​​, A.Alexandre Vignaud​​​‌ and P.Philippe Ciuciu‌. Plug-and-Play reconstruction for‌​‌ 3D non-cartesian fMRI data​​.33rd European Signal​​​‌ Processing Conference33rd European‌ Signal Processing ConferencePalermo,‌​‌ ItalySeptember 2025HAL​​
  • 33 inproceedingsP.-A.Pierre-Antoine​​​‌ Comby, A.Alexandre‌ Vignaud and P.Philippe‌​‌ Ciuciu. SNAKE-fMRI: A​​ modular fMRI simulator from​​​‌ the space-time domain to‌ k-space data and back‌​‌.Proceedings of the​​ 2024 ISMRM & ISMRT​​​‌ Annual MeetingISMRM 2024‌ - ISMRM & ISMRT‌​‌ Annual MeetingSingapour, Singapore​​May 2025HAL
  • 34​​​‌ inproceedingsR.Reuben Dorent‌, P.Polina Golland‌​‌ and W. M.William​​ M Wells Iii.​​​‌ Connecting Jensen-Shannon and Kullback-Leibler‌ Divergences: A New Bound‌​‌ for Representation Learning.​​NeurIPS 2025 - The​​​‌ Thirty-Ninth Annual Conference on‌ Neural Information Processing Systems‌​‌NeurIPS 2025 - 39th​​ Annual Conference on Neural​​​‌ Information Processing SystemsSan‌ Diego, United StatesDecember‌​‌ 2025HAL
  • 35 inproceedings​​Q.Quentin Ferdinand,​​​‌ R.Rémi Souriau,‌ L.Lucas Struber,‌​‌ H.Henri Lorach,​​ P.Philippe Ciuciu,​​​‌ M.Marina Reyboz and‌ T.Tetiana Aksenova.‌​‌ ECoG-Based Movement Classification and​​ Limbs 3D Translation Prediction​​​‌ : a Deep Learning‌ Study.2025 International‌​‌ Joint Conference on Neural​​ Networks (IJCNN)Rome, France​​​‌IEEEJune 2025,‌ 1-10HALDOI
  • 36‌​‌ inproceedingsP.Paul Krzakala​​, G.Gabriel Melo​​​‌, C.Charlotte Laclau‌, F.Florence d'Alché-Buc‌​‌ and R.Rémi Flamary​​. The quest for​​​‌ the GRAph Level autoEncoder‌ (GRALE).NeurIPS 2025‌​‌ - Thirty-Ninth Annual Conference​​​‌ on Neural Information Processing​ SystemsSan Diego, United​‌ States2025HAL
  • 37​​ inproceedingsV.Virginie Loison​​​‌, G.Guillaume Staerman​ and T.Thomas Moreau​‌. UNHaP: Unmixing Noise​​ from Hawkes Processes.​​​‌International Conference on Artificial​ Intelligence and StatisticsAISTATS​‌ 2025 - 28th International​​ Conference on Artificial Intelligence​​​‌ and StatisticsPhuket, Thailand​May 2025HALback​‌ to text
  • 38 inproceedings​​S.Sonia Mazelet,​​​‌ R.Rémi Flamary and​ B.Bertrand Thirion.​‌ Unsupervised Learning for Optimal​​ Transport plan prediction between​​​‌ unbalanced graphs.NeurIPS​ 2025 - 39th Annual​‌ Conference on Neural Information​​ Processing SystemsSan Diego​​​‌ (California), United States2025​HAL
  • 39 inproceedingsJ.​‌Joseph Paillard, A.​​Antoine Collas, D.​​​‌ A.Denis A Engemann​ and B.Bertrand Thirion​‌. Hierarchical Variable Importance​​ with Statistical Control for​​​‌ Medical Data-Based Prediction.​Information Processing in Medical​‌ Imaging 29th International Conference,​​ IPMI 2025, Kos, Greece​​​‌IPMI 2025 - Information​ Processing in Medical Imaging​‌LNCS-15830Lecture Notes in​​ Computer ScienceKos Island,​​​‌ GreeceSpringer Nature Switzerland​August 2025, 79-93​‌HALDOI
  • 40 inproceedings​​J.Joseph Paillard,​​​‌ A. R.Angel Reyero​ Lobo, V.Vitaliy​‌ Kolodyazhniy, B.Bertrand​​ Thirion and D.Denis​​​‌ Engemann. Measuring Variable​ Importance in Heterogeneous Treatment​‌ Effects with Confidence.​​Measuring Variable Importance in​​​‌ Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with​ ConfidenceICML 2025 -​‌ 42nd International Conference on​​ Machine Learning42Vancouver,​​​‌ Canada2025HALDOI​
  • 41 inproceedingsH.Hugues​‌ Roy, R.Reuben​​ Dorent and N.Ninon​​​‌ Burgos. Unsupervised anomaly​ detection using Bayesian flow​‌ networks: application to brain​​ FDG pet in the​​​‌ context of Alzheimer’s disease​.Lecture Notes in​‌ Computer Science : Deep​​ Generative ModelsDGM4MICCAI 2025​​​‌ - Deep Generative Models​16128Lecture Notes in​‌ Computer ScienceDaejong, South​​ KoreaSpringer Nature Switzerland​​​‌September 2026, 254-264​HALDOI
  • 42 inproceedings​‌E.Emilia Siviero,​​ G.Guillaume Staerman,​​​‌ S.Stéphan Clémençon and​ T.Thomas Moreau.​‌ Numerically Efficient Parametric Inference​​ for Learning Space-Time Hawkes​​​‌ Processes.Proceedings of​ the 12th IEEE International​‌ Conference on Data Science​​ and Advanced Analytics (DSAA)​​​‌Birmingham, United KingdomOctober​ 2025HAL
  • 43 inproceedings​‌M.Matthieu Terris,​​ S.Samuel Hurault,​​​‌ M.Maxime Song and​ J.Julián Tachella.​‌ Reconstruct Anything Model: a​​ lightweight foundation model for​​​‌ computational imaging.ICLR​ 2026 - Fourteenth International​‌ Conference on Learning Representations​​Rio de Janeiro (BR),​​​‌ BrazilApril 2026HAL​
  • 44 inproceedingsH.Herwig​‌ Wendt, P.Patrice​​ Abry, P.Philippe​​​‌ Ciuciu, M.Merlin​ Dumeur, S.Stéphane​‌ Jaffard, W. B.​​Wejdene Ben Nasr and​​​‌ G.Guillaume Saës.​ Analyse multifractale construite sur​‌ les weak scaling exponents​​.GRETSI 2025 -​​​‌ XXXe Symposium Signal and​ Image ProcessingStrasbourg, France​‌August 2025HAL
  • 45​​ inproceedingsH.Houssam Zenati​​​‌, J.Judith Abécassis​, J.Julie Josse​‌ and B.Bertrand Thirion​​. Double Debiased Machine​​​‌ Learning for Mediation Analysis​ with Continuous Treatments.​‌Proceedings of Machine Learning​​ ResearchAISTATS - 28th​​ International Conference on Artificial​​​‌ Intelligence and StatisticsPMLR-‌Mai Khao, ThailandMay‌​‌ 2025HAL

Conferences without​​ proceedings

  • 46 inproceedingsT.​​​‌Tiago Assis, I.‌Ines Machado, B.‌​‌Benjamin Zwick, N.​​Nuno Garcia and R.​​​‌Reuben Dorent. Deep‌ Biomechanically-Guided Interpolation for Keypoint-Based‌​‌ Brain Shift Registration.​​First International Workshop, COLAS​​​‌ 2025, Held in Conjunction‌ with MICCAI 2025, Daejeon,‌​‌ South Korea, September 23,​​ 2025, ProceedingsCOLAS 2025​​​‌ 2025 - First International‌ Workshop COLlaborative Intelligence and‌​‌ Autonomy in Image-guided Surgery​​ with MICCAI 2025LNCS-16298​​​‌Daejeon, South Korea2025‌HAL
  • 47 inproceedingsM.‌​‌Maxime Bertrait, C.​​Chaithya Giliyar Radhakrishna and​​​‌ P.Philippe Ciuciu.‌ gGRAPPA: A Flexible, GPU-Accelerated‌​‌ Python Package for Fast​​ and Efficient generalized GRAPPA​​​‌ Reconstruction.ISMRM &‌ ISMRT 2025 - Annual‌​‌ Meeting & ExhibitionHonololu,​​ Hawaii, United StatesMay​​​‌ 2025HALback to‌ text
  • 48 inproceedingsA.‌​‌Antoine Collas, C.​​Ce Ju, N.​​​‌Nicolas Salvy and B.‌Bertrand Thirion. Riemannian‌​‌ flow matching for brain​​ connectivity matrices via pullback​​​‌ geometry.NeurIPS 2025‌ - Thirty-Ninth Annual Conference‌​‌ on Neural Information Processing​​ SystemsSan Diego, United​​​‌ States2025HAL
  • 49‌ inproceedingsP.-A.Pierre-Antoine Comby‌​‌, G.Guillaume Daval-Frérot​​, C.Chaithya Gr​​​‌, A.Alexandre Vignaud‌ and P.Philippe Ciuciu‌​‌. MRI-NUFFT: An open​​ source Python package to​​​‌ make non-Cartesian MR Imaging‌ easier.Proceedings of‌​‌ the 2025 ISMRM &​​ ISMRT Annual Meeting &​​​‌ ExhibitionISMRM & ISMRT‌ 2025 - Annual Meeting‌​‌ & ExhibitionHonolulu (Hawai),​​ United StatesMay 2025​​​‌HALDOI
  • 50 inproceedings‌P.-A.Pierre-Antoine Comby,‌​‌ B.Benjamin Lapostolle,​​ M.Matthieu Terris and​​​‌ P.Philippe Ciuciu.‌ Robust plug-and-play methods for‌​‌ highly accelerated non-Cartesian MRI​​ reconstruction.2025 IEEE​​​‌ 22nd International Symposium on‌ Biomedical Imaging (ISBI)Houston,‌​‌ FranceIEEEApril 2025​​, 1-5HALDOI​​​‌
  • 51 inproceedingsC.Chaithya‌ Giliyar Radhakrishna, A.‌​‌Alexandre Vignaud, M.​​Maxime Bertrait, A.​​​‌Aurélien Massire, M.‌Michel Bottlaender and P.‌​‌Philippe Ciuciu. Bringing​​ GRAPPA to non-Cartesian MRI​​​‌ through SPARKLING: An application‌ to MPRAGE anatomical MRI‌​‌.ISMRM & ISMRT​​ 2025 - Annual Meeting​​​‌ & ExhibitionHonololu, Hawaii,‌ United StatesMay 2025‌​‌HAL
  • 52 inproceedingsL.​​Louis Jalouzot, A.​​​‌Alexis Thual, Y.‌Yair Lakretz, C.‌​‌Christophe Pallier and B.​​Bertrand Thirion. Optimizing​​​‌ fMRI Data Acquisition for‌ Decoding Natural Speech with‌​‌ Limited Participants.NeurIPS​​ Workshop 2025 : Foundation​​​‌ Models for the Brain‌ and Body.San Diego‌​‌ (CA), United StatesDecember​​ 2025HAL
  • 53 inproceedings​​​‌A.Asma Tanabene,‌ C.Chaithya Giliyar Radhakrishna‌​‌, A.Aurélien Massire​​, M. S.Mariappan​​​‌ S. Nadar and P.‌Philippe Ciuciu. Benchmarking‌​‌ 3D multi-coil NC-PDNET MRI​​ reconstruction.ISMRM &​​​‌ ISMRT 2025 - Annual‌ Meeting & ExhibitionHonololu,‌​‌ Hawaii, United StatesMay​​ 2025HAL

Scientific book​​​‌ chapters

  • 54 inbookB.‌Bertrand Thirion. Machine‌​‌ learning for NeuroImaging data​​ analysis.Encyclopedia of​​​‌ the Human BrainElsevier‌2025, 580-588HAL‌​‌DOI

Doctoral dissertations and​​​‌ habilitation theses

  • 55 thesis​T.Thomas Chapalain.​‌ Investigating the representation of​​ numerosity in humans and​​​‌ convolutional neural networks using​ high-variability photorealistic stimuli.​‌Université Paris-SaclayMarch 2025​​HAL
  • 56 thesisM.​​​‌Merlin Dumeur. Multifractal​ analysis for studying criticality​‌ in neural dynamics.​​Universite Paris-Saclay; Aalto University​​​‌May 2025HAL
  • 57​ thesisT.Theo Gnassounou​‌. Multi-source domain adaptation​​ for learning on biosignals​​​‌.Université Paris-SaclayNovember​ 2025HAL

Reports &​‌ preprints

Other scientific publications

11.3‌ Cited publications

  • 77 inproceedings‌​‌ M.Mart\i Abadi.​​ back to text
  • 78​​​‌ articleP.Pierre Ablin‌, J.-F.Jean-Francois Cardoso‌​‌ and A.Alexandre Gramfort​​​‌. Faster independent component​ analysis by preconditioning with​‌ Hessian approximations.IEEE​​ Trans. Signal Process.66​​​‌152018, 4040-4049​back to text
  • 79​‌ inproceedingsP.Pierre Ablin​​, T.Thomas Moreau​​​‌, M.Mathurin Massias​ and A.Alexandre Gramfort​‌. Learning Step Sizes​​ for Unfolded Sparse Coding​​​‌.Advances in Neural​ Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS)​‌Vancouver, BC, Canada2019​​, 13100--13110back to​​​‌ textback to text​
  • 80 inproceedingsP.Pierre​‌ Ablin, G.Gabriel​​ Peyré and T.Thomas​​​‌ Moreau. Super-Efficiency of​ Automatic Differentiation for Functions​‌ Defined as a Minimum​​.International Conference on​​​‌ Machine Learning (ICML)July​ 2020back to text​‌
  • 81 inproceedingsA.Ahmed​​ Alaa and M.Mihaela​​​‌ Van Der Schaar.​ Validating Causal Inference Models​‌ via Influence Functions.​​Proceedings of the 36th​​​‌ International Conference on Machine​ Learning97Proceedings of​‌ Machine Learning ResearchLong​​ Beach, California, USAPMLR​​​‌09--15 Jun 2019,​ 191--201URL: http://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/alaa19a.htmlback​‌ to text
  • 82 article​​M.Marcelo Arenas,​​​‌ G.Georg Gottlob and​ a.as Pieris.​‌ Expressive Languages for Querying​​ the Semantic Web.​​​‌ACM Transactions on Database​ Systems433November​‌ 2018, 1--45DOI​​back to text
  • 83​​​‌ articleS.Susan Athey​ and G.Guido Imbens​‌. The State of​​ Applied Econometrics - Causality​​​‌ and Policy Evaluation.​ArXiv e-printsJuly 2016​‌, arXiv:1607.00699back to​​ text
  • 84 inproceedingsS.​​​‌Sergul Aydore, B.​Bertrand Thirion and G.​‌Gael Varoquaux. Feature​​ Grouping as a Stochastic​​​‌ Regularizer for High-Dimensional Structured​ Data.ICML2019​‌, 385--394back to​​ text
  • 85 articleV.​​​‌Vince BáRány, B.​ T.Balder Ten Cate​‌, B.Benny Kimelfeld​​, D.Dan Olteanu​​​‌ and Z.Zografoula Vagena​. Declarative Probabilistic Programming​‌ with Datalog.ACM​​ Transactions on Database Systems​​​‌424October 2017​, 1-35DOIback​‌ to text
  • 86 article​​T.T. Baltrušaitis,​​​‌ C.C. Ahuja and​ L.L. Morency.​‌ Multimodal Machine Learning: A​​ Survey and Taxonomy.​​​‌IEEE Transactions on Pattern​ Analysis and Machine Intelligence​‌412Feb 2019​​, 423-443DOIback​​​‌ to textback to​ text
  • 87 articleH.​‌Hubert Banville, O.​​Omar Chehab, A.​​​‌Aapo Hyvarinen, D.​Denis Engemann and A.​‌Alexandre Gramfort. Uncovering​​ the structure of clinical​​​‌ EEG signals with self-supervised​ learning.Journal of​‌ Neural Engineering2020back​​ to text
  • 88 article​​​‌L.Luigi Bellomarini,​ E.Emanuel Sallinger and​‌ G.Georg Gottlob.​​ The Vadalog System: Datalog-Based​​​‌ Reasoning for Knowledge Graphs​.Proceedings of the​‌ VLDB Endowment119​​May 2018, 975-987​​​‌DOIback to text​back to text
  • 89​‌ articleY.Y. Bengio​​, A.A. Courville​​​‌ and P.P. Vincent​. Representation learning: A​‌ review and new perspectives​​.Pattern Analysis and​​​‌ Machine Intelligence352013​, 1798back to​‌ text
  • 90 articleY.​​Yoav Benjamini and Y.​​​‌Yosef Hochberg. Controlling​ the False Discovery Rate:​‌ A Practical and Powerful​​ Approach to Multiple Testing​​.Journal of the​​​‌ Royal Statistical Society Series‌ B (Methodological)571‌​‌1995, 289-300URL:​​ http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2346101DOIback to​​​‌ text
  • 91 inproceedingsM.‌Maxime Bertrait, C.‌​‌ G.Chaithya Giliyar Radhakrishna​​ and P.Philippe Ciuciu​​​‌. gGRAPPA: A Flexible,‌ GPU-Accelerated Python Package for‌​‌ Fast and Efficient generalized​​ GRAPPA Reconstruction.ISMRM​​​‌ & ISMRT 2025 -‌ Annual Meeting & Exhibition‌​‌Honolulu, USAHALback​​ to text
  • 92 inproceedings​​​‌Q.Quentin Bertrand,‌ Q.Quentin Klopfenstein,‌​‌ M.Mathieu Blondel,​​ S.Samuel Vaiter,​​​‌ A.Alexandre Gramfort and‌ J.Joseph Salmon.‌​‌ Implicit Differentiation of Lasso-Type​​ Models for Hyperparameter Optimization​​​‌.International Conference on‌ Machine Learning (ICML)2002.08943‌​‌onlineApril 2020,​​ 3199--3210back to text​​​‌back to text
  • 93‌ articleG.Gilles Blanchard‌​‌, P.Pierre Neuvial​​ and E.Etienne Roquain​​​‌. Post hoc confidence‌ bounds on false positives‌​‌ using reference families.​​Ann. Statist.483​​​‌06 2020, 1281--1303‌URL: https://doi.org/10.1214/19-AOS1847DOIback‌​‌ to textback to​​ textback to text​​​‌
  • 94 phdthesisM.Martin‌ Bompaire. Machine learning‌​‌ based on Hawkes processes​​ and stochastic optimization.​​​‌Université Paris Saclay (COmUE)‌CMAP, École Polytechnique2019‌​‌back to text
  • 95​​ articleC.Claire Boyer​​​‌, N.Nicolas Chauffert‌, P.Philippe Ciuciu‌​‌, J.Jonas Kahn​​ and P.Pierre Weiss​​​‌. On the generation‌ of sampling schemes for‌​‌ magnetic resonance imaging.​​SIAM Journal on Imaging​​​‌ Sciences942016‌, 2039--2072back to‌​‌ text
  • 96 articleE.​​Emmanuel Candès, Y.​​​‌Yingying Fan, L.‌Lucas Janson and J.‌​‌Jinchi Lv. Panning​​ for gold: ‘model-X’ knockoffs​​​‌ for high dimensional controlled‌ variable selection.Journal‌​‌ of the Royal Statistical​​ Society: Series B (Statistical​​​‌ Methodology)8032018‌, 551-577URL: https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/rssb.12265‌​‌DOIback to text​​
  • 97 articleL.Lotfi​​​‌ Chaari, P.Philippe‌ Ciuciu, S.Sébastien‌​‌ Mériaux and J.-C.Jean-Christophe​​ Pesquet. Spatio-temporal wavelet​​​‌ regularization for parallel MRI‌ reconstruction: application to functional‌​‌ MRI.Magnetic Resonance​​ Materials in Physics, Biology​​​‌ and Medicine276‌2014, 509--529back‌​‌ to text
  • 98 article​​G.GR Chaithya,​​​‌ P.Pierre Weiss,‌ A.Aurélien Massire,‌​‌ A.Alexandre Vignaud and​​ P.Philippe Ciuciu.​​​‌ Globally optimized 3D SPARKLING‌ trajectories for high-resolution T2*-weighted‌​‌ Magnetic Resonance Imaging.​​2020back to text​​​‌back to text
  • 99‌ inproceedingsS.S. Chambon‌​‌, V.V. Thorey​​, P. J.P.​​​‌ J. Arnal, E.‌E. Mignot and A.‌​‌A. Gramfort. A​​ Deep Learning Architecture to​​​‌ Detect Events in EEG‌ Signals During Sleep.‌​‌2018 IEEE 28th International​​ Workshop on Machine Learning​​​‌ for Signal Processing (MLSP)‌Sept 2018, 1-6‌​‌DOIback to text​​
  • 100 articleN.Nicolas​​​‌ Chauffert, P.Pierre‌ Weiss, J.Jonas‌​‌ Kahn and P.Philippe​​ Ciuciu. A projection​​​‌ algorithm for gradient waveforms‌ design in Magnetic Resonance‌​‌ Imaging.IEEE Transactions​​ on Medical Imaging35​​​‌92016, 2026--2039‌back to text
  • 101‌​‌ articleL.Lang Chen​​​‌, D.Demian Wassermann​, D. A.Daniel​‌ A. Abrams, J.​​John Kochalka, G.​​​‌Guillermo Gallardo-Diez and V.​Vinod Menon. The​‌ Visual Word Form Area​​ (VWFA) Is Part of​​​‌ Both Language and Attention​ Circuitry.Nature Communications​‌101December 2019​​, 5601DOIback​​​‌ to text
  • 102 inproceedings​H.Hamza Cherkaoui,​‌ L.Loubna El Gueddari​​, C.Carole Lazarus​​​‌, A.Antoine Grigis​, F.Fabrice Poupon​‌, A.Alexandre Vignaud​​, S.Sammuel Farrens​​​‌, J.-L.J-L Starck​ and P.Philippe Ciuciu​‌. Analysis vs synthesis-based​​ regularization for combined compressed​​​‌ sensing and parallel MRI​ reconstruction at 7 Tesla​‌.2018 26th European​​ Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO)​​​‌IEEE2018, 36--40​back to text
  • 103​‌ articleH.H. Cherkaoui​​, T.T. Moreau​​​‌, A.A. Halimi​, C.C. Leroy​‌ and P.P. Ciuciu​​. Multivariate semi-blind deconvolution​​​‌ of fMRI time series​.revised for publication​‌ to NeuroImageApril 2021​​back to textback​​​‌ to text
  • 104 inproceedings​H.Hamza Cherkaoui,​‌ J.Jeremias Sulam and​​ T.Thomas Moreau.​​​‌ Learning to Solve TV​ Regularised Problems with Unrolled​‌ Algorithms.Advances in​​ Neural Information Processing Systems​​​‌ (NeurIPS)online2020back​ to text
  • 105 inproceedings​‌J.-A.Jérôme-Alexis Chevalier,​​ J.Joseph Salmon and​​​‌ B.Bertrand Thirion.​ Statistical Inference with Ensemble​‌ of Clustered Desparsified Lasso​​.MICCAIGrenade, Spain​​​‌2018HALback to​ text
  • 106 articleJ.​‌ H.James H Cole​​, R.Robert Leech​​​‌, D. J.David​ J Sharp and A.​‌ D.Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging​​ Initiative. Prediction of​​​‌ brain age suggests accelerated​ atrophy after traumatic brain​‌ injury.Annals of​​ neurology7742015​​​‌, 571--581back to​ text
  • 107 inproceedingsR.​‌Ronan Collobert and J.​​Jason Weston. A​​​‌ unified architecture for natural​ language processing: Deep neural​‌ networks with multitask learning​​.ICML2008,​​​‌ 160back to text​back to text
  • 108​‌ inproceedingsE. D.Ekin​​ D. Cubuk, B.​​​‌Barret Zoph, J.​Jonathon Shlens and Q.​‌ V.Quoc V. Le​​. Randaugment: Practical automated​​​‌ data augmentation with a​ reduced search space.​‌IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer​​ Vision and Pattern Recognition​​​‌ Workshops (CVPRW)Seattle, WA,​ USAIEEEJune 2020​‌, 3008--3017URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9150790/​​DOIback to text​​​‌
  • 109 unpublishedK.Kamalaker​ Dadi, G.Gael​‌ Varoquaux, J.Josselin​​ Houenou, D.Danilo​​​‌ Bzdok, B.Bertrand​ Thirion and D.Denis​‌ Engemann. Beyond brain​​ age: Empirically-derived proxy measures​​​‌ of mental health.​October 2020, working​‌ paper or preprintHAL​​DOIback to text​​​‌
  • 110 articleK.Kamalaker​ Dadi, G.Gaël​‌ Varoquaux, A.Antonia​​ Machlouzarides-Shalit, K. J.​​​‌Krzysztof J Gorgolewski,​ D.Demian Wassermann,​‌ B.Bertrand Thirion and​​ A.Arthur Mensch.​​​‌ Fine-grain atlases of functional​ modes for fMRI analysis​‌.NeuroImage2212020​​, 117126back to​​​‌ text
  • 111 bookJ.​ M.John M. Danskin​‌. Theory of Max-Min​​ and Its Application to​​ Weapons Allocation Problems..​​​‌OCLC: 953666019Berlin/HeidelbergSpringer‌ Berlin Heidelberg1967back‌​‌ to text
  • 112 inproceedings​​G.G. Daval-Frérot,​​​‌ A.A. Massire,‌ M.M. Ripart,‌​‌ B.B. Mailhe,​​ M.M. Nadar,​​​‌ A.A. Vignaud and‌ P.P. Ciuciu.‌​‌ Off-resonance correction non-Cartesian SWI​​ using internal field map​​​‌ estimation.29th Proc.‌ of the ISMRM annual‌​‌ meetingvirtualMay 2021​​back to text
  • 113​​​‌ incollectionJ.Jia Deng‌, A. C.Alexander‌​‌ C Berg, K.​​Kai Li and L.​​​‌Li Fei-Fei. What‌ does classifying more than‌​‌ 10,000 image categories tell​​ us?ECCV2010,​​​‌ 71back to text‌
  • 114 articleJ.Jacob‌​‌ Devlin, M.-W.Ming-Wei​​ Chang, K.Kenton​​​‌ Lee and K.Kristina‌ Toutanova. BERT: Pre-training‌​‌ of Deep Bidirectional Transformers​​ for Language Understanding.​​​‌CoRRabs/1810.048052018,‌ URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805back to‌​‌ text
  • 115 articleE.​​Elvis Dohmatob, H.​​​‌Hugo Richard, A.‌ L.Ana Lu\'isa Pinho‌​‌ and B.Bertrand Thirion​​. Brain topography beyond​​​‌ parcellations: local gradients of‌ functional maps.NeuroImage‌​‌January 2021, 117706​​HALDOIback to​​​‌ text
  • 116 articleN.‌ U.Nico UF Dosenbach‌​‌, B.Binyam Nardos​​, A. L.Alexander​​​‌ L Cohen, D.‌ A.Damien A Fair‌​‌, J. D.Jonathan​​ D Power, J.​​​‌ A.Jessica A Church‌, S. M.Steven‌​‌ M Nelson, G.​​ S.Gagan S Wig​​​‌, A. C.Alecia‌ C Vogel, C.‌​‌ N.Christina N Lessov-Schlaggar​​ and others. Prediction​​​‌ of individual brain maturity‌ using fMRI.Science‌​‌32959972010,​​ 1358--1361back to text​​​‌
  • 117 inproceedingsT.Tom‌ Dupré la Tour,‌​‌ T.Thomas Moreau,​​ M.Mainak Jas and​​​‌ A.Alexandre Gramfort.‌ Multivariate Convolutional Sparse Coding‌​‌ for Electromagnetic Brain Signals​​.Advances in Neural​​​‌ Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS)‌Montreal, Canada2018,‌​‌ 3296--3306back to text​​
  • 118 inproceedingsL.Loubna​​​‌ El Gueddari, E.‌Emilie Chouzenoux, A.‌​‌Alexandre Vignaud, J.-C.​​Jean-Christophe Pesquet and P.​​​‌Philippe Ciuciu. Online‌ MR image reconstruction for‌​‌ compressed sensing acquisition in​​ T2* imaging.Wavelets​​​‌ and Sparsity XVIII11138‌International Society for Optics‌​‌ and Photonics2019,​​ 1113819back to text​​​‌
  • 119 articleL.Loubna‌ El Gueddari, C.‌​‌Chaithya Giliyar Radhakrishna,​​ E.Emilie Chouzenoux and​​​‌ P.Philippe Ciuciu.‌ Calibration-Less Multi-Coil Compressed Sensing‌​‌ Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction​​ Based on OSCAR Regularization​​​‌.Journal of Imaging‌732021,‌​‌ 58back to text​​
  • 120 inproceedingsL.Loubna​​​‌ El Gueddari, C.‌Carole Lazarus, H.‌​‌Hanaé Carrié, A.​​Alexandre Vignaud and P.​​​‌Ph Ciuciu. Self-calibrating‌ nonlinear reconstruction algorithms for‌​‌ variable density sampling and​​ parallel reception MRI.​​​‌2018 IEEE 10th Sensor‌ Array and Multichannel Signal‌​‌ Processing Workshop (SAM)IEEE​​2018, 415--419back​​​‌ to text
  • 121 article‌D. A.Denis A‌​‌ Engemann, O.Oleh​​ Kozynets, D.David​​​‌ Sabbagh, G.Guillaume‌ Lemaître, G.Gael‌​‌ Varoquaux, F.Franziskus​​​‌ Liem and A.Alexandre​ Gramfort. Combining magnetoencephalography​‌ with magnetic resonance imaging​​ enhances learning of surrogate-biomarkers​​​‌.eLife9may​ 2020, e54055URL:​‌ https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54055DOIback to​​ text
  • 122 articleS.​​​‌S Farrens, A.​A Grigis, L.​‌L El Gueddari,​​ Z.Z Ramzi,​​​‌ G.GR Chaithya,​ S.S Starck,​‌ B.B Sarthou,​​ H.H Cherkaoui,​​​‌ P.P Ciuciu and​ J.-L.J-L Starck.​‌ PySAP: Python Sparse Data​​ Analysis Package for Multidisciplinary​​​‌ Image Processing.Astronomy​ and Computing322020​‌, 100402back to​​ textback to text​​​‌
  • 123 articleD.Davis​ Gilton, G.Gregory​‌ Ongie and R.Rebecca​​ Willett. Deep Equilibrium​​​‌ Architectures for Inverse Problems​ in Imaging.arXiv​‌ preprint arXiv:2102.079442021back​​ to text
  • 124 article​​​‌J.Julie Gonneaud,​ A. T.Alex T​‌ Baria, A. P.​​Alexa Pichet Binette,​​​‌ B. A.Brian A​ Gordon, J. P.​‌Jasmeer P Chhatwal,​​ C.Carlos Cruchaga,​​​‌ M.Mathias Jucker,​ J.Johannes Levin,​‌ S.Stephen Salloway,​​ M.Martin Farlow and​​​‌ others. Functional brain​ age prediction suggests accelerated​‌ aging in preclinical familial​​ Alzheimer's disease, irrespective of​​​‌ fibrillar amyloid-beta pathology.​bioRxiv2020back to​‌ text
  • 125 articleK.​​ J.Krzysztof J Gorgolewski​​​‌, G.Gael Varoquaux​, G.Gabriel Rivera​‌, Y.Yannick Schwarz​​, S. S.Satrajit​​​‌ S Ghosh, C.​Camille Maumet, V.​‌ V.Vanessa V Sochat​​, T. E.Thomas​​​‌ E Nichols, R.​ A.Russell A Poldrack​‌, J.-B.Jean-Baptiste Poline​​ and others. NeuroVault.​​​‌ org: a web-based repository​ for collecting and sharing​‌ unthresholded statistical maps of​​ the human brain.​​​‌Frontiers in neuroinformatics9​2015, 8back​‌ to text
  • 126 inproceedings​​K.Karol Gregor and​​​‌ Y.Yann Lecun.​ Learning Fast Approximations of​‌ Sparse Coding.Proceedings​​ of the 27th International​​​‌ Conference on Machine Learning​2010back to text​‌
  • 127 articleA. G.​​Alan G Hawkes.​​​‌ Point spectra of some​ mutually exciting point processes​‌.Journal of the​​ Royal Statistical Society: Series​​​‌ B (Methodological)333​1971, 438--443back​‌ to text
  • 128 article​​A. A.Andrés A​​​‌ Hoyos-Idrobo, G.Gaël​ Varoquaux, Y.Yannick​‌ Schwartz and B.Bertrand​​ Thirion. FReM --​​​‌ scalable and stable decoding​ with fast regularized ensemble​‌ of models.NeuroImage​​2017, 1-16HAL​​​‌DOIback to text​back to text
  • 129​‌ inproceedingsV.Valentin Iovene​​, G.Gaston Zanitti​​​‌ and D.Demian Wassermann​. Complex Coordinate-Based Meta-Analysis​‌ with Probabilistic Programming.​​Association for the Advancement​​​‌ of Artificial IntelligenceOnline,​ FranceFebruary 2021HAL​‌back to text
  • 130​​ inproceedingsM.Maëliss Jallais​​​‌, P. L.Pedro​ Luiz Coelho Rodrigues,​‌ A.Alexandre Gramfort and​​ D.Demian Wassermann.​​​‌ Cytoarchitecture Measurements in Brain​ Gray Matter using Likelihood-Free​‌ Inference.June​​ 2021HALback to​​​‌ textback to text​
  • 131 inproceedingsH.H.​‌ Janati, T.T.​​ Bazeille, B.B.​​ Thirion, M.M.​​​‌ Cuturi and A.A.‌ Gramfort. Group Level‌​‌ MEG/EEG Source Imaging via​​ Optimal Transport: Minimum Wasserstein​​​‌ Estimates.Information Processing‌ in Medical ImagingCham‌​‌Springer International Publishing2019​​, 743--754back to​​​‌ text
  • 132 inproceedingsH.‌Hicham Janati, M.‌​‌Marco Cuturi and A.​​Alexandre Gramfort. Wasserstein​​​‌ regularization for sparse multi-task‌ regression.AISTATS89‌​‌Proceedings of Machine Learning​​ ResearchPMLRApril 2019​​​‌, 1407--1416URL: http://proceedings.mlr.press/v89/janati19a.html‌back to text
  • 133‌​‌ inproceedingsM.Mainak Jas​​, T.Tom Dupré​​​‌ la Tour, U.‌Umut Şimşekli and A.‌​‌Alexandre Gramfort. Learning​​ the Morphology of Brain​​​‌ Signals Using Alpha-Stable Convolutional‌ Sparse Coding.Advances‌​‌ in Neural Information Processing​​ Systems (NeurIPS)Long Beach,​​​‌ CA, USA2017,‌ 1099--1108back to text‌​‌
  • 134 articleA.Adel​​ Javanmard and A.Andrea​​​‌ Montanari. Confidence Intervals‌ and Hypothesis Testing for‌​‌ High-Dimensional Regression.15​​1January 2014,​​​‌ 2869–2909back to text‌
  • 135 articleA. Q.‌​‌Albert Q Jiang,​​ A.Alexandre Sablayrolles,​​​‌ A.Arthur Mensch,‌ C.Chris Bamford,‌​‌ D. S.Devendra Singh​​ Chaplot, D. d.​​​‌Diego de las Casas‌, F.Florian Bressand‌​‌, G.Gianna Lengyel​​, G.Guillaume Lample​​​‌, L.Lucile Saulnier‌ and others. Mistral‌​‌ 7B.arXiv preprint​​ arXiv:2310.068252023back to​​​‌ text
  • 136 unpublishedJ.‌Julie Josse, N.‌​‌Nicolas Prost, E.​​Erwan Scornet and G.​​​‌Gaël Varoquaux. On‌ the consistency of supervised‌​‌ learning with missing values​​.March 2019,​​​‌ working paper or preprint‌HALback to text‌​‌
  • 137 articleS.S.​​ Kapur, A. G.​​​‌A. G. Phillips and‌ T. R.T. R.‌​‌ Insel. Why has​​ it taken so long​​​‌ for biological psychiatry to‌ develop clinical tests and‌​‌ what to do about​​ it?Molecular Psychiatry17​​​‌122012, 1174--1179‌back to text
  • 138‌​‌ articleJ.-R.J-R King​​, L.L Gwilliams​​​‌, C.C Holdgraf‌, J.J Sassenhagen‌​‌, A.A Barachant​​, D.D Engemann​​​‌, E.E Larson‌ and A.A Gramfort‌​‌. Encoding and Decoding​​ Framework to Uncover the​​​‌ Algorithms of Cognition.‌The Cognitive Neurosciences VI,‌​‌ MIT Pressin press​​2020back to text​​​‌
  • 139 articleE.Elnaz‌ Lashgari, D.Dehua‌​‌ Liang and U.Uri​​ Maoz. Data augmentation​​​‌ for deep-learning-based electroencephalography.‌Journal of Neuroscience Methods‌​‌3462020, 108885​​URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027020303083DOIback​​​‌ to text
  • 140 article‌C.Carole Lazarus,‌​‌ P.Pierre Weiss,​​ N.Nicolas Chauffert,​​​‌ F.Franck Mauconduit,‌ L.Loubna El Gueddari‌​‌, C.Christophe Destrieux​​, I.Ilyess Zemmoura​​​‌, A.Alexandre Vignaud‌ and P.Philippe Ciuciu‌​‌. SPARKLING: variable-density k-space​​ filling curves for accelerated​​​‌ T2*-weighted MRI.Magnetic‌ Resonance in Medicine81‌​‌62019, 3643--3661​​back to textback​​​‌ to text
  • 141 article‌C.Carole Lazarus,‌​‌ P.Pierre Weiss,​​ L.Loubna Gueddari,​​​‌ F.Franck Mauconduit,‌ A.Aurélien Massire,‌​‌ M.Mathile Ripart,​​​‌ A.Alexandre Vignaud and​ P.Philippe Ciuciu.​‌ 3D variable-density SPARKLING trajectories​​ for high-resolution T2*-weighted Magnetic​​​‌ Resonance imaging.NMR​ in Biomedicine33e4349​‌2020, 1--12back​​ to textback to​​​‌ text
  • 142 inproceedingsH.​ K.H. K. Lee​‌, J.-H.J.-H. Lee​​, J.-O.J.-O. Park​​​‌ and Y.-S.Y.-S. Choi​. Data-driven Data Augmentation​‌ for Motor Imagery Brain-Computer​​ Interface.2021 International​​​‌ Conference on Information Networking​ (ICOIN)ISSN: 1976-7684January​‌ 2021, 683--686DOI​​back to text
  • 143​​​‌ articleF.Franziskus Liem​, G.Gaël Varoquaux​‌, J.Jana Kynast​​, F.Frauke Beyer​​​‌, S. K.Shahrzad​ Kharabian Masouleh, J.​‌ M.Julia M Huntenburg​​, L.Leonie Lampe​​​‌, M.Mehdi Rahim​, A.Alexandre Abraham​‌, R. C.R​​ Cameron Craddock and others​​​‌. Predicting brain-age from​ multimodal imaging data captures​‌ cognitive impairment.NeuroImage​​1482017, 179--188​​​‌back to text
  • 144​ miscM.Molei Liu​‌, E.Eugene Katsevich​​, L.Lucas Janson​​​‌ and A.Aaditya Ramdas​. Fast and Powerful​‌ Conditional Randomization Testing via​​ Distillation.2020back​​​‌ to textback to​ text
  • 145 articleF.​‌F. Lotte. Signal​​ Processing Approaches to Minimize​​​‌ or Suppress Calibration Time​ in Oscillatory Activity-Based Brain-Computer​‌ Interfaces.Proc. of​​ the IEEE1036​​​‌2015, 871-890back​ to text
  • 146 article​‌C.Christos Louizos,​​ U.Uri Shalit,​​​‌ J.Joris Mooij,​ D.David Sontag,​‌ R.Richard Zemel and​​ M.Max Welling.​​​‌ Causal Effect Inference with​ Deep Latent-Variable Models.​‌arXiv e-printsMay 2017​​, arXiv:1705.08821back to​​​‌ text
  • 147 articleJ.​Julien Mairal, F.​‌ R.Francis R. Bach​​, J.Jean Ponce​​​‌ and G.Guillermo Sapiro​. Online Learning for​‌ Matrix Factorization and Sparse​​ Coding.Journal of​​​‌ Machine Learning Research (JMLR)​1112010,​‌ 19--60back to text​​
  • 148 inproceedingsM.M.​​​‌ Massias, A.A.​ Gramfort and J.J.​‌ Salmon. Celer: a​​ Fast Solver for the​​​‌ Lasso with Dual Extrapolation​.Proceedings of the​‌ 35th International Conference on​​ Machine Learning802018​​​‌, 3321--3330URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07481​back to text
  • 149​‌ articleM.Mathurin Massias​​, S.Samuel Vaiter​​​‌, A.Alexandre Gramfort​ and J.Joseph Salmon​‌. Dual Extrapolation for​​ Sparse GLMs.Journal​​​‌ of Machine Learning Research​212342020,​‌ 1-33URL: http://jmlr.org/papers/v21/19-587.htmlback​​ to text
  • 150 article​​​‌V.Vinod Menon,​ G.Guillermo Gallardo,​‌ M. A.Mark A​​ Pinsk, V.-D.Van-Dang​​​‌ Nguyen, J.-R.Jing-Rebecca​ Li, W.Weidong​‌ Cai and D.Demian​​ Wassermann. Microstructural Organization​​​‌ of Human Insula Is​ Linked to Its Macrofunctional​‌ Circuitry and Predicts Cognitive​​ Control.eLife9​​​‌June 2020, e53470​DOIback to text​‌
  • 151 inproceedingsA.Arthur​​ Mensch, J.Julien​​​‌ Mairal, D.Danilo​ Bzdok, B.Bertrand​‌ Thirion and G.Gaël​​ Varoquaux. Learning Neural​​​‌ Representations of Human Cognition​ across Many fMRI Studies​‌.NIPSLong Beach,​​ United StatesDecember 2017​​HALback to text​​​‌
  • 152 articleA.Arthur‌ Mensch, J.Julien‌​‌ Mairal, B.Bertrand​​ Thirion and G.Gael​​​‌ Varoquaux. Stochastic Subsampling‌ for Factorizing Huge Matrices‌​‌.IEEE Transactions on​​ Signal Processing661​​​‌January 2018, 113--128‌back to text
  • 153‌​‌ inproceedingsI.Ishan Misra​​, C. L.C​​​‌ Lawrence Zitnick and M.‌Martial Hebert. Shuffle‌​‌ and learn: unsupervised learning​​ using temporal order verification​​​‌.ECCVSpringer2016‌, 527--544back to‌​‌ text
  • 154 articleT.​​Thomas Moreau and A.​​​‌Alexandre Gramfort. DiCoDiLe:‌ Distributed Convolutional Dictionary Learning‌​‌.Transaction on Pattern​​ Analysis and Machine Intelligence​​​‌ (TPAMI)in press2020‌back to textback‌​‌ to text
  • 155 inproceedings​​T.Thomas Moreau,​​​‌ L.Laurent Oudre and‌ N.Nicolas Vayatis.‌​‌ DICOD: Distributed Convolutional Sparse​​ Coding.International Conference​​​‌ on Machine Learning (ICML)‌Stockohlm, SwedenPMLR (80)‌​‌2018, 3626--3634back​​ to textback to​​​‌ text
  • 156 articleS.‌ A.Samuel A Neymotin‌​‌, D. S.Dylan​​ S Daniels, B.​​​‌Blake Caldwell, R.‌ A.Robert A McDougal‌​‌, N. T.Nicholas​​ T Carnevale, M.​​​‌Mainak Jas, C.‌ I.Christopher I Moore‌​‌, M. L.Michael​​ L Hines, M.​​​‌Matti Hämäläinen and S.‌ R.Stephanie R Jones‌​‌. Human Neocortical Neurosolver​​ (HNN), a new software​​​‌ tool for interpreting the‌ cellular and network origin‌​‌ of human MEG/EEG data​​.eLife9jan​​​‌ 2020, e51214URL:‌ https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51214DOIback to‌​‌ text
  • 157 inproceedingsT.-B.​​Tuan-Binh Nguyen, J.-A.​​​‌Jérôme-Alexis Chevalier, B.‌Bertrand Thirion and S.‌​‌Sylvain Arlot. Aggregation​​ of Multiple Knockoffs.​​​‌ICML 2020 - 37th‌ International Conference on Machine‌​‌ LearningProceedings of the​​ ICML 37th International Conference​​​‌ on Machine Learning,119‌Vienne / Virtual, Austria‌​‌July 2020HALback​​ to text
  • 158 inproceedings​​​‌T.-B.Tuan-Binh Nguyen,‌ J.-A.Jérôme-Alexis Chevalier and‌​‌ B.Bertrand Thirion.​​ ECKO: Ensemble of Clustered​​​‌ Knockoffs for robust multivariate‌ inference on MRI data‌​‌.IPMIJune 2019​​HALback to text​​​‌
  • 159 articleX.Xinkun‌ Nie and S.Stefan‌​‌ Wager. Quasi-Oracle Estimation​​ of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects​​​‌.ArXiv e-printsDecember‌ 2017, arXiv:1712.04912back‌​‌ to text
  • 160 inproceedings​​F.Feng Niu,​​​‌ C.Ce Zhang,‌ C.Christopher and‌​‌ J. W.Jude W​​ Shavlik. DeepDive: Web-scale​​​‌ Knowledge-base Construction using Statistical‌ Learning and Inference..‌​‌VLDS2012, 25​​back to text
  • 161​​​‌ inproceedingsM.Mehdi Noroozi‌ and P.Paolo Favaro‌​‌. Unsupervised learning of​​ visual representations by solving​​​‌ jigsaw puzzles.ECCV‌Springer2016, 69--84‌​‌back to textback​​ to text
  • 162 article​​​‌A. v.Aaron van‌ den Oord, Y.‌​‌Yazhe Li and O.​​Oriol Vinyals. Representation​​​‌ learning with contrastive predictive‌ coding.arXiv e-prints‌​‌2018back to text​​
  • 163 miscL.Liam​​​‌ Paninski. Lecture notes‌ in Statistical analysis of‌​‌ neural data course: Chapter​​ 2 -- Introduction to​​​‌ Point Processes.September‌ 2019back to text‌​‌back to text
  • 164​​​‌ articleM.M. Paschali​, W.W. Simson​‌, A.A. Guha​​ Roy, M.M.​​​‌ Ferjad Naeem, R.​R. Göbl, C.​‌C. Wachinger and N.​​N. Navab. Data​​​‌ Augmentation with Manifold Exploring​ Geometric Transformations for Increased​‌ Performance and Robustness.​​arXiv e-printsJanuary 2019​​​‌back to text
  • 165​ inproceedingsA.Adam Paszke​‌, S.Sam Gross​​, F.Francisco Massa​​​‌, A.Adam Lerer​, J.James Bradbury​‌, G.Gregory Chanan​​, T.Trevor Killeen​​​‌, Z.Zeming Lin​, N.Natalia Gimelshein​‌, L.Luca Antiga​​, A.Alban Desmaison​​​‌, A.Andreas Kopf​, E.Edward Yang​‌, Z.Zachary DeVito​​, M.Martin Raison​​​‌, A.Alykhan Tejani​, S.Sasank Chilamkurthy​‌, B.Benoit Steiner​​, L.Lu Fang​​​‌, J.Junjie Bai​ and S.Soumith Chintala​‌. PyTorch: An Imperative​​ Style, High-Performance Deep Learning​​​‌ Library.Advances in​ Neural Information Processing Systems​‌ (NeurIPS)Vancouver, BC, Canada​​2019, 12back​​​‌ to text
  • 166 article​L.Luis Pineda and​‌ others. Active MR​​ k-space Sampling with Reinforcement​​​‌ Learning.Lecture Notes​ in Computer Science (including​‌ subseries Lecture Notes in​​ Artificial Intelligence and Lecture​​​‌ Notes in Bioinformatics)12262​ LNCS2020, 23--33​‌back to text
  • 167​​ articleA. L.Ana​​​‌ Lu\'isa Pinho, A.​Alexis Amadon, M.​‌Murielle Fabre, E.​​Elvis Dohmatob, I.​​​‌Isabelle Denghien, J.​ J.Juan Jesús Torres​‌, C.Chantal Ginisty​​, S.Séverine Becuwe-Desmidt​​​‌, S.Séverine Roger​, L.Laurence Laurier​‌, V.Véronique Joly-Testault​​, G.Gaëlle Médiouni-Cloarec​​​‌, C.Christine Doublé​, B.Bernadette Martins​‌, P.Philippe Pinel​​, E.Evelyn Eger​​​‌, G.Gaël Varoquaux​, C. C.Christophe​‌ C Pallier, S.​​Stanislas Dehaene, L.​​​‌Lucie Hertz-Pannier and B.​Bertrand Thirion. Subject-specific​‌ segregation of functional territories​​ based on deep phenotyping​​​‌.Human Brain Mapping​December 2020HALDOI​‌back to text
  • 168​​ articleA. L.Ana​​​‌ Lu\'isa Pinho, A.​Alexis Amadon, B.​‌Baptiste Gauthier, N.​​Nicolas Clairis, A.​​​‌André Knops, S.​Sarah Genon, E.​‌Elvis Dohmatob, J.​​Juan Jesús Torre,​​​‌ C.Chantal Ginisty,​ S.Séverine Becuwe-Desmidt,​‌ S.Séverine Roger,​​ Y.Yann Lecomte,​​​‌ V.Valérie Berland,​ L.Laurence Laurier,​‌ V.Véronique Joly-Testault,​​ G.Gaëlle Médiouni-Cloarec,​​​‌ C.Christine Doublé,​ B.Bernadette Martins,​‌ E.Eric Salmon,​​ M.Manuela Piazza,​​​‌ D.David Melcher,​ M.Mathias Pessiglione,​‌ V.Virginie Van Wassenhove​​, E.Evelyn Eger​​​‌, G.Gaël Varoquaux​, S.Stanislas Dehaene​‌, L.Lucie Hertz-Pannier​​ and B.Bertrand Thirion​​​‌. Individual Brain Charting​ dataset extension, second release​‌ of high-resolution fMRI data​​ for cognitive mapping.​​​‌Scientific Data71​October 2020HALDOI​‌back to text
  • 169​​ inproceedingsZ.Zaccharie Ramzi​​​‌, P.Philippe Ciuciu​ and J.-L.Jean-Luc Starck​‌. Density Compensated Unrolled​​ Networks for Non-Cartesian MRI​​ Reconstruction.ISBI 2021​​​‌ - International Symposium on‌ Biomedical Imaging2021,‌​‌ URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.01570back to​​ textback to text​​​‌
  • 170 articleZ.Zaccharie‌ Ramzi, C.Chaithya‌​‌ Giliyar Radhakrishna, J.-L.​​Jean-Luc Starck and P.​​​‌Philippe Ciuciu. NC-PDNet:‌ a Density-Compensated Unrolled Network‌​‌ for 2D and 3D​​ non-Cartesian MRI Reconstruction.​​​‌IEEE Transactions on Medical‌ ImagingThis work is‌​‌ an extended version of​​ the work presented at​​​‌ the 2021 ISBI conference.‌January 2022HALDOI‌​‌back to text
  • 171​​ conferenceZ.Z. Ramzi​​​‌, J.-L.J.-L. Starck‌ and P.P. Ciuciu‌​‌. XPDNet for MRI​​ Reconstruction: an application to​​​‌ the 2020 fastMRI challenge‌.ISMRM2021back‌​‌ to textback to​​ text
  • 172 inproceedingsP.​​​‌ L.Pedro L. C.‌ Rodrigues, T.Thomas‌​‌ Moreau, G.Gilles​​ Louppe and A.Alexandre​​​‌ Gramfort. HNPE: Leveraging‌ Global Parameters for Neural‌​‌ Posterior Estimation.Advances​​ in Neural Information Processing​​​‌ Systems (NeurIPS)December 2021‌back to text
  • 173‌​‌ articleJ. D.J.​​ D. Rosenblatt, L.​​​‌L. Finos, W.‌ D.W. D. Weeda‌​‌, A.A. Solari​​ and J. J.J.​​​‌ J. Goeman. All-Resolutions‌ Inference for brain imaging‌​‌.Neuroimage18111​​ 2018, 786--796back​​​‌ to text
  • 174 article‌Y.Yannick Roy,‌​‌ H.Hubert Banville,​​ I.Isabela Albuquerque,​​​‌ A.Alexandre Gramfort,‌ T. H.Tiago H‌​‌ Falk and J.Jocelyn​​ Faubert. Deep learning-based​​​‌ electroencephalography analysis: a systematic‌ review.Journal of‌​‌ Neural Engineering165​​aug 2019, 051001​​​‌URL: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ab260cDOIback‌ to text
  • 175 article‌​‌D. B.Donald B​​ Rubin. Estimating causal​​​‌ effects of treatments in‌ randomized and nonrandomized studies.‌​‌.Journal of educational​​ Psychology6651974​​​‌, 688back to‌ textback to text‌​‌
  • 176 articleD.David​​ Sabbagh, P.Pierre​​​‌ Ablin, G.Gaël‌ Varoquaux, A.Alexandre‌​‌ Gramfort and D. A.​​Denis A Engemann.​​​‌ Predictive regression modeling with‌ MEG/EEG: from source power‌​‌ to signals and cognitive​​ states.NeuroImage222​​​‌2020, 116893back‌ to text
  • 177 article‌​‌P.Paula Sanz Leon​​, S.Stuart Knock​​​‌, M.M. Woodman‌, L.Lia Domide‌​‌, J.Jochen Mersmann​​, A.Anthony McIntosh​​​‌ and V.Viktor Jirsa‌. The Virtual Brain:‌​‌ a simulator of primate​​ brain network dynamics.​​​‌Frontiers in Neuroinformatics7‌2013, 10URL:‌​‌ https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fninf.2013.00010DOIback to​​ text
  • 178 bookD.​​​‌ W.David W Scott‌. Multivariate density estimation:‌​‌ theory, practice, and visualization​​.John Wiley &​​​‌ Sons2015back to‌ text
  • 179 bookB.‌​‌ W.Bernard W Silverman​​. Density estimation for​​​‌ statistics and data analysis‌.Routledge2018back‌​‌ to text
  • 180 article​​S. M.Stephen M​​​‌ Smith, D.Diego‌ Vidaurre, F.Fidel‌​‌ Alfaro-Almagro, T. E.​​Thomas E Nichols and​​​‌ K. L.Karla L‌ Miller. Estimation of‌​‌ brain age delta from​​ brain imaging.NeuroImage​​​‌2019back to text‌
  • 181 articleD.David‌​‌ Spiegelhalter. How old​​​‌ are you, really? Communicating​ chronic risk through ‘effective​‌ age’of your body and​​ organs.BMC medical​​​‌ informatics and decision making​1612016,​‌ 1--6back to text​​
  • 182 inproceedingsD.Dan​​​‌ Suciu. Probabilistic Databases​ for All.Proceedings​‌ of the 39th ACM​​ SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles​​​‌ of Database SystemsPortland​ OR USAACMJune​‌ 2020, 19--31DOI​​back to text
  • 183​​​‌ articleJ.Joost Vennekens​, M.Marc Denecker​‌ and M.Maurice Bruynooghe​​. CP-Logic: A Language​​​‌ of Causal Probabilistic Events​ and Its Relation to​‌ Logic Programming.Theory​​ and Practice of Logic​​​‌ Programming93May​ 2009, 245--308DOI​‌back to text
  • 184​​ articleD.Demian Wassermann​​​‌, N.Nikos Makris​, Y.Yogesh Rathi​‌, M.Martha Shenton​​, R.Ron Kikinis​​​‌, M.Marek Kubicki​ and C.-F.Carl-Fredrik Westin​‌. The White Matter​​ Query Language: A Novel​​​‌ Approach for Describing Human​ White Matter Anatomy..​‌Brain Structure and Function​​January 2016DOIback​​​‌ to textback to​ text
  • 185 articleZ.​‌Zizhao Zhang, A.​​Adriana Romero, M.​​​‌ J.Matthew J Muckley​, P.Pascal Vincent​‌, L.Lin Yang​​ and M.Michal Drozdzal​​​‌. Reducing Uncertainty in​ Undersampled MRI Reconstruction with​‌ Active Acquisition.February​​ 2019, URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.03051​​​‌back to text